Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

    Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

    April 13, 2020

    There is a book published in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia in 1971 entitled:

    Chess Meets of the Century

    World-Soviet Union, Belgrade 1970
    Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970
    Fischer-Taymanov 6:0 Vancouver 1971
    Fischer-Larsen 5:0 Denver 1971

    By Robert Fischer and Dimitrije Bjelica

    152 pages

    I think it would be interesting to give the blitz tournament round by round. All of Fischer’s games are known and a smattering of the others.

    Introduction - On April 8, 1970, Herceg Novi in Yugoslavia hosted a blitz tournament that might well be the best blitz tournament of all time. Twelve of the world's best players competed in a double round-robin. Bobby Fischer won with 19 out of 22.

    24 of the world's best players had come to Belgrade to take part in the "Match of the Century" (USSR vs Rest of the World) in 1970. Some stayed in Yugoslavia after the match was over and accepted an invitation to a blitz tournament in Herceg Novi.

    The first official FIDE Blitz World Championship of FIDE was not held until 2006. Before that there had been a strong blitz tournament with world championship character in 1988 in St. John which was won by Mikhail Tal. But due to the strength of the field the blitz tournament in Herceg Novi in 1970 also went down in history as a kind of unofficial early Blitz World Championship.

    Each player had five minutes for the whole game, the usual time-limit for blitz before the introduction of electronic clocks.

    In the absence of World Champion Boris Spassky, many experts considered Tigran Petrosian, Spassky's predecessor as favourite. Tal and Viktor Korchnoi also enjoyed a reputation as powerful blitz-players. Bobby Fischer, at that time the number one in the world, was not known as a particularly strong blitz player – until then.

    But Fischer won the tournament in impressive fashion. He scored 19/22, distancing runner-up Tal by 4.5 points. Fischer lost only one game, against Korchnoi, and quickly established a big time advantage in all of his games. According to contemporary reports, Fischer never used more than 2.5 minutes of his time in any game and outclassed the five Soviet grandmasters with 8.5-1.5. Fischer defeated Smyslov, Tal and Petrosian 2-0 each. For this dominating performance Fischer 400 USD as prize-money.

    Hundreds of spectators had followed the tournament. In a room next door a football match between Yugoslavia and Austria was shown on television but attracted only ten spectators.

    Today a large number of blitz games are automatically recorded, usually by DGT-boards or online. However, in 1970 blitz games usually did not survive. But some of the games in Herceg-Novi were recorded and Fischer even made handwritten notes of his games after the tournament, sometimes adding annotations.

    Probably Fischer wrote down the games from memory after the tournament and annotated some of them afterwards. Later Fischer and the Yugoslavian journalist Bjelica published a book about the tournament that contains 60 selected games.

    André Schulz

    https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-bl...fischer-papers

    Round One

    The day was April 8th 1970. Time : 4:00 P. M. Place : Hotel "Plaza" in Herceg Novi, on the Sea Coast. Eleven Grandmasters and one international master began the strongest Rapid tournament ever played. In the first round, there was played the derby - match Tai - Fischer.

    As Tal says he always loses the first game, but Fischer was lucky from the very beginning. Fischer was the only player who won both games. He was leading till the end of the Tournament.

    Herceg Novi Blitz
    Herceg Novi, Montenegro
    Game 1, April 8, 1970
    Tal, Mikhail – Fischer Robert J.
    B50 Sicilian Defence, Scheveningen/Najdorf/dragon

    1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Nc3 e5 4.Bc4 Be7 5.d3 Nf6 6.O-O Nc6 7.Ne1 O-O 8.f4 a6 9.a4 exf4 10.Bxf4 Be6 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.Bg3 Qb6 13.Qd2 Ng4 14.Nf3 Nd4 15.Rab1 Nxf3+ 16.gxf3 Ne5 17.Kg2 Ng6 18.Ne2 Nh4+ 19.Bxh4 Bxh4 20.b4 Qc7 21.bxc5 dxc5 22.a5 Rf6 23.f4 Raf8 24.Rb6 Bg5 25.e5 Rf5 26.Rxe6 Qf7 27.Rd6 Bxf4 28.Rxf4 Rxf4 29.Nxf4 Qxf4 30.Qxf4 Rxf4 31.Rd7 Ra4 32.e6 Kf8 33.Rf7+ Ke8 34.Rxg7 Rxa5 35.Rxb7 Ra2 36.Kf3 Rxc2 37.Rxh7 c4 38.d4 c3 39.d5 Rd2 40.Ke4 c2 41.Rc7 Kd8 42.Rc4 a5 43.h4 a4 44.Ke5 a3 45.d6 Re2+ 46.Kf5 Rf2+ 47.Kg4 a2 48.d7 Ke7 49.Rc8 Rd2 50.Re8+ Kf6 51.e7 Rxd7 0-1

    Position after Black’s 44….a3

    

    - Why didn't Tal simply play 50. d8-Q+? Seems like it would be an easy win. Then again, I must be overlooking something.

    - 50 ..... Rxd8 is one of only two legal moves, but is quite sufficient.

    - 45. Kd6 is soo won. I mean I don't even need an engine to say that Tal made a huge mistake with d6.

    Round 1, Game 2,
    April 8, 1970
    Fischer, Robert J. – Tal, Mikhail
    A00 Symmetrical Opening, Hungarian Opening

    1.g3 g6 2.Bg2 Bg7 3.Nf3 c5 4.c3 Nf6 5.O-O O-O 6.d4 d6 7.dxc5 dxc5 8.Qxd8 Rxd8 9.Be3 Na6 10.Na3 Nd5 11.Rfd1 Bg4 12.Bd2 h6 13.h3 Be6 14.Nb5 Ndc7 15.a4 Bb3 16.Rdc1 Nxb5 17.axb5 Nc7 18.Be3 Nxb5 19.Bxc5 b6 20.Bxe7 Re8 21.Ba3 Rad8 22.e3 a5 23.Nd4 Nxa3 24.Rxa3 Bc4 25.Bf1 Bd5 26.Bg2 Bc4 27.Ra4 Bd3 28.b4 axb4 29.Rxb4 Rd6 30.Rd1 Bc2 31.Rd2 Bf5 32.Rdb2 Rc8 33.Rxb6 Rxb6 34.Rxb6 Rxc3 35.Nxf5 gxf5 36.Bd5 Rc7 37.Rb5 Re7 38.Bc4 Re5 39.Rb7 Kh7 40.Rxf7 Kg6 41.Rc7 Bf8 42.Rc6+ Kg7 43.Bd3 Be7 44.Bc2 Ra5 45.Kg2 1-0

    Final Position

    


    You can read Fischer’s comments on several of the games at:

    https://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...on?cid=1006241

    First Round Results

    Ostojic-Reshevsky 1-1
    Uhlmann-Bronstein 0.5-l.5
    Korchnoi-Petrosyan 0.5-l.5
    Matulovic-Hort 1-1
    Tal-Fischer 0-2
    Ivkov-Smyslov 1-1

    Fischer 2, Bronstein and Petrosyan 1.5 etc.

  • #2
    Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

    April 13, 2020

    Round Two

    Fischer continued with the wins. Tal is already at the 50 percent, but the biggest surprise is Korchnoi, he is in last place with 0.5 points from 4 game. Reshevsky is playing very well, he won the match against Smyslov. Bronstein put Korchnoi in trouble. It seemed that Bronstein would have been most dangerous for Fischer. . . The audience was around Fischer's and Bronstein's tables. Tai won easily against Hort and after that he came to see what Fischer was doing. Fischer's games were 2 minutes longer than Tal's.

    Round 2, April 8
    Game 1
    Fischer, Robert J. – Ivkov, Borislav
    B07 Pirc

    1.e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.c3 Nf6 5.Bd3 O-O 6.O-O Nc6 7.Qe2 e5 8.h3 Nh5 9.Bg5 Bf6 10.Be3 Bg7 11.Nbd2 Re8 12.d5 Ne7 13.c4 Nf4 14.Bxf4 exf4 15.Rab1 Nf5 16.b4 a5 17.bxa5 Rxa5 18.Nb3 Ra8 19.c5 h6 20.Bb5 Bd7 21.a4 Bxb5 22.axb5 Nh4 23.cxd6 cxd6 24.Nxh4 Qxh4 25.Nd2 Bd4 26.Qf3 Ra2 27.Nc4 Qf6 28.Rbd1 Bc5 29.e5 dxe5 30.d6 e4 31.d7 Rd8 32.Qxe4 f3 33.Qxf3 Qxf3 34.gxf3 Rc2 35.Na5 Be7 36.Nxb7 Rc7 37.Nxd8 Bxd8 38.Rfe1 1-0

    - complete domination by the future world champ

    - Fischer winds up playing the white side of a King's Indian, in effect. 17. bxa5 probably surprised Ivkov. A pretty center break with 29. e5 and 31. d7! wins the game.

    - There just wasn't enough power to attack with on move 26 by Ivkov.

    Round 2, April 8
    Game 2
    Ivkov, Borislav – Fischer, Robert J.
    E67 King’s Indian, Fianchetto, Classical variation

    1.Nf3 Nf6 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.O-O O-O 5.c4 d6 6.d4 Nbd7 7.Nc3 e5 8.e4 exd4 9.Nxd4 Nc5 10.h3 a5 11.Re1 Re8 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bf4 Nfd7 14.Qd2 Ne5 15.Bf1 Ne6 16.Nxe6 Nf3+ 17.Kg2 Nxe1+ 18.Rxe1 Bxe6 19.Bxh6 Bxh6 20.Qxh6 Qf6 21.Qd2 a4 22.f4 Qe7 23.g4 c6 24.Qd4 f6 25.Rd1 Rad8 26.Nxa4 c5 27.Qd3 Kg7 28.Nc3 Rh8 29.Qd2 Rh4 30.a3 Rdh8 31.Kg3 f5 32.exf5 Rxh3+ 33.Bxh3 Qh4+ 34.Kf3 Qxh3+ 35.Ke2 Bxc4+ 36.Kf2 Qh2+ 0-1

    Position after White’s 17.Kg2

    

    - 15. ...Ne6! starts a nice deflection combo. Then 31. ...f5 32. ...Rxh3+! and 33. ...Qh4+ makes for a quick finish. Never seen this game before but it’s pretty good!

    - I give up. Why did Fischer take the rook instead of the queen at move 17? Not that it mattered. Was this a form of contempt for his opponent?

    - As you can see, 17...Nxe1+ wins an exchange. Taking the Queen loses a piece. Play it out on your board and you'll see. :)

    - Fischer was just awesome in this tournament.

    - It was a nice sequence by Fischer, but Ivkov was fighting back. He even picked up two pawns for the exchange, and later, Ivkov could have won the game outright with 32. Qxd6. I'm sure that by this point, Ivkov's flag must have been ready to fall.

    - 32. Qxd6 still allows Rxh3+. Is there a significant difference?

    - Oh, my apologies..... I meant 31. Qxd6 and wins. Thanks.

