Can Biden win?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Erik Malmsten View Post

    I thought Christ is the anointed one (Christos) and he can't return until after the antichrist reigns with a false Christianity. Although Trump is a master of the seven deadly sins, a man of lawlessness, he is clearly not the antichrist as Vlad is still here. But then maybe Vlad with his lack of love for his fellow man is not a Christian but brainwashed by a satanic cult that follows witches calling themselves prophets and worshipping money.

    http://www.propheciesofrevelation.or...ement-pg2.html
    The Anointed One

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to navigationJump to search

    The Anointed or The Anointed One may refer to:*****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
    What is the definition of anointed?
    Definition of anoint. transitive verb. 1 : to smear or rub with oil or an oily substance. 2a : to apply oil to as part of a religious ceremony The priest anointed the sick.

    Anoint | Definition of Anoint by Merriam-Webster

    www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anoint
    See all results for this question
    What does the name anointed mean?
    verb (used with object) to rub or sprinkle on; apply an unguent, ointment, or oily liquid to. to smear with any liquid. to consecrate or make sacred in a ceremony that includes the token applying of oil: He anointed the new high priest.

    Anoint | Definition of Anoint at Dictionary.com

    www.dictionary.com/browse/anointed
    See all results for this question
    Who is anointed one in the Bible?
    However, there are other times when the "Anointed One" being described is God Himself -- largely in connection with Jesus, the Messiah. Most often, the term "anointed one" is used in the Bible to refer to a person who has received a special calling from God.

    Who Is the "Anointed One" in the Bible?

    http://www.learnreligions.com/who-is...-the-bi…
    See all results for this question
    What is the verb for anointed?
    [uh-noint] See more synonyms for anoint on Thesaurus.com. verb (used with object) to rub or sprinkle on; apply an unguent, ointment, or oily liquid to. to smear with any liquid. to consecrate or make sacred in a ceremony that includes the token applying of oil: He anointed the new high priest.
    *****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
    https://www.learnreligions.com/who-i...e-bible-363390
    By
    Sam O'Neal

    Anointed People


    Most often, the term "anointed one" is used in the Bible to refer to a person who has received a special calling from God. There are many such individuals in the Scriptures -- most often notable public figures such as kings and prophets.

    King David, for example, is often described in the Old Testament as God's "anointed one" (Psalm 28:8). David also used a similar expression, "the Lord's anointed," to describe King Saul on a number of occasions (1 Samuel 24:1-6). King Solomon, David's son, used the same expression to refer to himself in 2 Chronicles 6:42.

    In each of these situations, the person described as "anointed" was chosen by God for a special purpose and a heavy responsibility -- one that required a deeper connection with God Himself.

    There are also times when the entire assembly of the Israelites, God's chosen people, are described as God's "anointed ones." For example, 1 Chronicles 16:19-22 is part of a poetic look at the Israelites' journey as God's people:
    19 When they were but few in number,
    few indeed, and strangers in it,
    20 they wandered from nation to nation,
    from one kingdom to another.
    21 He allowed no one to oppress them;
    for their sake he rebuked kings:
    22 “Do not touch my anointed ones;
    do my prophets no harm.”



    In each of these situations, the "anointed one" being described is a regular person who has received an extraordinary call or blessing from God.

    **************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
    Many are projecting here and ascribing beliefs onto me which are nonsensical. The whole Left Behind science fiction while entertaining is not what I believe will happen.

    Trying to cloak the democrat party in the mantle of compassion is pathetically laughable. Trying to claim that Christ would have been on the side of the Democrats is also amusingly idiotic. One set of facts shows me that this is not possible. Democrats hate Israel and they are anti-Semitic. They hate Jews. They act against Israel when they have the chance. They offer a place of honour to those who clearly hate Israel and the Jewish people. Anyone who says anything against the Jews which reflects their hatred is clearly on the side of the Devil and Darkness and not on the side of God and the Light. You can criticize Israel when they do wrong but you cannot hate Israel and its people and claim to be on God's side. In the same way, you cannot hate Christians and Christianity and then wrap yourself in the mantle of Christ. People who attack Jews and Christians and innocents, or tolerate people that do, are not the ones that God would be supporting in this election.

    I am very much a sinner and do not pretend to be anything else. I do believe in God, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit and hope that when the tests come and the torturers come that I will hold true to the faith that I have. I will probably not hold to the business of turning the other cheek as I tried that for many years and it did not work out for me. Not turning the other cheek also didn't work out for me. Eventually I found the right balance.

