CFC charitable status annulled

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: CFC charitable status annulled

    Originally posted by Larry Bevand View Post
    Hi Zeljko,

    If a corporation sponsors an event, can they claim it as an expense? If they make a donation, is that treated differently?

    In the past I have not had corporations asking for charitable tax receipts...but I have had individuals doing so.

    Please clarify?

    Thanks,

    Larry
    What I've been taught in my tax courses is that corporations can deducted charitable donations to determine their taxable income under section 110.1(1)(a) of the ITA. Corporations deduct under a different section than individuals do, rather than receiving a tax credit as individuals do. Its pretty clear if its a charitable donation. If its not a charity my best thinking is that it would depend on the nature of the event and whether its clearly in the course of pursuing normal business income - advertising & promotion expense etc I don't see any difference between it being considered a donation or a sponsorship; in both cases the corporation hands over money to the charity as a donation for an event the charity is holding.

    However, I am not yet qualified to be giving tax advise so I would check with an accountant. Not sure why they would or wouldn't ask for a tax receipt.
    Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Saturday, 5th February, 2011, 02:59 PM.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: CFC charitable status annulled

      A charitable donation is by definition one that has no real benefit for the entity making the donation. Therefore I don't see how "sponsorship" in return for advertising would qualify. On the other hand, many corporations do make a certain amount of charitable donations without expecting anything in return.
      Christopher Mallon
      FIDE Arbiter

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: CFC charitable status annulled

        Originally posted by Christopher Mallon View Post
        A charitable donation is by definition one that has no real benefit for the entity making the donation. Therefore I don't see how "sponsorship" in return for advertising would qualify. On the other hand, many corporations do make a certain amount of charitable donations without expecting anything in return.
        A charitable donation is to a charitable organization or registered amateur athletic organization that uses it for charitable purposes. It is not denied just because for example you get to put your name on a university buidling or hospital ward or call an event the Deloitte Canadian Open for say a skating or chess event, as long as the organization is a charity. It is not denied if you have your name permanently put on a plaque in the lobby of an arts building or have your corporations name or individual name acknowledged in a printed program or at signage during the event. Heck its not even denied I believe if you name the whole communtiy theatre building after your corporation such as the Dofasco centre for the performing arts or name a hospital after yourself. You are not required to keep the donation a secret in order to qualify for the deduction. The ITA regime is meant to encourage us as individuals or corporations to support worthwhile public good charitable causes including athletics. It is not meant to discourage donations.

        If it is not a charity such as the Molson Indy or BMO Field my thinking is that it is still deductible as an advertising or promotion expense in the ordinary course of business just as a newspaper ad or tv commercial would be.
        Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Saturday, 5th February, 2011, 04:40 PM.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: CFC charitable status annulled

          From the accounting courses I've taken, most corporations can claim a lot of things under advertizing / public relations / promotions and this taxwise would effectively be equivalent to a charitible donation.

          So probably the biggest hit might be in terms of individual Olympic donations or bequeaths as Paul mentions.

          Parents getting tax receipts for their children going to International events would be frowned upon both as a charity and as a RAAA.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: CFC charitable status annulled

            Originally posted by Gary Ruben View Post
            Change the name to The Canadian Chess and Global Warming Federation and apply again. Change the mandate to the promotion of chess and study of hot air in Canada.
            LOL... the best suggestion in a long while...

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: CFC charitable status annulled

              Losing the charitible status is a big loss.

              Were there any suggestions given on how to meet the requirements to gain status? Has the organization learned anything from this experience?
              Gary Ruben
              CC - IA and SIM

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                Originally posted by Zeljko Kitich View Post
                My guess and its just a guess is that if they issued tax receipts to parents for paying for their children to go to international events then this would be contrary to CRA tax donation rules. A similar issue happened in Hamilton with Redeemer college where parents received tax receipts for making donations to a bursary/tuition fund which in fact funded some of their own children. ...
                Yet another ethical embarrassment for the CFC. Who were the CFC executives and parents who were involved? They must have been pretty dense not to have recognized this sleazy little attempt to circumvent the intent of the tax laws for what it was. :(
                Last edited by Peter McKillop; Monday, 7th February, 2011, 10:59 AM. Reason: ok, ok, I retract "slimeballs"
                "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
                "Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
                "If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                  Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post
                  Yet another ethical embarrassment for the CFC. Who were the CFC executives and parents who were involved? They must have been pretty dense not to have recognized this sleazy little attempt to circumvent the intent of the tax laws for what it was. I think their names should be made public so that our governors will know who to elect to CFC executive positions in the years ahead. It would be a shame not to put these slimeballs to work for the benefit of chess in Canada. :(
                  Well if you are wanting to look into it this thread from July of last year has a post from Bob Gillanders which mentions some of the issues involved re specified player donations and that the CFC had issues prior to July 28th,2010 with CRA and were 'slapped on the wrist' . http://www.chesstalk.info/forum/show...ipts#post27176 the thread also has some excellent points in my opinion from Steve Douglas outlining the potential issues.

