2017 CYCC & Canadian Open - ssmchess.ca

[Hal Bond]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Girls

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U8 Girls
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Lucy Gao 1167 W5 D4 W10 W3 W2 W8 W6 6.5 113 24.5 3
2 Lily Ma 820 W6 W10 W3 W4 L1 W5 W8 6.0 113 25 4
3 Jin Rong (Winnie) Zhuang 1082 W7 W8 L2 L1 W4 W9 W5 5.0 118 26 3
4 Helena Jin 790 W11 D1 W8 L2 L3 W7 B--- 4.5 96 23.5 3
5 Alina Chen 670 L1 W11 W9 W7 W6 L2 L3 4.0 105 26 4
6 Jocelyn Liao 402 L2 D7 W11 W9 L5 B--- L1 3.5 91 16 3
7 Daniella Li 648 L3 D6 B--- L5 W11 L4 W10 3.5 78 13 4
8 Alice Ran 690 W9 L3 L4 W10 B--- L1 L2 3.0 103 19 3
9 Milana Inozemtseva unr. L8 B--- L5 L6 W10 L3 W11 3.0 74 11.5 3
10 Catherine Zhao unr. B--- L2 L1 L8 L9 W11 L7 2.0 86 14.5 3
11 Maia Chertkow unr. L4 L5 L6 B--- L7 L10 L9 1.0 76 14 2

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U10 Girls
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Kate Jiang 875 W2 W8 W11 W3 D4 W5 L6 5.5 126.5 28 4
2 Michelle Hua 1461 L1 D5 W14 W10 W11 W3 W4 5.5 124 26 4
3 Dania Surya 918 W14 W10 W4 L1 W7 L2 W8 5.0 121 27 3
4 Faina Pobereshnikova 893 W9 W6 L3 W12 D1 W7 L2 4.5 121.5 28 3
5 Amy Ai 1260 D7 D2 W15 D11 W6 L1 W10 4.5 117 26 4
6 Emilia Vozian 1071 W16 L4 D10 W14 L5 W13 W1 4.5 100 22.5 4
7 Joyce Zhang 863 D5 D12 W9 W8 L3 L4 W15 4.0 111 24.5 4
8 Isabelle Knowles 1047 W13 L1 W17 L7 W15 W9 L3 4.0 101 23 4
9 Sarah Chi 691 L4 B--- L7 W16 W12 L8 W14 4.0 79 19 3
10 Jodie Liao 800 W12 L3 D6 L2 W17 W11 L5 3.5 105 20 3
11 Alexz Ksenych 931 W15 W17 L1 D5 L2 L10 B--- 3.5 92.5 16.5 3
12 Joyce Deng 1000 L10 D7 W13 L4 L9 B--- W16 3.5 77.5 15 3
13 Anne-Marie Boucher 817 L8 L14 L12 B--- W16 L6 W17 3.0 64.5 11 2
14 Kaitlyn Tao 778 L3 W13 L2 L6 B--- D15 L9 2.5 87.5 18 3
15 Audrey Siahou 794 L11 W16 L5 W17 L8 D14 L7 2.5 87 15 3
16 Sophie Carrier 821 L6 L15 B--- L9 L13 W17 L12 2.0 63.5 12 3
17 Ella White unr. B--- L11 L8 L15 L10 L16 L13 1.0 70.5 13 3

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U12 Girls
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Mysha Gilani 1484 W9 W5 D2 D3 D4 W6 W7 5.5 107 26.5 4
2 Julia Tsukerman 1371 W4 W7 D1 W6 D3 D5 W10 5.5 102 26.5 3
3 Isamel Shen 1538 W7 W6 L4 D1 D2 W10 W8 5.0 102.5 25 4
4 Anna Van 1720 L2 W10 W3 W8 D1 W9 L5 4.5 93.5 23 3
5 Joey Qiao 1460 W8 L1 L6 D7 W9 D2 W4 4.0 106.5 25 4
6 Haotong Hazel Guo 1388 W10 L3 W5 L2 W8 L1 W9 4.0 93.5 23 3
7 Jezzel Farkas 1326 L3 L2 W9 D5 W10 W8 L1 3.5 93.5 17.5 3
8 Natasha Belleau 860 L5 W9 W10 L4 L6 L7 L3 2.0 84 17 3
9 Aili Laird 982 L1 L8 L7 W10 L5 L4 L6 1.0 93.5 18 4
10 Morganne Vielleux-Michaud unr. L6 L4 L8 L9 L7 L3 L2 0.0 104 20 4

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U14 Girls
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[R] TBrk[K]
1 Svitlana Demchenko 2224 W7 W4 U--- W5 W2 W3 W6 6.0 18 3
2 Kylie Tan 1626 W3 W6 W7 D4 L1 D5 U--- 4.0 10 1.5
3 Sasha Chertkow 1232 L2 U--- W6 W7 W4 L1 W5 4.0 9 1
4 Elena Yang 1607 U--- L1 W5 D2 L3 W6 W7 3.5 7.25 0.5
5 Isabelle Wang 1341 W6 W7 L4 L1 U--- D2 L3 2.5 4.25 0.5
6 Gloria Liu 954 L5 L2 L3 U--- W7 L4 L1 1.0 0.5 0
7 Emma Etchells-Foisy unr. L1 L5 L2 L3 L6 U--- L4 0.0 0 0

