The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Day 8 - Saturday, July 17: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. I

    The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog - Pt. I

    Day8/Rd.8– Saturday, July 17

    Starting the Day Off Right

    Friday night after the Rd. 7, I went out to dinner with a friend from my Scarborough Chess Club in Toronto, Dave Southam, and then we headed home on pubic transit. I got in just before midnight, and then started finishing the analysis of my Rd. 4 game, so I could post it on the chess website, Chess5, and mention it in Friday’s blog. The pairings came up on MonRoi shortly after 1:00 AM, and so I was then able to finish my Day 7 Blog, and post it. I wasn’t tired, and so messed around for about another hour, and went to bed about 3:30 AM. - turned out to be another 5 hr. sleep, as I woke up at 8:30 AM.

    Another Nice CO Day

    In the morning, my wife and I chatted by phone for a while ( she’s up at our recreational property during the Open ), and she was making plans to go to a wedding in Barrie. It is of the son of good friends, who helped her and her sisters so much, when they had to clear out and sell the family home in Timmins, when their parents went into a nursing home two years ago. I brought her up to speed on all the exciting chess things going on around the Open ( and of course, this blog ), and she wished me luck in Rd. 8. I never know about that you know. Like aren’t we supposed to conquer by skill, not luck? But I’ve always considered it lucky when my opponent makes a bad move !

    I then did a draft of this Day 8 Blog, and then settled in to do some prior games analysis, until it was time to go to the round. I left about 1:00 PM for the playing hall ( round started at 2:00 PM yesterday )..

    Some of My Games from Prior Rounds

    As I’ve said in prior blogs ( I’ve decided to use a template here, since new people come to the blog, and I need to give them the following information – so I have to ask you who are repeat offenders to tolerate the repetition ), I like to think class games have some interest. I believe in some ways they are more educational to class players than GM games, if properly annotated. They are understandable, because we all think similarly – GM moves are many times incomprehensible to us class players. For years now, I’ve used a chess website, Chess5 ( http://www.chess5.com ), as my own personal chess games blog – I have gotten to know the owner/administrator Eydun, quite well over the years. I introduced Canada to his website, after I first saw it. Canada is now one of the main posters to this on-line databank. I post all my games, using what I call my “ Comprehensive Annotation System “, hoping that this makes them even more helpful to viewers.

    So yesterday on the website ( click on the heading link “ public games “. and you get a list of games posted this month so far ). I posted my fifth & sixth round games ( my first 4 games were posted on prior days ):

    Rd. 5 – David Filipovich ( 2218 ) 1 – 0 Robert Armstrong ( 1800 ) – a somewhat typical King’s Indian game, where I tried to get a K-side attack, but David was faster on c5.

    Rd. 6 – William Doubleday ( 2206 ) 1 – 0 Robert Armstrong ( 1800 ) – my worst game in a few years

    I think Game 5 is definitely worth a look. I’d ignore Game 6.

    The U 2000 Group

    There are 56 players in our prize group. Going into Rd. 8, our top 5 players were:

    5 pts. – Arjun Bharat ( 1841 )
    4.5 pts. – Eric Bennett ( 1990 ); Louis Cheng ( ( 1975 ); David Itkin ( 1966 ); Ferdinand Supsup (1851 ).

    These players faced tough opposition in Rd.7. Here is what happened:

    15 FM Michael Dougherty (2322 : W : 5.0) 1/2 Arjun Bharat (1841 : B : 5.0)
    23 Eric Bennett (1990 : W : 4.5) 0-1 FM Alex Betaneli (2312 : B : 4.5)
    29 Louis Cheng (1975 : W : 4.5) 0-1 Ian Loadman (2202 : B : 4.5)
    31 Ferdinand Supsup (1851 : W : 4.5) 0-1 Ted Kret (2165 : B : 4.5)
    32 David Itkin (1966 : w : 4.5) 1-0 Stanimir Ilic (2340 : BB : 4.0)

    I got a draw in my Rd. 8 game, against Reuben McCleary ( 1597 ), leaving me below 50% - 3.5/8 pts.

    As a result of the Rd. 8 results for our leaders, we now have a partly new leader group of 7 going into the final Rd. 9:

    5.5 pts - David Itkin ( 1966 ); Arjun Bharat ( 1841 )
    5 pts. – Dalia Kagramanov ( 1998 ); Stephan Tonakanian ( 1990 ); Derick Joshua Twesigye ( 1990 ); Ruokai ( David ) Li ( 1932 ); Alex Rapoport ( 1838 ).