                  I don't support calling anyone a slimeball though, but that's up to you.
                  Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Sunday, 6th February, 2011, 07:59 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                    Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post
                    Yet another ethical embarrassment for the CFC. Who were the CFC executives and parents who were involved? They must have been pretty dense not to have recognized this sleazy little attempt to circumvent the intent of the tax laws for what it was. I think their names should be made public so that our governors will know who to elect to CFC executive positions in the years ahead. It would be a shame not to put these slimeballs to work for the benefit of chess in Canada. :(
                    1) Les Bunning has put a lot of time for us into this business with CRA over the years, since these incidents became an issue. While it's clear now that a number of tax receipts had been issued inappropriately in past years, we had discontinued this practice. Les had discovered that in certain instances parent's donations for their children could be issued tax receipts, but we hadn't acted on this after the 2010 AGM, as we were working on a new policy document.
                    2) The annullment was issued as we weren't considered to be 100% Educational which was the charitible branch we were registered under many years ago. It's my understanding that the CRA reviews and annuls many charities each year for this reason (we should have never been a charity). Les made strong arguments in our favour, but they weren't budging. We hope to apply as a Registered Athletic Association in a year or so.

                    I'm not sure there was ever a slimeball in this instance.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                      Originally posted by Fred McKim View Post
                      1) Les Bunning has put a lot of time for us into this business with CRA over the years, since these incidents became an issue. While it's clear now that a number of tax receipts had been issued inappropriately in past years, we had discontinued this practice. Les had discovered that in certain instances parent's donations for their children could be issued tax receipts, but we hadn't acted on this after the 2010 AGM, as we were working on a new policy document.
                      2) The annullment was issued as we weren't considered to be 100% Educational which was the charitible branch we were registered under many years ago. It's my understanding that the CRA reviews and annuls many charities each year for this reason (we should have never been a charity). Les made strong arguments in our favour, but they weren't budging. We hope to apply as a Registered Athletic Association in a year or so.

                      I'm not sure there was ever a slimeball in this instance.
                      Why wait the year? It's a one page form & mainly requires a report on your activities as to how you are training coaches, referees and high performance athletes, regulating and promoting the sport etc. Shouldn't take that long to put together.

                      The CRA site shows only 34 charities as ever having been annuled, with effective dates all the way back to 1967. So that would seem to be less than one a year.

                      Also if there are strong arguments in favour of the CFC then why not take those strong arguments to federal tax court? CRA is not the ultimate arbiter, there is a court process.
                      Last edited by Zeljko Kitich; Sunday, 6th February, 2011, 10:38 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                        Originally posted by Zeljko Kitich View Post
                        Why wait the year? It's a one page form & mainly requires a report on your activities as to how you are training coaches, referees and high performance athletes, regulating and promoting the sport etc. Shouldn't take that long to put together.

                        The CRA site shows only 34 charities as ever having been annuled, with effective dates all the way back to 1967. So that would seem to be less than one a year.

                        Also if there are strong arguments in favour of the CFC then why not take those strong arguments to federal tax court? CRA is not the ultimate arbiter, there is a court process.
                        I presume it could be costly to take the matter to the federal tax court?
                        Any idea how much? More than a new website? I do not see any benefit to appealing the decision - I don't see an 'up side' for the potential expense (other than the perceived impact on people's decision-making about donations to the Chess Foundation. I don't know whether that is a significant issue or not.
                        ...Mike Pence: the Lord of the fly.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                          Originally posted by Kerry Liles View Post
                          I presume it could be costly to take the matter to the federal tax court?
                          Any idea how much? More than a new website? I do not see any benefit to appealing the decision - I don't see an 'up side' for the potential expense (other than the perceived impact on people's decision-making about donations to the Chess Foundation. I don't know whether that is a significant issue or not.
                          No more costly presumably than all the time and effort spent to date defending the charitable status. I hate to see good arguments on behalf of the CFC shut down just because there is a cost to go through the courts. Not being a lawyer I have no idea how much it would cost. I can tell you that many cases are taken to court each year - they are referred to as Dominion Tax Cases and form an important common law component of our tax laws and their interpretation.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                            Originally posted by Kerry Liles View Post
                            I presume it could be costly to take the matter to the federal tax court?
                            Any idea how much? More than a new website? I do not see any benefit to appealing the decision - I don't see an 'up side' for the potential expense (other than the perceived impact on people's decision-making about donations to the Chess Foundation. I don't know whether that is a significant issue or not.
                            The Executive felt that we would be best served by letting the matter go, accept the annullment and proceed with the Registered Atlhetic Association project at some point in time down the road. Maybe we'll have to scrutinize the regulations, and set up different programs, so as to maximize our chances.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                              How long of an interregnum does the Executive propose, Fred?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: CFC charitable status annulled

                                Originally posted by Ken Craft View Post
                                How long of an interregnum does the Executive propose, Fred?
                                I don't see us applying before the next Executive is seated. I would think that could be a primary project for 2011/12.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X