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U18 - U16 Girls
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Ellen Tao 16 1490 W8 W3 L4 D2 W10 W5 W6 5.5 104 25.5 4
2 Jiaying Wang unr. D4 W10 W5 D1 W3 D6 W7 5.5 103.5 26.5 3
3 Andrea Botez 16 1887 W7 L1 W6 W4 L2 W8 W9 5.0 103 24.5 3
4 Khrystyna Borysenko 16 1437 D2 W7 W1 L3 D6 W9 W8 5.0 103 24.5 3
5 Agniya Pobereshnikova 1579 W9 D6 L2 W7 W8 L1 W10 4.5 84 20.5 4
6 Rachel Tao 1682 W10 D5 L3 W9 D4 D2 L1 3.5 103.5 21 3
7 Pepi Eirew 16 1078 L3 L4 W8 L5 W9 W10 L2 3.0 92.5 17.5 4
8 Daphnee Veilleux-Michaud 16 unr. L1 W9 L7 W10 L5 L3 L4 2.0 92 18.5 4
9 Lisette Barrette unr. L5 L8 W10 L6 L7 L4 L3 1.0 92.5 18 4
10 Mackenzie Belanger 643 L6 L2 L9 L8 L1 L7 L5 0.0 102 19.5 3

[Hal Bond]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U8 Open
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Johnathan Han 869 W21 W4 W7 W2 L3 W14 W9 6.0 138 28.5 3
2 Anand Rishi Chandra 1711 W17 W5 W10 L1 W8 W3 W7 6.0 136 29 3
3 Ryan Yang 1267 W19 W14 W16 W9 W1 L2 W4 6.0 135 28 4
4 Ethan Song 1315 W11 L1 W18 W10 W9 W7 L3 5.0 136.5 28 3
5 Alex Xu 881 W22 L2 W15 L7 W19 W8 W11 5.0 107.5 24.5 4
6 Gabriel Li 813 L13 W28 W25 L8 W18 W10 W14 5.0 88 20 3
7 Eric Liu 1152 W23 W18 L1 W5 W13 L4 L2 4.0 126.5 29 3
8 Matheo Huard 1292 L15 W20 W19 W6 L2 L5 W13 4.0 113.5 26 3
9 Sean Ran 906 W28 W13 W24 L3 L4 W15 L1 4.0 113 26 4
10 Drew Ksenych 954 W26 W15 L2 L4 W16 L6 W20 4.0 110 26 4
11 Daniel Pugach 748 L4 W22 L13 W23 W21 W16 L5 4.0 96 23 4
12 Winston Huang 586 L16 L24 W22 L15 W27 W26 W19 4.0 68 16.5 4
13 Denis K Dupuis 1354 W6 L9 W11 D14 L7 W17 L8 3.5 119 19.5 4
14 Luca Georgescu-nicolau 877 W27 L3 W23 D13 W17 L1 L6 3.5 111 20 3
15 Rut Jurry de Leon 736 W8 L10 L5 W12 W24 L9 D18 3.5 105.5 19.5 3
16 Richard Wang 1008 W12 W25 L3 D17 L10 L11 W24 3.5 101 17.5 3
17 Arnav Mane 829 L2 W26 W20 D16 L14 L13 W23 3.5 99.5 15.5 4
18 Aiden Taylor 718 W29 L7 L4 W20 L6 W21 D15 3.5 94.5 18.5 4
19 William Jiang 659 L3 W27 L8 W25 L5 W24 L12 3.0 93 17.5 3
20 Xiuqi (Arthur) Wang 634 W24 L8 L17 L18 W25 W23 L10 3.0 87.5 16.5 3
21 Caden Shen unr. L1 L23 W28 W22 L11 L18 W27 3.0 73 14 3
22 Nicolas Brunet unr. L5 L11 L12 L21 W28 W27 W25 3.0 66.5 14 4
23 Kingsley Bai 652 L7 W21 L14 L11 W26 L20 L17 2.0 93.5 18.5 4
24 Henry Deng 1014 L20 W12 L9 W26 L15 L19 L16 2.0 91 18.5 4
25 Rhys Pearson unr. B--- L16 L6 L19 L20 W28 L22 2.0 63.5 13 3
26 Andrew Li unr. L10 L17 W27 L24 L23 L12 D28 1.5 65.5 13 3
27 Tye Turco unr. L14 L19 L26 W28 L12 L22 L21 1.0 62 14.5 4
28 Chase Mcintyre unr. L9 L6 L21 L27 L22 L25 D26 0.5 70.5 14 4
29 Leo Lin 1285 L18 U--- U--- U--- U--- U--- U--- 0.0 13.5 0 0

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U10 Open
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Kevin Zhong 1810 W21 W20 W3 D2 W10 D5 W4 6.0 148 30.5 4
2 Max Chen 1974 W45 W22 W13 D1 W11 D4 W6 6.0 135.5 29 3
3 Andrii Borysenko 1425 W42 W36 L1 W33 W31 W15 W5 6.0 124.5 24.5 4
4 Prince Eric Jr. Guipi Bopala 1814 W34 W12 W18 W7 D5 D2 L1 5.0 143 30.5 3
5 Eric Ning 1922 W32 W16 W6 W31 D4 D1 L3 5.0 142.5 29.5 3
6 Youhe Huang 1448 W9 W23 L5 W30 W14 W12 L2 5.0 136 29 4
7 Daniel Xu 1941 W47 W14 W8 L4 L12 W30 W10 5.0 128 26.5 4
8 Vishruth Sharma 1719 W37 W26 L7 L12 W32 W20 W11 5.0 117 24.5 3
9 Sam Ripley 876 L6 W52 D24 D26 W36 W42 W22 5.0 95 22 4
10 Jeffrey R. Zhao 1520 W33 W24 D11 W13 L1 W16 L7 4.5 131.5 28.5 3
11 Tigran Ghazarian 1825 W19 W30 D10 W41 L2 W17 L8 4.5 127.5 27 4
12 Daniel Wang 1285 W50 L4 W21 W8 W7 L6 D15 4.5 124.5 28.5 3
13 Henry Liu 1547 W27 W29 L2 L10 W47 W23 D14 4.5 119 26 4
14 William (Zhimao) Gao 1313 W25 L7 W32 W36 L6 W19 D13 4.5 112.5 25.5 3
15 Atharva Srinivas 1383 L41 W28 W45 W20 W23 L3 D12 4.5 111 24.5 4
16 Matthew Zhu 1318 W51 L5 W19 D17 W27 L10 W28 4.5 109 25 4
17 Richard Bocan 1086 W48 L18 W35 D16 W41 L11 W26 4.5 103 22 3
18 Austin Xie 1348 W38 W17 L4 L23 L19 W27 W32 4.0 108 24 4
19 Zhixing (Daniel) Wang 980 L11 W25 L16 W49 W18 L14 W30 4.0 106 24.5 3
20 Noah Nathaniel Yuen 1218 W49 L1 W37 L15 W33 L8 W34 4.0 105.5 24.5 3
21 Hao Chao (Henry) Yuan 961 L1 W46 L12 W43 D26 D24 W36 4.0 104.5 23 3
22 Derek Chen 1336 W44 L2 L41 W35 W34 W31 L9 4.0 102.5 22.5 3
23 Divjot Locham 1119 W52 L6 W42 W18 L15 L13 W33 4.0 101.5 23.5 3
24 Vincent Latorre 1200 W39 L10 D9 L27 W45 D21 W37 4.0 93 23 4
25 Neal Nian Li 565 L14 L19 W54 L29 W48 W47 W31 4.0 81 18.5 3
26 David [Ziye] Wang 1263 W40 L8 D27 D9 D21 W29 L17 3.5 102 20.5 4
27 Stanley Wu 928 L13 W49 D26 W24 L16 L18 W42 3.5 99.5 18.5 3
28 Peter Vo 1362 D35 L15 L31 W44 W46 W41 L16 3.5 94.5 15.5 3
29 Andrew Wang 1196 W53 L13 L33 W25 D42 L26 W41 3.5 87 15.5 3
30 Jonathan Zhang 1278 W46 L11 W34 L6 W37 L7 L19 3.0 111.5 21.5 3
31 Mathieu Beliveau 1097 W43 W38 W28 L5 L3 L22 L25 3.0 103.5 21.5 4
32 Andrew Chen 1009 L5 W50 L14 W38 L8 W46 L18 3.0 102 20.5 3
33 Xinge Xu 910 L10 W54 W29 L3 L20 W43 L23 3.0 98.5 18 4
34 Raf Adrik de Leon 965 L4 W40 L30 W50 L22 W38 L20 3.0 94.5 19 3
35 Shukun He 812 D28 D41 L17 L22 W39 L36 W48 3.0 90.5 17.5 4
36 James Qiu 1152 W54 L3 W48 L14 L9 W35 L21 3.0 89 18 4
37 Yinan Wang 952 L8 W39 L20 W48 L30 W40 L24 3.0 87.5 18.5 4
38 Trent Hodgson 682 L18 L31 W40 L32 W49 L34 W46 3.0 81 16 4
39 Ricky Zhu unr. L24 L37 W44 L42 L35 W49 W47 3.0 70 15 4
40 Aidyn Burrows unr. L26 L34 L38 W54 W51 L37 W45 3.0 61 13 4
41 Noah Ripley 814 W15 D35 W22 L11 L17 L28 L29 2.5 110.5 23 4
42 Grant Chen 817 L3 W43 L23 W39 D29 L9 L27 2.5 99 21 4
43 Daniel Liu unr. L31 L42 B--- L21 W50 L33 D44 2.5 67.5 13 3
44 Ivan Milardovic 639 L22 L47 L39 L28 W54 W50 D43 2.5 60 12.5 4
45 Cammeron Bitar 1063 L2 W51 L15 L46 L24 W53 L40 2.0 83 17.5 3
46 Alexandre Brunet 356 L30 L21 W47 W45 L28 L32 L38 2.0 80 16.5 4
47 Etienne Parent 1039 L7 W44 L46 W53 L13 L25 L39 2.0 76 18 3
48 Evan Odrich unr. L17 B--- L36 L37 L25 W51 L35 2.0 70.5 15 3
49 Kai Pearson unr. L20 L27 W51 L19 L38 L39 W52 2.0 67.5 16.5 4
50 Warren Yim 441 L12 L32 W52 L34 L43 L44 W54 2.0 58.5 11.5 3
51 Samuel Boucher 616 L16 L45 L49 W52 L40 L48 W53 2.0 52 11.5 3
52 Oliver Smith unr. L23 L9 L50 L51 L53 W54 L49 1.0 53.5 12 3
53 Elijah Beaton unr. L29 U--- U--- L47 W52 L45 L51 1.0 38.5 7 3
54 Bryson Barrow unr. L36 L33 L25 L40 L44 L52 L50 0.0 59.5 14.5 3

