Trump - The NEW, New Thread

[Neil Frarey]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

My daughter was killed by Donald Trump's botched drone attack in Yemen

But at least he's, shall we say, killing it on the international relations front.

Targeting intel goes back to Obama 2015 ... destroying hospitals, markets, residential neighborhoods ...etc..

...next?

[Ben Daswani]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

My daughter was killed by Donald Trump's botched drone attack in Yemen

But at least he's, shall we say, killing it on the international relations front.

[Ben Daswani]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/07/news...4AMVODTopVideo

Employers have added 863,000 jobs during Donald Trump's first five full months in office. That's not quite as many as the 908,000 jobs added during President Barack Obama's last five months in office.

Thank eff that Trump stepped in to save the economy.

[Ben Daswani]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Drkulec once referred to all people who smoke weed as "sadly comical." Personally, I think there are many worse indulgences, including compulsive TV watching.

Is Donald Trump a TV Addict

[Ben Daswani]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Being part of an organized internet attack
( basically a mob without a moral compass )

Fifteen years later and you're still as a clueless as ever. You were never the victim of an "organized" attack by a "mob." No one gave that much of a shit about you. A lot of people thought you were a cocky idiot and responded how people often respond to cocky idiots. A normal person--not a raging egoist like you--might have said, "Hey, dozens of people are calling me a cocky idiot and very few people are standing up for me... perhaps I'm being a cocky idiot?" Instead, you developed an absurd conspiracy about some "organized" attack that you've apparently held onto for a decade and a half.

You sound like you're still a miserable and petty person. Enjoy your life, bud.

[Duncan Smith]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Wow, vicious trolling. Sounds scary!


There was never any need.


Once again, there was never any need.

You appear to be a sociopath who doesn't give a shit about others as long as you feel you're winning something. Being part of an organized internet attack
( basically a mob without a moral compass ), taking personal communications out of context and repeatedly posting them online, and being somewhat dishonest about all of it is not surprising given the man you appear to be now. I own my mistake to give you and others the time of day in the past. It doesn't excuse what you did.

[Ben Daswani]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Duncan Smith the other night said that you viciously trolled him for years,

Wow, vicious trolling. Sounds scary!

lied about him

There was never any need.

and tried to publicly embarrass him.

Once again, there was never any need.

[Sid Belzberg]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Wow, another fucking essay and you only managed to respond to one of my questions. We've got a God damn genius on our hands, folks.

Yes, only the enlightened Ben Daswani is entitled to partially respond to posts and questions. As was pointed out in my post, point b referenced both in question 1 and question 2 was not what you originally posted so i said "no" with reference to your question 1 "Do you agree with that basic rendering of the facts?" and hence chose not to answer the second question that referenced the same statements that were different then the original post under discussion and hence not a "basic rendering of the facts." as you claimed.


I have some questions for you ....Duncan Smith the other night said that you viciously trolled him here for years, outright lied about him and tried to publicly embarrass him. Is that true? If no, why would anyone give credence to such a denial? Anyways, the only way to deal with a troll is to ignore him as I have done with Paul Bonham. You are viewed by many on this board as an "idiotic troll". I certainly can understand why the majority here view you that way and you are now on my ignore list.

[Ben Daswani]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

No, these are not facts. These are new statements you have created to to support your contention that I can not read. I ask again, are you really as smart as you say you are?
Point 1 I do not dispute that this occurred and do not condone any reporters being physically body slammed and consider this an isolated incident of bad behavior of an individual politician and not GOP policy.

Point 2 above references a person that is "afraid" of losing their healthcare, you then go on to state that you are implying that your first statement could be an example of such a person.
Your actual post was more generalized and could refer to any person that would be part of a group of people who are going to actually lose their healthcare in the eventuality that Obamacare is repealed. If you meant to say something else then you should take the time to learn how to say what you mean.:D

I posted a link in response to your second sentence that states that even high profile Democrats like Bill Clinton have serious reservations about Obamacare. The point being are people losing their healthcare or regaining their freedom not to be forced into buying useless coverage at unaffordable prices?

In many states coverage has more then doubled in price that has deductibles that are so high that the so called coverage is useless. Under the Obama regime 10 percent of your income can be subjected to forfeiture if you do not buy useless coverage charged extortive prices by healthcare insurers.. To start with Obama claimed his system would allow people to keep whoever their current care providers are. Total lie. Calling Obamacare legitimate healthcare is like calling Madoff's ex investment fund a "safe investment" when in fact it was nothing more then a fraud. The main difference being that one had a choice about whether or not to invest their money with Madoff.
So to answer your question about if I was a person who was going to lose my healthcare who would I see as the the "fucking fascist"? I absolutely would see Obama as the "fucking fascist"and nothing but a sucker who sold out the American people to the highly profitable and politically influential health insurers. Why?.. you may ask.... because under Obamacare chances are I would have effectively lost my coverage anyways as it is unaffordable and useless with its high deductibles and the reluctance of insurers to pay out any costs.

