Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Motion Suggesting Tournament Membership Fee Elimination

    Originally posted by Alex Toolsie View Post
    Jason,

    I recommend that you try not to be so cynical. This is a chess discussion board where good ideas, hopefully, get discussed, canvassed, and implemented - and the bad ideas are discarded. The elimination of the tournament fee is a bad idea, so hopefully it will get the chop.

    Best Regards,

    Alex Toolsie
    The problem is that this topic has been thoroughly discussed several times both on this board and the old board. Each time it has been pointed out that this will reduce the amount of people playing in CFC rated tourneys. No amount of discussing this subject will change their minds, They are set in their ways. The proposal continues to be advanced to the new board.
    I am only cynical because this proposal refuses to drop this one item.

    I have discussed this issue with several people at local tournaments. Several people who only play in one or two tournaments a year have told me that they will just stop playing in CFC tournaments. It doesn't mean that they will stop playing chess... it just means that the CFC will have less income coming in.

    Unfortunately through several threads I have come the conclusion that these people just don't care. They think that these players will say 'OK I'll just buy a membership', not taking in to account that these people will just say 'thanks but no thanks'.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

      Well, it works both ways: people who dont want to buy a CFC membership and support the national federation may not be worth accommodating. There I've said it. That is the other side of the coin.

      Now, there may be middle ground: several Governors and notably Chris Mallon (past president and now treasurer) have pointed out that the intent of the tournament membership was always to be a one-time, "see how you like it" membership pitch. It was NOT intended to be a CFC lite membership.

      If we are going to keep this beast on the books and available for people, I would like to see the definition clarified exactly and enforced. I don't really care which set of choices actually wins out since I will be buying a membership anyway and it therefore doesn't impact me directly. As a member though, I *do* object to people getting a discount just because they dont participate much!

      If you don't want to join the CFC or don't see the perceived value or it doesn't work for you, or you don't like the rating system or whatever, then don't join.

      The best thing the CFC can do is offer value for the membership fee (and I will admit freely that at the moment there is less than there was...) If there is value, people will see it and they will join and membership and value will likely rise.

      Right now, many of us are working on regaining the value and providing decent return on the membership fee.
      ...Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

        And this is exactly what I said. The "grassroots" campaign doesn't care about the average chess player. there is no option for someone who just wants to play in their local club tournament other than buying a CFC membership. Most people who play Casually will just say, "thanks but no thanks" and tournament participation will drop. When the participation starts to drop off they are going to bemoan about how chess is dying in Canada which is FAR from the truth. Just look how Canada stacks up against other countries on online servers. On the ONE online server I play on (www.chessworld.net) based in the UK, Canada is ranked FOURTH!!! amongst participants. Canada is playing chess, its the CFC that has to get with the times.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Grassroots' Campaign -Tournament Membership Elimination

          Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
          Hi Alex:

          There is no reason for two classes of members, one subsidizing the other. Community input has asked for numbers of special case exemptions/partial exemptions for annual memberships. This motion makes clear that tournament memberships must go, but this issue can be fine-tuned at the time of implementation if special cases re annual memberships seem warranted.
          I don't really see how regular CFC members are subsidizing individuals who buy a tournament membership. The person who pays the tournament membership pays $10 + rating fees ($3.00) for which the CFC has to do 2 small transactions (record a new member and record that members results). Seems like a reasonable transaction from the CFC perspective (i.e. one which will net some cash).

          This reminds me of a few years ago when the local school boards greatly increased the cost of renting out rooms for community groups (like chess clubs). The school boards were already counting the cash. What happened? The school boards found themselves with unrented rooms and no revenue at all. And the chess clubs were out of places to play (like we were with the CFC). Raising prices (which you are effectively doing by banning tournament memberships) do not necessarily result in rising revenues.

          It is not a slam dunk that removing tournament memberships will "force" people to buy full year memberships. All things (even addictive substances) have a certain elasticity in their price-demand curves.

          I'm perfectly OK with paying my CFC fees. But I'm not so sure that all those who are using tournament membeships will feel this way.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

            I always thought that the tournament fee of $10.00 was created so that Quebec members and CFC members could play in each others' tournaments to avoid buying two memberships. I know in Cdn Open 2008 we were to pay an extra $10 to play on Quebec soil but I don't remember if they waived it or we paid it without looking at my bank account.

            You have to find out how this tournament fee was created and to what purpose it was to be used for. My gut feeling is that it was misused from the beginning and that past executives did not plug the holes in the dike and it became common practice to use the tournament fee rather than join the CFC. I'm sure that some of the number crunchers can figure out how many memberships were lost with the creation of this tournament fee.

            I for one will use it until the end of the year as my membership expires in Oct and I have two more Peel tournaments to compete in before the end of the year.
            John R. Brown

            As added off topic notes: What has Chris Mallon done for Ontario Chess since he became Presient of the OCA ? How can he be Treasurer of CFC and still have an impartial judgement on the OCA affairs. Better keep two sets of books Chris as it may be audited extensively due to past OCA shady dealings. Also I feel that the Elora Tournament should have been the Ontario Open but I think that Chris was worried that no one would come to Kitchener if they had an opportunity to play at a new site . Why not take the money at Kitchener and drain Elora dry. If I had the weekends off , I would support Elora as I can play at Kitchener any old time.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

              Originally posted by John Brown View Post
              As added off topic notes: What has Chris Mallon done for Ontario Chess since he became Presient of the OCA ? How can he be Treasurer of CFC and still have an impartial judgement on the OCA affairs. Better keep two sets of books Chris as it may be audited extensively due to past OCA shady dealings.

              Also I feel that the Elora Tournament should have been the Ontario Open but I think that Chris was worried that no one would come to Kitchener if they had an opportunity to play at a new site . Why not take the money at Kitchener and drain Elora dry. If I had the weekends off , I would support Elora as I can play at Kitchener any old time.
              I'm not sure I understand your final point at all (starting with "Also I feel the Elora...") - That has confused me, sorry. As for Chris Mallon's roles - he is currently CFC treasurer and OCA president - as the OCA Treasurer I can assure you that every penny coming or going since the last AGM will be accounted for properly. I was one of the people who was EXTREMELY upset with the gross mismanagement of the last OCA tenure and that is why I got involved. There will be no repeat of the dubious dealings that occurred previously. I dont know if Chris can wear both hats - you will have to ask him.

              I suggest you start a new thread with this as the start if you like.
              Last edited by Kerry Liles; Saturday, 6th September, 2008, 11:27 PM. Reason: typos
              ...Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                Originally posted by Kerry Liles View Post
                I'm not sure I understand your final point at all (starting with "Also I feel the Elora...") - That has confused me, sorry. As for Chris Mallon's roles - he is currently CFC treasurer and OCA president - as the OCA Treasurer I can assure you that every penny coming or going since the last AGM will be accounted for properly. I was one of the people who was EXTREMELY upset with the gross mismanagement of the last OCA tenure and that is why I got involved. There will be no repeat of the dubious dealings that occurred previously. I dont know if Chris can wear both hats - you will have to ask him.

                I suggest you start a new thread with this as the start if you like.
                Hi Kerry, I wish you all the best as OCA Treasurer, as we really need that job done well!

                I am furious at what seems to be the lack of "recovery" from past transgressions, but it has been suggested to myself to let that go. So, aside from mentioning it, I'm trying to!

                I have heard many people express discomfort at Chris' dual CFC/OCA roles, but it seems to me that he ran fair and square, and I don't know how much competition he received. Chess organization elections often seem to be a very small handful of people who just volunteer, and we should really appreciate these few people who do so (Chris twofold).

                I've never met Chris in person, but we have discussed things via email or over the phone, and he seems to be someone trying to do his best, at both CFC and OCA levels.

                However, now that I am the new EOCA President, local people talk to me about their concerns more than it used to be for me, and I can tell you that the OCA term by Chris, yourself, and the rest of the executive, will be appreciated only when the currently owed membership rebates are forwarded from the OCA to the EOCA (and the other Ontario leagues). As I have indicated to Chris and others, the anti-OCA sentiment in EOCA due to this seems to exceed anti-CFC sentiments. Now, please note that this is my perception, and there very well could be many people in EOCA who are not that upset about this, but there are at least dozens (we are one of the CFC's highest membership regions) who tell me to eliminate the OCA level. I have no idea how to even start to do that, but the big problem disappears when we get our membership rebates! ;)

                All the best,

                Aris Marghetis
                EOCA President
                OCA/CFC Governor

                P.S. This was not intended to be disrespectful in any way. But I felt I had to post it, as many EOCA players feel I should fight for this more aggressively. This weekend has been a great time organizing and running the RA Fall Open, but it's all been a forum for many players to complain to me. And those complaints are running 80%-20% for OCA vs. CFC.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                  I'm gonna start an OCA thread.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                    Originally posted by Aris Marghetis View Post
                    I have heard many people express discomfort at Chris' dual CFC/OCA roles, but it seems to me that he ran fair and square, and I don't know how much competition he received. Chess organization elections often seem to be a very small handful of people who just volunteer, and we should really appreciate these few people who do so (Chris twofold).

                    I've never met Chris in person, but we have discussed things via email or over the phone, and he seems to be someone trying to do his best, at both CFC and OCA levels.
                    I in fact did not run for Treasurer, I simply stated on my proxy that if nominated I would be willing to do any of VP, Treas, Secretary. And that only because David Lavin asked me to. As it turns out nobody else was willing to stand, although I'm sure Frank Dixon would love to argue that the CFC would be better off with no Treasurer than by having me in that position!! :)

                    Now that I have the job, I am trying to do as much good as I can. A lot of the normal tasks of a Treasurer are made much easier by the fact that our ED is a certified accountant.

                    As for anything else... I'll continue to help protect the rights of the provincial organizations, which I would do whether or not I was involved at all at the provincial level. I haven't run into any conflict of interest scenarios as of yet.
                    Christopher Mallon
                    FIDE Arbiter

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                      Hi Kerry;
                      ALSO means as the dictionary says:inaddition,likewise,too,besides,sometimes used with conjunctive force as an equivalent of AND.
                      Does this explain also for you????

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                        Originally posted by John Brown View Post
                        Hi Kerry;
                        ALSO means as the dictionary says:inaddition,likewise,too,besides,sometimes used with conjunctive force as an equivalent of AND.
                        Does this explain also for you????
                        lol I didn't have a problem with "ALSO". It was the point of the group of sentences that I didn't understand. I guess I don't know enough about the tournaments you mentioned.
                        ...Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                          Originally posted by Aris Marghetis View Post
                          Hi Kerry, I wish you all the best as OCA Treasurer, as we really need that job done well!
                          Thanks. I will do the best I can; as I stated earlier, there will be no unaccounted-for money.

                          Originally posted by Aris Marghetis View Post
                          I am furious at what seems to be the lack of "recovery" from past transgressions, but it has been suggested to myself to let that go. So, aside from mentioning it, I'm trying to!
                          I understand your frustration and I too was/am furious. The Trillium money was almost completely wasted in my opinion. However, the Trillium people met with Hal Bond and Barry Thorvardsen and although they slapped Barry for not using the money in the most appropriate fashion, they stopped short of proceeding any further. The OCA balance when the current executive took over was -$2.

                          Originally posted by Aris Marghetis View Post
                          I have heard many people express discomfort at Chris' dual CFC/OCA roles, but it seems to me that he ran fair and square, and I don't know how much competition he received. Chess organization elections often seem to be a very small handful of people who just volunteer, and we should really appreciate these few people who do so (Chris twofold).

                          I've never met Chris in person, but we have discussed things via email or over the phone, and he seems to be someone trying to do his best, at both CFC and OCA levels.
                          I met Chris at the OCA AGM and I believe he is genuinely trying to make positive changes. If he can handle both jobs, I say let him do it.

                          Originally posted by Aris Marghetis View Post
                          However, now that I am the new EOCA President, local people talk to me about their concerns more than it used to be for me, and I can tell you that the OCA term by Chris, yourself, and the rest of the executive, will be appreciated only when the currently owed membership rebates are forwarded from the OCA to the EOCA (and the other Ontario leagues). As I have indicated to Chris and others, the anti-OCA sentiment in EOCA due to this seems to exceed anti-CFC sentiments. Now, please note that this is my perception, and there very well could be many people in EOCA who are not that upset about this, but there are at least dozens (we are one of the CFC's highest membership regions) who tell me to eliminate the OCA level. I have no idea how to even start to do that, but the big problem disappears when we get our membership rebates! ;)

                          All the best,

                          Aris Marghetis
                          EOCA President
                          OCA/CFC Governor

                          P.S. This was not intended to be disrespectful in any way. But I felt I had to post it, as many EOCA players feel I should fight for this more aggressively. This weekend has been a great time organizing and running the RA Fall Open, but it's all been a forum for many players to complain to me. And those complaints are running 80%-20% for OCA vs. CFC.
                          The revenue from the OCA will be sent very, very soon (I am talking about days here not more than a week I hope). We have just completed the surprisingly annoying process of getting a new bank account for the OCA and we will processing the CFC cheques tomorrow...
                          ...Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                            Originally posted by Kerry Liles View Post
                            Well, it works both ways: people who dont want to buy a CFC membership and support the national federation may not be worth accommodating. There I've said it. That is the other side of the coin.
                            Well, only to the extent that regular players continue to pay the tournament fee instead of obtaining CFC membership.

                            I don't think its fair to say that that is the other side of the coin. Its only one more aspect to the debate. I think it stands to reason that there will be less overall players if the tournament fee option is abolished, and because that result is unecessary and unconducive to building player numbers, I do hope that common sense ultimately prevails. As the adage goes, one shouldn't fix something if it ain't broke.

                            Best Regards,

                            Alex Toolsie
                            OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum - Upcoming Chess Tournaments, Game Analysis, Chess Politics, & Australian Chess News
                            http://www.ozchess.com

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Grassroots' Campaign - Response to GL # 1

                              Kerry, thank you for your thorough and hopeful reply. It sounds like we are all looking forward to getting past old mistakes, making things right, and moving on. Best regards.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X