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U12 Open
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Patrick Huang 2003 W23 W19 W16 W8 W2 W7 W9 7.0 134 27 3
2 Max Rusonik 1846 W29 W21 W5 W6 L1 D4 W14 5.5 139.5 31 4
3 Aahil Noorali 2043 W30 W18 W4 D7 D5 D8 W10 5.5 136 28.5 3
4 Tony (Dongze) Wu 1734 W36 W20 L3 W17 W14 D2 W7 5.5 133.5 27.5 4
5 Tyler Tanaka 2085 W26 W15 L2 W24 D3 W12 W8 5.5 131.5 27.5 4
6 Dorian Kang 2026 W41 W10 W17 L2 L7 W16 W13 5.0 124.5 26.5 3
7 Ian Zhao 1930 W25 W27 W14 D3 W6 L1 L4 4.5 140 30 4
8 Neil Doknjas 1844 W33 W24 W13 L1 W15 D3 L5 4.5 131.5 29.5 3
9 Jonathan Zhao 1692 W34 L13 W25 W20 D12 W11 L1 4.5 121 27 4
10 Jeffrey Renfei Zhao 1525 W32 L6 W22 W13 D11 W15 L3 4.5 120 27 3
11 Alan Bui 1716 W31 L16 W23 W21 D10 L9 W18 4.5 114 24.5 3
12 Harry Liu 1734 W22 L17 W26 W19 D9 L5 W23 4.5 110.5 25.5 3
13 Nameer Issani 2157 W28 W9 L8 L10 W26 W17 L6 4.0 122 25.5 3
14 Christopher Xiang 1271 W40 W28 L7 W18 L4 W21 L2 4.0 120 26.5 3
15 David Craciun 1617 W42 L5 W29 W16 L8 L10 W26 4.0 112 24.5 3
16 Lucas Yunkun Lu 1299 W45 W11 L1 L15 W38 L6 W27 4.0 110 25.5 4
17 Henry Yang 1318 W44 W12 L6 L4 W29 L13 W30 4.0 104.5 25 3
18 Raymond Gao 1537 W39 L3 W33 L14 W28 W20 L11 4.0 104 24 4
19 Andy Vo 1512 W35 L1 W36 L12 L25 W24 W28 4.0 103 24 4
20 Xiaoyu (Charles) Ran 1300 W38 L4 W40 L9 W31 L18 W29 4.0 98 22 3
21 Kevin Butchart 1363 W46 L2 W39 L11 W36 L14 W25 4.0 92.5 21.5 4
22 Vaamanan Mugunthan 865 L12 W44 L10 L38 W39 W32 W36 4.0 77 18.5 4
23 Pranoy Mukherjee 1048 L1 W35 L11 W42 D24 W25 L12 3.5 107.5 18.5 4
24 Savio Joseph Benher 1344 W43 L8 W32 L5 D23 L19 W37 3.5 97 17.5 3
25 Jacob Gaisinsky 943 L7 W37 L9 W32 W19 L23 L21 3.0 107 21.5 3
26 Anirud Chakkoli 1174 L5 W42 L12 W27 L13 W34 L15 3.0 105.5 21 4
27 Alexander Stopic 1502 W37 L7 D31 L26 W41 D30 L16 3.0 90.5 17.5 3
28 Roger Guo 1230 L13 L14 W46 W34 L18 W31 L19 3.0 89.5 20 3
29 Justin Greco 918 L2 W46 L15 W39 L17 W42 L20 3.0 89 18.5 4
30 Richard Feng 1164 L3 L39 W44 D31 W37 D27 L17 3.0 84.5 15 4
31 Kevin Shi 799 L11 W45 D27 D30 L20 L28 W40 3.0 80 15 4
32 Alexander Sotnikov 651 L10 W41 L24 L25 W33 L22 W43 3.0 79 17.5 4
33 Jack Schaffner 898 L8 W43 L18 L37 L32 W38 W44 3.0 75 14 3
34 Justin Yim 748 L9 L40 W43 L28 W45 L26 W38 3.0 66.5 12 3
35 Kevin Li unr. L19 L23 L38 W44 L43 W45 W41 3.0 53.5 10.5 3
36 Marc-Antoine Brunet 850 L4 W38 L19 W40 L21 D37 L22 2.5 91 18 3
37 Jacky Men unr. L27 L25 W41 W33 L30 D36 L24 2.5 78 16.5 4
38 Jimmy Schell unr. L20 L36 W35 W22 L16 L33 L34 2.0 81 19.5 4
39 David Eirew 678 L18 W30 L21 L29 L22 L43 W45 2.0 76 16.5 3
40 William Love unr. L14 W34 L20 L36 L42 B--- L31 2.0 74.5 15 3
41 Ethan Guenette 1073 L6 L32 L37 W43 L27 W44 L35 2.0 68.5 14 4
42 Clarin Xavier Joseph 711 L15 L26 W45 L23 W40 L29 U--- 2.0 64.5 11.5 4
43 Thomas Copps unr. L24 L33 L34 L41 W35 W39 L32 2.0 62.5 16 4
44 An Cheng Wang unr. L17 L22 L30 L35 B--- L41 L33 1.0 62 15 3
45 Eathen Baranyai unr. L16 L31 L42 B--- L34 L35 L39 1.0 59.5 13.5 3
46 Austin Hookimaw unr. L21 L29 L28 U--- U--- U--- U--- 0.0 39 6 1