By the way according to the Antidefamation league as per Tom's Time magazine article he posted shows that the antisemitic Chicago incident with the LGBT is not isolated as you might like everyone to believe and in fact antisemitism is creeping into progressivism.
http://time.com/4839592/anti-semitis...mation-league/
Here is the New York LGBT protesting Jewish LGBT marchers celebrating Israel....disgusting, isn't it?
http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/2362...-israel-parade

Wow, another fucking essay and you only managed to respond to one of my questions. We've got a God damn genius on our hands, folks.

[Vlad Drkulec]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

I guess you don't understand that in Canada, unlike the U.S., hate speech overrides protected speech. And the onus would be on you to prove that your claim is true.

Do your worst. I am not worried.

[Paul Bonham]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

You are just silly. Whatever I said is protected speech based on my religious beliefs and on scripture. You would have to demonstrate that what I said was a false claim which you can't do.

I guess you don't understand that in Canada, unlike the U.S., hate speech overrides protected speech. And the onus would be on you to prove that your claim is true.

[Vlad Drkulec]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

We aren't talking about your criticism of the left. We are talking about your assertion regarding atheists, a group identifiable by religion (not identifiable AS religion, identifiable BY religion which is what the law states.) The assertion you made was a false claim designed to incite hatred for atheists.

You are just silly. Whatever I said is protected speech based on my religious beliefs and on scripture. You would have to demonstrate that what I said was a false claim which you can't do.

On the other hand what you said about people with diabetes violates Canadian human rights law and also U.S. law specifically the Americans with Disabilities Act. Anyway the only reason that I even read your idiocy was because I read Chesstalk at the library on a public terminal where my ignore list was not being considered. I can't promise that I will read your reply.

[Paul Bonham]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Paul Bonham along with Ben Daswani are the only people who I have noticed violating Canada's hate speech laws on chesstalk. Larry removed that thread at my request I suspect though the removal was delayed. Criticizing the demon possessed left is not hate speech. You should really have the reading comprehension to read the law which you quoted before making leaps of logic.

Larry did NOT remove the thread because of your request, he removed it because I pointed out it violated Canada's hate speech law, and I posted the exact clause it violated. The reason I know this is because in another thread, I repeated your actual statement, and Larry promptly removed that entire thread as well the very next day.

We aren't talking about your criticism of the left. We are talking about your assertion regarding atheists, a group identifiable by religion (not identifiable AS religion, identifiable BY religion which is what the law states.) The assertion you made was a false claim designed to incite hatred for atheists.

I am absolutely sure that if I repeated your comments here, Larry Bevand would delete this entire thread (or at least my post) as soon as he became aware of my doing that.

Is this your way of showing that you are whipped. You made threats. Empty threats, which no one responded to beyond suggesting that you get up off of your chair and act. I know that is alien to you.

I am happy to hear that is your thought process.

[Vlad Drkulec]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

No.... what's REALLY sad is that the President of the CFC made hate speech comments here on ChessTalk, comments that were so bad that Larry Bevand (owner of ChessTalk) had to remove the entire thread once he was made aware of them because he knew that Drkulec's comments violated Canada's hate speech laws.....

Paul Bonham along with Ben Daswani are the only people who I have noticed violating Canada's hate speech laws on chesstalk. Larry removed that thread at my request I suspect though the removal was delayed. Criticizing the demon possessed left is not hate speech. You should really have the reading comprehension to read the law which you quoted before making leaps of logic.

....and that I made everyone here on ChessTalk aware of this and challenged voting members of the CFC to have Drkulec removed as President because he had stained the CFC with hatred, and that Garland Best who I believe is a voting member of the CFC chooses to do and say nothing about this and instead posts asking people to post great moments in Canadian Chess.

You get what you deserve.

Is this your way of showing that you are whipped. You made threats. Empty threats, which no one responded to beyond suggesting that you get up off of your chair and act. I know that is alien to you.

[Neil Frarey]

Re: Trump - The NEW, New Thread

Thanks, Bob, but it was wrong of me to say that to Neil. You'd think after all of these years I would have learned to not post when I'm angry. :(

Neil, I apologize. You didn't deserve it and I shouldn't have said it.

I'm truly impressed, and humbled, apology accepted thanks so much, Peter.

My post, re: Vets, was off topic (sorry about that) and not addressing your question about CBO's healthcare projected numbers ...I just don't have faith in those numbers as Sid has alluded.

And speaking of the numbers which can be easily reinterpreted ...

U.S. unemployment hits lowest level since 2001

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...at-4-4-percent

...with both the Dow and the S&P having a good day. Gold is sinking like a sunset ... I have a target I want it to drop down to and then I'm in for 50k!