If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
I indeed live in Quebec. Companies have millions of reasons to invest in chess. Most often, they have someone working there that has played seriously at one point in their lives and wish to give back to the community. Some businesses like to be associated with the game of kings (whatever that is) or to a highly intellectual activity. Others need to invest in non-profit organizations. Etc, etc, etc.... Furthermore, investment in chess is relatively cheap: for 5000$, you could have your company name plastered everywhere in the chess tournament. I work closely with pharmaceuticals that pay 10 times this amount for barely nothing.
Yes, my own contribution can be considered "sympathy money", but I get to invest in a game that has given me a lot through the years and i can even get a tax break in some cases (nice bonus but not essential). Sympathy money is NOT hard to come by, you just need the right people making the right calls. Don't underestimate the number of enthusiasts that have money to spare. Just don't expect them to throw money at poorly organized projects.
As for my own contribution, I do invest my own money, but do not wish to discuss my initiatives over a message board.
Hi Marc, I would be interested in chatting with you to try and learn a few things. I am originally from Montreal, and sometimes visit, or I could gladly pay for the phone call.
Thanks and regards,
My email address is :
arismarghetis at rogers dot com
I would rather have my money for myself and not to promote someone else's career or hobbies.
Hear, hear! I wish that more people felt this way. Then we wouldn't be bailing out GM or building hockey arenas or paying for hosting the Winter Olympics or a myriad of other projects funded with taxpayer dollars. The way things work now if the majority want to steal money from the minority to fund their pet projects, then they get funded. It's criminal.
While you guys are getting your jollies from laughing at Jean, he would have been a fine addition to the team. He's very well known in the correspondence chess circles, as well as across Canada and would have brought interest to the team. His games, and probably the rest of the team, would be watched.
Agree wholeheartedly. His chess qualifications are without question.
It might even have brought some donations for the teams.
That's a pretty big might. In fact, I'm going to go out on a limb and say there is zero difference between the donations with or without him.
If it wasn't for the players the organizers wouldn't be needed. Judging from the number of active players in Canada, I'd say many of the players have voted with their feet.
So have the organizers. I believe a top player needs the services of a strong organizer more than an organizer needs the services of the top players since I believe a tournament can be just as successful, if not more, through volume of players instead of quality.
Just a reminder that if funding does not come through the B team is ready...
Unofficial pay-your-own-way grassroots team
1st board: Vlad Drkulec
2nd board: Paul Beckwith
3rd board: Gary Ruben
4th board: Ed Seedhouse
5th board: Bob Gillanders
6th board: Paul Bonham
Ok, I saw this quote from The Watchmen and here's the deal:
if this grassroots team goes, we will during all games wear T-shirts that say:
"We're not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with us!"
...the reality of things is that the CFC has been run for the last few decades by level 1 organizers (with one or two exceptions), that are satisfied with simply collecting entry fees and giving back the little that is left after expenses and then saying to justify themselves that "everyone had a good time."
Only in chess do we find people thinking that it is enough....
Only in chess do we find people thinking that it is enough.... because only in chess do we have a game that the general public cares NOTHING about. Even bowling gets on TV, even DARTS gets on TV. Don't even bring up Europe, that's a whole different world, and as the game of soccer has found out, you can't simply export European culture to North America and expect it to catch on like wildfire with the natives.
Now, Jean, please indulge us for a moment, because what I'm about to ask is very important. All the examples you've given of sponsorship are from events within Quebec. There might be one or two prominent others from outside Quebec, but the bulk of sponsored events, 80 or 90% of them it would seem, are in Quebec.
Now, given that, are we to assume that organizers in Quebec are ambitious and driven, getting better and more efficient, and everywhere else in Canada they are none of this?
If your answer is yes, then please give us your take of why this might be the case. What is so special about Quebec in this regard? If organizers outside of Quebec are as bad as you claim, what are the underlying reasons?
I really wonder: if you were to transplant some organizer that you consider higher than "level 1" from Quebec into B.C. or into Ontario and ask him or her to reproduce his or her successes in Quebec, would they in fact be able to do this?
The one glaring difference we can all see in Quebec is provincial government involvement in chess organization. Is it possible that this government involvement has created an artificial environment of chess sponsorship (via direct matched funding, or more likely, indirect means such as tax breaks, which companies LOVE)?
Is it possible that you see this all around you in Quebec and that you are blind to it when you write about "level 1" organizers? In other words, most organizers outside of Quebec might be doing as much work as those inside Quebec, but without government help, the results are quite different?
The only other glaring difference, of course, is the language. If you're going to make a case for THAT being a cause, i.e. something like "Anglophone organizers are lazier than Francophone organizers".... this could become the most vitriolic thread in Chesstalk history!