[Hal Bond]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U14 Open
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Rohan Talukdar 2265 W16 W5 D4 W8 D2 W14 W6 6.0 141 29 4
2 Nicholas Vettese 2234 W20 W11 W13 D6 D1 W9 W3 6.0 138 28.5 3
3 Eugene Hua 2358 W23 W9 D7 D10 W5 W6 L2 5.0 137 29 3
4 Benito Surya 1994 W35 W18 D1 L7 D10 W12 W16 5.0 123 27 3
5 Richard Feng 1866 W36 L1 W23 W19 L3 W17 W14 5.0 116.5 26 4
6 Qiuyu Huang 2239 W24 W21 W15 D2 W7 L3 L1 4.5 135.5 29 3
7 Adam Gaisinsky 2056 W29 W14 D3 W4 L6 D11 D8 4.5 134.5 27.5 4
8 Henry Zhang 2108 W26 W19 W12 L1 L9 W18 D7 4.5 127 27 3
9 Alec Chung 1799 W28 L3 W20 W17 W8 L2 D13 4.5 123.5 27 4
10 Kevin (Yihuan) Bu 1981 W25 L13 W16 D3 D4 W19 D11 4.5 121.5 26.5 4
11 Callum Lehingrat 1794 W27 L2 W24 W18 D12 D7 D10 4.5 119.5 26 3
12 Arhant Washimkar 1922 W22 W17 L8 W13 D11 L4 D15 4.0 121.5 26 4
13 Aidan Mirabelli 1453 W31 W10 L2 L12 W26 D15 D9 4.0 117 26 3
14 Arul Papneja 1682 W37 L7 W26 W15 W21 L1 L5 4.0 114 26 3
15 Kaixin Wang 1957 W34 W30 L6 L14 W20 D13 D12 4.0 106 23 3
16 Ethan Eckert 1239 L1 W36 L10 W27 W30 W28 L4 4.0 100 24 4
17 William Xu 1283 W33 L12 W30 L9 W35 L5 W27 4.0 96 21 3
18 David Makarczyk 1414 W39 L4 W33 L11 W22 L8 W23 4.0 95 22.5 4
19 Joseph Liao 1674 W32 L8 W39 L5 W25 L10 W24 4.0 90.5 22 4
20 Brian Yang 1194 L2 W27 L9 W36 L15 W30 D21 3.5 104.5 17.5 3
21 Jonas Dornieden 1729 W38 L6 D25 W29 L14 D23 D20 3.5 91.5 16.5 4
22 Jingran [Matt] Huang 1015 L12 L23 W37 W24 L18 D26 W35 3.5 85.5 15 3
23 Brett Yang 1247 L3 W22 L5 D25 W29 D21 L18 3.0 105.5 22 4
24 Kevin Zhang 1205 L6 W28 L11 L22 W39 W25 L19 3.0 95.5 18.5 4
25 Jungmin Shinn 1079 L10 W31 D21 D23 L19 L24 W36 3.0 86 18 3
26 Simon Cloutier 1163 L8 W38 L14 W39 L13 D22 D28 3.0 86 16 4
27 Christopher Renard 908 L11 L20 W32 L16 W34 W35 L17 3.0 82 18.5 4
28 Cole Cyrenne 993 L9 L24 D31 W37 W36 L16 D26 3.0 77 16 3
29 Daniel Xie 1102 L7 D37 W35 L21 L23 W32 D31 3.0 76.5 14.5 4
30 Liam Schultz unr. B--- L15 L17 W31 L16 L20 W37 3.0 74 15.5 3
31 Shawn (Haofeng) Chen unr. L13 L25 D28 L30 B--- W37 D29 3.0 66.5 13 3
32 Nicholas Grant 550 L19 L35 L27 B--- D33 L29 W39 2.5 59 10.5 3
33 Ayush Patel unr. L17 B--- L18 L35 D32 L36 W38 2.5 57.5 11 3
34 Oleg Sher 1022 L15 U--- U--- D38 L27 W39 B--- 2.5 35.5 4.5 2
35 Alexander Laird 1101 L4 W32 L29 W33 L17 L27 L22 2.0 80.5 17.5 4
36 Milo Eirew 996 L5 L16 W38 L20 L28 W33 L25 2.0 78.5 16.5 4
37 Eghosa Asemota 799 L14 D29 L22 L28 W38 L31 L30 1.5 71.5 15.5 3
38 Quenton Ketterer 818 L21 L26 L36 D34 L37 B--- L33 1.5 51 11.5 3
39 Adam Iacucci unr. L18 B--- L19 L26 L24 L34 L32 1.0 64 15 2

