If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
We want to accomodate everyone and we want everyone to pass (80% on the exam) so I'm proposing an email study group in the 4 months leading up the seminar.
- John-Erik
That could be a good idea! Lets start those group as soon as possible.
:)
I am interested in taking this course at the Canadian Open. I have one problem. I can't make the Wednesday course. I have to work and won't be able to get the day off. Is there still a way I can participate?
John Erickson
Niagara Falls, Ontario
TD for the Niagara Falls Open April 10th and 11th
Hi John,
Stephen would prefer the course to be spread over 5 days and then the exam on the next day. A 14-hour day is long. But how to work around the CFC meeting and GM lectures?
We want to accomodate everyone and we want everyone to pass (80% on the exam) so I'm proposing an email study group in the 4 months leading up the seminar.
- John-Erik
I am interested in taking this course at the Canadian Open. I have one problem. I can't make the Wednesday course. I have to work and won't be able to get the day off. Is there still a way I can participate?
John Erickson
Niagara Falls, Ontario
TD for the Niagara Falls Open April 10th and 11th
John, I'm not sure if EriK will read your post attached to mine. He gives an email address in the opening post in this thread. Possibly send him an email for the best reply.
Earning a FA or IA title is worthwhile, even if I do joke about mine. I value my correspondence chess IA title more than my playing titles. For one thing, there are fewer of those titles. :)
I am interested in taking this course at the Canadian Open. I have one problem. I can't make the Wednesday course. I have to work and won't be able to get the day off. Is there still a way I can participate?
John Erickson
Niagara Falls, Ontario
TD for the Niagara Falls Open April 10th and 11th
Ex-champion too :) M.Botvinnik was an arbiter during 1988 Soviet Union championship (1-2 Kasparov and Karpov with the dispute who is the First)
Well, an "ex" is a used to be. :)
Of course, I hold the correspondence title of SIM which is higher than my IM title. My mistake was waiting until I was pretty much finished organizing before starting on earning playing titles. My play is now too weak to attain the CC GM title. I've reached the second time in a players "career" when there is no pressure to perform. I've reached the age where I don't care about my results or my rating.
Not trying to win and not caring about the result are two different things.
Teaching is a bit different, I think. It's not necessary to be a very strong player to teach, although, it migh be helpful. Some of the players who have hellped me the most are those who understood aspects of the game better than I did.
Conventional wisdom? So most of our rated players are organizers?
As regards Arbiters, we do have some IM's among us and GM Gligorich served as an Arbiter for many years, including Spraggett-Yuopov I believe. But mostly we are class players and experts. At the World Championship match in Bonn we were roughly 2100, 1900 and 1700. In Sophia my two colleagues from Bonn will take care of things - now that the players don't have private quarters only 2 Arbiters are needed.
Do Fide arbiters have to be of a certain rating? After all situations come up where they have to assess chess positions. Just wondering what the standard is for this.
I don't think so. The conventional wisdom is those who can't play organize.
Do Fide arbiters have to be of a certain rating? After all situations come up where they have to assess chess positions. Just wondering what the standard is for this.
Aris Marghetis
FA since 2009 ;) [Of course, someone who's been an FA longer may differ in opinion!]
I have to tell you, I've been a correspondence IA for years. Never made a cent from the title or directing ICCF events.
It was awarded to me after directing ICCF events continuously (by post) for 6 years. I actually did it for longer than that but to qualify for the title it had to be 6 years. At times I was directing 300 or more players all over the world.
Anyone who thinks I got the title because of my pleasant personality and easy going ways is mistaken.
There was nothing I liked better than forfeiting a game from someone who was indulging in the fine art of "chess lawyering" with me. All those years and I never had a decision overturned by the appeals committee.
There's nothing more satisfying than being able to forfeit someones games simply because he's breaking the rules. Well, maybe sex is better.
I think it also should be noted that this course is income-generating in future to the graduates - they do get a return on their investment.
Bob
Hi Bob, I wasn't going to say anything at first, but for the sake of transparency, and just in my humble opinion, becoming an FA does not seem to make any difference in generation of income. If I may suggest to people who are considering becoming FAs, you should do it for the proverbial love of the game, because you get a rush from chess tournaments being run right. I realize that sounds corny, but if it does not resonate with the reader, then I propose that answers the reader's question whether he should strive to become an FA. I cannot speak for FAs in Europe, nor even in the bigger Canadian cities like Toronto-Vancouver-Montreal, but from my own experience in a fair-size Canadian city like Ottawa, becoming an FA did not increase my income generation, LOL!
Aris Marghetis
FA since 2009 ;) [Of course, someone who's been an FA longer may differ in opinion!]
Bob, I think the participants should pay for most if not all of the course. Any subsidy in my view would be in the 20% range. The key to reducing the cost is to attract more participants. With 2 people delivering the course we should be able to handle 15 - 20 students.
Perhaps the organizers will entertain a discount for players in the Open.
Leave a comment: