Trump

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fred Harvey
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by Mavros Whissell View Post
    Do you get chills from Dennis Prager, disinterested Fred?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Prager
    What the hell is this? Relevance?

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Harvey
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by Mavros Whissell View Post
    Is it way back here when you were "disinterested" Fred? Or are you just a leftist that hates to be argued with? Option B.
    Love to be argued with my friend, but we need a reasonable opposition! Keep digging...you're done here!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mavros Whissell
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Do you get chills from Dennis Prager, disinterested Fred?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Prager

    Leave a comment:


  • Mavros Whissell
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by fred harvey View Post
    Advocating violence is enough to get you kicked off most sites on the net.....except of course for the screwball sites! Pathetic....
    Is it way back here when you were "disinterested" Fred? Or are you just a leftist that hates to be argued with? Option B.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Harvey
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by Mavros Whissell View Post
    For what it's worth, you seem to be a immigrant (2nd, 3rd, etc. generation - probably born in Canada) who is happy to come to/or be part of a Judeo-Christian society and then take a dump on it, while enjoying the verbal freedom your home country would most likely never allow. Whether you are a good or bad person, I have no idea. But would it kill you to be thankful for the society you are in, which has accepted you so readily? People like Bonham get so angry at Trump - well that's why Trump has succeeded so very much, people are tired of those who abuse their freedoms. The very liberal-minded people continue to be abusive, but it is their "right". Taking issue with the bible or even biblical literalism makes you contradict yourself - look where you have chosen to live? Guess where the basis of the law comes from?
    To clarify my opinion of you, this earlier post of yours filled me with chills! Your subsequent posts have done nothing to alleviate my opinion. How old are you really?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucas Davies
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Personally, I decry no man's religion. I've recently been studying the video of Starboy by the Canadian pop genius The Weeknd in which some Christian symbolism is vividly portrayed. You can watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34Na4j8AVgA. Would anyone care to share their interpretation of this symbolism that is so cleverly contrasted by the capitalist, hedonistic nature of the lyrics?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Daswani
    replied
    Re: Trump

    He wasn't going after a Christian. He was going after a racist who happened to be a Christian. The fact that he's a Christian is irrelevant. Why do you think everyone is out to get you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mavros Whissell
    replied
    Re: Trump

    At least Lucas post was remotely funny. But still a typical atheist attack. Typical to go after Christians. No mention of the horrors committed by ISIS, or anything like that. Much worse to be a biblical literalist. Much easier to talk about and make fun of, as there are no repercussions. Oh no, I might forgive you to death.

    Its a bit spineless and entirely typical of the atheist approach. If you are going to attack or mock, do it across the board. Not doing so clearly shows that you are anti-Christian. Attacking the Jewish faith I know is something you are terrified of. That community has a powerful voice and is not afraid to stand up immediately to anyone as they should be. So Christians would be smart to do the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucas Davies
    replied
    Re: Trump

    https://twitter.com/GovMikeHuckabee/...31958660325376

    Checkmate, atheists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by ben daswani View Post
    Awww...shit for brains doesn't have a counter argument.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Daswani
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    You fucking moron crook, if you knew the correct word you would of said "Akin to LIBEL". About the only Racist around here is you. As for your Pro Bono work thats about all it would be worth. Your arguments are idiotic, what the fuck?? Did God shit in your brain and forget to flush??? Oh....maybe not according to you no God, you were just born a shit head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by ben daswani View Post
    I didn't say something was "slander." I said it was "akin to slander." You do know what the word "akin" means, right? Then again, you've demonstrated in this thread that you can't spell "existence," you don't know the difference between "then" and "than," and you apparently have difficulty reading multi-syllabic words such as "rantings." But go ahead, take more cheap shots at my lingual acumen, you semi-literate sympathizer to racists.
    You fucking moron crook, if you knew the correct word you would of said "Akin to LIBEL". About the only Racist around here is you. As for your Pro Bono work thats about all it would be worth. Your arguments are idiotic, what the fuck?? Did God shit in your brain and forget to flush??? Oh....maybe not according to you no God, you were just born a shit head.
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 7th May, 2017, 08:55 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Daswani
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by Mavros Whissell View Post
    Wow you must be his servant, the disinterested reader who is a 100-odd posts into the thread and decides to randomly jump in - right. Cutting me up for written vs. spoken. Good on you, its all the same to me. Lies.
    Yes, everybody who points out that you're a racist is my "servant." Don't worry, this is all just a vast liberal conspiracy against you. You're totally not a fucking idiot or anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Daswani
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    Interestingly Ben also used the term slander incorrectly earlier in this thread, you know, the guy with the perfect score in LSATs who apparently is now starting his career as a lawyer for the oppressed in Kansas. Looks like his LSAT score and his law degree and .50 cents might buy you a cup of coffee.
    I didn't say something was "slander." I said it was "akin to slander." You do know what the word "akin" means, right? Then again, you've demonstrated in this thread that you can't spell "existence," you don't know the difference between "then" and "than," and you apparently have difficulty reading multi-syllabic words such as "rantings." But go ahead, take more cheap shots at my lingual acumen, you semi-literate sympathizer to racists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mavros Whissell
    replied
    Re: Trump

    Originally posted by fred harvey View Post
    Oh dear....I think you mean libel, lol! More silly work......
    Wow you must be his servant, the disinterested reader who is a 100-odd posts into the thread and decides to randomly jump in - right. Cutting me up for written vs. spoken. Good on you, its all the same to me. Lies.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X