Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Yakov Vaingorten
    • 2011-02-22
    • 4

    #1

    Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

    I just came through the table of that tournament and noticed that four players scored 6.5 points. My first question is: who was declared as the winner?
    I also noticed that Christian Stevens scored 6 points, but he is not an IM. Why didn't he get the title, as usually the case in that tournament?
  • Hugh Brodie
    • 2008-05-30
    • 5581

    #2
    Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

    There was a four-way knockout playoff - with pairs of games using faster time controls.

    Samsonkin beat Livshits 1.5-0.5.
    Noritsyn-Hebert: there were five pairs of (recorded) games - all which were split. Noritsyn finally won - I'm not sure whether it might have been via an unrecorded Armageddon game.

    Noritsyn then beat Samsonkin in the final 1.5-0.5.

    I believe that Noritsyn earned the only IM title allowed to be earned at this event.
    Last edited by Hugh Brodie; Wednesday, 18 May, 2011, 10:36 AM.

    Comment

    • Pierre Denommee
      • 2008-05-30
      • 593

      #3
      Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

      In a zonal, only one player can get the IM title by scoring at least two third of the points and at most two players can get the FM title by scoring at least 50%.

      Previously, the number of IM and FM titles was unlimited, but in a Zonal in Mexico, a blatant abuse has been committed by inviting a lot of unrated players to the Zonal. Consequently, it became possible to get a score of 50% by playing only unrated players. This Zonal has resulted in the creation of unrated FM. Off course, FIDE has reacted by closing this gap in the rules before everybody on Earth become an unrated FM.
      Last edited by Pierre Denommee; Thursday, 19 May, 2011, 01:29 PM.

      Comment

      • Joshua Guo
        • 2010-01-08
        • 73

        #4
        Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

        Looking at FIDE website, looks like Raja got his FM title in the 2007 zonal.



        Should there be another FM title handed out? Because I was the only other non-FM to score 5 points or more. I know its 4 years after the fact, but I would like to inquire.

        And yes, I played 9 games :)

        Edit: 2007 Zonal standings here - http://www.chess.ca/xtable.asp?TNum=200706210
        Last edited by Joshua Guo; Wednesday, 18 May, 2011, 01:43 PM.

        Comment

        • Eric Hansen
          • 2008-06-20
          • 414

          #5
          Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

          Michael Barron scored 5.5 and was rewarded with the FM title.

          Comment

          • Joshua Guo
            • 2010-01-08
            • 73

            #6
            Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

            Ahh, thanks. I thought he got his title from before.

            Comment

            • David Cohen
              • 2008-05-31
              • 178

              #7
              Titles are here

              Titles are here:

              Comment

              • Christopher Mallon
                • 2008-05-29
                • 1117

                #8
                Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                Originally posted by Hugh Brodie View Post
                There was a four-way knockout playoff - with pairs of games using faster time controls.

                Samsonkin beat Livshits 1.5-0.5.
                Noritsyn-Hebert: there were five pairs of (recorded) games - all which were split. Noritsyn finally won - I'm not sure whether it might have been via an unrecorded Armageddon game.

                Noritsyn then beat Samsonkin in the final 1.5-0.5.

                I believe that Noritsyn earned the only IM title allowed to be earned at this event.
                Yes I remember, that was a LONG night! Exciting, but LONG!

                Anyway, a player finishing 1st in a Zonal is automatically an IM. This does not count towards the limit of 1 player earning the title for being at 2/3rds score.

                At least that's how the rule is written now. Perhaps it was different almost 4 years ago?
                Christopher Mallon
                FIDE Arbiter

                Comment

                • Joshua Guo
                  • 2010-01-08
                  • 73

                  #9
                  Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                  Originally posted by Christopher Mallon View Post
                  Yes I remember, that was a LONG night! Exciting, but LONG!

                  Anyway, a player finishing 1st in a Zonal is automatically an IM. This does not count towards the limit of 1 player earning the title for being at 2/3rds score.

                  At least that's how the rule is written now. Perhaps it was different almost 4 years ago?

                  You're right. In that case Stevens should have received IM title along with Noritsyn, and Barron and Panjwani gets the FMs.

                  Comment

                  • Yakov Vaingorten
                    • 2011-02-22
                    • 4

                    #10
                    Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                    Thank you! Seems like there was a great action in that tournament.

                    Comment

                    • Stephen Wright
                      • 2008-08-25
                      • 461

                      #11
                      Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                      The 2007 Championship was not a zonal, according to the report in Chess Canada.

                      Comment

                      • Christopher Mallon
                        • 2008-05-29
                        • 1117

                        #12
                        Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                        Who wrote the report? We had assurances from FIDE that it was in fact a Zonal.
                        Christopher Mallon
                        FIDE Arbiter

                        Comment

                        • Stephen Wright
                          • 2008-08-25
                          • 461

                          #13
                          Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                          Robert Hamilton

                          Comment

                          • Fred McKim
                            • 2008-05-30
                            • 1433

                            #14
                            Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                            Originally posted by Christopher Mallon View Post
                            Who wrote the report? We had assurances from FIDE that it was in fact a Zonal.
                            If you look at the Canadian Closed events and the World Cup events we can see

                            Canadian Closed
                            2006 Zugic
                            2007 Noritsyn (tie-break)
                            2009 Hebert

                            World Cup
                            2007 Zugic
                            2009 Hebert

                            Both the 2006 and 2009 events are called Zonals on the rating page, while the 2007 event was not.

                            I'm making a pretty big guess, as I wasn't involved or watching at the time, that FIDE mistakenly processed this 2007 Closed as a Zonal.

                            Comment

                            • Egidijus Zeromskis
                              • 2008-05-30
                              • 5715

                              #15
                              Re: Couple questions about Canadian Closed-2007

                              Originally posted by Christopher Mallon View Post
                              At least that's how the rule is written now. Perhaps it was different almost 4 years ago?
                              R.Hamilton wrote: "With 2007 being an off-zonal year, the Championship did not nominate a Canadian who would advance in the World Ch. cycle. However, changes to FIDE regulations have made it so that, even in an off-zonal year, IM and FM titles can be earned in a Canadian Championship."

                              Retrieving older FIDE rules: http://web.archive.org/web/200803152...sp?level=B0101
                              I don't see any mentioning of national non-zonal championships and IM titles (only norms). The closest is:

                              Zonal or sub-zonal - 1st,up to 3
                              9 or more games 2450+ (a) =20 game norm
                              9 or more games >= 66.66% (b)

                              (b) Such an event must be approved by the Presidential Board. Results are pooled as in (a). Where a zonal is an open Swiss, only the highest scoring or the highest placed on tie-break shall be awarded the title.

                              Comment

                              Working...