    Round 2, April 8
    Bronstein, David – Korchnoi, Viktor
    C02 French, Advance variation

    1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.dxc5 Bxc5 5.Bd3 Qb6 6.Qe2 Nc6 7.Nf3 f6 8.O-O fxe5 9.Nxe5 Nxe5 10.Qxe5 Nf6 11.Nc3 O-O 12.Na4 Bxf2+ 13.Kh1 Qa5 14.Qe2 e5 15.Rxf2 Bg4 16.Qe3 Qxa4 17.Qxe5 Rae8 18.b3 Qb4 19.c3 Qb6 20.Qd4 Re1+ 21.Rf1 Rxf1+ 22.Bxf1 Ne4 23.Be3 Qxd4 24.Bxd4 b6 25.Kg1 Be6 26.Bb5 Rc8 27.Rd1 Kf7 28.c4 Nd6 29.Ba6 Rc6 30.cxd5 Bxd5 31.Bd3 Be6 32.Bxh7 Bf5 33.Rf1 Ke6 34.Bg8+ Ke7 35.Bxg7 Rc2 36.h3 Rxa2 37.Rf3 Ra3 38.Kh2 1-0

    - Forceful.

    - Bronstein beats back a powerful attack and then turns the tables on Korchnoi.

    Results and Standings of Round Two

    Ostojic-Uhlmann 0-2
    Reshevsky-Smyslov 1.5-0.5
    Fischer-Ivkov 2-0
    Hort-Tal 0-2
    Petrosyan-Matulovic 1.5-0.5
    Bronstein-Korchnoi 2-0

    Fischer 4, Bronstein 3.5, Petrosyan 3, Reshevsky 2.5, Tal 2 etc.

    Comment


    • #3
      Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

      April 14, 2020

      Round Three

      Fischer is already leading by 2 points . He is practically the winner. Korchnoi "gave" his last place to Ostojic who will stay there till the end of the tournament. With the exception of Ostojic all the other players had taken part in the Century Match in Belgrade. Ostojic was the Yugoslav Champion. He was once very good in 5 minute chess, but this tournament was too strong for him.

      The main surprise was Matulovic's victory against Bronstein. According to the results of rapid tournaments, Matulovic is the best Yugoslav player at five minute chess .. .

      Round 3, April 8
      Game 1
      Smyslov, Vasily – Fischer, Robert J.
      D79 Neo-Grunfeld

      1.c4 g6 2.g3 Bg7 3.Bg2 Nf6 4.Nf3 O-O 5.O-O c6 6.d4 d5 7.cxd5 cxd5 8.Nc3 Ne4 9.Qb3 Nc6 10.Be3 Na5 11.Qd1 Nxc3 12.bxc3 b6 13.Ne5 Ba6 14.Re1 Rc8 15.Bd2 e6 16.e4 Bb7 17.exd5 Bxd5 18.Bxd5 Qxd5 19.Qe2 Rfd8 20.Ng4 Nc4 21.Bh6 f5 22.Bxg7 Kxg7 23.Ne3 Nxe3 24.Qxe3 Rc6 25.Rac1 Rdc8 26.c4 Rxc4 27.Rxc4 Rxc4 28.Qxe6 Qxe6 29.Rxe6 Kf7 30.Re3 Rxd4 31.Ra3 a5 32.Rc3 Ke6 33.Kg2 Kd6 34.h4 Ra4 35.Rc2 b5 36.Kf3 b4 37.Ke3 Kd5 38.f3 Ra3+ 39.Kf4 a4 40.g4 fxg4 41.fxg4 b3 42.axb3 axb3 43.Rc7 Ra4+ 44.Kg5 Rb4 45.Rc1 Kd4 46.Kh6 Rb7 0-1

      - What a beautifully played game by Fischer! Simple, logical.

      One of the secrets of Fischer's success is that he realized that the difference between White and Black is only one tempo. Some GM's hunker down and just try to survive their games with Black, while others realize that the advantage of the first move is relatively small and easily lost through imprecise play.

      Of all the world champions, the best ones with the black pieces were Steinitz and Fischer (while Kramnik was probably the worst).

      - There has never been a modern professional would could put wins up on the board with the black pieces like Fischer could.And Fischer's attitude was a big part of that: Fischer simply wanted to crush you whether he had the White or Black pieces, every game.

      If Kramnik had won the first three games of the Taimanov and Larsen matches like Fischer, he would have crawled into a shell and tried to draw out the match. Fischer, on the other hand, proceeded to win the next three games in a row as well(!), beating both Taimanov and Larsen by identical, incredible scores of 6-0(!!!).

      Round 3, April 8
      Game 2
      Fischer, Robert J. – Smyslov, Vasily
      A03 Bird’s Opening

      1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.b3 g6 4.Bb2 Bg7 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 c5 7.e3 Nc6 8.O-O d4 9.Qe2 Bf5 10.Ne1 Bxc2 11.Nxc2 d3 12.Qd1 dxc2 13.Qxc2 Nb4 14.Qc4 Rb8 15.a4 b6 16.Rd1 Rc8 17.Na3 e6 18.e4 Qe7 19.e5 Nfd5 20.Nb5 Rfd8 21.a5 bxa5 22.Rxa5 Nb6 23.Qe2 Rd7 24.Rda1 a6 25.Nd6 Rcd8 26.Bc3 N6d5 27.Bxd5 Nxd5 28.Rxa6 g5 29.f5 Nxc3 30.dxc3 exf5 31.Re1 Qxe5 32.Qxe5 Bxe5 33.Rxe5 Rxd6 34.Rxd6 Rxd6 35.Rxf5 Rb6 36.Rxg5+ Kf8 37.Rxc5 Rxb3 38.Kg2 Rb2+ 39.Kh3 Kg7 40.g4 Kf6 41.Kg3 Ke6 42.h4 h6 43.h5 Rc2 44.Rc6+ Ke7 45.Kf4 f6 46.Kf5 Rf2+ 47.Ke4 Kf7 48.c4 Rg2 49.Kf3 Rg1 50.Rc7+ Ke6 51.Rh7 Rf1+ 52.Kg2 Rc1 53.Rc7 Ke5 54.Kg3 Rc3+ 55.Kh4 Rc1 56.c5 Ke6 57.Kg3 Rg1+ 58.Kf3 Rf1+ 59.Kg2 Rc1 60.Rc8 Rc3 61.c6 Rc4 62.Kf3 Rc3+ 63.Kg2 Rc2+ 64.Kg3 1-0

      Black lost on time

      Position after White’s 56.c5

      

      - well, my endgame skills need work. I can’t figure out a) how the pawn keeps successfully marching further down the board b) why Smyslov needs to resign already

      - I'd always heard that the Russians were utterly unprepared when Fischer departed from his customary 1. e4 in the 1972 WC match, but it seems that this game is proof Fischer was willing to experiment.

      - 64...Kd6 65 Ke3 is too powerful

      - What is wrong with 56...Kf4 (threatening rh1#). It seems to me this wins black the g pawn. Is white's passed pawn really that dangerous?

      - I believe the reason why is: 56...Kf4 57. Kh3, Rh1 58. Kg2, Rh4 (to win the g pawn) 59. Rg7!. White would gladly exchange the g pawn and its rook for the black rook because the c pawn is now unstoppable. Furthermore, it's too late for the black rook to return to defend against the c pawn since it's now trapped. What do you think?

      - 56...Kf4 was Black's best move. For instance, <57.Kh3 Rg1 58.Rf7 Rg3+ 59.Kh2 Rc3 60.Rxf6+ Kxg4 61.Rxh6 Rxc5

      Round 3, April 8
      Bronstein, David – Matulovic, Milan
      C30 King’s Gambit Declined

      1.e4 e5 2.f4 Nf6 3.Nf3 d6 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.Bb5 exf4 6.d4 a6 7.Bxc6+ bxc6 8.Bxf4 Be7 9.Qd3 O-O 10.O-O-O Be6 11.Rhe1 Qb8 12.Bg5 Re8 13.e5 Nd5 14.Nxd5 Bxd5 15.Bxe7 Rxe7 16.exd6 Rxe1 17.Rxe1 cxd6 18.Ng5 g6 19.Qh3 h5 20.a3 Qb5 21.Qg3 Rb8 22.b3 Qa5 23.Kb2 Qd2 24.Qe3 Rxb3+ 25.Qxb3 Bxb3 26.Re8+ Kg7 27.Kxb3 Qxg5 0-1

      Position after Black’s 24….Rb3

      

      Matulovic – It was one of the best positional games of the tournament, with a nice combination.

      Round Four

      Mikhail Tal, one of the best blitz players in the world has only 3 points out of 8 games. It is the biggest surprise of the tournament. He told me after this round: 'There is still time till the end." Reshevsky took the first half point from Fischer.

      Before the beginning of the tournament Hort was complaining that it would be too strong a tournament for him. But he was not right, he even won against Smyslov . .

      Round 4, April 8
      Game 1
      Reshevsky, Samuel – Fischer, Robert J.
      E92 King’s Indian, Gligoric-Taimanov System

      1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 O-O 5.Be2 d6 6.Nf3 e5 7.Be3 c6 8.O-O Ng4 9.Bg5 f6 10.Bc1 f5 11.h3 exd4 12.Nxd4 Ne5 13.exf5 gxf5 14.f4 Qb6 15.Be3 Ng6 16.Nxf5 Qxb2 17.Nxg7 Qxc3 18.Bd4 Qa5 19.Bg4 Na6 20.Bxc8 Raxc8 21.Qg4 Rc7 22.Ne6 Qf5 23.Nxf8 Qxg4 24.hxg4 Nxf8 25.f5 c5 26.Bc3 Rd7 27.Rad1 Nc7 28.Rfe1 Kf7 29.Re3 b5 30.Red3 bxc4 31.Rxd6 Rxd6 32.Rxd6 Nb5 33.Rf6+ Ke7 34.Rc6 Nxc3 35.Rxc5 Nxa2 36.Rxc4 Nd7 37.Ra4 Nc3 38.Rxa7 Ne4 39.Kh2 Kd6 40.Kh3 Ndf6 41.Kh4 h6 42.Rg7 Ke5 43.Rg6 Kf4 44.g3+ Kf3 45.Rxh6 Nxg4 46.Rg6 Nxg3 47.Rxg4 1/2-1/2

      - Terrible game by both players, sloppy even for blitz.

      - In the final position, Reshevsky might have played on. The game will become King and rook vs. King and Knight, a theoretical draw, but there are chances for the defending side to go wrong.

      - It's surprising that Fischer accepted the draw, he had a reputation for playing to the kings. Good game all the same, some sharp positions despite the inevitable errors that come with blitz games.

      - Why would Fischer play on when he had no winning chances?

      - Interesting that according to Fischer's own notes Sammy had him dead to rights in both of the blitz games they played on this day.

