If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
I wonder, what scores better for Black in the databases? The 3....Bb4 Winawer or say 3...a6 in the Ruy Lopez ?
All this talk about the French makes me curious - I'll have to check on this sometime.
Hi David,
I don't know. I think with the Ruy Lopez it would still have to be narrowed down farther. For example, in the exchange variation 4. Bxc6 white takes a better pawn formation into the endgame. I think someone came up with a bust for the Ruy Lopez Breyer which is 9. ... Nb8. I think the key move is somewhere around 16 or 17 where white plays a4. I'd have to find my notes on this and can't recall where I tucked them away.
The strong players can, for the most part, play whatever defence they want against weaker players and the result won't matter much. A weaker player using the Winawer against a strong titled player is usually just making it easier. Maybe if it has to be the French defence the Burn would be better.
That looks like a fair analysis. In a game amongst equals, rather than a weak player using the defence against one who is weaker, for one reason or another the black side of that defense so often does poorly. I used Euwe, in his winning championship match against Alekhine, an example. His loses came with the Winawer and he liked his chances so much he kept playing it.
It's (the Winawer) a game, I guess.
Gary,
So to answer your direct question ("what did I miss?") you missed everything of significance... except the final result.
I would suspect that the GM you quote spends most of his time studying contemporary games and openings. I have respect for the 'old' masters, I just don't think studying their games today should occupy more than 5% of my chess study time.
Maybe there's some truth in your construction; maybe not. I'm aware of one contemporary GM, a 2600+ player and former candidate for the world championship who has respect for the older masters:
"Tarrasch's chess career spanned roughly 50 years. Except for the great Lasker, no player of his generation had a more brilliant tournament record. Furthermore, his games are models of logical, precise and scientific play. Many chess historians consider him to have been a better player than Lasker. Certainly Tarrasch's best games are more aesthetically appealing than the great Lasker. Even Garry Kasparov has been immensely impressed! The difference, however, between the two great doctors, is that Tarrasch was a perfectionist: he could not easily permit himself to part with a winning game, whereas Lasker realized that it was more important to win the game.
But perhaps the most important aspect of Tarrasch's long and distinguished chess career are his teachings. Some have been translated into english. The good doctor wrote extensively on the game, about the ideas of positional play, of strategy and of correct opening principles. Several of his books are still considered classics to this day. Certainly his writings did more to influence the following generations of chess masters than all the other writers up that time together. Even I have learned a great deal from Tarrasch's writings!
When I was about 18 years old I first took a look at a book of Tarrasch's best games, and I was blown away by the fact that 100 years before chess masters could play such beautiful chess! I remember even reading his games when I was soaking in the bathtub! Not only were his best games beautiful, but they were instructive. His Spanishes, especially, are works of art."
What do you call the Alekhine opening then if not hypermodern? As can be seen from this quote provided by Wikipedia.
It is named after Alexander Alekhine, who introduced it in the 1921 Budapest tournament in games against Endre Steiner[1] and Fritz Sämisch. Four years later, (1921) the editors of the Fourth Edition of Modern Chess Openings (MCO-4) wrote, "Nothing is more indicative of the iconoclastic conceptions of the 'hypermodern school' than the bizarre defence introduced by Alekhine ... . Although opposing to all tenets of the classical school, Black allows his King's Knight to be driven about the board in the early stages of the game, in the expectation of provoking a weakness in White's centre pawns
Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Sunday, 26th April, 2009, 12:17 AM.
I didn't know Alekhine was one of the founders of hypermodern chess. From what I've read, it was Reti, Nimzovich, Breyer, and someone else. (I'm sure I'm forgetting someone important.)
I think you're missing Tartakower.
I think Alekhine's style was more classical like Tarrasch and Steinitz.
If you have a pawn center then you have have something to worry about. If you don't have a pawn center you REALLY have something to worry about.
I didn't know Alekhine was one of the founders of hypermodern chess. From what I've read, it was Reti, Nimzovich, Breyer, and someone else. (I'm sure I'm forgetting someone important.)
Let's put our historian hats on and figure this one out. A few years after the Russian revolution makes it about between 1917 and 1922, the whole country is in turmoil, many things are in short supply due to both WW1 and the revolution. The Russians suffered terrible deprivations on both the front and the home front, one of the causes of the revolution in the first place. I would also hazard to guess that Alekhine wasn't exactly wealthy then as anyone who was had their money & property confiscated by the state and those who were wealthy fled to France if they were lucky. If you could get enough firewood to not freeze during the winter you could count yourself fortunate.
The great Soviet state supported school of chess is some years away, I would think most if not all the Soviet chess newspapers are some years away as well. As with many things the state is dismantling the elite pre-revolutionary structure of chess and music and art and sports and government and agriculture and you name it.
The Informant is some 45 or so years away and in any case is a Yugoslavian publication.
That leaves poor Alekhine with nothing left to study but 90 year old games in some out dated tomb that somehow survived abandoned on some shelf. I feel sorry for him. A game from 1830 or so for one of the founders of hypermodern chess (so called back then) - poor meat to dine on.
Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Saturday, 25th April, 2009, 12:10 AM.
Probably your note was written tongue-in-cheek, but it reminded me of something Soltis wrote in one of the early chapters of his book Soviet Chess. Someone (I don't remember who) recalled visiting a chess club during the first few years following the Revolution, when Alekhine still lived in Russia, and finding Alekhine studying the games of the La Bourdonnais - McDonnell match, played almost 90 years prior.
No I didn't see it but I have a weak stomach for such things, I hate to see someone get crushed, especially someone of such a sweet disposition...
Okay I take that back, I watched the game, how the heck do you play that way against a GM, what the heck was he thinking, what kind of opening was that? Nights on the rim are dim and the exchange sac should not be surprising at all. At least play a6 like Anthony Miles did against Karpov.
I look at it differently. Nakamura didn't crush the person. He crushed the position. :)
I've played the Dutch against some strong correspondence opponents over the years but used a different move order. The result was pretty much in keeping with the expectation of the difference in elo rating but very nice. The reason I watched the game was to see how Nakamura would react to the previous loss. He made a statement!
No I didn't see it but I have a weak stomach for such things, I hate to see someone get crushed, especially someone of such a sweet disposition...
Okay I take that back, I watched the game, how the heck do you play that way against a GM, what the heck was he thinking, what kind of opening was that? Nights on the rim are dim and the exchange sac should not be surprising at all. At least play a6 like Anthony Miles did against Karpov.
Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Friday, 24th April, 2009, 04:04 PM.
Leave a comment: