If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
The tournament calendar is starting to get crowded.
So far, we have these tourneys for early spring:
1. U.S. Championships Mar. 27-Apr. 11
2. Korchoi Zurich Apr. 12-17
3. Grenke Karlsruhe/Baden Baden Apr. 15-22
4. Reykjavik Open Apr. 19-27
to which we can add the Gashimov Memorial, Shamkir 2017 which will take place Apr. 20-30 with these participants:
Wesley So
Vladimir Kramnik
Sergey Karjakin
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov
Michael Adams
Pentala Harikrishna
Pavel Eljanov
Radoslaw Wojtaszek
Veselin Topalov
Timor Radjabov
While these players are at Shamkir, Carlsen, Caruana and MVL (among others) will be at Grenke. Kramnik will have just finished up at Zurich before being at Shamkir three days later.
An international super-tournament dedicated to the memory of well-known Azerbaijani grandmaster, Europe champion late Vugar Gashimov, will be held the fourth time in a row. 10 strong grandmasters, again rating at high places in FIDE will compete in Vugar Gashimov’s memorial, supported by "Synergy Group" and Azerbaijan Chess Federation. Organizing committee of tournament has already specified the participants’ list.
In the super-tournament along with Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, Teymur Rajabov will take part, Wesley So (USA), former world champion Vladimir Kramnik (Russia), Sergey Karjakin (Russia), Michael Adams (England), Pentala Harikrishna (India), Pavel Eljanov (Ukraine), Radoslav Wojtaszek (Poland) and Bulgarian world champion Veselin Topalov.
The favorite of the rating of XXI category tournament will be the representative of the USA - Wesley So. The grandmaster is currently occupying the second place in the league table of the international chess federation, with an ELO of 2822.
Farid Huseynov - Director of the Vugar Gashimov memorial's, the Chairman of the Shamkir Chess 2017 Organizing Committee, has expressed his belief that the competition will be held at the high level:
«Dedicated to Vugar Gashimov " Shamkir Chess” tournament has become a tradition. The super-tournament, in which famous chess players participate, is organized in Shamkir for the fourth time. The main purpose of the tournament is to honor the memory of Vugar Gashimov, as well as to support the development of chess in Azerbaijan.
The strongest grandmasters will compete for victory in Shamkir. We believe that this time again the interesting chess parties and uncompromising fight are waiting for chess amateurs. Remaining faithful to its corporative social responsibility policy "Synergy Group" pays great attention to the holding of this tournament.
Gathering with famous chess players in Shamkir every year has become a tradition. Shamkir is almost included to the list of the chess cities of the world. Foreign players have always appreciated the organization of the competitions, and compared the ShamkirChess tournament to competitions like Wijk-aan- Zee and Linares which have a rich history. We believe that ShamkirChess 2017 tournament will also be held at the highest level.
One should remember that in 2014 and 2015, the winner of tournament was world champion Magnus Carlsen (Norway). In the last year’s tournament Azerbaijani chess player Shakhriyar Mamedyarov won the first place.
The grand opening ceremony will be in Heyder Aliyev Center in Shamkir on 20th of April. 9-round tournament will end on April the 30th.
The press service of the tournament ShamkirChess2017
The rounds are scheduled daily from 15:00 local time, which is 7 a.m. Toronto/Montreal time.
April 20 - 18.30 - Opening ceremony and drawing of lots
April 21 - 15.00 - Round 1
April 22 - 15.00 - Round 2
April 23 - 15.00 - Round 3
April 24 - 15.00 - Round 4
April 25 - 15.00 - Round 5
April 26 – Free day
April 27 - 15.00 - Round 6
April 28 - 15.00 - Round 7
April 29 - 15.00 - Round 8
April 30 - 14.00 - Round 9, Closing ceremony
_________
Time Control – 120 minutes for the first 40 moves, 60 minutes for the next 20 moves and then each player will be allotted 15 minutes after the second time control; an increment of 30 seconds per move will be allowed from move 61 onwards
Prizes
1. Place 25000 euro
2. Place 15000 euro
3. Place 12000 euro
4. Place 10000 euro
5. Place 9000 euro
6. Place 8000 euro
7. Place 7000 euro
8. Place 6000 euro
9. Place 5000 euro
10 Place 3000 euro
- (Tarjel J. Svensen) – Wesley So loses vs Mamedyarov, his first loss in 67 games. His last loss with white was in October 2015, 560 days ago.
- "Wesley So will lose a chess game". Isn’t that one of the six signs of the Apocalypse?
- Expect the rain of molten glass next
- Scotch is a good opening if your name is Kasparov. Anyway, So had an amazing streak and he is a great guy. Eventually he would lose a game.
- Mamed too good for So. So’s lucky streak finally ends
- After a long way, So was tired. Wait for the next match. Congrats Shakh
- So blundered in an equal position, one move before time control
________
I had forgotten how contentious and opinionated Ljubojevic is. At the post-mortem, So is hurting from the loss, Mamedyarov doesn’t want to be there and Ljubo is asking about the new proposed rating system (one rating for all sorts of chess) and about a faster playing speed from FIDE. He is pushing himself to the centre of the stage.
(Sam Copeland at chess.com) - Pavel Eljanov won his second game in a row to start The Gashimov Memorial in Shamkir in clear first place after two rounds, but the main story of the day was Veselin Topalov's beautiful win as Black against Radek Wojtaszek in which a rook sacrifice lead to an attack against White's centralized king.
Topalov's 2016 was remarkably up and down as he nearly won the Sinquefield Cup with Wesley So before finishing with a dismal 2/9 in the London Chess Classic. Some Internet commenters even stunningly mused that Topalov's career might be nearly over after that. Today Topalov presented excellent chess with an opening novelty, enterprising play as Black, and a beautiful sacrifice.
Wesley So spoke about the time difference between the US and Azerbaijan. The player, originally from Philippines, said that he doesn’t have any problem with the time difference:” The purpose of my arriving in Shamkir 3 days prior to competition was to get used to the change. The time difference doesn’t create a problem. 3 days in Shamkir was enough to get used to it. I don’t have any problems about sleep either. Each day I prepare for games for about 1-2 hours.”
The redoubtable Ljubomir Ljubojevic is in the chair as commentator. Readers will remember the job he did at the Gashimov Memorial 2016, where he irritated as much as enlightened. Today he was asking what medicines players take during a tournament and asking Wesley So about holistic medicines in the Philippines.
One of the two most important games of the round is Karjakin-Adams where Sergey falls to Micky. In time pressure Sergey plays 39.g3 and is lost.
The other is Elajanov-Mamedyarov, where Pavel looked like he was going to win his third game in a row. And then came 44.Re5 when he lost the initiative and then 54.Qe4 then Shakh took over.
Igor Khenkin was doing the commentary for a while. Igor is a Russian-born German grandmaster. He mentioned that Pavel Eljanov’s father was a publisher, who published Dvoretsky’s early works.
It is best explained in this 2010 interview of Eljanov by Anastasiya Karlovich in chessbase.com:
Going back to the beginning of your chess career, can you tell how you started playing chess?
I was lucky to be born in a chess family and my parents always supported my wish to play chess, even during the periods when I lacked the desire. My mother helped me from the beginning, and showed me the rules of chess, and afterwards we continued to study the basics using the famous book of Ivashenko. It was probably a good book (laughs).
Do you mean everybody who studies that book can play as well as Pavel Eljanov?
I think 90% start to study chess from that book... Anyhow, I was quickly improving at the beginning but lost interest when I was 8-9 years old. The teamwork with my trainer Anatoliy Astrakhancev (coincidence with Astrakhan?) helped me to achieve a candidate master norm. Of course during that period my father supported me financially and helped me improve in chess. In 1995 he got the idea of publishing Mark Dvoretsky’s books. I studied all those books several times before they were published, so I was one of their proofreaders as well. Together with Alexander Moiseenko, we checked variations and read the first books at least five times, so I can say I drank it in as mother's milk. At the time I had no trainers, though I studied together with Zakhar Efimenko, Alexander Moiseenko as well as worked alone. Since 1997 I have been coming to the Chess Club of the National Law Academy. I was the youngest one there and it was a great experience for me to play with more experienced opponents such as Alexander Zubarev, Eduard Andreev among others.