      (to be continued)

      Comment


      • #4
        Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

        April 14, 2020

        Round Four (continued)

        Round 4, April 8
        Game 2
        Fischer, Robert J. – Reshevsky, Samuel
        A34 English, symmetrical, Four Knights

        1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.c4 Nc6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.g3 g6 6.Bg2 Bg7 7.O-O O-O 8.d3 d6 9.h3 e5 10.a3 a5 11.Rb1 Bd7 12.Bd2 Ne8 13.Nd5 Ne7 14.b4 Nxd5 15.cxd5 cxb4 16.axb4 a4 17.b5 Nc7 18.b6 Nb5 19.Rb4 Qxb6 20.Qa1 a3 21.Rfb1 Rfc8 22.Bf1 Rc2 23.d4 a2 24.R1b3 exd4 25.Bxb5 Bxb5 26.Rxb5 Qd8 27.Rd3 Qe7 28.Ne1 Qxe4 29.Rbb3 Rxd2 30.Rxd2 d3 31.Rxa2 Bxa1 32.Rxa8+ Kg7 33.Rxa1 d2 34.Ng2 Qxd5 35.Rbb1 b5 36.Rd1 b4 37.Ne3 Qd3 38.Nf1 b3 39.Rab1 b2 40.Rxb2 d5 41.Rdxd2 Qc3 42.Ne3 d4 43.Nd1 Qc4 44.Rb1 h5 45.h4 f5 46.Rdb2 f4 47.Rb3 fxg3 48.Rxg3 Qc2 49.Rb7+ Kh6 50.Nb2 Qe4 51.Rb6 Qe1+ 52.Kg2 Qe4+ 53.Kf1 Qb1+ 54.Ke2 Qc2+ 55.Ke1 Qe4+ 56.Kd1 Qf5 57.Rbxg6+ Qxg6 58.Rxg6+ Kxg6 59.Ke2 Kf5 60.Kf3 1-0

        - An excellent game with excellent analysis by Fischer himself.

        - Remember this is only an error-laden - though entertaining - blitz game...

        - Can anyone see why Fischer didn't play 41 Rbxd2 instead of 41 Rdxd2? To me you not only win the pawn, but you get the other d-pawn on the next move and don't have to deal with the complications in the game. There must be a typo in the game score or some other reason (perhaps psychological) that doesn't present itself on the board.

        - Why is this called the "Kramnik Variation" when we all know Kramnik was not around then?

        - Maybe he was afraid of 41...Qf5, threatening the h-pawn and f-pawn simultaneously. Whereas Rdxd2 secures the defense of the f-pawn so he only has to worry about the h-pawn.

        Round 4, April 8
        Ivkov, Borislav – Petrosian, Tigran
        C15 French, Winawer, Nimzowitsch variation

        1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 Ne7 6.Qg4 Ng6 7.e5 Nc6 8.Bd3 Qh4 9.h3 Bd7 10.Nf3 Qxg4 11.hxg4 Na5 12.Ng5 h6 13.Nh3 Nc4 14.Nf4 Nxf4 15.Bxf4 Ke7 16.Ke2 Nb2 17.Rab1 Nxd3 18.cxd3 b6 19.g5 hxg5 20.Bxg5+ f6 21.Bf4 f5 22.Kd2 Kf7 23.Bg5 Rac8 24.Ke3 Ba4 25.Rbc1 Rxh1 26.Rxh1 c5 27.dxc5 Rxc5 28.Rh8 Be8 29.Rh1 Rxc3 30.Kd4 Rxa3 31.Rc1 Bb5 32.Rc3 Ra4+ 0-1

        Petrosian: Ivkov overlooked a pawn, but it was a good game.

        Round Four Results and Standings

        Reshevsky-Fischer 0.5-1.5
        Hort-Smyslov 2-0
        Petrosian-Ivkov 2-0
        Bronstein-Tal 2-0
        Ostojic-Matulovic 1-1
        Uhlmann-Korchnoi 0.5-1.5

        Fischer 7.5, Bronstein, Petrosian 6, Korchnoi, Matulovic, Hort 4 etc.

        Comment


        • #5
          Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

          April 15, 2020

          Round Five

          The big fight for the second place. Fischer plays very fast and very well. He will win the tournament. Bronstein is also in good form. He was complaining that he could have had more points. Tai and Korchnoi, the big candidates for the first place before the tournament, are only at 50 percent. - This was the biggest surprise.

          Round 5, April 8
          Game 1
          Fischer, Robert J. – Hort, Vlastimil
          A50 Queen’s Pawn, Slav

          1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Bf4 e6 6.e3 Nc6 7.Bb5 Bd6 8.Bxd6 Qxd6 9.f4 Bd7 10.Nf3 Ne4 11.Nxe4 dxe4 12.Nd2 Qb4 13.Qb3 Qa5 14.Qa4 Qxa4 15.Bxa4 Nb4 16.Bxd7+ Kxd7 17.Ke2 f5 18.Nc4 Rhc8 19.Rhc1 Nd3 20.Ne5+ Nxe5 21.dxe5 Rxc1 22.Rxc1 Rc8 23.Rxc8 Kxc8 24.Kd2 Kd7 25.Kc3 Kc6 26.Kc4 b6 27.a4 a6 28.b4 b5+ 29.axb5+ axb5+ 30.Kd4 Kb6 31.h3 g6 32.g4 h5 33.gxh5 gxh5 34.h4 Kc6 35.Kc3 1/2-1/2

          - Fischer opened games in this tournament 1 f4 and 1 g3. Maybe he didn't take blitz seriously?!

          - Larsen played these moves in classical games. I'm sure he took those seriously. Fischer was known to use opening novelties in Blitz games, so i think he took blitz more seriously than most. Can you imagine Kasparov using opening novelties in blitz??

          - Can you imagine Kasparov using opening novelties in blitz??

          You know, he beat me in a simul without using ANY novelties whatsoever. I was very hurt.

          In my opinion, Fischer may have actually been even better suited to 1.d4 than 1.e4.

          - Fischer was intellectually wedded to 1 e4 -- not that I am telling you anything you don't know. He was the last of the opening absolutists, the last really strong player to believe there was a "best move" even in the starting position. I think his use of 1 c4 and Alekhine's and Pirc's at the end of his career was purely pragmatic. If he had kept playing he would have had to broaden his repertoire. But I don't think he ever would have played 1 d4 with white or say, the French or Caro-Kann with black. He just didn't believe in them!

          I think you have a point re his style. The Ruy was almost perfect for him -- pity we never saw him play it against Karpov! That would have been fascinating. But obviously he loved forcing lines too, and 1 e4 gave him a lot of scope for those.

          In general, I don't think you can decide that a player should choose 1 e4 or 1 d4 based on whether you characterize his style as positional or tactical. Karpov was a tremendous 1 e4 player, while Kasparov and Shirov made their names as attacking players using 1 d4. Kasparov liked to build up his attacks into great crescendos, while keeping the position as complex as possible (who would have believed that 4 a3 in the Queen's Indian could be an attacking move?), while Karpov and Fischer tended more towards multiple sharp little struggles with clear resolutions within each game. Maybe that is the difference between 1 d4 and 1 e4 (to the extent there really is a difference) -- 1 d4 tends more towards the former type of game, and 1 e4 the latter.

          - Fischer played d4 against Tal in this blitz tournament ; in a book I have with all of Fischer's games, the first moves where (Fischer white) 1)d4 N-f6 2)Nf3 g6 3)g3 and so on, with d4,f4 c4 unusual moves for him, he used a surprise weapon .

          - In rounds 6, 8, 12 and 14 of the world championship against Spassky, Fischer opened c4. These games quickly transposed into queen's gambits or English in the case of round 8. This was Fischer's secret weapon against Spassky. When he played 1. c4 in round 6, a minor earthquake was caused by jaws dropping all over Russia.

          - a minor earthquake was caused by jaws dropping all over Russia.
          We can only imagine our fate if he played 1. f3.

          - This is probably the simplest Fischer game I've ever seen. I won't be so arrogant as to critique his play, but I really have no idea how he hoped to get an advantage in this game. Of course, it was blitz, and maybe he wasn't after an advantage anyway.

          - Hort was a strong player. My guess is that Fischer didn't want to see a particular variation on the board after 1. e4. Not that he was afraid of whatever it was, of course, but maybe he didn't want to reveal his best weapons against it.

          - This may be Fischer's least memorable game.

          Round 5, April 8
          Game 2
          Hort, Vlastimil – Fischer, Robert J.
          A48 King’s Indian, Torre Attack

          1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Bg5 h6 4.Bh4 Bg7 5.Nbd2 g5 6.Bg3 Nh5 7.e4 d6 8.Bd3 g4 9.Nh4 Bxd4 10.c3 Bf6 11.Nf5 Nxg3 12.fxg3 e6 13.Ne3 h5 14.O-O Nd7 15.Qe2 Qe7 16.Rae1 Ne5 17.Ndc4 Bd7 18.Na5 b6 19.Nac4 O-O-O 20.Nxe5 Bxe5 21.Ba6+ Kb8 22.Nc4 Bg7 23.a4 h4 24.a5 hxg3 25.hxg3 b5 26.Ne3 c6 27.c4 b4 28.c5 Bd4 29.cxd6 Qxd6 30.Rf4 Rh5 31.Rd1 Bxe3+ 32.Qxe3 Qxd1+ 33.Rf1 Qd6 34.Rc1 c5 0-1

          - An excellent example of white 'castling into' black's attack. White's king is safer in the center. While 31) Rd1? is the obvious loser, there was nothing constructive for white to do. It is impressive to see Fischer work on both sides of the board in harmony. First opening up the h file, then threatening to trap the silly a6 bishop, finally pinning the poor e3 knight.

          - Quite an interesting encounter...wonder how often Black has castled queenside in the King's Indian Defense?

          - Not often. Here is from the man himself:
          Shamkovich vs Bronstein, 1971 game is unique, for the fact that in a King's Indian Defense Black castled on the queenside! I was also pleased with the final combination. <Bronstein on King's Indian>

          - Wow! In a USSR championship no less...quite a game, too!

          Round 5, April 8
          Smyslov, Vasily – Petrosian, Tigran
          A33 English, symmetrical variation

          1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.Nf3 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 e6 6.e3 d5 7.cxd5 exd5 8.Bb5 Bd7 9.O-O Bd6 10.Nf3 Be6 11.b3 O-O 12.Bb2 a6 13.Be2 Rc8 14.Rc1 Re8 15.Re1 Qa5 16.Nd4 Bb4 17.Rf1 Ne7 18.Qd3 Ng6 19.a3 Bd6 20.b4 Qd8 21.Nxe6 fxe6 22.f4 Ne7 23.Na4 Rxc1 24.Rxc1 Nf5 25.Nc5 Bxc5 26.bxc5 Qa5 27.Bxf6 gxf6 28.h4 Ne7 29.Qc3 Qxc3 30.Rxc3 Rc8 31.Kf2 Rc7 32.Ke1 Kf7 33.Kd2 e5 34.fxe5 fxe5 35.g4 Ke6 36.g5 e4 37.Rb3 Ke5 38.Rb6 Nc6 39.h5 Kf5 40.g6 hxg6 41.hxg6 Kxg6 42.Bd1 Kf5 43.Ba4 Ne5 44.Bb3 Nf3+ 45.Kd1 d4 46.exd4 Nxd4 47.Ba4 e3 48.Rd6 Ke4 49.Rd8 Rxc5 50.Re8+ Kd3 0-1

          Petrosian – We both played very fast but there were no big mistakes

          Round 5, April 8
          Game 1
          Korchnoi, Viktor – Reshevsky, Samuel
          E52 Nimzo-Indian

          1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3 d5 6.Nf3 b6 7.a3 Be7 8.O-O Bb7 9.b4 Ne4 10.Bb2 Nxc3 11.Bxc3 dxc4 12.Bxc4 Nd7 13.d5 Bxd5 14.Bxd5 exd5 15.Qxd5 Nf6 16.Qe5 Bd6 17.Qg5 h6 18.Qf5 Qd7 19.Qc2 Qe7 20.Nd4 Qe4 21.Rac1 Rfe8 22.Nf5 Be5 23.Qxe4 Nxe4 24.Bxe5 Rxe5 25.Nd4 c5 26.bxc5 Nxc5 27.Rc4 Ne6 28.Nc6 Rc5 29.Rxc5 bxc5 30.Rb1 a5 31.Kf1 Ra6 32.Ne5 f6 33.Rb8+ Kh7 34.Nc4 a4 35.Ke2 Ra7 36.Rb5 Kg6 37.Ra5 Rxa5 38.Nxa5 Kf5 39.Kd3 Ke5 40.Nc4+ Kd5 41.Nb6+ Kc6 42.Nxa4 Ng5 43.Nc3 Nf7 44.a4 f5 45.Ne2 Ne5+ 46.Kc3 Ng4 47.Ng3 g6 48.Ne2 Nxf2 49.Nf4 g5 50.Ng6 Ne4+ 51.Kd3 Kd5 52.Ne7+ Ke6 53.Ng8 h5 54.a5 Kd5 55.Ne7+ Ke6 56.a6 c4+ 57.Kxc4 Nd6+ 58.Kb4 Kxe7 59.a7 1-0

          (If White's King was on a4 instead of b4, says Reshevsky, then 59 . . . Nc8!