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U16 Open
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 Richard Chen 2330 W12 W4 W2 D6 D3 W9 W5 6.0 127 27 3
2 Hairan Liang 2186 W18 W9 L1 W5 W10 W3 W7 6.0 125 26 4
3 Joshua Doknjas 2197 W13 W11 D5 W7 D1 L2 W6 5.0 130.5 27.5 4
4 Eric M Li 1992 W10 L1 L7 W18 W13 D6 W9 4.5 115.5 24 4
5 Jeffrey Xu 2125 W8 W14 D3 L2 D7 W10 L1 4.0 131 28.5 4
6 Jeff Wang 1939 W15 D7 W11 D1 D9 D4 L3 4.0 124 26.5 3
7 Zhanhe (Lambert) Liu 2188 W16 D6 W4 L3 D5 W14 L2 4.0 122.5 26.5 4
8 Blake Horner 1161 L5 W20 D13 L9 W18 D11 W15 4.0 82 19 4
9 Chenxi Wu 1904 W17 L2 W16 W8 D6 L1 L4 3.5 114 21.5 3
10 William Bremner 1104 L4 W12 W19 W14 L2 L5 D11 3.5 99 18 4
11 Zachary Saine 1966 W19 L3 L6 W16 D12 D8 D10 3.5 92.5 17.5 3
12 Zi Yu Guan 1478 L1 L10 W20 D13 D11 D17 D14 3.0 88.5 16.5 3
13 Matthew Chertkow 1448 L3 W19 D8 D12 L4 D15 D17 3.0 84.5 19 3
14 Joey (Junhe) Zhou 1563 W20 L5 W18 L10 D15 L7 D12 3.0 82.5 16 4
15 Kaden Rashid 987 L6 L16 W17 W19 D14 D13 L8 3.0 79.5 17.5 3
16 Dylan Fox 1270 L7 W15 L9 L11 L17 W20 W18 3.0 78 15.5 4
17 Eric Zhao 928 L9 L18 L15 W20 W16 D12 D13 3.0 68 14.5 3
18 Brian Butchart 1248 L2 W17 L14 L4 L8 W19 L16 2.0 87 19 3
19 Jose Java 1005 L11 L13 L10 L15 W20 L18 B--- 2.0 61 12 3
20 Nathan Larivee 799 L14 L8 L12 L17 L19 L16 U--- 0.0 58 13.5 3

SwissSys Standings. 2017 CYCC: U18 Open
# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]
1 John Doknjas 2281 W10 D4 D2 D6 W7 W3 W8 5.5 125 26.5 3
2 Diwen Shi 2278 W15 D7 D1 W12 D5 W4 D3 5.0 125.5 26.5 4
3 Joey Zhong 2156 W9 W13 W6 W7 D4 L1 D2 5.0 121.5 27 3
4 Jonathan Hay 1940 W12 D1 D5 W15 D3 L2 W6 4.5 128.5 27 4
5 Andrew Colvin 1905 W17 D10 D4 W9 D2 D6 D7 4.5 104 24.5 3
6 Vincent Greeson 1786 W16 W8 L3 D1 W9 D5 L4 4.0 122 27.5 3
7 Caleb Petersen 2107 W14 D2 W8 L3 L1 W11 D5 4.0 116.5 27 3
8 Brendan Adamo 2166 W11 L6 L7 W13 W15 W12 L1 4.0 102.5 22 4
9 Michael McGovern 1160 L3 W17 W13 L5 L6 W16 W12 4.0 101.5 20.5 4
10 Kole Robertson 1680 L1 D5 L12 W14 L11 B--- W17 3.5 75 14 3
11 Alexandre Renaud 1168 L8 L12 D14 B--- W10 L7 W13 3.5 74 15 3
12 Joshua Brousseau 1021 L4 W11 W10 L2 W16 L8 L9 3.0 97 20 3
13 Richard Thibault unr. B--- L3 L9 L8 W17 W15 L11 3.0 79.5 14.5 3
14 Andrew Situ 1028 L7 L15 D11 L10 B--- D17 W16 3.0 61 11 3
15 Sihao Ban 1566 L2 W14 W16 L4 L8 L13 U--- 2.0 82 15 3
16 Jean-Sebastian Michel unr. L6 B--- L15 W17 L12 L9 L14 2.0 69.5 13 3
17 Daniel Cloutier 992 L5 L9 B--- L16 L13 D14 L10 1.5 69 13.5 4