    In the Kim Clement prophecy, which was first presented in 2007, and expanded subsequently through 2014 Trump is referred to as God's David and his trumpet. All of this was before Donald Trump declared or even knew that he was running for president. The prophet Samuel anointed David king of Israel after Saul displeased the Lord. Samuel actually poured oil on David's head. Kim Clement prophesied that when Trump enters the White House he will not be a praying president but will become one possibly under the influence of Mike Pence and others that he has chosen to surround himself with.

    In the Clement prophecy God specifically states that he is dissatisfied with both the Democrats and Republicans.

    Trump is the anointed one in the sense that he was anointed by God to lead America in these troubled times.

    Mark Taylor who has been banned by Youtube received a prophecy in 2011 while watching a television program that featured Trump that he was looking at a president of the United States. The tone and wording of that prophecy has some consistency with the tone and wording of Kim Clement's prophecy.
    Last edited by Vlad Drkulec; Saturday, 24th October, 2020, 10:25 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucas Davies View Post

    But you said that you authenticated them against the email servers that the NYPost published, and that we can all do this as well. No metadata has been published, and despite probably every major news outlets attempts to get it, they've been unable to do so.
    That is a good point, so if we offer up a server where you can download the email and validate yourself against googles email servers would you accept that the emails shown in the NY post article are genuine?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucas Davies
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post

    I was given a few of the the emails depicted in the article in the form of an attachment that I then verified . Keep in mind that everyone that was CC'd on those emails has copies as well that are easily verifiable. The argument put forward that the Russians could have magically planted those emails on Google's servers and made sure that the cryptographic hash matches from the original emails is a physical impossibility.
    But you said that you authenticated them against the email servers that the NYPost published, and that we can all do this as well. No metadata has been published, and despite probably every major news outlets attempts to get it, they've been unable to do so.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucas Davies
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
    Breaking news: the FBI did not subpoena Hunter Biden's laptop over the Ukraine, Burisma, China, etc. The person signing the warrant was the FBI's special agent Joshua Wilson. Better use duckduckgo to find out what he specializes in. Google seems to be pointing in a more innocuous direction.
    I searched on Duckduckgo, and this was the first article to come up: https://heavy.com/news/joshua-wilson...y-unconfirmed/

    It says that Joshua Wilson's name may appear on a subpoena that may be for Hunter Biden's laptop. Truly hard-hitting stuff.

    Meanwhile, Fox News says that they have actual documents showing that the subpoena was in connection to money laundering: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lap...undering-probe

    Why are these right-wing conspiracies always about pedophilia? I saw this tweet with zero proof and over 50,000 likes: https://twitter.com/RealWayneRoot/st...91077266124800

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucas Davies View Post

    How are you checking DKIM when they posted pictures and PDFs and no metadata? Your link says that you need an original copy of the email.
    I was given a few of the the emails depicted in the article in the form of an attachment that I then verified . Keep in mind that everyone that was CC'd on those emails has copies as well that are easily verifiable. The argument put forward that the Russians could have magically planted those emails on Google's servers and made sure that the cryptographic hash matches from the original emails is a physical impossibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Breaking news: the FBI did not subpoena Hunter Biden's laptop over the Ukraine, Burisma, China, etc. The person signing the warrant was the FBI's special agent Joshua Wilson. Better use duckduckgo to find out what he specializes in. Google seems to be pointing in a more innocuous direction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Steve Douglas View Post

    Well, the fact that you were going on a kind of rant which made several references to the Bible, and then were disparaging those who were not really educated as Christians, or about the Bible, I was a bit concerned that people who were, ummm, you know ignorant about such things, might think that the "proverb" might have been in the Book of Proverbs, or perhaps someplace else in the Bible.

    So I thought I would clear it up. :-)

    Steve

    proverb


    Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
    prov·erb

    (prŏv′ûrb′)n.1. A short pithy saying in frequent and widespread use that expresses a basic truth or practical precept.
    2. Proverbs(used with a sing. verb) See Table at Bible.