          Korchnoi: I am not satisfied with my play.

          29....bxc5 In a tournament game Reshevsky surely should not have played this move, but this is blitz . . . Instead of taking with Knight, Reshevsky made a mistake . . Both grandmasters had on this moment 1.5 minutes . . .)

          - The final humiliation. Korchnoi wins from the White side of a Nimzo, something that Reshevsky failed to do in several trys in their previous Candidate's match. Yet 27... Ne6? is the culprit here, with 27... Rc8! (simply preventing Nc6) looking like fairly easy =. Of course, instead of 45 Ne2?, 45 f4 Nd6 46 e4 ( ) is probably good enough.

          Round 5, April 8
          Game 2
          Reshevsky, Samuel – Korchnoi, Viktor
          A00 Benko Opening

          1.g3 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.Nf3 g6 4.O-O Bg7 5.c4 e5 6.cxd5 cxd5 7.d3 Nc6 8.Nc3 Nge7 9.Bg5 h6 10.Bd2 O-O 11.e4 d4 12.Na4 b6 13.b4 a5 14.b5 Na7 15.Nb2 Nxb5 16.Nc4 Nc6 17.Rb1 Ba6 18.a4 Nc3 19.Bxc3 dxc3 20.Qc2 Bxc4 21.dxc4 Nd4 22.Qd3 Qd7 23.Kh1 Qxa4 24.Qxc3 Rfc8 25.Nxd4 exd4 26.Qf3 Qxc4 27.Rxb6 a4 28.e5 a3 29.e6 fxe6 30.Qg4 Qxf1+ 31.Bxf1 a2 32.Ra6 d3 33.Rxa2 d2 34.Rxd2 Ra1 35.Kg2 Kh7 36.Bd3 1-0

          - Kind of funny to see Reshevsky playing the Pirc Reversed, which is essentially what this is. Especially when you consider Korchnoi knew the Pirc better, and got wins including a famous win over Bobby Fischer. But, it worked out for Sammy here.

          - Am I the only one who finds this game weird??
          29.a6?? 30.Qg4?? 30...Qxf1???? 32.Ra6???? 32...d3???? 33...d2???? None of these moves make sense at all! Either there's something seriously wrong with the annotation or these guys were both drunk!

          - It's just blitz chess after all, and no doubt both players were about out of time.

          Round Five Results and Standings

          Korchnoi-Reshevsky 1-1
          Matulovic-Uhlmann 2-0
          Tal-Ostojic 2-0
          Ivkov-Bronstein 0.5-1.5
          Smyslov-Petrosian 1-1
          Fischer-Hort 1.5-0.5

          Fischer 9, Bronstein 7.5, Petrosian 7, Tal, Korchnoi 5 etc.

          Comment


          • #6
            Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

            April 15, 2020

            Round Six

            Four games ended with 2: 0; the game Petrosian - Fischer was at the centre of interest. Petrosian did not forget 1: 3 in the Match of the Century in Belgrade, but Fischer was on his best form. After this round Fischer is 2.5 points ahead. Who will be second? Tai and Korchnoi get better and better.

            Round 6, April 8
            Game 1
            Petrosian, Tigran – Fischer, Robert J.
            E70 King’s Indian, Benoni System

            1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.d4 d6 4.e4 Bg7 5.Bd3 c5 6.d5 O-O 7.Nge2 e6 8.Bg5 h6 9.Bd2 Nbd7 10.b3 exd5 11.cxd5 a6 12.O-O b5 13.f4 c4 14.bxc4 Nc5 15.Bc2 b4 16.e5 dxe5 17.fxe5 Ng4 18.Na4 Nxa4 19.Bxa4 Bxe5 20.Bf4 Qb6+ 21.Kh1 Bxa1 22.Qxa1 Nf2+ 23.Rxf2 Qxf2 24.Bxh6 f6 25.Bxf8 Kxf8 26.Ng1 Bg4 27.Qb1 Kg7 28.h3 Bf5 29.Qxb4 Ra7 30.Bd1 Qxa2 31.Bf3 a5 32.Qc5 Rb7 33.d6 Rb1 34.d7 Bxd7 35.Qe7+ Kh6 36.Qxd7 Qf2 37.Kh2 Qxg1+ 38.Kg3 Qe1+ 39.Kh2 Qe5+ 40.g3 Rb2+ 41.Bg2 Qe4 42.Qd5 Rxg2+ 0-1

            - whatever else, Fischer is an objective annotator, willing to criticize his own moves. (He also put in eight of his own losses in MSMG.)

            Black's move 8, that someone calls a "waste of tempo", Fischer awards an exclamation mark. I wish Bobby would have done a little talking about it.

            - I don't think he was criticizing the move, only pointing out that Fischer didn't gain any time.

            Personally I think Fischer took these blitz games a bit too seriously...but then, I suppose that sort of mentality is why he became WC, among other things.

            - unless there is a new edition that I haven't heard of, MSMG has "only" three losses (against Spassky, Tal and Geller--IMO the Tal and Geller losses are among the more "memorable" games in the entire book).

            - I stand corrected. I am sure I read that somewhere; probably in the old Frank Brady biography. anyway, I can't afford the book and in fact have never even seen a copy. It's a shame Fischer can't, or won't, get it together to put out a new edition. He could rake it in.

            - My copy dates from 1973, in glorious descriptive notation. The binding disintegrated years ago and I keep the book by itself in a small basket. It's probably my second favorite chess book, after Bronstein's Zurich 1953 Tournament Book.

            - Although he does use the phrase "waste of tempo", I believe his point was that White did not lose a tempo by playing two consecutive Bishop moves (8. Bg5 and 9. Bd2) because Black had to spend a tempo with 8. ... h6 to drive the Bishop away from the strong post at g5. The move 8. ... h6, which weakens Black's K-side, is only good because the Bishop cannot be allowed to remain on g5. The sequence 8. Bg5 h6 9. Bd2 results in a position that is comparatively better for White than the position with the immediate 8. Bd2. As indicated in his notes to this game, however, Fischer thinks that after 8. Bg5 h6, White's best is 9. Bh4 (maintaining the pin).

            Round 6, April 8
            Game 2
            Fischer, Robert J. – Petrosian, Tigran
            C18 French, Winawer, Classical variation

            1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Qc7 7.Nf3 Ne7 8.a4 Bd7 9.Bd3 Bc6 10.O-O Nd7 11.Ba3 h6 12.Re1 b6 13.Nd2 Bxa4 14.dxc5 bxc5 15.Qg4 Bc6 16.Qxg7 Rg8 17.Qxh6 Nxe5 18.Bxc5 d4 19.Be4 dxc3 20.Bxc6+ N7xc6 21.Ne4 O-O-O 22.Red1 Ng4 23.Qh4 Rxd1+ 24.Rxd1 f5 25.Nd6+ Kb8 26.Nb5 Qg7 27.Bd6+ Kb7 28.Rb1 Kc8 29.Qg3 Qb7 30.Nxc3 Qa6 31.h3 Nf6 32.Qh4 Nd7 33.Qh7 Rd8 34.Qf7 Qc4 35.Rb3 Qd4 36.Qxe6 Qf6 37.Qd5 Nde5 38.Nb5 Qf7 39.Qc5 Nf3+ 40.Rxf3 Kd7 41.Rd3 1-0

            Position after White’s 20.Bxc6+

            

            What is Black’s best move here?

            - 16. Qxg7 looks a bit risky. Opening the line directly to your King for Black doesn't seem worth the two pawns. Then again I don't play the French and probably don't know what I'm talking about.

            - Look at it this way , once the g-pawn is dead it can no longer threaten white's king or anything for that matter. :)

            - That's true. I know the logic behind the move, I just think it would be a difficult move to play because it can create a world of trouble(I'm not just referring to this move in particular, but also other such games where Qxg7 is played in the French).

            - Well after seeing the Fischer's notes in this game, I did not really enjoy this as there are many errors from both the masters here where they threw off the wins and draws...

            - Fischer comments clearly indicates that it was petrosian's mistake at move 20 that cost him the game, and not the fischer's genius. His games indicates more often than not that he won coz of luck many a times.

            - Out of curiosity, if a player doesn't make a mistake, how is the other guy supposed to win?

            - good point Fischer is the genius because he saw the mistake and Petrosian did not. All good players make decisions and take risks now and then, but the true genius's make the fewest mistakes and know when and how to punish their opponents mistakes. If there were no mistakes or risks taken, then EVERY chess game would end in a draw. My point is Fischer was a genius!

            Round 6, April 8
            Tal, Mikhail – Uhlmann, Wolfgang
            A00 Benko Opening

            1.g3 d5 2.Bg2 Nf6 3.c4 dxc4 4.Nf3 Nbd7 5.O-O a6 6.Na3 c5 7.Nxc4 e6 8.d4 Rb8 9.Bf4 Ra8 10.dxc5 Nxc5 11.Qxd8+ Kxd8 12.Rfd1+ Nfd7 13.Nb6 Ra7 14.Bb8 1-0

            A rather famous game – notorious even! Black loses his rook after 90 seconds, Tal spent 30 seconds on the game.

            Final Position

            

            Round 6, April 8
            Hort, Vlastimil – Reshevsky, Samuel
            B48 Sicilian, Taimanov variation

            1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 Qc7 7.Bd3 Nf6 8.O-O Ne5 9.h3 b5 10.f4 Nc4 11.Bxc4 Qxc4 12.Qd3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.a4 Qxd3 15.cxd3 b4 16.Nce2 Bb7 17.Nb3 Rc8 18.Rac1 Be7 19.Na5 Rb8 20.Ba7 Bd8 21.Bxb8 Bxa5 22.Bd6 Bb6+ 23.Kh1 f6 24.a5 Be3 25.Rc7 1-0

            Black resigns because he is losing a piece.

            Both grandmasters played very fast, so that we could not write down the moves. But Mikhail Tal, having finished both his games, was watching this game and after he wrote out the moves for us.