    The 8 Scarborough Chess Club U 2000 Results:

    5 pts. - Alex Rapoport ( 1838 )
    4.5 pts. - Robert Bzikot (1984 ); Michael Song ( 1866 )
    4 pts. - Jim Paterson ( 1889 ); .Ferdinand Cale ( 1806 ); Pino Verde ( 1800 );
    3.5 points - Pepin Manalo ( 1932 ); Bob Armstrong ( 1800 )

    My Game

    On move 10 of my round 8 game against young junior Rueben McCleary ( 1597 ), I was faced with a major dilemma. Do I play solidly for rating points, or do I play for fun, and try a sacrificial mating attack that likely doesn’t work ( but I felt I at least would get a three-time repetition draw ). I opted for “ fun “ – I just couldn’t resist trying it. And if Rueben went wrong, maybe I might get it. So I left pawns hanging all over the board, and went onto the attack – if it didn’t work, I was definitely going to lose. Well young Reuben defended against the mate totally accurately, and I had to sac to get a three-time repetition draw – the mate just wasn’t there. An enjoyable game, though it will cost me a few rating points. Fun must sometimes come first !

    Some Random Thoughts After Day 8

    Well, as I’ve quoted before in this blog: “ Time flies when you are having fun! “. It’s hard to believe that today is the final round 9. Where did 8 days go? Oh, I know how I can find out – read my own blog!! It has been fun. I’ve gotten to socialize with numbers of my chess friends, and chatted with numerous chess acquaintances over the 8 days. I think I helped move the CFC forward in our 2 AGM’s. I’ve had some very interesting chess games, and some good post-mortems, and my score, though a bit lower than I’d hoped at this point, still leaves me with the possibility of getting 50% ( I had been shooting to exceed 50% - I’m currently below 50% with 3.5/8 pts. ). All in all, a very nice “ chess holiday “ with a final round to play, and then the closing banquet. Oh, and I have to mention the fun of doing this blog, for which I’ve had commendation and encouragement from so many friends and acquaintances.

    I hope the foreign GM’s who came have had a good time here in Toronto. Some of them have been here before to play in Canadian tournaments. It does add something to the impression of the tournament – it sort of confirms that it is a premier Canadian tournament, and makes it respectable when promoting it on such international websites as ChessBase, and the Susan Polgar Blog. As I said before, these guys have talent – and I think this tournament has shown so far, that so do a number of our Canadian players, including a couple of juniors – Noritsyn, Hambleton, Sapozhnikov, , Martchenko, etc.. We cannot underestimate the word of mouth among foreign GM’s when they mention to each other that they had a great time in our Canadian Open – it opens up the possibility of other GM’s taking a look in future. Actually, I understand from Brian Fiedler, one of the organizing committee, that many more GM’s contacted them, but their budget didn’t allow them to meet conditions for more than the 9 GM’s they originally contracted with ( though only 7 showed up ). It’s true that GM’s add to the organizers’ budget. Is it worthwhile? Some are nostalgic for the old days where we met in downscale locations, and just had local GM’s and IM’s playing – lower budget they say, and lower registration fees. This is a legitimate debate I think. It will depend on whether the organizers actually lose money on this Open. Brian lost on the 2009 PwC Toronto Open, but he still is a firm believer that the Canadian Open has to be a high-class event, as a national championship. And many have said the room we have at the Westin Harbour Castle is the best in recent memory. The CFC governors may have an early issue on their plate, in terms of first getting a bid for the 2011 Canadian Open, and secondly determining what standards will be applied for such bid.

    How am I going to survive after this tournament? Scarborough Chess Club doesn’t re-open ‘til its AGM on Thursday, Sept. 2, and Rd. 1 of the Howard Ridout Memorial Swiss is not until Thursday, Sept. 9 ( we close for July and August, because we can’t rent our playing hall during those months ). I’m not going to be able to play in Kitchener in August. I’ll be in chess withdrawal ! Fortunately, I’ll still have my SCC newsletter to work on, the Scarborough Community of Toronto Chess News & Views. And there are some good international tournaments that I can follow. I guess I’ll survive.

    [ Continued in Pt. II below ]
    Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Sunday, 18th July, 2010, 01:51 AM.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Day 8 - Saturday, July 17: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. II

      The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog - Pt. II

      Day8/Rd.8– Saturday, July 17

      Round 9 ( Final Round ) – Sunday, July 18

      So who are our new top 7 U 2000 players playing tonight? Here are the pairings and they face some stiff opposition to hold onto their positions, and win prize money ( 1st - $ 1,000; 2nd - $ 500; 3rd - $ 250 ).

      17 FM Adam Ashton (2316 : w : 5.5) David Itkin (1966 : B : 5.5)
      19 Arjun Bharat (1841 : w : 5.5) Keith MacKinnon (2280 : b : 5.5)
      31 Alan J. Walton (2152 : WW : 5.0) Dalia Kagramanov (1998 : w : 5.0)
      32 Gordon Olheiser (2142 : w : 5.0) Derick Joshua Twesigye (1990 : b : 5.0)
      33 Jingle A. Kho (2120 : WW : 5.0) Stephan Tonakanian (1990 : w : 5.0)
      34 Mavros Whissell (2120 : w : 5.0) Ruokai [David] Li (1932 : b : 5.0)
      35 FM Michael Barron (2375 : b : 4.5) Alex Rapoport (1838 : B : 5.0)


      As a result of my Rd. 8 draw, I got paired down again for Rd. 9, having 3.5 pts. ( I’ve been paired down in Rds.1, 3, 7 & 8 previously ). It is interesting that the swiss pairing system has come through in my case – in 8 rounds, 4 playing up, and 4 playing down. So I only have a chance now to reach 50% ( my goal had been to exceed it ). Here is my pairing:

      82 Robert J. Armstrong (1800 : w : 3.5) Richard Marks (1632 : b : 3.5)

      Invitation

      Finally, I'd like again to invite everyone to join into the discussion - any comments, suggestions, questions, criticisms of the blog are welcome - and of anything to do with the Can. Open. I will try to respond if that seems appropriate.