1 Mamedyarov 2.5
2-4 Eljanov, Topalov, Adams 2.0
5 Kramnik 1.5
6-10 Harikrishna, Karjakin, So, Wojtaszek, Radjabov all with 1.0
________
Note added later:
Three-quarters of Eljanov vs Mamedyarov went Eljanov's way. He achieved a nice advantage out of the opening and played provocatively to gain space. The game featured a lot of slight ups and downs in the evaluation as is typical for such sharp and creative play, but Eljanov's advantage had become decisive when on move 44 he selected Re5? "blundering" (Eljanov's words) 44... Qh3! and missing 44. e7! which would have basically ended the game. After that, Mamedyarov had significant practical chances and won quickly.
Michael Adams has recently reachieved the peak rating of 2761 that he first tallied in September of 2013 and is playing excellent chess. Today, he outplayed Sergey Karjakin with the black pieces, achieving equality and then an advantage. In the final position, Karjakin blundered a tactic, but he could have continued to fight had he not forfeited on time at this point.
It is very unusual for a player to forfeit on time at such a level, but time trouble issues have been endemic to Shamkir as the players are struggling to adjust to the lack of increment.
The game of the day is Kramnik vs Harikrishna. Vladimir sacrifices his rook with 25.Rxe5. The computer says that he is much worse but, he gets three connected passed pawns on the queenside – so who is right?
Everyone knows that it is a rule of the Russian School that Kramnik’s passed pawns always queen, ergo this is an imposing position.
Harikrishna plays until his game is untenable and looks around for Kramnik so he can resign but he is not there. The arbiter comes over and waits until Vlad is back at the board, where he shakes Pentala’s hand and they both sign their score sheets and go to the post-mortem.
Ljubo is not very tall and, sitting behind the raised lid of the laptop, you can only see the top part of his face.
He seems to think that he has the right to ask any question that comes to mind. The first to most of the participants is about Bobby Fischer playing in Yugoslavia in 1992 and being censured by the State Department. Ljubo asks each one if their major concern in going to a country for a tournament that their land would not approve of is political, ethical or economical.
Wesley So says that he would take the advice of the State Department as to whether it is dangerous to go or not but in the end, he would make his own mind up. Veselin says that he went to Libya in 2004 and got along all right. If you’ll recall it was the World Chess Championship semi-final with Topalov, Kasimdzhanov, Radjabov and Adams in June/July of that year.
The Women’s World Championship in Tehran was mentioned and Michael Adams said that, in general, the Foreign Office just has recommendations on its website of countries where it is dangerous to go and doesn’t give any political opinion about them. Ljubo immediately brings up the boycott against South Africa. Michael says that was before his time.
Wesley So was asked why he came to the States. Was it because there was no financial support in the Philippines? Wesley said that he came over at the age of 18 and there was very little support. Ljubo pressed him to name private U.S. sponsors and a lady in the audience asked who the woman is that he is often with.
No sponsor’s names are given and the woman who is seen with is his mother.
Yesterday, Ljubo asked Kramnik and Leko, who have are at daggers-drawn with each other, what they would do if Kramnik’s son wanted to marry Leko’s daughter. I could not bear to watch the answer, if one was given.
Ljubo did ask Tal once if any of his opponents had fainted at the board when Tal played a spectacular move against him. Tal said that he could not remember that happening but he would have been honoured if it had.
Some online comments:
- Hari could strangle him…wish he would take one for the team
- Ljubo asks what do you think of fischer? Was he an alien and what about twin towers and chemtrails?
- Ljubo is so annoying, giving lectures instead of taking interviews
The games:
Shamkir Chess
Round 4, Apr. 24, 2017
Eljanov, Pavel – Radjabov, Teimour
C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defence
Only two days ago, Veselin Topalov played a wonderful rook sacrifice in Shamkir that some commented might be a move of the year candidate. Today, Topalov's long-time adversary Vladimir Kramnik one-upped him with a possibly even more astonishing rook sacrifice. Kramnik offered his rook for three not-very-dangerous pawns in the middlegame: a pure positional sacrifice! To the author's knowledge, this particular sacrifice is unique in the annals of chess history, but we invite readers to post comparable sacrifices in the comments
- After that sacrifice there was nothing black could do. Awesome play. Worthy opponent.
- Amazing how he saw the idea all the way back with 22. Qe2
- Positional sacrifice!
- Kramnik wow!!
- That is one impressive sacrifice!
Last edited by Wayne Komer; Monday, 24th April, 2017, 09:53 PM.
The two young guns beat the oldsters – Karjakin taking down Topalov and So winning against Kramnik.
