If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
You also didn't see Topolov maintaining his 2800 rating - and instead he shot up to 2816 with Anand.
It seems neither you nor I are qualified to judge what these guys can or cannot do! :)
Saying I "didn't see Topalov maintaining his 2800 rating" is a bit of a stretch from my "I guess I'm now hoping Topalov will prove to be your Achilles heel (:", Vlad. While I likely would have leaned towards betting against him maintaining his 2800 status (and seemingly have lost that bet!), the bet was certainly not Topalov centric. While you're clearly in your best position since the commencement of the bet, I don't think you can make a strong case for now having a 3/4 chance of winning (the figure needed to give me a negative $10 equity). Do you really think Giri is much better than even money to attain 2800 status in 2015 AND all 4 (I'll concede Carlsen!) of your 2800 club keep their status? I'd say at best that's still a coin flip and your only possible edge might be the slight (say 5 to 10%) chance that So makes a big ratings push.
Saying I "didn't see Topalov maintaining his 2800 rating" is a bit of a stretch from my "I guess I'm now hoping Topalov will prove to be your Achilles heel (:", Vlad. While I likely would have leaned towards betting against him maintaining his 2800 status (and seemingly have lost that bet!), the bet was certainly not Topalov centric. While you're clearly in your best position since the commencement of the bet, I don't think you can make a strong case for now having a 3/4 chance of winning (the figure needed to give me a negative $10 equity). Do you really think Giri is much better than even money to attain 2800 status in 2015 AND all 4 (I'll concede Carlsen!) of your 2800 club keep their status? I'd say at best that's still a coin flip and your only possible edge might be the slight (say 5 to 10%) chance that So makes a big ratings push.
I still like my bet. And if you think it is still very close, I will offer an additional bet of my $25 to your $20 on the aforesaid outcome.
........ and you're saying it's a very close call. So why would I offer to bet at the true odds? That would be gambling. And I try to not gamble and only bet when I have the edge. :)
November ratings are now out, Vlad, and I'm sure you'll agree that you're in a serious spot of trouble re your "safe prediction" (especially since Anand has lost his 2800 status unless he wins his final Biel game tomorrow). Looking at scheduled November tournaments, I'm not even sure you now have any realistic chance of winning our modest bet (:
Congratulations. Jack,
You've won the bet! Who knew that so many of the top players would have a melt down. Even Carlsen shed 30 points.
You (or a person you designate) can collect your $20 at the Madison Pub this Wednesday or at the Rapid on Saturday.
Also, please accept now 500 P$ (pretend dollars) to use as wagering against the odds posted on the betting line which you frequently quote. Readers here on ChessTalk will be watching with greater interest to see how you can do with it. Can you double up to 1000 P$ - or lose it all. If the posted odds are as flawed as you frequently aver you should have little trouble in doubling up - and if you do, I expect people will want to send you real cash to manage as a gaming fund where you will make them a profit (minus a suitable % fee).
Carlsen shedding points should have been to your advantage, Vlad. But both Caruana and Grischuk free-falling in the manner they did certainly was not! Had I known Topalov was going to maintain his 2800 status, I probably wouldn't even have made the bet. This was a difficult bet to handicap and I'm still not sure it was a 'good' bet. Probably little more than the proverbial 'coin flip' either way.
I'm not sure I'm going to make the Rapid on Saturday, but you can certainly give the money to my son, Zehn, in my absence.
And I'm going to pass on those "pretend dollars" you suggest. I'm going to take some very real dollars, probably closer to $2,000 and see what kind of 'income' I can generate in the world of chess betting (:
Carlsen shedding points should have been to your advantage, Vlad. But both Caruana and Grischuk free-falling in the manner they did certainly was not! Had I known Topalov was going to maintain his 2800 status, I probably wouldn't even have made the bet. This was a difficult bet to handicap and I'm still not sure it was a 'good' bet. Probably little more than the proverbial 'coin flip' either way.
I'm not sure I'm going to make the Rapid on Saturday, but you can certainly give the money to my son, Zehn, in my absence.
And I'm going to pass on those "pretend dollars" you suggest. I'm going to take some very real dollars, probably closer to $2,000 and see what kind of 'income' I can generate in the world of chess betting (:
Great Jack! Good luck with the chess betting - I imagine you'd get an avid following on ChessTalk if you care to post a running tally on your bets and how you're doing. Best of luck!
There won't be 6 guys over 2800 at the end of the year, obviously. But still, it came pretty close. The average for the top 6 or 7 players is above 2800 and we've got easily 7 or 8 guys who are either pretty close to 2800, or were recently above 2800.
It's really just a matter of time. Maybe it will happen next March, maybe in August. But it is inevitable.
A very rare situation that only one player is above 2800. I don't remember any other case like this in the last 5 years.
Among top-20 players 2 don't play in the World Cup (Topalov, Dominguez). So, only 1 out of 18 players (Svidler) gains rating. 17/18 players lose some points, including players who still in the World Cup. I can find 2 possible explanations to this anomally.
1. Players don't care much about rating in this tournament, they just want to advance to the next round. For example, in match 2800 player against 2500, the favorite wins the first game and doesn't try to get second win and accepts a draw. Total score is 1.5-0.5, top player advances to the next round, but loses around 2 rating points in these 2 games.
2. Many 2800 players play almost only in strong round-robin tournaments and don't play too often against 2600-2700 players. Is 2800 player able to score 64% against 2700 or 76% against 2600 just to maintain his rating? Not sure.
Last edited by Victor Plotkin; Sunday, 10th September, 2017, 10:23 PM.
A very rare situation that only one player is above 2800. I don't remember any other case like this in the last 5 years.
Among top-20 players 2 don't play in the World Cup (Topalov, Dominguez). So, only 1 out of 18 players (Svidler) gains rating. 17/18 players lose some points, including players who still in the World Cup. I can find 2 possible explanations to this anomally.
1. Players don't care much about rating in this tournament, they just want to advance to the next round. For example, in match 2800 player against 2500, the favorite wins the first game and doesn't try to get second win and accepts a draw. Total score is 1.5-0.5, top player advances to the next round, but loses around 2 rating points in these 2 games.
2. Many 2800 players play almost only in strong round-robin tournaments and don't play too often against 2600-2700 players. Is 2800 player able to score 64% against 2700 or 76% against 2600 just to maintain his rating? Not sure.
My educated guess is that the answer is a little bit of both. :p
Comment