      Bob

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog

        Hi Matthew:

        I could only get a draw against Reuben - does that help?

        Bob

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Foreign GM Conditions

          Hi Bob

          Can you tell me the general procedure for asking and organizing conditions for participation in the Canadian open and other Canadian tournaments.

          Once in a while a Hungarian GM will ask me

          1.If conditions are available
          2.What to do or how to go about getting conditions

          I can only come up with something lame like 'email the organiser'. If there is some general procedure to follow please can you let me know and/or have it put in an easy to find place on the CFC website.

          Michael Yip
          Budapest

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Foreign GM Conditions

            Originally posted by Michael Yip View Post
            Hi Bob

            Can you tell me the general procedure for asking and organizing conditions for participation in the Canadian open and other Canadian tournaments.

            Once in a while a Hungarian GM will ask me

            1.If conditions are available
            2.What to do or how to go about getting conditions

            I can only come up with something lame like 'email the organiser'. If there is some general procedure to follow please can you let me know and/or have it put in an easy to find place on the CFC website.

            Michael Yip
            Budapest
            Hi Michael:

            I have to plead ignorance on your question.

            I was not on the organizing committee for the Can. Open, and it seems the committee keeps the issue of " conditions " for GM's pretty close to their vest - the reason may be that they do not want to set precedents for conditions for future Canadian events. And Organizers of different tournaments, depending on the availability of sponsorships, may have different abilities to offer conditions.

            But I have forwarded your e-mail to the organizer responsible for sponsorships for the Open, Brian Fiedler, and asked that he e-mail you with whatever info is publicly available. Please post here your e-mail address, and I will then send it on to him as well.

            Bob

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Day 8 - Saturday, July 17: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. I

              Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
              ... when promoting it on such international websites as ChessBase, and the Susan Polgar Blog.
              Bob,

              It's not an accident that we're on those web sites - Zeljka from MonRoi is doing an outstanding job handling all of the media work, including PGNs, photos and press releases!

              David

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog

                Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                Hi Matthew:

                I could only get a draw against Reuben - does that help?

                Bob
                Better than a loss, I suppose; but I blundered out of a winning position with a 2120...

                Have to beat an 1860 today for a chance to stay in the top 3 in my category, though I can't catch the guy in first - he might move up and claim the U1800 prize.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog

                  Hi Matthew:

                  Where are you getting confirmation that players can claim a higher class prize? I was not aware that was possible. I thought you were restricted to your class prize, unless you won one of the top prizes.

                  Bob

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog

                    I don't think this would apply in this years CO since I think 1st place in the U2000 and U1800 sections are the same - but generally you should be able to win the highest ($ value) of any prize for which you qualify. A 1700 player scoring 7 could win the U2000 prize (if it's greater then the U1800 prize) if: 1) there are no other U1800 players scoring 7 or more. 2) there are no other U2000 players scoring 7 or more. 3) 7 points does not qualify for a place prize.

                    As far as I know - there are never any restrictions within rating groups about winning a (larger) prize in a higher rating group (in a 1-section event).

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Day 8 - Saturday, July 17: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. I

                      Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                      I went out to dinner with a friend from my Scarborough Chess Club in Toronto, Dave Southam, and then we headed home on pubic transit.
                      Ewww, "pubic" transit, the mind boggles.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Day 8 - Saturday, July 17: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. I

                        Originally posted by Hugh Siddeley View Post
                        Ewww, "pubic" transit, the mind boggles.

                        The last time I was on public transportation was before Henry invented the Ford.
                        Gary Ruben
                        CC - IA and SIM

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Day 7, Friday, July 16: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. II

                          " But it must be noted that the fault may lie, not just with the critics, but also with the establishment. "

                          Actually, Bob, it would be refreshing for the "new" CFC to outright acknowledge it set the tone for most of the recent problems in Canadian chess.
                          Last edited by Duncan Smith; Monday, 19th July, 2010, 03:19 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: The U 2000 Canadian Open Blog

                            that's the problem with public transit, they'll let just about anybody on

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Foreign GM Conditions

                              Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                              Hi Michael:

                              ...But I have forwarded your e-mail to the organizer responsible for sponsorships for the Open, Brian Fiedler, and asked that he e-mail you with whatever info is publicly available. Please post here your e-mail address, and I will then send it on to him as well.

                              Bob
                              Bob I sent a private message to you with my email.

                              Thanks

                              Michael Yip

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Day 8 - Saturday, July 17: The U 2000 Can. Open Blog - Pt. I

                                Hmmm, I don't think you got it: "pubic", as in "puberty" ...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X