Radjabov - Smeets rules question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Radjabov - Smeets rules question

    Well first of all this is one reason why I dislike multiple time controls, and it's made worse by digital clocks. If this had been an analog clock there would have (likely) been no dispute.

    That said, your opponent breaking a rule doesn't give you the right to break one yourself. Illegal moves and illegal use of the clock are both given equal weight and penalties in the FIDE regulations. Blitz has given many people bad habits when in time trouble.
    Christopher Mallon
    FIDE Arbiter

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Radjabov - Smeets rules question

      Okay, so Radjabov, is in time trouble (Radjabov's choice, of course) & Smeets is not in as much. The moment that Smeets attempted to stop his clock (ie the game moves are not considered to be in session during a clock stop / claim attempt, & so it would be hard to rule against Smeets for doing much wrong for making an attempt at claim / appeal - the real source of haziness within the FIDE rules) - ie starting his opponent's clock is one way to stop Smeet's time - the TD should have stepped in and made a ruling & assumed that Smeets was making a claim of some sort. What time penalties could be offered? Okay, how about, first penalizing the first offender, Radjabov, & assume that in this level of competition, he doesn't get tagged with an immediate loss of game forfeit for attempting to complete an illegal move (& turn, by touching the clock). Smeets might get a bonus amount of time awarded, & Radjabov a usual warning to take more care in only correctly setting up the pieces during one's turn or during appropriate time for touch-move. Radjabov might also get a time bonus, too, allowing the game to continue normally from the illegal move (by this time, both players have had an extra minute or so to think about the position, in addition to the extra bonus time(s) awarded) - but only if a forfeit were not awarded. Smeets should seem to have a good case for being allowed to stop HIS (not necessarily both) clock(s) during a claim. But Smeets should have only spoken to the arbiter, not the opponent (except to say "I'm stopping my clock to make a claim" or something similar) - nor should he expect the opponent or the expect to have the TD expect Radjabov to complete another move now that Radjabov's clock runs. In the video, the TD is present, & has observed the time remaining during/after a claim, & can always adjust the clock time and/or correct a board position. It was also my understanding here that no increments were advertised for this tournament.

      Comment

      Working...
      X