If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Back in the 70's many of our top young chessplayers continued to play seriously well into their adult years- some, such as Spraggett, Hebert and (occasionally) Day are still competing. Why do we not see that anymore? It's not like prize money was any greater in those days, and I suspect there were actually fewer opportunities to earn money on the side coaching kids.
I can speak as one-such player south of the border: I was US Jr. co-champion in 1977. In my case I always had other interests, and knew by age 13 that I desired to go into academic research, exactly the job I'm enjoying now. I played through college and graduate school but decreasingly, and near-nil thru being faculty and raising a family.
Of course that's different from having pursued the game further, studying openings seriously, and being a GM, but anyway my story.
Mark we will miss you and will keep the candle burning in the window. Best of luck in your future endeavours.
From his blog:
"The idea that professional chess players expect to be paid to “just” play chess is quite naive in a society where all other professions require social interaction and working with others."
Canadian chess loses this insightful perspective and meanwhile retains the poisonous rantings of a deprived elitist from Quebec...
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
"The idea that professional chess players expect to be paid to “just” play chess is quite naive in a society where all other professions require social interaction and working with others."
ALL professions? What about non-team professional sports, e.g. golf, tennis, boxing (you might include poker too)? And Olympic 'amateur' sports where athletes get grants from their governments and often support from corporate sponsors?
And who says chess does not require social interaction and working with others? For example:
Giving simultaneous exhibitions
Giving lectures
Teaching/coaching
Organizing/directing tournaments
Playing on an Olympiad team
"The idea that professional chess players expect to be paid to “just” play chess is quite naive in a society where all other professions require social interaction and working with others."
ALL professions? What about non-team professional sports, e.g. golf, tennis, boxing (you might include poker too)? And Olympic 'amateur' sports where athletes get grants from their governments and often support from corporate sponsors?
And who says chess does not require social interaction and working with others? For example:
Giving simultaneous exhibitions
Giving lectures
Teaching/coaching
Organizing/directing tournaments
Playing on an Olympiad team
Ken, you raise some good talking points about Mark's quote. I doubt that Mark meant literally "all" other professions. But in your comparing of chess to golf, tennis, boxing, and even poker, you miss one very important facet: chess, unlike all the others, has little to no money behind it. Even the horrible "sport" of bowling, in which the participants could be thousands of miles apart in separate bowling alleys for all the good it does them to be in the same bowling alley, has more money behind it than chess.
This means that chess, exponentially more than the others you mention, requires its participants to exude goodwill to each other and to the general public, in order to justify what pitiful amounts of money it does get from outside itself. All those other games can survive even if many of its main celebrities are a-holes, because the public (and by extension, sponsors) will continue to pour in money. Not so for chess. Even a single a-hole chess player can turn away sponsors / public who are already heavily prejudiced against chess as an interesting game to spectate. And I believe this is the main message behind Mark's quote.
Now, as to the activities thay you say chess "requires". No one demands that chess players do ANY of these activities. Remember, it is the players that Mark is talking about here. Organizers / directors are usually not also players, so strike that activity off your list. Playing on an Olympiad team requires that you be either exceptionally good or that you be pretty damn good and a good team player. The exceptionally good can get away with murder, figuratively speaking. The pretty damn good must be good at getting along with their teammates, yes. But I think getting along with teammates was NOT what Mark was getting at with his quote. So let's strike that activity off as well, not pertinent.
The rest of the activities are done by some chess players (on a pure profit basis, mind you). But the key point is that there is no requirement that a chess player do these things. A chess player can quite literally expect to be paid to "just" play chess.
Well, so can tennis players, golfers, bowlers expect to be paid to just play their sport. But again, the difference is that their chosen game is financially viable even if they make that choice en masse. Even if no pro tennis player teaches or gives lessons, tennis itself will still thrive. This is NOT the case with chess. Chess is so barely viable as a "commercial" venture that to even survive financially, it NEEDS players to give simuls, to lecture, to teach. And it needs the players that are doing those activities to exude nothing but a positive attitude in all their dealings with the public.
This is the insight of Mark's quote. You can agree or disagree as you see fit, but you can't run from the facts. The continuous, never-ending pitiful financial state of chess continues to prove the above points.
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
Comment