Ljubo’s press conferences are usually chaotic with everyone talking at once. I like this pronouncement during one of them:
“It is better for black; there is no question.”
His question of the day is whether the player would rather live in a big city or a small one, in an apartment or a house.
Radoslaw Wojtaszek is a 30-year-old Polish grandmaster. He has been a second to Vishy Anand. He is presently living in Warsaw but would like to retire to a small city.
Eljanov seems bored with the questions but says that he knows nothing of small city life, having spent all of his life in a big city. Though he lives on the sixth floor of his apartment, he always walks up and never uses the elevator.
The longest game is So-Kramnik with big Vlad having a deteriorating game and Wesley being very calm.
It is amusing at the end when Igor Khenkin, analyzing for the broadcast, said that Vladimir is lost but can trade away to an ending making Wesley mate him with knight and bishop.
I would have thought that if Wesley had outplayed Vlad so far, he would have no trouble accomplishing the bishop and knight mate.
It was one of the few post-mortems with Kramnik where he didn’t say that he had an equal or better game all through.
Both are asked by Ljubo about the big city/small city thing and Vlad says that he would like to retire to a small city and So would too.
Asked if they have pets:
Wesley: Two cats
Vladimir: Two kids!
The games:
Shamkir Chess
Round 5, Apr. 25
Eljanov, Pavel – Wojtaszek, Radoslaw
E04 Catalan, open
Karjakin's point came at expense of GM Veselin Topalov. The Bulgarian tried to play a Caro-Kann, which shape-shifted into a French Defense a tempo down after he refused the more standard lines with... Bf5. However, White had already committed to an early d- for c-pawn exchange.
GM Veselin Topalov could never find shelter for his king today. Taking the e-pawn proved too much. Black then spent many more tempi acquiring the bishop pair, activating his "French bishop," and even going after the White's final center pawn.
The final indiscretion proved too much and Karjakin punished Topalov for his profligacy. In particular 23. Nxe6! was a nice touch. Abandoning the queen to threaten a double-check mate highlighted the prior need for Topalov to eschew material and find safe harbor for his king.
Sometimes when a young player bursts onto the scene, his personal head-to-head record suffers against the veterans until he learns to play at the highest level. That's not so for So, who after today has grabbed two victories from GM Vladimir Kramnik without any losses in classical chess. (Curiously the former champ has So's number in fast time controls though.)
GM Wesley So played the day's longest game and was rewarded with a win, his first in Shamkir.
Today the Catalan produced a position with divergent themes. White had the only bishop, but Black had the queenside majority. That dynamic could have played out a number of ways, but moves 30-37 should be the reader's focus. Somehow all of So's pieces moved forward and took on ideal posts while Black's kept backing up.
If we are to believe Kasparov, who claimed that a knight on f5 is worth nearly a pawn, then So was even up material so to speak. Black's... g6 forced the steed out, but the weakening of dark squares gave the American an opening to win a pawn. So's game was a great example of envisioning the endgame starting at the middlegame.
Four on two and an active king was no problem for the world number two to convert. He did pass up on a few chances to force himself to do the bishop+knight mate, but since chess professionals don't get paid by the hour, that's understandable!
Vladimir Kramnik is not a player who loses consecutive games but he has lost two back-to-back, so to speak, so far – against Wesley So and today against Shakh. As a result of that win, Shakh is in first place a whole point ahead of Topalov, So and Adams.
Wesley So is playing well. He outplayed Karjakin, with a calm imperturbability that one associates with Capablanca. His successes of the past year reveal to me that he is a much bigger talent than I had supposed.
On the present live rating list Magnus has 2831.6 and Wesley 2816.0, a difference of about 15 ELO points.
A game has arisen of speculating when So’s rating will equal or surpass Carlsen’s.
In the chat room today:
- Let’s go Mamedyarov, 3 more wins and 2800
- Let’s go Wes, 3 more wins and you’ll catch up with Carlsen for live ratings
And on the EC Forum:
- I hope So can't or won't catch Carlsen by winning the next three games, against Eljanov (2751), Radjabov (2710), and Harikrishna (2755). Does anyone want to do that calculation?
- If So were to beat So, So and So, he'd gain 15.0 rating points. He can't gain 15.6 rating points from three games unless one of them is against Carlsen.
