If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
The men play Macau ( average rating 2020 ) and the women play 14th seed Slovenia ( average rating 2359 ). Bounce back day for the men and a thrilling but difficult challenge for
the women.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Wednesday, 19th November, 2008, 06:16 PM.
Canada, with top tiebreak among the 5 matchpointers, plays Macau, with the bottom tiebreak. So having a good tiebreak (which involves scoring more game points, regardless of the match result) also gives you "good" (that is, less difficult) pairings in subsequent rounds. And after the last round, of course, it could make a dozen places difference in the standings.
Using the same method (top vs. bottom, down to middle vs. middle), Canada would have played England (women), except that we've already played them. One rung down was Slovenia, whom we are playing. One rung up would have been Georgia! Slovenia is strong, but Georgia would have been a tale to tell the grandkids some day.
Canada, with top tiebreak among the 5 matchpointers, plays Macau, with the bottom tiebreak. So having a good tiebreak (which involves scoring more game points, regardless of the match result) also gives you "good" (that is, less difficult) pairings in subsequent rounds. And after the last round, of course, it could make a dozen places difference in the standings.
Using the same method (top vs. bottom, down to middle vs. middle), Canada would have played England (women), except that we've already played them. One rung down was Slovenia, whom we are playing. One rung up would have been Georgia! Slovenia is strong, but Georgia would have been a tale to tell the grandkids some day.
Our national team is currently in 86th place. The Women's team in 30th place. I like the chances against Slovenia better than against Georgia.
A lot of the WYCC players we used to see have filtered into the Women's Olympiad. Z. Tan from China is leading her board now with a monster performance so far. A. Muzychuk ( and her sister ) were WYCC regulars; she'll play Natalia tommorrow I presume. One potential interesting future match up is Turkey with Ozturk on the team.
Rd. 7 sees Canada's Women's team playing Slovania on Bd. 12.
WFM Yuanling Yuan ( 2157 ) is on second board ( 12.2 ) playing WGM Jana Krivec ( 2345 ).
Since Yuanling is a member of my chess club, Scarborough CC, I ( read Fritz ) will be doing live analysis of her game on the chess website, Chess5 ( www.chess5.com ). When you get to the homepage, click on " Public Games " to get the November list of games. Find the game, and then click on " View " and you will get a board and the score, with analysis ( it takes a few seconds for the game to load ). Hope you find it interesting.
It's pretty clear that the last move in Khoudgarian - Anna Muzychuk Qa5-d5, leaving the Q en prise, is a glitch. I'm guessing that the Q went to e5, and that White's next move was Resign.
Dina has a reasonable position, though down the road she may miss the dark-square bishop which she traded for a knight. Our games with Black feature sacrifices by one side or the other. Yuanling seems to have scant compensation for the two pawns she has given up. Irina's opponent does have obvious compensation for her gambit pawn in the form of an attack along the g-file.
Canada is up 3-0 against Macau, and Mark Bluvshtein's position looks good.
The men are doing well - Pascal, Igor, and Nikolay have all won, and Mark's position looks good. The ladies appear to be down 1-0 (Natalia lost on board 1 according to the team listing, but nothing has yet appeared on the individual board image).
Irina sacrificed the Exchange to blunt the attack, and now looks good on the dark squares.
Let me now broach a controversial subject. Under the old system of game points, match captains were allowed access to the playing hall at all times, dating back to the days of preliminary group qualifications. In a game-point Swiss there was no good reason to admit captains, but the tradition persisted. Now with match points, there again is a reason. A player is offered a draw, and before replying asks the captain whether she can accept. Based upon the match conditions and a general principles-only view of the game in question, the captain answers. By the way, at Calvia 2004 I was arbiting a match where this did not apply. Madl, playing AFAIR first board for Hungary against AFAIR Ukraine, asked the captain, GM Horvath (one of the GMs Horvath) whether she could accept a draw offer. Horvath came to the game position fresh, and started to look at the position, only to realize in an instant that it was a crazy game with wild material and positional imbalances. You should have seen the expression on his face. To look at this position and give a draw-or-not opinion would have been to offer Madl real chess advice, which is not a legit role of the captain. You could see all this pass over Horvath's face in a fraction of a second. He indicated that, yes, a draw was OK, and it was sealed.
Anyway, back to the question of captains, in a matchpoint event the captain's role is more sensible, as he keeps track of how the games are going, so the players themselves don't have to. He can also offer package deals (though the 30-move rule in this Olympiad eliminates early deals). I'm wondering if the Canadian captain in this match, with the score 1-0 in Slovenia's favour, could offer a package deal of three draws. That would give the match to Slovenia, but it would increase Canada's gamepoint tiebreaks and improve their future pairings. In none of the games does Canada look like it might win, and in a couple Canada looks worse. I think that would be a good move strategically for Canada's final placing, but what would the fans think? And what would Canada's players think? I'm not even thinking about Slovenia's players. Hey, buddy, I'm two pawns up, you can't agree to a draw for me! Well, that wouldn't happen because in Europe there is more respect for the captains. But the player might think it, which is almost as damaging.
I very much doubt that what I have described will happen. But a different match with different countries, different captains ....
Dina is on the cusp of a sacrificial attack. It's easy to sac on f7 from the sidelines, but if she retreats the knight, White's position looks just bad. Before I could send that off, she didn't sac, but found an interesting chance with Nxc5. It looks at first glance like Black could go up in material, but at the price of solving White's positional problems and giving her a passed d-pawn. As always, not using an engine.
Irina continues to have compensation for the Exchange sac.
All three games are down to time pressure. As we know, anything can happen in time pressure. I like the way Irina is handling her position. Whether it pays off of course is another matter. Hmm, I would have tried to avoid a rook trade. Anyway. There is a piquant variation in Dina's game where White gives up her last piece, a rook on d3, and playing d6-d7 queens the pawn. That will never happen, but at least it figures in the calculations.
Irina was outplayed in the latter stages. Lesson: avoid time trouble! Yuanling never got her counterplay off the ground. Dina is a piece up, but hasn't made progress and is down to 9+ minutes. Of course with the 30-second increment, there's still time to make many many more moves. Slovenia 3-0 Canada (and counting). Canada 4-0 Macau.
I didn't much like Dina's 44 Kf3 .... Better seemed 44 Be2 intending Bf3 regaining the long diagonal and then repositioning the knight to win with the passed pawn.
Macau was seeded 130rd. It doesn't get much easier.
Someone once tried to sell me a Macau. The bird was too darn loud and the mess it leaves is more than my dog "beware" does. If it catches your finger in its beak it can break the finger like a twig. All stuff that's good to know. :)
Comment