A New CFC Website??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A New CFC Website??

    The CFC website has been around for years now.

    Some say it is old, dated and hard to maintain and upgrade due to lack of documentation.

    Others say is has functioned fine for years and provides all the basic member services and so the CFC should not spend part of this year's surplus on a new website.

    What do you think? Answer the poll.

    Bob
    52
    Yes
    30.77%
    16
    No
    59.62%
    31
    It doesn't matter to me
    9.62%
    5

  • #2
    Re: A New CFC Website??

    Hi,

    I voted "no" because to me, the CFC site, when up and running, has all I am looking for:
    - ratings and crosstables
    - news and upcoming events
    - CFC Forum
    - occasionally flip through CFC Handbook

    And to me it seems like a waste to get a new site. Waste of time, money, energy.

    Alex F.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A New CFC Website?? A Yea Opinion

      Hi Alex:

      What do you have to say then to Ed Seedhouse, who recently posted:

      " A quick glance at the code shows an ancient table based layout with no document type declaration, no significant use of CSS, and over a hundred html syntax errors. A site straight out of the 1990's in other words.

      No attempt should be made to fix this mess. It needs to be torn down and started over from scratch. "

      I guess we can tell how he is voting.

      Bob

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A New CFC Website?? A Yea Opinion

        Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
        Hi Alex:

        What do you have to say then to Ed Seedhouse, who recently posted:

        " A quick glance at the code shows an ancient table based layout with no document type declaration, no significant use of CSS, and over a hundred html syntax errors. A site straight out of the 1990's in other words.

        No attempt should be made to fix this mess. It needs to be torn down and started over from scratch. "

        I guess we can tell how he is voting.

        Bob
        You didn't say how much you were wanting to spend for the site. To have it built in Canada would likely be more expensive than having it "outsourced". You have to give an idea of the amount you want to spend and exactly what the end result should contain so people know what they are voting to approve.
        Gary Ruben
        CC - IA and SIM

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: A New CFC Website?? Cost?

          Hi Gary:

          It's true that cost could be a factor. But I don't think the CFC will get it for free - in that case everyone would likely be quite happy to go with it.

          Kevin Spraggett has suggested it will cost $ 20,000, but President Eric has said of that that he is just pulling numbers out of the air. In another post, Chris Mallon has said he would do it for $ 10,000 ( correct me if I'm wrong on that figure Chris - I can't remember exactly where you made that offer ). So for the moment, I guess the best information we have is that it will be around $ 10,000.

          I would note that the Lavin budget line for the defunct webzine and new website, if necessary, was $ 20,000. However, at the AGM, the governors indicated they wanted $ 10,000 of that hived off for a new " National Championships Bid Development Fund ". So the $ 10,000 left has to cover the new website, ongoing maintenance of the site for the year, and the new CFC E-newsletter. These are the numbers I'm using at the moment, subject to executive correction ( who are now working on a revised Van Dusen budget ).

          Finally, I'd note that the President has already invited interested parties to submit bids ( though it is my view that they are not in position yet to enter into any contract for a new website ).

          Bob
          Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Sunday, 20th September, 2009, 01:19 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: A New CFC Website?? A Yea Opinion

            Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
            What do you have to say then to Ed Seedhouse, who recently posted:
            Well, it's just my opinion, not the voice of God or anything. I spent a decade or so doing web work for the Greater Victoria Public Library, from which I retired in April. Library sites are mostly awful and GVPL's is not an exception. My defence is that I had little to do with it directly, my web work being mostly for internal consumption behind the corporate firewall.

            I think the current CFC site should either stay the same or be rebuilt from scratch. Partial fixes will do more harm than good. But first the CFC should decide on what it wants from it's web page and what it can and should do for it's members.

            Better, IMHO, to leave it as it is than to "fix it up" without a major rethink of the whole idea of what a CFC website should be doing for the CFC and it's members.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: A New CFC Website?? Cost?

              Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post

              Kevin Spraggett has suggested it will cost $ 20,000, but President Eric has said of that that he is just pulling numbers out of the air. In another post, Chris Mallon has said he would do it for $ 10,000 ( correct me if I'm wrong on that figure Chris - I can't remember exactly where you made that offer ). So for the moment, I guess the best information we have is that it will be around $ 10,000.
              Kevin would pay that much to have a web site built in Portugal? Are you sure you understood him properly?

              I wouldn't think it would matter which country the web site was built in, if it was built to specifications. You have to know exactly what you want and have someone put together the pieces. More and more companies are doing this with IT.

              Even if you have the work done in Canada, you have to know how many hours it should take to put together what you want and then decide how much an hour you want to pay. If you figure IT guys in Canada are making 80K a year, if they can get it, then at 20K you're saying it will take 3 months of dedicated, full employment, by an IT professional to build a web site.

              Gary
              Gary Ruben
              CC - IA and SIM

              Comment


              • #8
                P.S.

                A fast google brought up this in B.C. I had never heard of them but suppose you can have a look around the site and at the rates. A case of looking around and getting prices from different suppliers.

                http://www.self-edit.com/
                Gary Ruben
                CC - IA and SIM

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: P.S.

                  Hi Gary:

                  Thx. I've sent the link on to Prez. Eric, in case it might be useful.

                  Bob

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: A New CFC Website?? Cost?

                    Hey Bob,

                    My offer was only semi-serious. We don't really have time to do it so we'd overcharge for the work to make it worthwhile. It was just to make the point that $20k is vastly too high for what is needed.