[Gary Hua]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

Thanks to Tournament Organizer Roman Peredun and team, Tournament Arbiter Hal Bond and Aris Marghetis and all the volunteers and all the participants, we had a great CYCC this year again. With more than 260 players this, this actually bettered the number of players than last year ( <260 players ). Great and well organized tournament without any controversies.

Cheers and congratulations to all the winners and for those who did not succeed, please try again in Quebec next year. July 1-5, 2018

For the winners ( official players ) who wants to go to WCCC ( Brazil ), please email to WCCC2017_Canada@hotmail.com ( 6 official players ). Her name is Anabelle Kovatcheva

And for those who wants to go to WYCC ( Uruguay ), please email to edcwtao@gmail.com ( 6 official players ). Her name is Christina Tao.

They are the Head of Delegation of both teams.

Some of the players are heading to NAYCC to be held in New Jersey from July 12-16,2017.

Cheers to Chess in Canada

[Rene Preotu]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

Any play-off results?

[Aris Marghetis]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

Any play-off results?

The text "TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]" indicates there was computer tiebreaks. I believe that we haven't had playoffs at the CYCC since Montreal (four? CYCCs ago).

[Rene Preotu]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

The text "TBrk[O] TBrk[M] TBrk[T]" indicates there was computer tiebreaks. I believe that we haven't had playoffs at the CYCC since Montreal (four? CYCCs ago).

Thank you Aris. The website shows "Tiebreaks TBA"

[Andrew Peredun]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

CYCC Final Standings as well as Standings and Pairings for the Canadian Open are now available on www.ssmchess.ca.

[Andrew Peredun]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

Canadian Open scoresheets now available at https://goo.gl/a3KoM5 or follow the link from our homepage at www.ssmchess.ca.

[Andrew Peredun]

Re: CYCC Final Standings, Open II

CYCC Bughouse Champions: Nicholas Vettese & Aidan Mirabelli

CYCC Blitz Champion: Adam Gaisinsky

[Morgon Mills]

Re: 2017 CYCC &amp; Canadian Open - ssmchess.ca

Hi:

The pairings for round 9 are incorrect. I should not have a forced bye, as I have more points than Michael Barron. Please correct or clarify.
I have also messaged the SSM Chess Facebook group and emailed info@ssmchess.ca about this, but I do not have direct contact information for the arbiters. Thank you.

-Morgon

[Pierre Denommee]

Re: 2017 CYCC &amp; Canadian Open - ssmchess.ca

Hi:

The pairings for round 9 are incorrect. I should not have a forced bye, as I have more points than Michael Barron. Please correct or clarify.
I have also messaged the SSM Chess Facebook group and emailed info@ssmchess.ca about this, but I do not have direct contact information for the arbiters. Thank you.

-Morgon

The myth that the pairing allocated byes goes to the player with the lowest score in the last score group shall be destroyed.

Here is what the official text says

A.5

Byes

See C.04.1.c (Should the number of players to be paired be odd, one player is unpaired. This player receives a pairing-allocated bye: no opponent, no colour and as many points as are rewarded for a win, unless the regulations of the tournament state otherwise).

FIDE does not indicate any method to determine the bye, it just says that after the best possible pairing has been found, one player will remain unpaired ans this player will get the bye.



The following is very technical


A.9

Round-Pairing Outlook


The pairing of a round (called round-pairing) is complete if all the players (except at most one, who receives the pairing-allocated bye) have been paired and the absolute criteria C1-C3 have been complied with.
If it is impossible to complete a round-pairing, the arbiter shall decide what to do. Otherwise, the pairing process starts with the top scoregroup, and continues bracket by bracket until all the scoregroups, in descending order, have been used and the round-pairing is complete.

However, if, during this process, the downfloaters (possibly none) produced by the bracket just paired, together with all the remaining players, do not allow the completion of the round-pairing, a different processing route is followed. The last paired bracket is called Penultimate Pairing Bracket (PPB). The score of its resident players is called the "collapsing" score. All the players with a score lower than the collapsing score constitute the special "collapsed" scoregroup mentioned in A.3.
The pairing process resumes with the re-pairing of the PPB. Its downfloaters, together with the players of the collapsed scoregroup, constitute the Collapsed Last Bracket (CLB), the pairing of which will complete the round-pairing.
Note: Independently from the route followed, the assignment of the pairing-allocated bye (see C.2) is part of the pairing of the last bracket.