            Results of Round Six and Standings

            Reshevsky-Hort 0-2
            Petrosian-Fischer 0-2
            Bronstein-Smyslov 1-1
            Ostojic-Ivkov 0-2
            Uhlmann-Tal 0.5-1.5
            Korchnoi-Matulovic 2-0

            Fischer 11, Bronstein 8.5, Korchnoi, Petrosian 7, Tal, Hort 6.5

            Comment


            • #7
              Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

              April 16, 2020

              Round Seven

              Fischer will be first, Ostojic last. That is all we know for the moment. Fischer again won against a close opponent. If Bronstein won 2 : 0, Fischer would be only half point ahead. But Bronstein said: Bobby is 12 years younger, and this is a blitz tournament.

              Tai had not had much success in the tournament games against Korchnoi. The moment has come for his revenge. Tai took the opportunity. Look at his beautiful game when he sacrificed, as he had one hour to calculate. It was Tai we remembered from his ,,golden days", in 1958-1960, when he was always first.

              Round 7, April 8
              Game 1
              Fischer, Robert J. – Bronstein, David
              C16 French, Winawer, Advance variation

              1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 b6 5.a3 Bf8 6.f4 Nc6 7.Nf3 Nh6 8.Bd3 Nf5 9.Ne2 h5 10.g3 Bb7 11.c3 Qd7 12.Qc2 O-O-O 13.b4 f6 14.Bd2 Kb8 15.O-O Nfe7 16.Rfb1 h4 17.Nxh4 g5 18.fxg5 fxe5 19.Rf1 exd4 20.cxd4 Bg7 21.Bc3 e5 22.Rf7 exd4 23.Rxg7 Rxh4 24.gxh4 Qg4+ 25.Ng3 dxc3 26.Qxc3 d4 27.Qd2 Ne5 28.Rf1 Nd5 29.Bf5 Nf3+ 30.Rxf3 Qxf3 31.Be4 Qxa3 32.Qxd4 Qc1+ 33.Kf2 Rf8+ 34.Nf5 Nc3 35.Bxb7 Rxf5+ 36.Bf3 Nd5 37.Rg8+ Kb7 38.Qe4 Qd2+ 39.Kg3 c6 40.Qxf5 Qe1+ 41.Kg4 Ne3+ 42.Kf4 Nxf5 43.Kxf5 Qxb4 44.Rg7+ Kc8 45.Be4 Qf8+ 46.Kg6 Qe8+ 47.Kf5 1/2-1/2

              - Two of the most prominent chess giants in the history of the game. Fischer was never one to hold the French to a high esteem and many opponents tried it against him. The annotations are interesting. Black's chance at counter play involves a pawn sacrifice and then, importantly, capturing AWAY from the king so as to open lines of attack. Fischer willing accepts the iso rather than to even hint at awakening the bishop on b7. However, in response to Fischer’s note on move 29, I thought 27) Qe2 would be faster. Fischer states the miss of two easy mates. Fun game.

              - Fischer's comments are not logically consistent. <French (C16)> is no worse than any other opening system in French.

              The counter-attacking chances <( 34...Qf4+ and 35...Rf5 wins for Black. - Fischer) > may look unfair, yet it happened.

              - Interesting note by Fischer about Byrne's line. Fischer would probably have prepared this line for his match against Petrosian in 1971 and perhaps also in 1970. Certainly Fischer played 3 Nc3 against Petrosian in 1971, and Petrosian had previously played the Winawer with 4...Qd7 with the same idea of the Q-side fianchetto (usually aiming at exchange of the white-squared bishops, but actually Black's white squares can then become weak) - unless Fischer was banking on using 4 a3 ?!, with which he lost to Kovacevic, against Petrosian's Winawer. So maybe Fischer knew a refutation; or maybe he was bluffing.

              5...Bf8, of course, is more Petrosianesque than Petrosian himself.

              - 5...Bf8
              Well it worked for ivanchuk against kasparov so it can’t be all that bad can it?

              See Kasparov vs Ivanchuk, 1995

              Round 7, April 8
              Game 2
              Bronstein, David – Fischer, Robert J.
              B22 Sicilian, Alapin’s variation

              1.e4 c5 2.c3 Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.d4 cxd4 5.Qxd4 e6 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Qe4 d6 8.Nbd2 Be7 9.Bd3 dxe5 10.Nxe5 Nxe5 11.Qxe5 O-O 12.Bc2 Bd6 13.Qh5 f5 14.Nf3 Nf4 15.Bxf4 Bxf4 16.O-O g6 17.Qh3 Qf6 18.Rad1 b6 19.Rfe1 Kh8 20.g3 Bc7 21.Qh6 Qg7 22.Qxg7+ Kxg7 23.Bb3 Re8 24.Nd4 Kf6 25.f4 a6 26.Nf3 Re7 27.h4 h6 28.Kf2 Bb7 29.Ne5 Rae8 30.a4 g5 31.hxg5+ hxg5 32.fxg5+ Kxg5 33.Rd4 Rh7 34.Nf3+ Kf6 35.Rh4 Rxh4 36.gxh4 e5 37.h5 e4 38.Nd4 f4 39.Rg1 e3+ 40.Ke2 Be4 41.Bc2 f3+ 42.Kxe3 Bxc2+ 43.Kxf3 Be4+ 44.Kf2 Bh7 45.h6 Re7 46.Rg4 Bg6 47.Rh4 Rh7 48.Kf3 Kg5 49.Rg4+ Kxh6 0-1

              - Do not take lightly the power of two connected passed pawns

              - To me, this position looks like Bronstein resigned. There was no immediate threat, so he could have made a quick move if he wanted to, even if he was low on time. But he was down a piece and he lost his passed pawn.

              - Fischer makes mincemeat of his opponent once again.

              - This is a wonderful game, that a master would be proud to play in 40/2, never mind 5 minutes for the whole game.

              - It's a shame that these two only played four games together - and only two non-blitz games.

              Round 7, April 8
              Tal, Mikhail – Korchnoi, Viktor
              C07 French, Tarrasch, open variation

              1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.Ngf3 a6 5.exd5 exd5 6.Be2 c4 7.O-O Bd6 8.Re1 Ne7 9.b3 b5 10.a4 c3 11.Nf1 b4 12.Ne5 O-O 13.Bf4 f6 14.Nd3 Bxf4 15.Nxf4 Qd6 16.Bf3 Nbc6 17.Ne3 Qxf4 18.Nxd5 Nxd5 19.Bxd5+ Kh8 20.Bxc6 Ra7 21.Qe2 Qxd4 22.Rad1 Qc5 23.Qe8 Rf7 24.Rd5 Qb6 25.Qxf7 1-0

              Korchnoi in time pressure played 24…Qb6 and allowed 25.Qxf7

              Korchnoi: It was a good game. I made a mistake on the 13th move

              Tal: A nice combination. I think that Korchnoi did not see Ne3.

              - As always, Tal surprises :)

              - You have to love the position after 22.Rad1. Tal lets Korchnoi recover the pawn, but look at his development! He controls the only two open files, and the fact that the Black rooks are not connected, and the Black king has no escape, forms the basis for the nice combination that sends Korchnoi home for the night.

              - And this because Korchnoi is a french specialist :)

              - 17.Ne3 sets up a beautiful trap which Black readily falls into!

              - "tal is a very ordinary player"...korchnoi(after their very close candidate match '68)

              - Korchnoi was quite upset because their match was much closer than he expected, with Tal missing a couple of wins, and Korchnoi just managing to scrape through 2 to 1. Tal never bore him a grudge though, he understood K's character and said he doesn't really mean many of his mean comments..

              Round 7, April 8
              Matulovic, Milan – Reshevsky, Samuel
              B42 Sicilian, Kan

              1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.Bd3 Qc7 6.O-O Nf6 7.Qe2 d6 8.c4 Nc6 9.Be3 Ne5 10.h3 Be7 11.Nc3 O-O 12.Rac1 Bd7 13.f4 Nxd3 14.Qxd3 Rac8 15.b3 Rfd8 16.g4 Bc6 17.f5 e5 18.Nde2 Nd7 19.Ng3 f6 20.Kh2 Qa5 21.Bd2 Qc5 22.h4 b5 23.Nd5 Bxd5 24.exd5 Qa3 25.cxb5 Rxc1 26.Rxc1 axb5 27.Rc2 Rb8 28.Rc7 Nc5 29.Qc2 Bd8 30.Rc6 Ra8 31.Rxd6 Be7 32.Rc6 Qxa2 33.Qd1 Nxb3 34.Rc2 Qa4 35.Be3 Nd4 36.Bxd4 exd4 37.Ne4 Qb3 38.Rc8+ Rxc8 39.Qxb3 1-0

              37….Qb3 is a big mistake, Reshevsky overlooked a simple move in time pressure and lost the Queen

              Matulovic: A very sharp game. Reshevsky played well till the 38thmove.

              Reshevsky: A terrible mistake. We had half a minute each left…

              Round Seven Results and Standings

              Matulovic-Reshevsky 2-0
              Tal-Korchnoi 2-0
              Ivkov-Uhlmann 2-0
              Smyslov-Ostojic 2-0
              Fischer-Bronstein 1.5-0.5
              Hort-Petrosian 1-1

              Fischer 12.5, Bronstein 9, Tal 8.5, Petrosian, Matulovic 8, Hort 7.5, Korchnoi 7, Ivkov 6.5, Smyslov 5.5, Reshevsky 4.5, Uhlmann 4 and Ostojic 2

              Comment


              • #8
                Tal - Korchnoi nice game.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

                  April 16, 2020

                  Round Eight

                  Bronstein is no longer in the second position. Tai finally came to the second place. Reshevsky started to play at his best, but it seems too late. Tai was complaining that it was short time to the end of the Tournament, only three rounds. If there had been several rounds more, perhaps Tai would have made the fight for the first place more interesting. Being 4.5 points ahead, Fischer is already winner. But he plays each game as if it were decisive for the first place.

                  Round 8, April 8
                  Game 1
                  Ostojic, Predrag – Fischer, Robert J.
                  B93 Sicilian, Najdorf

                  1.e4 c5 2.Ne2 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.a4 Qc7 7.Bd3 g6 8.f4 Bg7 9.Nf3 O-O 10.O-O Nbd7 11.Kh1 b6 12.Qe1 Bb7 13.Qh4 Rac8 14.Bd2 e5 15.Rae1 exf4 16.Bxf4 Ne5 17.Bh6 Bxh6 18.Qxh6 Nfg4 19.Qh4 Nxf3 20.Rxf3 f5 21.Rf4 d5 22.Rxg4 fxg4 23.Qxg4 Rf4 24.Qg3 dxe4 25.Bxe4 Bxe4 26.Nxe4 Rxe4 0-1

                  - I don't see a win by Fischer. Maybe a draw. Can somebody help me to understand?

                  - 10 minutes analysis by Fritz 8:

                  Main line: 27.Rxe4 Qxg3 28.hxg3 Rxc2 29.Rb4 Rc6 30.Rd4 h6 31.b4 Kf7 32.Rd7+ Kf6 33.Ra7 b5 34.axb5 axb5

                  Eval.: (-0.62)

                  - Oh, I thought Black was winning a pawn by 27. Rxe4 Qxc2 threatening ...Qxb2 and keeping in reserve threats to the first rank like ...Qb1+.

