If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
More rubbish from Kevin Spraggett (on his blog today):
-Quote- As a way of short digression, in the Canadian chess community, we have a bully who goes by the name of Larry Bevand: director, king, absolute dictator and modern-day oligarch of an otherwise smallish 'blackbox' enterprise known as CMA. (Do you know who is President of this group? I don't! And millions of other Canadians don't know either.) Not only has Larry intimdated and threatened to black-list some of my blog readers from posting pro-''Spraggett on chess'' messages on his chesstalk message board in the past, but he has also intimidated some of my own family members to try to get them to discourage me from publishing my ''True Colours'' report on the state of Canadian chess.
To this I can only say: intimidation is the smaller brother of extortion and blackmail!
It is all in writing, Larry! I only have to re-produce my email inbox.
Sue me! YOU STUPID F***!
-EndQuote- (lightly edited since there are children who read this site)
So, Spraggett, where is this fabled "True Colours" report??
You have talked about it for what seems like forever
- always saying it is just about to be published...
Where's the beef?
so if you think it's rubbish, why exactly do you pay attention, and copy & paste to make sure the rest of us see it?
Simply because it is out there and some people seem to think K.S. should be Saint Kevin... K.S. talks a good game (perhaps) but he so far has failed to deliver.
It seems that he does not provide any mechanism to reply to posts on his blog (moderated or not) and therefore his statements necessarily go unchallenged.
Given the title of this thread, I don't think it is a stretch to believe that people who don't care are able to ignore it...
[QUOTE=Kerry Liles;31220]...It seems that he does not provide any mechanism to reply to posts on his blog (moderated or not) and therefore his statements necessarily go unchallenged.... QUOTE]
I don't know Spraggett the man, and know some in terms of his chess by living and playing chess in Canada, and visiting his blog sometimes. Unfortunately chesstalk is way too keen on feuds and long histories I don't care too much for.
(I have my blitz friendly grudge matches at the Hart House Chess Club)
However, Spraggett's blog has incredible entertainment and educational value in my opinion. And I will not stop visiting it because he has posted a picture of an upside down Canadian flag, or because he has some problems with some people. I simply SCROLL DOWN on the stuff I don't consider interesting, and get to the goods: chess and humour.
The tactics puzzles are quite sharp and good, and Kevin Spraggett's chess analyzes are absolutely awesome, and more often than not, on games that happened... a few hours prior. Combined with some pretty entertaining humour, even if some of it seems a bit vulgar, it makes for a pretty enjoyable read. I've also learned a few things from his blog completely unrelated to chess, from some random articles about facts or interesting things.
So KS promises an article that everyone is talking about because they have nothing too interesting to do while waiting for it. One thing seems to work for him though: it's a publicity stunt and many people keep coming back and reading everything else KS wants to show you. YOU keep his blog running, as interested parties. Maybe it will be an interesting article, or a rant, or a personal issue. Or maybe it will never be published. I don't know, I don't much care.
I visit his site 2-3 times a week because I get something out of it every time. I plan to visit his blog whether an article comes out or not, and / or even after it's published, provided Mr. Spraggett keeps making his blog educational and entertaining.
The reason I posted this is because everything I read about his blog on chesstalk is negative, and maybe I am naive but I find a lot of positive in it, worth re-visiting.
When Spraggett started slagging a nice honest elderly lady whom I happened to know, and who has done far more for chess than I or anyone else I know has, I tuned out and have no plans to go back unless and until someone lets me know he has recanted and apologized to her.
...The reason I posted this is because everything I read about his blog on chesstalk is negative, and maybe I am naive but I find a lot of positive in it, worth re-visiting.
Alex Ferreira
I think there has been a fair bit of praise here for Kevin's blog. And, no matter what you think of his politics, he is the best Canadian chess player ever. I would buy, sight unseen, any chess book he wrote.
But I can see how his writings can rile some people. I always thought that was his aim.
He might be the Bill O'Reilly or the Glenn Beck of the Canadian Chess Community(I've heard from several sources that O'reilly's persona on TV might be more of an act than his actual views, while Glenn Beck is just insane). He might not believe everything he is saying and is just doing it to arouse discussion or cause controversy, maybe he enjoys it?
Not that I'm defending his actions but it is a possibility. Of course he might just be extremely deluded and has his sense of reality horribly skewed.
Last edited by Adam Cormier; Thursday, 11th November, 2010, 06:28 PM.
Reason: added another point
Perhaps we have a simple case of sour grapes here - none of us, including GM Kevin, thought of the Chess 'n Math idea before Larry Bevand did! As a result he is making money while the rest of us are just looking in! But we only have ourselves to blame...
Perhaps we have a simple case of sour grapes here - none of us, including GM Kevin, thought of the Chess 'n Math idea before Larry Bevand did! As a result he is making money while the rest of us are just looking in! But we only have ourselves to blame...
Chess 'n Math is a non-profit. Presumably, Strategy Games is a business venture, and I hope it makes some money - although I don't see much company info on the Internet...
Anyway, if KS ever actually publishes his rants, we might learn the specifics of his complaints about all and sundry. From what KS posted on his blog, I gather that Larry suggested that it wasn't wise to publish what might be considered slanderous (KS seems to think that such suggestions to not do something is a sort of threat; without seeing the fabled emails or other correspondence, it is rather hard to tell).
I'm tired of KS making blanket statements (that can't be rebutted in the same blog where they are posted) and constantly making promises to publish his pronouncements (anyone remember how long it took for him to produce his blockbuster report on the Olympiad Team fiasco several years back? A "21-page report..." (or something like that) that turned out to be a yawn. And so it goes.
I very much like the chess content of KS's blog, but the level of claptrap is getting too much.
Comment