                    I think you could get it done for less. If you were willing to keep the same basic "look" as the old site (ie not much need for new graphics) then perhaps MUCH less.
                    Christopher Mallon
                    FIDE Arbiter

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: A New CFC Website??

                      Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                      The CFC website has been around for years now.

                      Some say it is old, dated and hard to maintain and upgrade due to lack of documentation.

                      Others say is has functioned fine for years and provides all the basic member services and so the CFC should not spend part of this year's surplus on a new website.

                      What do you think? Answer the poll.

                      Bob
                      I have a strong experience in websites. In my opinion the website is ok. Nice looking. We can get the information. For a chess federation this is ok for the next 10 years.

                      The code is not perfect? So what. It will not break like a car. If it works then it is like 75% of the websites and computer systems, ugly when we look at the code but ok on our screens. In the large companies and the Canadian banks you can not imagine how the code is very very ugly and old (90% from the '70 and '80) but work well and they keep it.

                      Lets keep the money for new projects, new web pages, etc.

                      Carl

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: A New CFC Website?? A Yea Opinion

                        Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                        Hi Alex:

                        What do you have to say then to Ed Seedhouse, who recently posted:

                        " A quick glance at the code shows an ancient table based layout with no document type declaration, no significant use of CSS, and over a hundred html syntax errors. A site straight out of the 1990's in other words.

                        No attempt should be made to fix this mess. It needs to be torn down and started over from scratch. "

                        I guess we can tell how he is voting.

                        Bob
                        Hi Bob,


                        I don't deny that Ed has his points regarding errors, code is ancient and that it may be worth more to rebuild from scratch than to attempt to fix it. However to me, the website has served its purpose. The only nuisance I've come across is trying to look up ratings and getting these errors, presumably due to high traffic, which probably has to due with all the coding, resources, etc...
                        Still, I'd rather have a site straight from the 90s with its errors, than to see CFC spend $ on a new website / fixing the old one. Too much money? Lower the tournament memberships back to $10. $20 is killing it for first timers / one timers. I see it at University.


                        Alex Ferreira

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: A New CFC Website?? A Yea Opinion

                          I'd personally rather see them lower the regular membership rate. Be nice to the people who constantly support the CFC rather than the people who occasionally do!
                          Christopher Mallon
                          FIDE Arbiter

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: A New CFC Website??

                            Hi Carl:

                            A differing opinion is given by Chris Mallon on CFC Chess Forum where he was talking about the site deficiencies:

                            " Jonathan Berry already did a fairly thorough job over on Chesstalk on the nitty-gritty technical stuff [ that is wrong with the CFC website ]. From an administrator's point of view, here are the problems:

                            It's is very difficult (ie requires significant web design knowledge) to do anything other than the most minor update to the site.

                            There is no common way to navigate the site (the menu bar does not appear on every page).

                            There is a lack of branding, and advertising is either not present on pages, or TOO present (see Ratings page).

                            The site requires ASP support which (in general) means a Windows server, which (in general) are more expensive. The CFC gets a horrible deal on webhosting, but there isn't much better out there until they dump ASP.

                            The site is extremely vulnerable to hackers. See recent multiple infections, as well as same thing last summer. (No Google list back then!)

                            And the #1 Problem!

                            The site doesn't look even remotely professional. It's been hacked together by too many different people using different programs etc. Imagine you are a potential sponsor and you decided to check out the site? All I can say is, Ack!

                            Could it be fixed? Probably. It would probably cost more than a fresh design though, so why bother? "

                            What do you and Alex, as two of the status quo supporters, have to say about Chris' list?

                            I guess my concerns would be:

                            1. does it take an inordinate amount of staff time to deal with the site becausse of its deficiencies?
                            2. are any of the current member services incomplete because of deficiencies ( for example, are participation points now in the rating calculation system or not? I heard they couldn't code it in );
                            3. are there any projected important immediate services needed, that cannot be added to the existing site - and can someone list them?
                            4. what are projected services/information the CFC sees as needed for the long-term future which cannot technically be added to the site - and can someone list them?
                            5. if there is currently missing documentation ( which I understand is like an instruction manual ) which prevents necessary upgrading from being done, is it still possilbe to have the creators do the manual ? or is it too costly? What is the cost for this in relation to getting a whole new site? ( if we don't spend the money on a new site, we have some $$ to deal with the existing site, if it is not cumulatively too great )

                            It seems to me CFC needs to address these questions for us all, so we can know whether in fact we need to junk a site that has been running well ( subject to the recent hacking ), and still seems to be running well, and is providing what appear to be all needed member services. The fact that 2/3 of those voting in this poll want to keep the existing site shows that the CFC has a big selling job to do to explain to people why the new site is necessary.

                            Bob
                            Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Sunday, 20th September, 2009, 09:32 AM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: A New CFC Website??

                              Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                              A differing opinion is given by Chris Mallon on CFC Chess Forum where he was talking about the site deficiencies:
                              <snip>
                              And the #1 Problem!

                              The site doesn't look even remotely professional. It's been hacked together by too many different people using different programs etc. Imagine you are a potential sponsor and you decided to check out the site? All I can say is, Ack!
                              Bob
                              This comment about the site not looking professional is, IMHO, like so many other things: very much in the eye of the beholder. I have very little problem with the appearance of the site.

                              John Cordes

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X