Trump is taking us back to medieval times and violating the US constitution.
King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View PostTrump is taking us back to medieval times and violating the US constitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmzz6CHTAQc
Michael Moore sums up what happened and what the repurcussions are now:
Donald Trump: Last President of the United StatesOnly the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
I like the baseball cap he wears during the interview. Made in Canada :o
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
History 101 ... in Medieval times there wasn't a US constitution to violate.Trump is taking us back to medieval times and violating the US constitution.
;)
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Neil, your reading comprehension needs work.Originally posted by Neil Frarey View PostHistory 101 ... in Medieval times there wasn't a US constitution to violate.
;)
The two sentences in Bob's post are connected by "and" but that doesn't necessarily imply they are related - just two things that he claims Trump is doing....Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Kerry, your reading comprehension needs work.The two sentences in Bob's post are connected by "and" but that doesn't necessarily imply they are related - just two things that he claims Trump is doing.
In Bob's post there's only one sentence.
;)Trump is taking us back to medieval times and violating the US constitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmzz6CHTAQc
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
It depends whether one chooses to believe Bob is using hasty, ambiguous grammar, or whether he indeed, deliberately or otherwise, giving an anachronistic view of history. Regardless, it should be noted that he's linking to left-wing mainstream media, i.e. Clinton News Network.Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.
Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View PostTrump is taking us back to medieval times and violating the US constitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmzz6CHTAQc
Ha! The title of this thread made me think of something.... why has no one thought of this before?
It's the Trump / Clinton Chess Set!!!!
The Trump side will obviously be the White pieces (with KKK engraved in the base of each piece):
King: The Donald
Queen: Ivanka Trump ("Hey, if I wasn't her father....!!!!")
King's Bishop: Rex Tillerson
Queen's Bishop: Don Trump Jr.
King's Knight: Steve Bannon
Queen's Knight: Eric Trump
King's Rook: Vladimir Putin
Queen's Rook: Mike Pence
Pawns: Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz
Clinton's side will be the Black pieces (with MLK engraved in the base of each piece):
King: Barack Obama (symbolizing that Hillary's policies would merely have continued Obama's)
Queen: Hillary Clinton
King's Bishop: Joe Biden
Queen's Bishop: Bill Clinton (oh, the irony!)
King's Knight: Al Sharpton
Queen's Knight: Elizabeth Warren
King's Rook: Khizr Khan
Queen's Rook: Tim Kaine
Pawns: James Comey, Bernie Sanders, Lawrence O'Donnell, Jessie Jackson, Bruce Springsteen, Mark Cuban, Beyonce, Lady GagaOnly the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Point taken. I meant to say "two clauses" but there you go... I still believe the two concepts are not necessarily related. I guess it depends on what you think the connector "and" means...Originally posted by Neil Frarey View PostKerry, your reading comprehension needs work.
In Bob's post there's only one sentence.
;)...Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
I see the Trump supporters are reduced to criticizing my grammar.Originally posted by Kerry Liles View PostPoint taken. I meant to say "two clauses" but there you go... I still believe the two concepts are not necessarily related. I guess it depends on what you think the connector "and" means...
To that I say,
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
In my case at least, don't get me wrong. I think The Donald may be the best candidate yet to become the Anti-C, if one actually arises (I'd say Putin, but Russia is thought to be going to lead a 1st war in Asia, along with Iran (aka Persia), if it comes to that, with the Anti-C eventually stepping in to try to finish things off). Regardless, CNN is still left-wing & Clinton-supportive.Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.
Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Comment
-
Re: King Trump & Royal Family: Conflicts of Interest
Trump is not the anti-Christ. Soros might be, though probably not.Originally posted by Kevin Pacey View PostIn my case at least, don't get me wrong. I think The Donald may be the best candidate yet to become the Anti-C, if one actually arises (I'd say Putin, but Russia is thought to be going to lead a 1st war in Asia, along with Iran (aka Persia), if it comes to that, with the Anti-C eventually stepping in to try to finish things off). Regardless, CNN is still left-wing & Clinton-supportive.Last edited by Vlad Drkulec; Saturday, 17 December, 2016, 06:44 PM.
Comment


Comment