If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Re: Chess and Math Puzzle (nothing to do with CMA)
The "number of positions" with regard to chess usually means with a fixed board position vis a vis number of positions in computer searches, number of positions possible etc.
Given that the board is not normally rotated ( except at end of game to play another game ) or flipped ( except when game comes to an abrupt end ) it necessary to explicity state these conditions.
The problem is interesting even without the rotation/flipping as it provides insight into how many positions are possible in a regular game especially with regard to the legal positions.
Last edited by David Lyall; Tuesday, 17th November, 2009, 09:17 PM.
Reason: typos
Re: List (so far) of Illegal and Illogical Positions
Paul,
The problem did start with an 8x8 chess board.
The definition of legal could include any position that may be arrived at in the regular 8x8 game where the pieces are then moved into the center 4x4 squares.
Such a distinction may allow bishops of the same colour to remain legal as well as those positions with the Queen and Rook battery, for example, the last pawn taken - beside the King - was by a Queen from outside the 4x4 center squares.
The definition of legal could include any position that may be arrived at in the regular 8x8 game where the pieces are then moved into the center 4x4 squares.
Such a distinction may allow bishops of the same colour to remain legal as well as those positions with the Queen and Rook battery, for example, the last pawn taken - beside the King - was by a Queen from outside the 4x4 center squares.
Good thinking about the pawn capture, I had not thought of that. So that means that the Queen & Rook battery, the doubled Rook battery, and the Queen & Bishop battery are legal as long as the checking piece that is adjacent to the King is on the outside edge of the board. If it's in the center, then it couldn't happen. But actually, I think I already mentioned that, so it means the battery check isn't anything special that we need to eliminate.
It also makes case (7) possible, the Rook could have captured a pawn as well.
Technically, the Bishops on the same color are legal, yes. If everyone involved in this thread wants to include it, and even include it for both sides having Bishops on the same color (wow!), then fine, we'll include it.
I was going to insist that it's too far-fetched to include, but then again, all these positions are far-fetched!
For one thing, has there ever been a game in which all 16 pawns have been captured and no pieces have been captured (or alternatively, one or two pieces were captured such as each side's Queen, but pawn promotions replaced them)?
Then you have to have both players bringing all their pieces into the central 4 x 4 grid, like stars being sucked into a black hole.
Maybe that's what we could call this puzzle: the Black Hole Puzzle!
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
Re: Chess and Math Puzzle (nothing to do with CMA)
If we WERE to eliminate all those positions in which either side has both Bishops on same-colored squares (with the assumption that all pawn promotions are to Queen), it seems to be quite simple.
Since all 4 Bishops must be in the grid, here is the matrix of possible placements of them with respect to the color of square they are on:
White Bishops on Same Color Squares: Yes Yes No No
Black Bishops on Same Color Squares: Yes No Yes No
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowed: No No No Yes
From this, we can see that there are 4 possible placement combinations, and only 1 of them are allowed.
In the 212,497,084,800 combinations we have narrowed down to so far (thanks to Bob Gillanders), all 4 combinations are equally distributed. Therefore only one quarter of these combinations would be allowed, the other three quarters would have same-colored Bishops on the same-colored square.
Let's say White to move first. Here's one possible line:
1. Nxe4+ this forces a King move
1. ... Ke7
2. Nxe5 Bxe5 now White Queen is pinned
3. Bxe6 Ne2+
4. Kd2 Ncxd4
5. Bxd4 Nxd4
6. Rxd4 Kxe6 Black is a Rook down with no compensation
if instead Black had moved
2. ... Nxd4 immediately getting the Queen
3. Bxe6
( 3. Kxd4? Bxe5+ 4. Kc5 Nxd3+ and Black is ahead)
3. ... Nb5+
4. Kd2 Kxe6
5. Rxd6+ Nxd6
6. Nxd6 and White is still well ahead.
I did not use a computer for this and do not claim any of these are best lines.
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
I haven't seen 1=2 yet, so please indulge us. However back in high school I did have a proof for 3=7, probably a similiar theme. ;)
Hi Bob,
Sorry for the delay in responding, I completely forgot about this thread. I've shown this puzzle many times on a chalk board, this is the first time using text, so let's see if this works.
Each of the following steps are conisdered true statements. Find the flaw that allows 1 = 2. Suppose that X = 1 in the following series of steps:
1) X = X
2) X² = X² [Square both sides]
3) (X² - X²) = (X² - X²) [Subtract X² from both sides]
4) (X+X)(X-X) = X(X-X) [Difference of squares on left, Factor out X on right]
5) (X+X)(X-X) = X(X-X) [Remove the common factor (X-X) from both sides]
6) X+X = X
7) 2 = 1
Last edited by Jordan S. Berson; Wednesday, 25th November, 2009, 04:42 PM.
Reason: Removed hint and underlining, added parentheses on one line.
No matter how big and bad you are, when a two-year-old hands you a toy phone, you answer it.
Sorry for the delay in responding, I completely forgot about this thread. I've shown this puzzle many times on a chalk board, this is the first time using text, so let's see if this works.
Each of the following steps are conisdered true statements. Find the flaw that allows 1 = 2. Suppose that X = 1 in the following series of steps:
1) X = X
2) X² = X² [Square both sides]
3) (X² - X²) = (X² - X²) [Subtract X² from both sides]
4) (X+X)(X-X) = X(X-X) [Difference of squares on left, Factor out X on right]
5) (X+X)(X-X) = X(X-X) [Remove the common factor (X-X) from both sides]
6) X+X = X
7) 2 = 1
Nice try! ;) Statement 4 is wrong. s/b (X+X)(X-X) = 2X(X-X) not X(X-X)
of course (X-X) = 0, so when you go from stmt 5 to stmt 6, you are dividing by zero which isn't kosher, and you can get anything to equal anything.
It's the same trick I employed in my 3=7 proof back in high school.
Comment