If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
P. S: Thank you, Egidijus, for suggesting a thread to kick off this journey.
You're welcome :) And you're in a good club of dad's who played along their sons and daughters - Plotkin, Preotu, Hua to mention several names.
Being a little bit old fashion I recommend books :) For the start Soviet Chess Primer and going over the real chess board. For a little bit entertainment Tal's book on his match against Botvinnik.
Agreed, and in fact just after the end of the clip Finegold actually mentioned Anand as another 50+ player who could make it, along with Nigel (Short) and Kasparov.
OTOH, Vishy and GK are still way over 2700, and no one with that kind of a rating would be "only" an IM with no GM norms; so maybe Ben's counterexamples aren't really counterexamples.
I think Anand example is not useful.
"the probability of anyone becoming GM after 50 is vanishing low" -- I think it is about a person still climbing a hill, not going down especially from 2800 heights.
It would be necessary to double check but I think Beliavsky is one of the oldest active GM - 66 years and still with 2517 points.
Karpov is older but does not play regularly in tournaments.
While I agree with GM Finegold that the probability of anyone becoming GM after 50 is vanishing low, I'd disagree that it is exactly 0 . Simply because there is a counterexample : Viswanathan Anand. Anand, who will turn 51 in a couple of months, is rated currently at 2753.
Agreed, and in fact just after the end of the clip Finegold actually mentioned Anand as another 50+ player who could make it, along with Nigel (Short) and Kasparov.
OTOH, Vishy and GK are still way over 2700, and no one with that kind of a rating would be "only" an IM with no GM norms; so maybe Ben's counterexamples aren't really counterexamples.
Thanks, Aris; really rooting for you to make 2200 and following your posts in the other thread ; since you had already broken 2K, I am certain you can do it.
Not sure what you meant by contributing to blogging ; if you meant documenting your own progress in this thread, sure. In fact, it would be great to see more people who wanted to get to 2200 over a few years come together here to egg each other on.
Again, not too sure what you meant by my sharing tips to you ; as of now, I am noob-level and don't have any tips to share with someone at your level.
Oh, I just meant things we try that we find seemed to work, or didn't seem to work. Some things will be dependent on our rating levels, but some will be moreover practicing methods, etc.
For example, at some point early in the pandemic, I started the Chess.com lessons, right from the beginning, and I wouldn't move up until I got every answer perfect (there's a hint function).
Anyway, as of today, my profile says that I've done 457 lessons (now, that seems double-high, but I never bothered noting how it was counting, it's a little number off in an upper corner). Anyway, regarding openings during this time, I'm playing almost none of the "lines" I've played forever, and at Rapid-speed games, I'm prioritizing aggressive development. My Chess.com rating has gone up over 50 points in the last month, but I doubt that means much. Tomorrow afternoon will be my first "test", with a few dozen CFC-rated players at Victor Xu's free Sigma tournament:
Good for you Amit! I think I would be very fulfilled getting to CM within the next 6 years.
I don't want to hijack your thread, but if you want to, I can contribute to your "blogging".
If you want to share tips more directly, please email to arismarghetis at rogers dot com
Thanks, Aris; really rooting for you to make 2200 and following your posts in the other thread ; since you had already broken 2K, I am certain you can do it.
Not sure what you meant by contributing to blogging ; if you meant documenting your own progress in this thread, sure. In fact, it would be great to see more people who wanted to get to 2200 over a few years come together here to egg each other on.
Again, not too sure what you meant by my sharing tips to you ; as of now, I am noob-level and don't have any tips to share with someone at your level.
Thanks for sharing, John ; GM Finegold sure knows the terrain. I guess the probability of me making 2200 is about the same : 0 .
While I agree with GM Finegold that the probability of anyone becoming GM after 50 is vanishing low, I'd disagree that it is exactly 0 . Simply because there is a counterexample : Viswanathan Anand. Anand, who will turn 51 in a couple of months, is rated currently at 2753. Since a GM norm is a 2600-performance, he would comfortably make the GM norms even at his age.
Of course, this isn't to say that I can do it. But, surely someone else with similar prowess as Anand could. For example, it is conceivable that if Carlsen continues to be actively playing chess at 50, he would make the GM norms.
Last edited by Amit R; Saturday, 24th October, 2020, 04:12 PM.
OK, now that the arrogant (for me) thread title is done with, on to the details of the challenge :
Achieve 2200 FIDE by October 24th, 2030.
Starting point : Oct 24th, 2020. 41 years old. On chess.com, rapid = 998, slow = 1466, from rather infrequent play. No FIDE ID. Played an OTB tournament once as a kid, and lost pathetically.
FAQ:
Q. Why do it at all ?
A. Was inspired by Mike McDonald's challenge. Besides, I hope to continue being a sparring partner for my son for a little longer.
Q. Is this a money bet?
A. No, not in the traditional sense, atleast. But, it would be nice to have some financial incentive, since there is a significant money and , more importantly, time investment involved ; over 10 years, I'd put it at $50 * 10K hours = $500,000 . Of course, getting to 2200 is its own reward ; nevertheless, I think there is value in showing that late-stage improvement can be done.So, in the very unlikely event I pull this off, it would be nice if some folks can get together to crowdfund some incentive.
Anyway, since this all about the impossible, I'll give myself some impossible lifetime-targets and corresponding rewards :
FM : $100K
IM : $500K
GM : $4M
That's about it. If you'd like, do wish me luck and lots of hard work. It is admittedly a bit presumptuous to talk of 10 years when life is so fickle, more so in these pandemic times. Anyway, let's see where this goes.
P. S: Thank you, Egidijus, for suggesting a thread to kick off this journey.
Leave a comment: