The biggest match in many years is coming up Saturday night.
Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Collapse
X
-
Mayweather vs Pacquiao
19Floyd Mayweather42.11%8Manny Pacquiao31.58%6Draw0.00%0I don't care21.05%4Are they chess players???5.26%1The poll is expired.
Last edited by Eric Hansen; Thursday, 30th April, 2015, 06:31 PM.Tags: None
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Yes- there is a chess connection. A couple of friends who have played with Manny say he is around 1600 level legitimately. He loves the game.
Last edited by Eric Hansen; Thursday, 30th April, 2015, 06:40 PM.
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Mayweather.
He was the Colbert Report's chess correspondent:
Mayweather: For kids in a tough neighbourhood, chess the the only way out...
Colbert: Floyd, how did you stay straight?
Mayweather: Well, I was lucky. My father put a bishop in my hand when I was three . By the time I was six, I could checkmate a man twice my size.
[CT won't let me upload the screencap: undefined error]
http://en.chessbase.com/post/colbert...alk-che-270913
Comment
-
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Originally posted by Andy Shaw View PostMayweather. Easy fight. He will outsmart his opponent and make the necessary adjustments.
Pacquiao: Hard Fight (Pound for Pound Boxing - Show Me What You Got!). Attack, Attack, Attack. Knockout strategy works perfectly for a Fighter like Manny Pacquiao!
Prediction: Draw!!!
A Rematch??? It will be on September!!! Why settle for ONCE when you can get as much TWICE!?
MANY (Manny Pacquiao) MONEY (Money Mayweather) ISN'T IT? Those two words perfectly rhyme too.
Comment
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Originally posted by David Ottosen View PostAlthough I am pretty interested in the result, I'm planning not to watch. Mayweather is such an odious human being that I will not support his ventures with money. Hoping Pacquiao destroys him, but expecting Mayweather to win.
Comment
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
the betting odds have narrowed down still in favor of Mayweather. Skiils are not that far apart and the mental aspect can narrow the gap ... in this case Pacman has a real chance because the thought of avoiding a loss could stress Mayweather mentally. This could be Pacman's streak - destroying lossless players three in a row - Bradley, Algeiri, Mayweather. Incidentally cherry picker Mayweather wanted no part of Bradley becuase the man is fast and iron chinned and fought slow footed Maidana instead.
Comment
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Originally posted by Eric Hansen View PostI want Pacquiao to win but at this point in their careers I clearly favor Mayweather.
The rematch had a big gate for the times, as I recall.
If it's an exciting close fight tonight I wonder how much a rematch would bring in.Gary Ruben
CC - IA and SIM
Comment
-
Re: Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Marciano-Walcott
In the early days of television, our family and relatives would come together for a whole evening in front of our small-screen, black-and-white television.
It was May 15, 1953 – a Friday. The Friday night fights were boxing matches, usually sponsored by Gillette.
Jersey Joe Walcott had lost his heavyweight title eight months before to Rocky Marciano. Rocky was 29 years old, Jersey Joe 39. Rocky had won all 43 of his fights, 38 by knockout. This was the rematch and Rocky’s first defense of the Heavyweight crown.
Walcott was careful in the first two minutes, keeping away from Rocky. My mother went out to the kitchen to get a cold beer for my Uncle John.
Marciano threw a roundhouse left hook that dazed Walcott, then followed with a withering right uppercut before Jersey Joe knew what had hit him. He went down and was sitting on the seat of his pants waiting to get up at the count of seven. The noise was terrific, he never heard it. Walcott was counted out. The ring announcer hoisted Marciano’s hand in the air at 2:25 of the first round!
Later Marciano said, “I was surprised he didn’t get up!”
My mother came in to the living room with my Uncle’s cold beer and asked, “What happened?”
“The fight’s over, Mom. You missed it.”Last edited by Wayne Komer; Saturday, 2nd May, 2015, 01:54 PM.
Comment
Comment