I indeed live in Quebec. Companies have millions of reasons to invest in chess. Most often, they have someone working there that has played seriously at one point in their lives and wish to give back to the community. Some businesses like to be associated with the game of kings (whatever that is) or to a highly intellectual activity. Others need to invest in non-profit organizations. Etc, etc, etc.... Furthermore, investment in chess is relatively cheap: for 5000$, you could have your company name plastered everywhere in the chess tournament. I work closely with pharmaceuticals that pay 10 times this amount for barely nothing.
Yes, my own contribution can be considered "sympathy money", but I get to invest in a game that has given me a lot through the years and i can even get a tax break in some cases (nice bonus but not essential). Sympathy money is NOT hard to come by, you just need the right people making the right calls. Don't underestimate the number of enthusiasts that have money to spare. Just don't expect them to throw money at poorly organized projects.
As for my own contribution, I do invest my own money, but do not wish to discuss my initiatives over a message board.
Fair enough, Marc. I would like to believe what you say about sympathy money not being hard to come by, but other organizers say otherwise. I'm not involved in chess organization in any way, so I, like perhaps many others, don't know where the truth lies. Perhaps if you know a lot of people that can invest and would if asked, you can do chess in Canada a favor and put them in touch with some organizers?
I've been pretty critical of Jean Hebert as you may have seen, but it's only because he's so antagonistic and appears to be entirely selfish. He has no sense of diplomacy whatsoever. I have not seen him yet ever admit to being wrong on anything, and in fact, the very act of implying he's wrong on something leads to a personal attack from Jean. There's a real psychological problem there.
What chess in Canada needs is someone who's both activist and diplomat. Perhaps yourself?
So what you're saying is almost every organizer in Canada should just stop organizing, other than maybe one or two? Yup, I'm sure that will do wonders for chess in Canada.
Yes, that's what he wants, and not because it will do wonders for chess in Canada.
Hebert wants a wholesale change, from weekend swisses that return entry fees minus expenses to more prestigious sponsored events across Canada that he can travel to year round. It would be a financial windfall for Hebert, as he would easily finish top 3 in every event plus rake in simul fees and lecture fees.
If it takes a wholesale purge of existing organizers to get this to happen, so be it according to Jean. It matters little to Jean if the "basement dwellers" (that's his term, not mine) lose out by having far fewer weekend events to attend, and instead have to pony up higher entry fees to help defray the costs of Jean's red carpet treatment.
Anyone who is a fanboy of Hebert's and calls him Canadian Champion with reverence is conveniently ignoring this aspect of his character. One has to look at the whole person. There's a word for what he is, much more graphic than what I've used in the past, too graphic to post here.
He hides it as best he can, calling himself an author and a coach, as if he's got other people's interests in mind. But for those with eyes to see and ears to hear, the truth is out there. Brian Profit, with his posts on this thread, is one of those and I applaud him for getting the voice of the 99% of players heard.
Meanwhile, to the organizers across Canada, I say, keep up your good work! Hebert be damned.
I indeed live in Quebec. Companies have millions of reasons to invest in chess. Most often, they have someone working there that has played seriously at one point in their lives and wish to give back to the community. Some businesses like to be associated with the game of kings (whatever that is) or to a highly intellectual activity. Others need to invest in non-profit organizations. Etc, etc, etc.... Furthermore, investment in chess is relatively cheap: for 5000$, you could have your company name plastered everywhere in the chess tournament. I work closely with pharmaceuticals that pay 10 times this amount for barely nothing.
Yes, my own contribution can be considered "sympathy money", but I get to invest in a game that has given me a lot through the years and i can even get a tax break in some cases (nice bonus but not essential). Sympathy money is NOT hard to come by, you just need the right people making the right calls. Don't underestimate the number of enthusiasts that have money to spare. Just don't expect them to throw money at poorly organized projects.
As for my own contribution, I do invest my own money, but do not wish to discuss my initiatives over a message board.
I know several companies that would be interested in sponsoring chess events. I have chess-playing friends working in big law firms that wouldn't hesitate to fund chess activities. I myself have often offered sponsorship to any organizer that would just take 2 minutes to contact me and explain his/her project. Back in the day, the FQE had the good sense to approach high-profile chess enthusiasts (Claude Filion, Roger Lemelin, Gilles Carles, etc...) who thereafter attracted potential sponsors.
Marc, it sounds like you are in Quebec, where it seems 80 or 90% of all chess sponsorship in Canada is occurring.
Can you elaborate on just why these companies are interested in sponsoring chess events? What do they believe they will get out of it?