    [Middle English proverbe, from Old French, from Latin prōverbium : prō-, forth; see pro-1 + verbum, word; see wer- in Indo-European roots.]
    American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
    proverb

    (ˈprɒvɜːb)n1. (Literary & Literary Critical Terms) a short, memorable, and often highly condensed saying embodying, esp with bold imagery, some commonplace fact or experience
    2. a person or thing exemplary in respect of a characteristic: Antarctica is a proverb for extreme cold.
    3. (Ecclesiastical Terms) ecclesiast a wise saying or admonition providing guidance

    vb (tr)4. to utter or describe (something) in the form of a proverb
    5. to make (something) a proverb

    [C14: via Old French from Latin prōverbium, from verbum word]
    Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014 © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014
    pro′-verb`



    n. a word that can substitute for a verb or verb phrase, as do in They never attend meetings, but I do.
    [1905–10]
    prov•erb

    (ˈprɒv ərb)

    n. 1. a short popular saying, usu. of unknown and ancient origin, that expresses effectively some commonplace truth or useful thought; adage; saw.
    2. a person or thing commonly regarded as an embodiment or representation of some quality; byword.
    3. a profound Biblical saying, maxim, or oracular utterance requiring interpretation.
    [1275–1325; Middle English proverbe < Middle French < Latin prōverbium=prō- pro-1 + verb(um) word + -ium -ium1]
    Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.


    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Neil Frarey View Post

    Luke 12: 51

    Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division.

    Luke 12:53

    They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law."

    NIV

    So, remind us again ... what doctrine have you been taught???

    .
    I thought about that but figured it might go over their heads.

    God did not disappear. He is still available to those who want to find him and welcome him into their lives. Like a Stephen King novel, evil looks like it will triumph for most of the 683 pages but in the last hundred pages or so things start to go wrong for the Walking Dude. We've gotten to that part of the story where events will unfold very quickly. If a Christian perspective offends you we can speak of this moment from the perspective of Miyamoto Musashi, the sword saint from the Book of Five Rings.

    To Know “Collapse”

    Everything can collapse. Houses, bodies, and enemies collapse when their rhythm becomes deranged.

    In large-scale strategy, when the enemy starts to collapse you must pursue him without letting the chance go. If you fail to take advantage of your enemies’ collapse, they may recover.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Douglas
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post

    Shakespeare contains many proverbs.
    Well, the fact that you were going on a kind of rant which made several references to the Bible, and then were disparaging those who were not really educated as Christians, or about the Bible, I was a bit concerned that people who were, ummm, you know ignorant about such things, might think that the "proverb" might have been in the Book of Proverbs, or perhaps someplace else in the Bible.

    So I thought I would clear it up. :-)

    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve Douglas
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucas Davies View Post

    How are you checking DKIM when they posted pictures and PDFs and no metadata? Your link says that you need an original copy of the email.
    Thank-you for asking my question for me. To authenticate an email you would need the metadata which AFAIK has not been published. So I don't know what Sid has or has not done. And for what it's worth, an email *BY* either Biden would be significant. But an email *to* them is mostly worthless. I get emails all the time telling me I've inherited something and all I have to do is send somebody some money get get my legacy. The fact that I got the email doesn't mean I inherited something.

    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucas Davies
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    if anyone has any doubts about an email not being authentic it is quite simple to run DKIM (DOMAIN KEYS IDENTIFIED MAIL). ALL emails sent by gmail are immutably recorded and can be authenticated against the google email servers.

    I authenticated several key gmails against the google's email servers the NY POST published and unfortunately they are valid. If anyone wants to know how to do it and try it themselves here is where it shows you how to run the scripts:

    https://github.com/associatedpress/verify-dkim.
    https://www.propublica.org/nerds/aut...asowitz-emails
    How are you checking DKIM when they posted pictures and PDFs and no metadata? Your link says that you need an original copy of the email.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    if anyone has any doubts about an email not being authentic it is quite simple to run DKIM (DOMAIN KEYS IDENTIFIED MAIL). ALL emails sent by gmail are immutably recorded and can be authenticated against the google email servers.

    I authenticated several key gmails against the google's email servers the NY POST published and unfortunately they are valid. If anyone wants to know how to do it and try it themselves here is where it shows you how to run the scripts:

    https://github.com/associatedpress/verify-dkim.
    https://www.propublica.org/nerds/aut...asowitz-emails
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Friday, 23rd October, 2020, 10:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Originally posted by Pargat Perrer View Post
    Please provide proof that the Democratic Party of the U.S. rejects the divinity of Christ.
    At this year’s DNC, several caucuses took place alongside the main convention.