                  Can Fritz, or anyone else who sees it, say what White has against 27. Rxe4 Qxc2?

                  - According to the book 'Chess Meets of the Century' by Bjelica & Fischer, Ostojic lost this game on time.

                  - Nobody reported that Ostojic could quickly win this game, because 20...f5? was a blunder by Fischer.

                  After 21. exf5! Bxf3 (what else? If 21...h5, 22. Re7!, Qb8 23. Qg5, Rf6 24. Ne4, Bxe4 25. Bxe4 threatening both Bd5+ and h3 ) 22. Re7! and no way to avoid either Qxh7+ or to lose the Queen (22...Bxg2+ 23. Kxg2, Qc6+ 24. Be4 ). If 22...Qxe7 23. Qxe7, Rae8 24. Qh4! decides.

                  21. Rf4?? was a big mistake and a waste of a winning chance by Ostojic.

                  - Ostojic finished last with only 2 points whilst Fischer topped the Herceg Novi World Blitz Championship 1970 with 19/22. "In my opinion, Fischer plays blitz in the same manner as in serious games: quickly, confidently and practically faultlessly.", said Tal.

                  - Practically faultlessly, but not in this game with Ostojic.

                  A note on Ostojic from Wikipedia: Predrag Ostojić (22 February 1938 — 5 July 1996) was a Yugoslav chess Grandmaster, born in Kraljevo. He won the Yugoslav Chess Championship in 1968 and 1971. His 5-year best rating is 2480, according to Dr. Arpad Elo.

                  Ostojić was murdered by gangsters who threw him out of a window because of unpaid gambling debts.

                  Round 8, April 8
                  Game 2
                  Fischer, Robert J. – Ostojic, Predrag
                  B34 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Exchange variation

                  1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.e5 Ng8 8.Bc4 Bg7 9.Bf4 Qa5 10.O-O Bxe5 11.Bxe5 Qxe5 12.Re1 Qc7 13.Qd4 f6 14.Bxg8 Rxg8 15.Qxf6 d5 16.Re2 Ba6 17.Nxd5 cxd5 18.Qxa6 Rf8 19.Rae1 Rf7 20.Qe6 Rd8 21.c3 Kf8 22.g3 d4 23.cxd4 Rxd4 24.Qe5 Qxe5 25.Rxe5 Rd2 26.R1e2 Rxe2 27.Rxe2 Rf6 28.Kf1 Rc6 29.Ke1 e6 30.Kd2 Ke7 31.Re4 Rb6 32.b3 Ra6 33.a4 Kd6 34.Rh4 h5 35.Rd4+ Ke7 36.Kc3 Rc6+ 37.Rc4 Ra6 38.Rc7+ Kf6 39.Kb4 Rb6+ 40.Kc4 a6 41.a5 Rd6 42.b4 Rd2 43.Kc5 Rxf2 44.Kb6 e5 45.Kxa6 e4 46.b5 e3 47.Rc1 Ke5 48.b6 Rg2 49.b7 Rb2 50.Ka7 g5 51.b8=Q+ Rxb8 52.Kxb8 1-0

                  Position after Black’s 12…Qc7??

                  

                  - If Fischer entices you with a pawn, best not to take it.

                  Round 8, April 8
                  Game 2
                  Tal, Mikhail – Matulovic, Milan
                  A89 Dutch, Leningrad, main variation

                  1.Nf3 g6 2.d4 d6 3.g3 f5 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.O-O Nf6 6.c4 O-O 7.Nc3 Nc6 8.d5 Na5 9.Qa4 b6 10.Nd2 Ng4 11.Qc2 Ne5 12.b3 f4 13.Bb2 c5 14.dxc6Naxc6 15.Nd5 Bf5 16.Qc1 g5 17.gxf4 gxf4 18.Nf3 Nxf3+ 19.Bxf3 e5 20.Kh1 e4 21.Rg1 Ne5 22.Bg2 Ng4 23.Qxf4 Bxb2 24.Bxe4 Bxe4+ 25.Qxe4 Bxa1 26.Qxg4+ Kh8 27.Rxa1 Qe8 28.Rg1 Rg8 29.Qd4+ Qe5 30.Qxe5+ dxe5 31.Rg3 Rxg3 32.hxg3 Kg7 33.Kg2 Kf7 34.Kf3 Rd8 35.Ke4 Ke6 36.g4 a6 37.f3 b5 38.Nc7+ Kf6 39.Nxa6 Rd4+ 40.Ke3 1-0

                  Position after 23.Qxf4

                  

                  Tal: Matulovic did not expect 23.Qxf4 but it was possible. I think it was an interesting game. Matulovic played very well.

                  - Nice sacrifice. Tal in his element.

                  - Looks like Milan lost on time

                  Results of Round Eight and Standings

                  Reshevsky-Petrosian 1-1
                  Bronstein-Hort 0.5-1.5
                  Ostojic-Fischer 0-2
                  Uhlmann-Smyslov 1-1
                  Korchnoi-Ivkov 2-0
                  Matulovic-Tal 0.5-1.5

                  Fischer 14.5, Tal 10, Bronstein 9.5, Korchnoi, Petrosian, Hort 9 etc.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

                    April 17, 2020

                    Round Nine

                    Tal is one point ahead of his rivals for the second place. Fischer is four points ahead and he can lose all his games till the end. As for the last player it is obvious that Ostojic was not for this company. The tournament was too strong for him.

                    Round 9, April 8
                    Game 1
                    Fischer, Robert J. – Uhlmann, Wolfgang
                    C15 French, Winawer, Nimzowitsch variation

                    1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 dxe4 6.Qg4 Nf6 7.Qxg7 Rg8 8.Qh6 Rg6 9.Qe3 Nc6 10.Bb2 b6 11.O-O-O Bb7 12.h3 h5 13.c4 Qd6 14.Ne2 O-O-O 15.Nf4 Rgg8 16.Be2 Qe7 17.d5 exd5 18.cxd5 Ne5 19.c4 Ba6 20.Qc3 Nfd7 21.d6 cxd6 22.c5 Bxe2 23.cxd6+ Nc5 24.dxe7 Rxd1+ 25.Rxd1 Bxd1 26.Qxe5 Ba4 27.Kb1 Bc6 28.Nd5 Bxd5 29.Qxd5 1-0

                    Position after Black’s 21…cxd6

                    

                    - 23...Nc5??

                    - 23...Nc5??, what else is there to play? As pointed out in the game 22.... Bxe2 was the mistake. Fischer sure gives some good notes!

                    - It's quite impressive to see the moves d6 and c5 played in a blitz game.

                    - Fischer's iron accuracy wins again.

                    A lot of his opponents played the Winawer against him in this tournament...I guess word was getting out that he had trouble with this opening....But aside from his only loss of the tournament to Korchnoi, he handled the Winawer quite well at Herceg Novi

                    - <Fischer: If 15...e5 16.Nxg6 exd4 White has many interesting possibilities; the most sure is 17.Nf4 dxe3 18.Rxd6 Rxd6 19.fxe3 h4 20.Be2 with a winning position in the endgame with two strong Bishops.>
                    The assessment of the position at the end of this line as decidedly winning for White may be a tad too optimistic, but in any case this comment by Fischer nicely illustrates what Robert Byrne wrote about his style in the introduction to Mednis' "How to Beat Bobby Fischer":

                    <In discussing some of his most exciting games with him, I am struck primarily by his evaluation of the play in predominantly simple positional terms and endgame possibilities, very much in the manner of Capablanca. Even in the midst of mopping up the floor with Najdorf by smashing through a sacrificial attack (in Fischer vs Najdorf, 1962), he never let the tactical fireworks distract him from envisaging the entire situation in terms of pawn structure, weak squares, and other solid, positional considerations. To confirm further Capablanca's heavy influence on his play, it must be pointed out that whenever he is faced with the choice between pursuing a promising middle-game attack and achieving a small but clear and certain endgame advantage, Fischer invariably goes for the endgame.>

                    - A beautiful tactical game from Fischer; laced with traps and always waiting to explode! Hard to believe it was blitz.

                    Round 9, April 8
                    Game 2
                    Uhlmann, Wolfgang – Fischer, Robert J.
                    E73 King’s Indian, Averbakh System

                    1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 O-O 5.Be2 d6 6.Bg5 h6 7.Be3 c5 8.d5 e6 9.Qd2 exd5 10.exd5 Kh7 11.h3 Re8 12.Bd3 Nbd7 13.Nf3 Ne5 14.Nxe5 Rxe5 15.O-O Bf5 16.Bf4 Bxd3 17.Qxd3 Re7 18.Rfe1 a6 19.g4 Qd7 20.Qg3 Rae8 21.Rxe7 Rxe7 22.Bxd6 Ne4 23.Nxe4 Rxe4 24.Bxc5 Rxc4 25.Qd6 Qxd6 26.Bxd6 Rd4 1/2-1/2

                    - I thought Uhlmann had a much better position, but as to what he should have done differently, I can't say.

                    Round 9, April 8
                    Game 1
                    Reshevsky, Samuel – Tal, Mikhail
                    A65 Benoni

                    1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.e4 g6 7.Bb5+ Nbd7 8.f4 Bg7 9.Nf3 O-O 10.O-O a6 11.Bd3 Re8 12.a4 c4 13.Bc2 Nc5 14.e5 Ng4 15.h3 Nh6 16.Be3 Nd7 17.g4 dxe5 18.fxe5 Nxe5 19.Nxe5 Rxe5 20.Bd4 Rg5 21.Bxg7 Nxg4 22.hxg4 Bxg4 23.Qd4 Bh3+ 24.Kf2 Rg2+ 25.Kf3 Qg5 26.Qf4 Qh5+ 27.Ke3 Re8+ 28.Kd4 Rg4 29.Bf6 Bxf1 30.Rxf1 Rxf4+ 31.Rxf4 Qh2 32.Re4 Qf2+ 33.Kxc4 Rc8+ 34.Kb3 Qxf6 0-1

                    - I don't think Tal saw this through to the end. (from move 21), but just liked what he saw a few moves ahead.

                    - Well of course not, nobody could have seen that far in advance.

                    - Wow, Tal rips reshevsky up good here. It seems like a lot of these GM`s in Tal`s time fell to these benoni attacks, and looking at Tal’s games it seems as if he is playing the same game basically in the benoni, so my question is this: Why do these guys seem so unprepared in these games ? or was Tal just that good?

                    - yes, Tal was that good! too bad for him, sickness did not allow him to create what would have been hundreds of similar games, he was a mastermind after all

                    - You misunderstand the relevance of Tal's sickness, the candle that burns most brightly burns half as long.

                    - well maybe, however I do know that he left important tournaments unattended because of his sickness, have you seen the movie Luzin's Defense? I can't recall the title very well so it may not be called this way, but it shows how sickness can destroy a player's enthusiasm towards chess

                    - was a good movie indeed. It made my girl cry and she liked it, if it does that!! it is a great chess movie. Back to the Benoni: I think that systems involving the early move f3,instead of putting the knight on f3 give the benoni the roughest time.

                    - Sammy could have had a good game with 25. Ke1!

                    Results of Round Nine and Standings

                    Tal-Reshevsky 2-0
                    Ivkov-Matulovic 0.5-1.5
                    Smyslov-Korchnoi 0-2
                    Fischer-Uhlmann 1.5-0.5
                    Hort-Ostojic 2-0
                    Petrosian-Bronstein 1-1

                    Fischer 16, Tal 12, Korchnoi, Hort 11, Bronstein 10.5, Matulovic and Petrosian 10 etc.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

                      April 17, 2020

                      Round Ten

                      Fischer lost his only game one round before the end of the Tournament! It happened at the moment when he was sure of his victory. Fischer won the first game against Korchnoi and he was proclaimed the winner. Korchnoi was the only player who drew his match against Fischer. Also, after this round everybody had at least one lost game. With his victory against Ivkov - Tal, Tal was practically assured second place. The question arose who would be third?

                      Round 10, April 8
                      Game 1
                      Korchnoi, Viktor – Fischer, Robert J.
                      E97 King’s Indian, Orthodox, Aronin-Taimanov variation

                      1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 O-O 6.Nf3 e5 7.O-O Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.Nd2 c5 10.a3 Ne8 11.b4 b6 12.Rb1 f5 13.f3 f4 14.a4 g5 15.a5 Rf6 16.bxc5 bxc5 17.Nb3 Rg6 18.Bd2 Nf6 19.Kh1 g4 20.fxg4 Nxg4 21.Rf3 Rh6 22.h3 Ng6 23.Kg1 Nf6 24.Be1 Nh8 25.Rd3 Nf7 26.Bf3 Ng5 27.Qe2 Rg6 28.Kf1 Nxh3 29.gxh3 Bxh3+ 30.Kf2 Ng4+ 31.Bxg4 Bxg4 0-1

                      Fischer - And here Korchnoi thought for about a minute and a half and not seeing a defence to the double threat of 31...Bxe2 and 32...Qh4+ resigned

                      - Steinitz had a winning streak of 25 straight games. Fischer's winning streak is counted either as 19, 20, or 21. The two sometimes-counted-sometimes-not games are the Panno game from the last round of the Interzonal (1.c4 Black resigns; the argument for counting it is that Panno did resign rather than forfeit), and a rescheduled game from early in the tournament that was actually played during the winning streak.

                      Personally, I think 20 is the most sensible number (I count the rescheduled but not the 1... resigns game).

                      - After 24...Nh8 25.Nd2! and 97 hours of thinking Stockfish is not impressed...

                      <73/104 97:00:51 0.00 25.Nd2 Rg6 26.Rd3 Nf7 27.a6 h6 28.Qa4 Bf8 29.Nd1 Ng5 30.Nf2 Bd7 31.Qa3 Rg7 32.Rdb3 Qe8 33.Rb7 h5 34.R1b3 Qg6 35.Bf1 Re7 36.Rb1 Ree8 37.Be2 Bc8 38.h4 Ngh7 39.Rc7 Ng4 40.Nxg4 hxg4 41.Qa4 f3 42.Bf1 Bh6 43.Qc6 Bxa6 44.Qxa6 Be3+ 45.Bf2 Qh6 46.Bxe3 Qxe3+ 47.Kh1 Qf2 48.g3 Qxg3 49.Qxd6 Qxh4+ 50.Kg1 Nf6 51.Rb3 Qg3+ 52.Kh1 Qf4 53.Rbb7 Qh6+ 54.Kg1 Qe3+ 55.Kh1

                      - Stockfish would have flagged 96 hours and 55 minutes ago! :)

                      Round 10, April 8
                      Game 2
                      Fischer, Robert J. – Korchnoi, Viktor
                      C19 French, Winawer, Advance, Smyslov variation

                      1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 Ne7 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 c5 7.a4 Qa5 8.Bd2 Nbc6 9.Qg4 O-O 10.Nf3 f6 11.Bd3 f5 12.Qg3 c4 13.Be2 b5 14.O-O bxa4 15.Ng5 Nxd4 16.cxd4 Qxd2 17.Qh4 h6 18.Nf3 Ng6 19.Nxd2 Nxh4 20.Rxa4 Ng6 21.Rfa1 a6 22.Nb1 Ne7 23.Ra5 Nc6 24.R5a4 Nxd4 25.Bd1 f4 26.Nc3 Nc6 27.Ne2 Nxe5 28.Nd4 Rb8 29.h4 Rb6 30.h5 Nc6 31.Ne2 e5 32.Nc3 Rd8 33.Bf3 e4 34.Be2 Nd4 35.Bf1 Bb7 36.Rd1 Nb5 37.Nxe4 Rc8 38.Nd2 Nc3 39.Rda1 Nxa4 40.Rxa4 Bc6 41.Ra5 Bb5 42.Nf3 c3 43.Nd4 Bxf1 44.Kxf1 Rb4 45.Rxd5 a5 46.Ke2 a4 47.Kd3 Ra8 48.Kxc3 Rb1 49.Rb5 Rxb5 50.Nxb5 a3 51.Nxa3 Rxa3+ 52.Kd4 Ra2 53.Kd3 Kf7 54.g3 fxg3 55.fxg3 0-1

                      Position after White’s 19.Nxd2

                      

                      - This is supposed to be the strongest blitz player of all time(Fischer that is). Eh, hardly....This game is a pretty good example, he misses what, 3 one movers?.
                      He was lost against Tal as black as well, but Misha faltered, in a hard fight.

                      Annotating by result is unfortunately far too common in chess. Fact is that Fischer’s level of play was nothing over the ordinary in these blitz games(as he acknowledges in his annotations) but he moved fast, that's it.

                      - Who <doesn't> move fast in blitz? Anyone?

                      - After move 51 Fischer probably thought he might still be able to win on time but gave up the idea as hopeless when Korch played his next three moves in about two nanoseconds. Bear in mind that in 1987 Kasparov won a blitz game on time vs. Karpov despite being a rook, knight, and pawn in arrears.

                      Round 10, April 8
                      Tal, Mikhail – Ivkov, Borislav
                      B06 Robatsch Defence

                      1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Bg5 h6 5.Be3 b6 6.Nf3 Bb7 7.Bd3 Nd7 8.Qd2 c5 9.O-O-O Ngf6 10.b3 c4 11.Bxc4 Nxe4 12.Nxe4 Bxe4 13.Rhe1 Bxf3 14.gxf3 e6 15.Bf4 Nf6 16.Bxe6 fxe6 17.Rxe6+ Kf7 18.Rxd6 Qc8 19.Be5 Rd8 20.Rxd8 Qxd8 21.Rg1 Qd7 22.Qd3 Qf5 23.Qc4+ Qe6 24.Qc7+ Qe7 25.Qc4+ Qe6 26.Qd3 Qf5 27.Qa6 Qd7 28.h4 h5 29.Qd3 Qf5 30.Qc4+ Qe6 31.Qxe6+ Kxe6 32.Rxg6 1-0

                      They played so fast that we could not write the moves. lvkov gave a piece for a pawn, and Tal won - 1: 0

                      Tal: My sacrifice was half correct. May be enough for a draw, but lvkov was in time troubles. Our second game was better.

                      lvkov: I had a good position, but no time on my clock. .

                      Round 10, April 8
                      Game 2
                      Ivkov, Borislav – Tal, Mikhail
                      E92 King’s Indian, Petrosian System, Stein variation

                      1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.Be2 e5 7.d5 a5 8.Bg5 Na6 9.Nd2 Nc5 10.O-O h6 11.Bh4 Bd7 12.b3 c6 13.a3 cxd5 14.cxd5 Rc8 15.a4 Qb6 16.Rb1 Qb4 17.Na2 Qd4 18.Bxf6 Bxf6 19.Bf3 b5 20.axb5 Bxb5 21.Be2 Nd3 22.Nc4 Nf4 23.Bg4 Bxc4 24.bxc4 Qxe4 25.f3 Qe3+ 26.Kh1 Rxc4 0-1

                      A King’s Gambit!

                      Round 10, April 8
                      Game 1
                      Bronstein, David – Reshevsky, Samuel
                      C36 King’s Gambit Accepted, Modern Defence

                      1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5 4.exd5 Nf6 5.c4 c6 6.d4 cxd5 7.Nc3 dxc4 8.Bxc4 Bd6 9.Qe2+ Qe7 10.Qxe7+ Kxe7 11.Nb5 Bb4+ 12.Bd2 Nc6 13.d5 Bxd2+ 14.Kxd2 Na5 15.d6+ Kd8 16.Bxf7 Bd7 17.Nc7 Rc8 18.Rhe1 Rf8 19.Ng5 h6 20.Nge6+ Bxe6 21.Nxe6+ Kd7 22.Nxf8+ Rxf8 23.Be6+ Kxd6 24.Rad1 Kc7 25.Kc3 Nc6 26.b4 b5 27.a4 a6 28.Bd5 Nxd5+ 29.Rxd5 f3 30.axb5 fxg2 31.Rg1 Rf3+ 32.Kd2 Nxb4 33.Rd4 Rf2+ 34.Ke3 Rb2 35.Rc4+ Kb6 36.bxa6 Kxa6 37.Rg4 Nd5+ 38.Kf3 Rb3+ 39.Kf2 Rb2+ 40.Kg3 Nf6 0-1

                      Position after White’s 22.Nxf8+

                      


                      Bronstein: I will always remember this game as the most cheerful moment of the Century Match. This blitz tournament took place immediately after the Match. My old friend Reshevsky was not cautious enough. He played 1....e5 and fell into a trap. Probably he did not know that I had just published a book of the open games. In the King's gambit I am like a fish in water. But what happened in this game?. I played 22. Nf8+ and then Reshevsky with my knight took his own King on d7. I asked him: what are you doing? and he answered: Ah, my God. We started to laugh together. .


                      - I suspect, White lost because of the time troubles.
                      41. Rxg7 is not a losing move, is it?

                      - It is. 41. R:g7 Nh5+ and Black is a knight up with some pawns still left on the board.

                      - Great game by Bronstein, who used the King gambit against Reshevsky and lost only because of time. Reshevsky's position was so poor at the mid game, although he did his best not to lose after about 20 moves. So... maybe there is a future for this opening?

                      (Eric Schiller) - The problem with many gambits is that the other side won't cooperate. I advise my students to generally take a pawn, but give it back and concentrate on development. However, all is not lost for King's Gambiteers. I believe that before long we will have more competitions where openings are assigned, eliminating the computer-fueled deep preparation. Players will need broader knowledge in such competitions, and exciting (but roughly equal) positions that are often avoided would appear on the boards of top GMs. This would be the opposite of a Thematic tournament. The opening positions would be randomly assigned from a collection of "roughly equal" opening variations. I'd love to see events of this type, but sponsors are needed. I'm not sure whether such games should be rated, but wouldn't you love to see some super-GMs start off in the middle of a wild line of the Latvian Gambit, or something like that. We ought to find a way to keep interesting positions alive, even if they are in unpopular, or simply bad, openings!

                      - Yes, for practicing the strategy, KG is a good tool. As to the Latvian Gambit (1. e4 e5. 2. Nf3 f5), your suggestion with the reversed colors can also work well: 3. d4 fxe4. 4. Nxe5 etc.

                      In general, it would be quite unlikely to see Kasparov, Kramnik, Anand etc. using the KG systematically.

                      Although 50+ years ago there were games played by Keres or Bronstein, Tolush etc. - and later - Spassky, who studied chess from Tolush.