From your description of your own wish to sponsor, it sounds like you represent what is called "sympathy money", meaning you just want to contribute to chess, and don't particularly care about ROI. Does this sound correct?
Sympathy money is hard to come by, but again, it seems to be most abundant in Quebec. May I also ask and get an honest answer, if you sponsor a chess event in Quebec, do you (or your company) receive anything like tax breaks or some other financial incentive from the Quebec government or the FQE?
If things are happening in Quebec and not anywhere else in Canada, and if they are happening in Quebec despite no financial windfall such as tax breaks, then it is imperative for the good of chess in Canada that someone who is in the know explain to the rest of Canada what they are missing. It's hard to believe that Quebec has hard-working ambitious organizers and the rest of Canada has lazy do-nothing organizers, which is what Jean Hebert is implying.
Do not ask yourself why chess is in such a poor state in Canada and why the CFC has been on the verge of bankrupcy and still is in more ways than one. When we read about a former CFC president and current Ontario Chess Association president stating flatly that he or his events have no need for sponsors and that he has no use for advice on how to find any, then we understand what the problem is. Turning away even the possibility of sponsorship is in effect giving up on involving the community into what you are doing for the good of that community. No decent organizer (whether its chess or something else) can think like that.
I never stated that I need no sponsorship (I accept paypal at dcmallon@rogers.com :p)
I also never stated that none of "my events" need sponsorship - I currently have no upcoming events, therefore I am not currently seeking sponsorship.
What bothers some people here is not so much that I push organizers to find sponsorship (I use this word in the largest sense possible, which includes donations and any other support that is possible to get from public, private or corporate sources when you simply bother to make contacts and ask) it is that I regularly underlines real life examples where it is being done successfully by several people in Canada. That seems to make people like Chris and others feel ill at-ease, if not inadequate, incompetent and useless. And not without reason.
The easy way to react is to shoot at the messenger. But the reality of things is that the CFC has been run for the last few decades by level 1 organizers (with one or two exceptions), that are satisfied with simply collecting entry fees and giving back the little that is left after expenses and then saying to justify themselves that "everyone had a good time."
Only in chess do we find people thinking that it is enough. If someone like a chess organizer has no interest in getting better and more efficient at what he is doing and could/should be doing, then maybe he should consider stepping down and leave the spot completely vacant for someone else with a little more ambition and drive.
So what you're saying is almost every organizer in Canada should just stop organizing, other than maybe one or two? Yup, I'm sure that will do wonders for chess in Canada.
I personally love how top players are always complaining along the lines of "you guys need to do a better job organizing chess in Canada" and "I can't believe how bad you are at organizing. I would never do it that way!"
All are completely self-serving statements as they would be the main beneficiary of more funding. I sure wouldn't. Why should organizers do things only with them in mind? How about the majority of players who are just playing for fun? Just because they have chosen it as their life's work, doesn't mean everyone should go along for the ride to make things better for them.
I am waiting for the day when they all realize that chess in this country is not an important activity to the masses and even to us most of the time. If they want to promote themselves, let them go and do it. If they want to get someone to sponser them, go do it.
As for complaing about the CFC, the fact that it has never been able to do a better job to give them their Utopian federation should tell them something beyond the fact that the people involved are not competent. There has to be other reasons!
To more than 99% of us, it is just a game. Go earn your own living. Stop complaining about others. If you want something to change, take up the job yourself.
Well said! But Jean isn't part of your 99%, he's the 1% that desperately wants to live off of your money. So you won't shut him up, unfortunately.
I know several companies that would be interested in sponsoring chess events. I have chess-playing friends working in big law firms that wouldn't hesitate to fund chess activities. I myself have often offered sponsorship to any organizer that would just take 2 minutes to contact me and explain his/her project. Back in the day, the FQE had the good sense to approach high-profile chess enthusiasts (Claude Filion, Roger Lemelin, Gilles Carles, etc...) who thereafter attracted potential sponsors.
Hi Marc, what part of the country are you located in?
My email address is : arismarghetis at rogers dot com
Thanks and regards, Aris (FA in Ottawa/Gatineau area)
I know several companies that would be interested in sponsoring chess events. I have chess-playing friends working in big law firms that wouldn't hesitate to fund chess activities. I myself have often offered sponsorship to any organizer that would just take 2 minutes to contact me and explain his/her project. Back in the day, the FQE had the good sense to approach high-profile chess enthusiasts (Claude Filion, Roger Lemelin, Gilles Carles, etc...) who thereafter attracted potential sponsors.
I'm not involved in any organizing at the moment except in the most general of terms, and the last event I was the sole organizer for I did in fact find a fair bit of sponsorship - money, services AND goods.
Leave a comment: