U1600 Players at 3.5 & 3.0:
Sorted by Score, then by Rating.
At 3.5:
Wayne Siu (1449):
Round 1: Defeated Unrated
Round 2: Defeated 1694
Round 3: Took a Bye
Round 4: Defeated 2048
Round 5: Board 7: Wayne Siu (1449 : w : 3.5) v. IM Nikolay Noritsyn (2536 : b : 3.5)
At 3.0:
Mei Chen Lee (1552):
Round 1: Defeated 1308
Round 2: Defeated 1711
Round 3: Defeated 1572
Round 4: Lost to 2162
Round 5: Board 18: Mei Chen Lee (1552 : b : 3.0) v. Lorne Yee (2222 : b: : 3.0)
Tian Lan (1510):
Round 1: Defeated Unrated
Round 2: Defeated 1708
Round 3: Defeated 1835
Round 4: Lost to 2372
Round 5: Board 19: Tian Lan (1510 : b : 3.0) v. Paul Gelis (2216 : b : 3.0)
Matthew Scott (1506):
Round 1: Defeated Unrated
Round 2: Defeated 1688
Round 3: Lost to 1851
Round 4: Defeated 1897
Round 5: Board 21: Matthew Scott (1506 : w : 3.0) v. Jonathan Zaczek (2179 : b : 3.0)
Isaac Andrade (1354):
Round 1: Lost to 1572
Round 2: Defeated 1580
Round 3: Defeated 1754
Round 4: Defeated 1897
Round 5: Board 20: Ilia Bluvshtein (2216 : w : 3.0) v. Isaac Andrade (1354 : b : 3.0)
EDIT: While I did research this for my own curiosity (and to see the extent to which the Round 3 pairings favoured one of the players above), I do hope that it removes *some* of the criticism that these guys don't deserve to be up there (for at least tonight's round. I suspect most if not all of us will fall tonight). Most of them are playing well beyond their "Class C" designation (if you're using USCF designations as analogous to CFC ratings).
Sorted by Score, then by Rating.
At 3.5:
Wayne Siu (1449):
Round 1: Defeated Unrated
Round 2: Defeated 1694
Round 3: Took a Bye
Round 4: Defeated 2048
Round 5: Board 7: Wayne Siu (1449 : w : 3.5) v. IM Nikolay Noritsyn (2536 : b : 3.5)
At 3.0:
Mei Chen Lee (1552):
Round 1: Defeated 1308
Round 2: Defeated 1711
Round 3: Defeated 1572
Round 4: Lost to 2162
Round 5: Board 18: Mei Chen Lee (1552 : b : 3.0) v. Lorne Yee (2222 : b: : 3.0)
Tian Lan (1510):
Round 1: Defeated Unrated
Round 2: Defeated 1708
Round 3: Defeated 1835
Round 4: Lost to 2372
Round 5: Board 19: Tian Lan (1510 : b : 3.0) v. Paul Gelis (2216 : b : 3.0)
Matthew Scott (1506):
Round 1: Defeated Unrated
Round 2: Defeated 1688
Round 3: Lost to 1851
Round 4: Defeated 1897
Round 5: Board 21: Matthew Scott (1506 : w : 3.0) v. Jonathan Zaczek (2179 : b : 3.0)
Isaac Andrade (1354):
Round 1: Lost to 1572
Round 2: Defeated 1580
Round 3: Defeated 1754
Round 4: Defeated 1897
Round 5: Board 20: Ilia Bluvshtein (2216 : w : 3.0) v. Isaac Andrade (1354 : b : 3.0)
EDIT: While I did research this for my own curiosity (and to see the extent to which the Round 3 pairings favoured one of the players above), I do hope that it removes *some* of the criticism that these guys don't deserve to be up there (for at least tonight's round. I suspect most if not all of us will fall tonight). Most of them are playing well beyond their "Class C" designation (if you're using USCF designations as analogous to CFC ratings).
Comment