    DNC LGBTQ Caucus Meeting, Dr Marisa Richmond, left out “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.

    Muslim Delegates and Allies Assembly, AJ Durrani, DNC Committeeman & Co-Chair Interfaith Council, also omitted “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.

    ...

    Sorry, remind us again, what were you saying about 'rejecting' Christ?


    .
    Last edited by Neil Frarey; Friday, 23rd October, 2020, 09:39 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucas Davies
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post

    You do stupid things when addicted to crack.



    Seth Rich was likely the real source of the leaked Hiilary emails and not necessarily.



    He probably forgot where he left it.



    The FBI and the DOJ confirmed that it is Hunter Biden's laptop.

    Hunter Biden asked for the laptop back.

    The lawyer for Hunter Biden asked for the laptop back and there is a signed document confirming that but it had already been turned over to the FBI. The FBI obtained it as part of search warrant associated with an investigation into money laundering which has just sent a couple of Biden's business partners to prison.

    The laptop is real. The emails are real as has been confirmed by several sources who were on email chains for various of the emails found on the laptop.

    Pretty good October surprise.

    You lose again.
    Interesting that you don't try to respond to the fact that nobody at the NYPost verified that the information was legitimate, or that they didn't release any of the metadata, or that they won't let any other media outlet verify any of the information, or that the primary writer refused to put his name on it, or that a Republican committee just spent MONTHS investigating this and found absolutely nothing, or that Giuliani specifically chose a news outlet that he knew wouldn't spend time trying to verify anything, or the fact that this was all supposedly found in 2019 and nothing was mentioned until now.

    None of that in any way verifies the claim that Hunter Biden dropped the laptop off there, or that it was his, or that anything that's been released is legitimate. The laptop was seized as part of a money laundering investigation in 2019. If there's so much damning stuff on there, then how are we nearly 11 months into 2020 and nothing has been done? Giuliani and Bannon both had the information and could relay anything illegal to Trump, so there are two possibilities: either there's nothing on there, or Trump and co are too incompetent to do anything about it.

    Don't worry, though; they're definitely going to get Biden! Trump promised that he'd lock Hillary up in 2016, and he followed through on that! Oh wait, he just immediately gave up on that after he was elected because it was obviously all bullshit propaganda, and Trump fans are falling for it once again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pargat Perrer
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
    As the proverb goes, the devil can quote scripture for his own ends. I read that verse as an indictment of the Demonrats and their whole race-baiting agenda. Did you even read what you quoted? Specifically "obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught," The doctrine that you have been taught would have been the doctrine with respect to the divinity of Christ, the Holy Spirit and the Creator or Father. The Democrats seek to replace God with the state.
    Cuckoo. Nutso. Crackpot. You should start your own website using Alex Jones as a template.

    Please provide proof that the Democratic Party of the U.S. rejects the divinity of Christ.

    And I will say in advance of your reply: Didn't think so.

    Of course, as Peter McKillop has pointed out here, you just use this as a deflection. It seems to be all you know how to do.


    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
    The Bible does explain it. The proof of a prophet is in whether his prophecies come true or not.
    Ok, let's go with that.


    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
    Some predictions do not come true because in the face of promised destruction people can genuinely repent and then God can repent of the promised punishment. Presumably it can work in the other direction too.
    OOOOOPS!!!! Guess that eliminates that "proof of a prophet" nonsense in the previous quote.


    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
    It is amusing to be lectured on Christianity by people who might charitably be described as pagans and atheists or at best individuals not at all grounded in religious principles or biblical understanding.
    It is saddening that someone who is so prone to bias, to characterization and overgeneralization is, according to another thread on this forum, deciding whether CFC members are cheating in their chess games or not. I wonder Vlad if you look at someone's name, decide they would vote Democrat or that they are not Christian, and decide based on that that he or she must be guilty as charged, in addition to guilty of being "charitably described" as you just attempted to describe me.

    I hope someone you decided was cheating slaps you with a lawsuit, with all your postings here their case would be rock solid on the grounds of bias and discrimination.


    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
    It would be a sin to send back people who are seeking asylum because of persecution but most of those seeking asylum do not fall into that category.
    Thank GOD we have you to tell us this, Vlad! I wonder if you wear your religious vestments when you preside over a CFC meeting?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X