BC Closed - is this allowed?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BC Closed - is this allowed?

    While browsing through a few Canadian chess sites, I came upon the details of the BC Closed to be held in October. One of the rules states the following:

    "7. Participants in the BC Closed must be members of the CFC. A tournament membership is not allowed for this tournament."

    Can an organizer refuse to issue a tournament membership and insist on a regular one?

    http://chess.bc.ca/Policy/BC%20Close...ty%20Final.pdf

  • #2
    Re: BC Closed - is this allowed?

    Why not? it is a provincial matter, and is in keeping with CFC rules about full membership for national championships. A tournament "membership" is a misnomer - this is more like a permit which allows you to play without being a member.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: BC Closed - is this allowed?

      Sounds like a bad idea anyways.

      Players should be allowed to pay whatever they want in order to participate in tournaments.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: BC Closed - is this allowed?

        Originally posted by Hugh Brodie View Post
        While browsing through a few Canadian chess sites, I came upon the details of the BC Closed to be held in October. One of the rules states the following:

        "7. Participants in the BC Closed must be members of the CFC. A tournament membership is not allowed for this tournament."

        Can an organizer refuse to issue a tournament membership and insist on a regular one?

        http://chess.bc.ca/Policy/BC%20Close...ty%20Final.pdf
        a little late to the party Hugh. This has been BCCF policy for something like 5 or 6 years. It also matches the policy that the CFC has for participation in the Canadian Closed (and possibly some other national championships) which has also been in place for quite a while. So clearly it is allowed.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: BC Closed - is this allowed?

          From the Handbook:

          Canadian Closed requirements:

          "Each contestant in the the Canadian Championship or Zonal Tournament shall be a member of the CFC in good standing."

          FIDE event requirements:

          "h) All Canadian players who compete in a FIDE registered event must be members in good standing of the CFC, or possess a valid tournament passport prior to the start of the tournament. [2013-H Bond/McKim]"

          So does this mean that the holder of a "tournament passport" is not a "member in good standing of the CFC"? Don't they have all the rights of any CFC member during "their" event (e.g. being able to play rated games, being able to appeal a decision, etc.)?

          If a tournament such as the BC Closed is FIDE-rated, doesn't the above rule take effect?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: BC Closed - is this allowed?

            Originally posted by Hugh Brodie View Post
            From the Handbook:

            Canadian Closed requirements:

            "Each contestant in the the Canadian Championship or Zonal Tournament shall be a member of the CFC in good standing."

            FIDE event requirements:

            "h) All Canadian players who compete in a FIDE registered event must be members in good standing of the CFC, or possess a valid tournament passport prior to the start of the tournament. [2013-H Bond/McKim]"

            So does this mean that the holder of a "tournament passport" is not a "member in good standing of the CFC"? Don't they have all the rights of any CFC member during "their" event (e.g. being able to play rated games, being able to appeal a decision, etc.)?

            If a tournament such as the BC Closed is FIDE-rated, doesn't the above rule take effect?
            The CFC Governors passed a motion some number of years ago explicitly requiring a full CFC membership for the Canadian Closed. If the Handbook has not been updated to reflect that well... I am shocked! shocked! that such a thing could happen.

            The rule you cite is a minimum requirement and does not prohibit extra requirements. For example, the rule above does not say participants in a FIDE rated tournament must be residents of BC but I don't see anybody reasonably objecting to the BC Closed having such a rule. So quoting that rule from the Handbook does not speak to the issue of the BC Closed requiring a full CFC membership over and above the restrictions given by the rule you quote.

            Comment

            Working...
            X