In lays man terms, if it is impossible to pair the score bracket containing the players with 2 points, a fusions of the players with 2 and 2.5 will be made, If this is still insufficient, we put together all the players with 2, 2.5 and 3 and the process continues until a legal pairing can be found. Ounce a score bracket has become heterogeneous, there is absolutely no guarantee that the pairing allocated bye will go he the lowest score.

I would also add that no player can receive more then one pairing allocated bye per tournament and that some players could be legally prevented from downfloating.

Trivial example

BWB 2000 BWB 1750
BWB 1800 WBW 1500
_________WBW 1200

The 1750 would be FIDE first choice for the pairing allocated bye because in this score bracket, three players want to play with White and two players wants to play with Black. Elementary mathematics demonstrate trivially that in order to give each player is due colour, the bye has to be given to a player who want to play White and the 1750 is the lowest of such players. FIDE has no problem giving the bye to the 2000 in complex situations where many of those players have already played together. The first priority is to give as many players as possible their due colours while complying with all the rules. After the best possible compliant optimization of the pairings has been found, a player will remain unpaired, nobody can predict in advance who he will be.

http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.ht...0&view=article

[Neil Frarey]

Re: 2017 CYCC &amp; Canadian Open - ssmchess.ca

The myth that the pairing allocated byes goes to the player with the lowest score in the last score group shall be destroyed.

Here is what the official text says

A.5

Byes

See C.04.1.c (Should the number of players to be paired be odd, one player is unpaired. This player receives a pairing-allocated bye: no opponent, no colour and as many points as are rewarded for a win, unless the regulations of the tournament state otherwise).

FIDE does not indicate any method to determine the bye, it just says that after the best possible pairing has been found, one player will remain unpaired ans this player will get the bye.



The following is very technical


A.9

Round-Pairing Outlook


The pairing of a round (called round-pairing) is complete if all the players (except at most one, who receives the pairing-allocated bye) have been paired and the absolute criteria C1-C3 have been complied with.
If it is impossible to complete a round-pairing, the arbiter shall decide what to do. Otherwise, the pairing process starts with the top scoregroup, and continues bracket by bracket until all the scoregroups, in descending order, have been used and the round-pairing is complete.

However, if, during this process, the downfloaters (possibly none) produced by the bracket just paired, together with all the remaining players, do not allow the completion of the round-pairing, a different processing route is followed. The last paired bracket is called Penultimate Pairing Bracket (PPB). The score of its resident players is called the "collapsing" score. All the players with a score lower than the collapsing score constitute the special "collapsed" scoregroup mentioned in A.3.
The pairing process resumes with the re-pairing of the PPB. Its downfloaters, together with the players of the collapsed scoregroup, constitute the Collapsed Last Bracket (CLB), the pairing of which will complete the round-pairing.
Note: Independently from the route followed, the assignment of the pairing-allocated bye (see C.2) is part of the pairing of the last bracket.

In lays man terms, if it is impossible to pair the score bracket containing the players with 2 points, a fusions of the players with 2 and 2.5 will be made, If this is still insufficient, we put together all the players with 2, 2.5 and 3 and the process continues until a legal pairing can be found. Ounce a score bracket has become heterogeneous, there is absolutely no guarantee that the pairing allocated bye will go he the lowest score.

I would also add that no player can receive more then one pairing allocated bye per tournament and that some players could be legally prevented from downfloating.

Trivial example

BWB 2000 BWB 1750
BWB 1800 WBW 1500
_________WBW 1200

The 1750 would be FIDE first choice for the pairing allocated bye because in this score bracket, three players want to play with White and two players wants to play with Black. Elementary mathematics demonstrate trivially that in order to give each player is due colour, the bye has to be given to a player who want to play White and the 1750 is the lowest of such players. FIDE has no problem giving the bye to the 2000 in complex situations where many of those players have already played together. The first priority is to give as many players as possible their due colours while complying with all the rules. After the best possible compliant optimization of the pairings has been found, a player will remain unpaired, nobody can predict in advance who he will be.

http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.ht...0&view=article

Are you still an Arbiter?

[Morgon Mills]

Re: 2017 CYCC &amp; Canadian Open - ssmchess.ca

Thank you or your response, Pierre. The current pairings are:

11. Fradkin (3.5) - Dougherty (3.5)
12. Shen (3.5) - Chakkoli (2.0)
13. Barron (2.5) - Zhang (2.5)
BYE - MILLS (3.0)

Why not:

11. Fradkin (3.5) - Shen (3.5)
12. Dougherty (3.5) - Zhang (2.5)
13. Mills (3.0) - Chakkoli (2.0)
BYE - Barron (2.5)

The latter pairings are clearly superior. The bye goes to the correct player, and no players are paired with people 1.5 points above/below them. I'm not sure about colours, as the crosstable doesn't record them, but it's an odd-numbered round, so most players are at 4-4 anyway, so there's some combination that should work.

[Hugh Brodie]

Re: CYCC Standings after Round 5 - Open II

I guess you could submit an appeal to the tournament Appeals Committee. :-)