- So, if I understand correctly if So plays three so-and-sos he can only overtake Carlsen if at least one of the so-and-sos is Carlsen?
- My spreadsheet says that:
1 win against Carlsen and 2 wins against Caruana would gain him 15 points.
2 wins against Carlsen and 1 win against Caruana would gain him 15.3 points.
3 wins against Carlsen would gain him 15.6 points.
So it's only 3 wins against Carlsen that would allow So to match Carlsen's current rating in 3 games. (Obviously, 2 wins against Carlsen would allow So to overtake Carlsen because So would gain 10.4 points and Carlsen would lose 10.4 points.)
________
Radoslaw and Teimour came from their finished game to the postmortem room in a loud friendly argument about the play. It is obvious that they have analyzed together many times before. With big smiles on their faces, they lighten Ljubo’s presence.
Ljubo draws a lot of criticism but there was a rather nice comment about him on the chess24 forum today:
Ljubo was last active as a player in the "Rising Stars vs. Experience events" until 2010, he was also often/always guest of honor at Joop van Oosterom's other project/brainchild: the Amber rapid/blindfold events. He also played in the "honorary group" 2008 in Wijk aan Zee with Timman (one of Timman's many roles over the years), Portisch and Korchnoi.
Ljubo also did live commentary for Shamkir Chess 2016, a year ago I wrote "also in press conferences he surprises with constructive criticism of the players and original questions".
The commentators are still Ljubomir Ljubojevic and Igor Khenkin.
The first two games to finish with draws as the result are Radjabov-Topalov and Mamedyarov-Adams.
Ljubo asks Veselin if he believes in astrology and he says that he does not. Just where is this question going? Well, it seems that in the huge hotel restaurant, Ljubo has observed Kramnik eating at a certain table and when he had finished and gone, Topalov coming in and going to sit and eat at that exact same table. Ljubo thinks it has been ordained by the stars!
He tells us that Mickey Adams has the nickname “Spider”. It came from Garry Kasparov saying that he believes Adams weaves a web around his opponents. Ljubo asks Mickey what he thinks about the nickname and Adams says that he is not unhappy with the designation. In fact, he has a cartoon on his wall at home of himself as Spiderman at Dortmund taking the trophy away from Kramnik!
Ljubo’s follow-up question is odd too.
Stanley Kubrick, the great film director, was known to love chess and he would often watch big events with Tim Rice. His difficulty was how to portray chess the way he saw it in his mind on the screen.
Mickey, did you ever meet Stanley Kubrick and have you ever been an advisor on a chess film?
Mickey says that he never met Kubrick and the only person he knows who has been an advisor on a film was Jonathan Speelman who acted as a consultant on the film Luzhin’s Defence (2000) to the Dutch director Marleen Gorris.
There is an article about Kubrick and Chess in The New York Review of Books at:
Each player is asked if there has been a film made about them. Shakh says that there have been four television documentaries made about him but he doesn’t remember the names nor could he tell us how to find them online.
Pavel and Wesley come on and Wesley congratulates Pavel on his good prep, 19.Na7 being singled out as a particularly good move.
No documentaries have been made so far about either So or Eljanov. Wesley has enjoyed the Bobby Fischer movies that have appeared but Ljubo says that Pawn Sacrifice (2014) had exaggerations of what real chess is like.
Radoslaw Wojtaszek commenting on the film in the next post-mortem says that it was odd seeing Tobey Maguire, who was Spiderman, playing Bobby Fischer.
Wesley is not satisfied with his play. He singles out Shakh and Mickey as not only playing well but being the only unbeaten players.
I had never met a movie mogul and had no idea what to expect. But as soon as Kubrick opened the door I felt an immediate kindred spirit. He looked and acted like every obsessive theoretical physicist I have ever known. His obsession at that moment was whether or not anything could go faster than the speed of light. I explained to him that according to the theory of relativity no information-bearing signal could go faster. We conversed like that for about an hour when I looked at my watch and realized I had to go. “Why?” he asked, seeing no reason why a conversation that he was finding interesting should stop.
I told him I had a date with a chess hustler in Washington Square Park to play for money. Kubrick wanted the name. “Fred Duval” I said. Duval was a Haitian who claimed to be related to Francois Duvalier. I was absolutely positive that the name would mean nothing to Kubrick. His next remark nearly floored me. “Duval is a patzer,” is what he said. Unless you have been around chess players you cannot imagine what an insult this is. Moreover, Duval and I were playing just about even. What did that make me?