                      Results of Round Ten and Standings

                      Reshevsky-Bronstein 1.5-0.5
                      Ostojic-Petrosian 0-2
                      Uhlmann-Hort 1-1
                      Korchnoi-Fischer 1-1
                      Matulovic-Smyslov 0.5-1.5
                      Tal-Ivkov 2-0

                      Before the last round Fischer had 17, Tal 14, Korchnoi, Petrosian and Hort 12, Bronstein 11, Matulovic 10.5 etc.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Blitz Tournament, Herceg Novi 1970

                        April 17, 2020

                        Round Eleven

                        Tal drew his first game against Smyslov, and he stands second. Smyslov won the second game very nicely. Korchnoi played wonderfully his last games, and it means: 1. Fischer, 2. Tal 3. Korchnoi. Petrosian came in the big four. Bronstein and Hort are also in the group of winners with more than 50 per cent. Fischer's victory was not in question, He played, almost without mistake.

                        After this tournament lvkov said: Now I see that Spassky is the only player who could be even with Fischer.

                        Round 11, April 8
                        Game 1
                        Fischer, Robert J. – Matulovic, Milan
                        C63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defence

                        1.e4 { Notes by Bobby Fischer } 1...e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 { This is Matulovic's specialty the same as his gambit in the Sicilian defence. In blitz games there is no problems for White because of the Black King's weaknesses. I know this variation very well and because of that I was surprised at Matulovic's choice. } 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Nxe5 dxe4 7.Nxc6 Qg5 { 7 Qd5 gives probably more problems for White. } 8.Qe2 Nf6 9.f4 Qxf4 10.d4 Qh4+ 11.g3 Qh3 { The same was played in the game Gheorghiu-Maric, Skopje 1968. Georghiu played 12Na7+ but he did not get any advantage in this position. I analyzed this position all night with Robatsch and Gheorghiu in Vinkovci. Gheorghiu showed me that game against Maric and it was very interesting for me. Our idea was 12 Bg5 } 12.Bg5 a6 13.Ba4 Bd7 14.Bxf6 gxf6 15.Qxe4+ Kf7 16.Ne5+ fxe5 17.Rf1+ Ke7 { Black has many problems. If 17...Kg8 18 Rf6! Re8 (if 18...Bxa4 19 Qd5+ with Qf7 mate) 19 Bb3+ Kg7 20 Rf7+ Kh6 21 dxe5 with a winning attack. If 17...Qxf1 18 Kxf1 Bxa4 19 Qf5+ wins. } 18.Bxd7 Kxd7 { If 18...Qxd7 19 O-O-O and Black's King and Queen are attacked. } 19.Rf7+ Ke8 { ?? Be7!! gave good chances for a successful defence. } 20.Rxc7 Bd6 21.Rxb7 Rc8 22.O-O-O Qxh2 23.dxe5 Be7 24.Rxe7+ { After this move Black has no hope. Maybe I had an easier way to win, but thought I had not enough time. As a matter of fact I had three minutes. } 24...Kxe7 25.Qb7+ Ke6 26.Qd7+ Kxe5 27.Qd5+ Kf6 28.Rf1+ Kg6 29.Qf5+ Kh6 30.Qe6+ Kh5 31.Rf5+ Kg4 32.Rf4+ Kxg3 33.Qg4# 1-0

                        Game without notes:

                        1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Nxe5 dxe4 7.Nxc6 Qg5 8.Qe2 Nf6 9.f4 Qxf4 10.d4 Qh4+ 11.g3 Qh3 12.Bg5 a6 13.Ba4 Bd7 14.Bxf6 gxf6 15.Qxe4+ Kf7 16.Ne5+ fxe5 17.Rf1+ Ke7 18.Bxd7 Kxd7 19.Rf7+ Ke8 20.Rxc7 Bd6 21.Rxb7 Rc8 22.O-O-O Qxh2 23.dxe5 Be7 24.Rxe7+ Kxe7 25.Qb7+ Ke6 26.Qd7+ Kxe5 27.Qd5+ Kf6 28.Rf1+ Kg6 29.Qf5+ Kh6 30.Qe6+ Kh5 31.Rf5+ Kg4 32.Rf4+ Kxg3 33.Qg4# 1-0

                        - Today's game title, "Fancy Meeting You Here", refers to the games venue, Herceg Novi, being in the state Serbia-Montenegro, and that the game's loser, Milan Matulovic, is a Serbian.

                        The humour lies in the ridiculosity of uttering the game's title <to> a Serbian while <in> Serbia. It's like saying boo to a goose.

                        - Compare Steinitz vs Von Bardeleben, 1895 or maybe Yanofsky vs A Dulanto, 1939 for the attacker threatened with mate throughout the final process - exactly calculated.

                        - Fischer may have been mentally unstable and hold extremely unpleasant views, but as a chess player, he was incomparable.

                        In his prime, would he have beaten Kasparov or Carlsen in their primes? Probably not; though it's by no means impossible and with the advances in computer analysis to help, he would have been truly formidable. But he was so much further ahead of the field than anyone before or since. And that field included Spassky, Petrosian, Tal, Geller, Keres, Larsen, Portisch, Smyslov, Botvinnik, all of whom were superb players in their own right.

                        That's why he deserves to be considered the greatest player of all time.

                        - The Schliemann's crazy enough, but against Fischer? That’s insane

                        - I wonder if the opening is the kind of stuff that Fischer used as a kid playing speed chess at clubs or in the parks, gambits where all of the lines are known in advance? You wouldn't play this in serious chess but it happens in blitz. Probably a lot of fun for the players, just pull out all of the stops.

                        Round 11, April 8
                        Game 2
                        Matulovic, Milan – Fischer, Robert J.
                        B97 Sicilian, Najdorf

                        1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Nb3 Qa3 10.Bxf6 gxf6 11.Bd3 Nc6 12.O-O Bg7 13.Rf3 f5 14.Rg3 Bf6 15.exf5 Qb4 16.Bf1 d5 17.Re1 Ne7 18.fxe6 Bxe6 19.f5 Nxf5 20.Nxd5 Qxd2 21.Nxf6+ Ke7 22.Nxd2 Nxg3 23.Nd5+ Kf8 24.Nc7 Nxf1 25.Rxf1 Ke7 26.Nxa8 Rxa8 27.c4 Rd8 28.Rf2 Rd4 29.Re2 Kd6 30.Ne4+ Kc6 31.c5 Bc4 32.Re3 Bxa2 33.Nd6 b5 34.Ra3 Ra4 35.Rh3 Kxc5 36.Nb7+ Kc6 37.Nd8+ Kc7 38.Rd3 Bc4 39.Rd4 Ra2 40.h4 a5 41.h5 a4 42.h6 a3 43.g4 Rb2 44.g5 a2 0-1

                        - after 27. c4?, Black's endgame technique is exemplary. I vote for changing the name of the Sicilian Najdorf to the Sicilian Fischer variation after watching him dominate these lines so often.

                        - the way Fischer outplays a strong Matulovic in this complicated opening is impressive

                        - In this game, as in others he played, he also showed how the b2 pawn in this line wasn't always poison :)

                        - It's not poisoned if white can't figure out a way to make an advantage out of his better position.

                        Round 11, April 8
                        Game 2
                        Tal, Mikhail – Smyslov, Vasily
                        C98 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, Rauzer Attack

                        1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 O-O 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 c5 11.d4 Qc7 12.Nbd2 Nc6 13.dxc5 dxc5 14.Nf1 Be6 15.Ne3 Rad8 16.Qe2 c4 17.Nf5 Rfe8 18.Bg5 Nd7 19.Bxe7 Nxe7 20.Ng5 Ng6 21.Nxe6 fxe6 22.Ne3 Nf4 23.Qg4 Nf6 24.Qf3 Nd3 25.Bxd3 Rxd3 26.a4 Qb7 27.axb5 axb5 28.Qg3 Qxe4 29.Ra7 Nh5 30.Qg5 Qg6 31.Qxe5 Rf8 32.Ng4 Nf4 33.Rea1 Nxh3+ 34.gxh3 Rxh3 35.Qd4 Rd3 36.Qb6 Qxg4+ 37.Kf1 Rh3 38.Qc6 Rhf3 39.Qc5 Qh4 0-1

                        Position after White’s 33.Rea1

                        

                        Tal: Smyslov made a nice combination on his 33rd move. It was a nice victory for him. This was the last game of the Tournament. I made a draw in our first game, and it was enough for the second place.


                        - A good play by Smyslov! White's pieces became passive after 20 moves. Tal's white bishop is entangled by his own pawns. I don't see any particular mistake by white.

                        - If someone loses, there's always a mistake somewhere; you just have to keep looking.

                        Smyslov's ...Nh5 was a dangerous gamble which should have lost as White could have forced a won ending. After 30. Qg5 Qg6 (forced), White should have played 31. Qxg6 hxg6 32. Rb7 and White starts picking off the loose Black pawns. 29...Nd7 would have held for Black.

                        After Tal failed to see this, Smyslov was better. However, Tal still had chances to hold until he played the suicidal 33. Rea1?. 33. Rb7 would have prevented the Knight sac because the Knight was guarding e6; 33. Rea1 removed the R from this valuable service and allowed the sacrifice. 33. Rb7 Nxh3? 34. gxh3 Rxh3 would have been answered by 35. Qxe6 with check, stopping the attack cold.

                        Final Round Results and Standings

                        Ivkov-Reshevsky 0.5-1.5
                        Smyslov-Tl 1.5-0.5
                        Fischer-Matulovic 2-0
                        Hort-Korchnoi 0-2
                        Petrosian-Uhlmann 1.5-0.5
                        Bronstein-Ostojic 2-0

                        Fischer 19, Tal 14.5, Korchnoi 14, Petrosian 13.5, Bronstein 13, Hort 12, Matulovic 10.5, Smyslov 9.5, Reshevsky 8.5 Uhlmann 8, Ivkov 7.5 and Ostojic 2.

                        This tournament took place fifty years ago. Of all the great names on the list of participants, only Ivkov, Hort and Uhlmann are still with us. The others still live by their games and by anecdotes of their lives.

                        _____________

                        The game referred to in the notes:

                        Buenos Aires Olympiad
                        Preliminary A, Rd 7
                        Buenos Aires, Argentina
                        August 30, 1939
                        Yanofsky, Daniel A. – Dulanto, Alberto Ismodes
                        C11 French, Burn variation

                        1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 dxe4 5.Nxe4 Nbd7 6.Nf3 Be7 7.Nxf6+ Nxf6 8.Bd3 c5 9.dxc5 Qa5+ 10.c3 Qxc5 11.O-O O-O 12.Re1 Rd8 13.Ne5 b6 14.Bxf6 Bxf6 15.Bxh7+ Kf8 16.Qh5 Bxe5 17.Rxe5 Qc7 18.Be4 Bb7 19.Bxb7 Qxb7 20.Qh8+ Ke7 21.Qxg7 Rg8 22.Rxe6+ Kxe6 23.Re1+ Kd6 24.Qf6+ Kc5 25.Re5+ Kc4 26.b3+ Kd3 27.Qd6+ Kc2 28.Re2+ 1-0

                        Last edited by Wayne Komer; Saturday, 18th April, 2020, 12:31 AM.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X