Kubrick explained that early in his career he too played chess for money in the park and that Duval was so weak that it was hardly worth playing him. I said that we should play some time and then left the apartment. I was quite sure that we would never play. I was wrong.
I wrote a Talk of the Town on my meeting with Kubrick, which he liked. I was thus emboldened to ask if I could write a full scale profile of him. He agreed but said that he was about to leave for London to begin production of what became 2001: A Space Odyssey. Still better, I thought: I could watch the making of the film. Our first meeting was at the Hotel Dorchester in London where he was temporarily living with his family. Kubrick brought out a chess set and beat me promptly. Then we played three more games and he beat me less promptly. But I won the fifth game!
Seizing the moment I told him that I had been hustling him and had deliberately lost the first four games. His response was that I was a patzer. All during the filming of 2001 we played chess whenever I was in London and every fifth game I did something unusual. Finally we reached the 25th game and it was agreed that this would decide the matter. Well into the game he made a move that I was sure was a loser. He even clutched his stomach to show how upset he was. But it was a trap and I was promptly clobbered. “You didn’t know I could act too,” he remarked.
From: Playing Chess with Kubrick, The New York Review of Books, April 5, 2010
by Jeremy Bernstein.
Wojtaszek used some prep to knock off Mamedyarov. 17…Nxd4 lets loose white’s attack. Adams went down to Kramnik, so both of the unbeaten players didn’t survive the round.
Sergey Karjakin also won, converting an endgame against Pavel Eljanov with two bishops vs. rook and two pawns.
Wesley So also pushed for a while against Teimour Radjabov and even managed to win a pawn, but it wasn't enough to win in a same-color bishop endgame.
Lastly, Veselin Topalov could not make much progress against Pentala Harikrishna, but a draw does bring him to 4.5/8, within striking distance going into the last round
At the moment there are four drawn games and the only match still going on is Eljanov–Kramnik which will decide if big Vlad shares second place.
Earlier, Adams and Wojtaszek came in for the post-mortem and went through a long analysis. Then Ljubo asked them if there was anyone on the chess world that they really hated. The answer was no. Ljubo said you could also include organizers and officials but the answer was still in the negative.
Ljubo said that Korchnoi once said that there were some people he really hated. On the other hand, Gligoric said he never played people, he played the pieces. In fact he wrote a book with just that title I Play Against Pieces (2003).
One review said:
The 130(!) games in this collection range from 1939 to 2001 and include battles with world-champions Botvinnik, Euwe, Smyslov, Petrosian, Tal and Fischer as well as high-class grandmasters such as Keres, Korchnoi, Geller, Portisch, Taimanov and Larsen. As Gligoric himself asserts, he has maybe played more tournament games than any other grandmaster during his long career, battling it out with veterans Vidmar and Stahlberg in the 1940's as well as youngsters Sakaev and Jenni in the 1990's.
If you see a copy in a used bookstore, pick it up. Used copies are getting premium prices these days.
________
Back to Eljanov-Kramnik. Just after the first time control Eljanov appeared to have the advantage. Ljubo analyzing by himself kept saying how complex the position was. Igor Khenkin comes in and they both explore the possibilities. It looks like Pavel misplayed the ending. He should have pushed the a-pawn and instead moved his knight to e5 (move 43).
The kibitzers are having a good time now:
- psychologically Eljanov is in a very difficult position. Kramnik has managed to invert the trend and rather than defending from a potentially queening a5 pawn is threatening to queen his once c5 pawn. What a game!
With seven minutes left, Eljanov cannot believe that he has to fight for a draw. He blocks the black pawn on c2 with 46. Rc1. On move 47 he takes the pawn and throws away the game.
The next time control is move 60 with the players almost there. It is predicted that when they do, Eljanov will resign.
But Pavel is still sitting at the board. They now get 15 minutes for all moves and a 30 second per move increment.
Finally, Pavel resigns at move 63.
They are late for the closing ceremony so there may not be a final press conference.
Eljanov first led the tournament, then weakened and Shakh took over. Four of the participants could be in the Moscow Grand Prix which starts in 12 days and this would be good practice for them.
Tweet
Comment