If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
I seem to remember reading about this at some point but I can't remember where, or what the consensus was. A quick google search proved fruitless, so naturally I'm turning to the wisdom of chesstalk :)
Consider a situation in which one player is using a Monroi device and his opponent isn't. The player with the device is continually staring at it, most likely calculating variations (I've done this at times myself, and seen others do it). Given that the opponent does not have this option, should this be allowed?
Many of my students have told me they calculate much better when looking at a screen. Not just kids, but adults as well.
I can see why it may be considered an advantage but I don't see anything in the rules to prevent it.
Re: Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
Maybe not yet - but soon! Its only a matter of time before someone implants an effective chess engine into the device. And if it's well concealed, no TD or arbiter may be able to spot its use.
Re: Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
I know of at least one individual who has used his monroi device to calculate variations. He would put a variation in his monroi then look at it and then scroll back to the original position.
Re: Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
I calculate better on a screen than over the board (I'm a young adult - I've played far more chess online or on screen than over the board), and I have used a Monroi machine once (in the 2010 Canadian Open). I did not use it for calculation purposes there, but conceivably, I could have.
I guess my view of things is this: If someone wants to cheat, they're going to cheat. Admittedly I don't take tournaments as seriously as some folk (I mean, I play to win, but it is just for fun at the end of the day), but where do you draw the line? It would be pretty easy to excuse yourself and go talk with someone or go to your car or wherever and run a position through an engine if you wanted to. Maybe this is a little more transparent than using a Monroi machine, but I would think the person staring at the Monroi machine would be a pretty good indicator that something abnormal is going on.
There's a fundamental balance to be struck between convenience and security. Having Monroi machines increases the exposure of the game, particularly where there are live feeds. They also save time by not making people copy things down by hand only to put them into a computer later. I don't think this technology is about to go away, whether people like them or not. It wouldn't surprise me if we eventually reach a day where they are as standard as chess clocks.
In short, while I understand there are legitimate concerns and possible abuses, I don't think the answer is to ban them - it seems analogous to standing on a beach at low tide and proclaiming that the tide shall not come in. The best way to deal with progress is to try and address the actual problems (e.g.: incentives to cheat) as opposed to the symptoms (e.g.: another possible way to do it). This is reinforced by any subtle advantage that might be gained calculation wise could be eliminated if the other player chooses to also use a Monroi device.
Re: Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
Let me clarify that I'm not talking about using the device to cheat or actually input variations. I'm talking about the situation where a player is simply using the 2-dimensional screen as a "visual aid" and inputting moves normally.
Let me clarify that I'm not talking about using the device to cheat or actually input variations. I'm talking about the situation where a player is simply using the 2-dimensional screen as a "visual aid" and inputting moves normally.
Can you really split the difference there though? If it is possible to do the things mentioned, it's completely possible that by allowing them some players will do this.
In any case, I don't think my answer changes - they should be allowed.
Re: Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
Here's a real life situation: one player is using monroi and steps away from the room with the device. Firstly, is this permitted, and secondly, doesn't this create the potential for cheating? Beyond the capabilities of the device itself couldn't the player in question show the position on the device to one of his highly rated friends for feedback?
Here's a real life situation: one player is using monroi and steps away from the room with the device. Firstly, is this permitted, and secondly, doesn't this create the potential for cheating? Beyond the capabilities of the device itself couldn't the player in question show the position on the device to one of his highly rated friends for feedback?
I would hope that taking the Monroi device out of the playing area would be considered the same as making notes... and it should be prohibited, but leaving an expensive device on the table while one takes a bathroom break would be rather trusting?
Everyone should understand that when the Monroi is in 'record game mode' (no idea what their terminology is...) the device is locked down so that other software cannot be run - ie: you cannot just "alt-tab" and run something else. Having said that, any device is hackable at some level, although I rather doubt anyone has hacked a Monroi (if they did, they likely would not talk about it!)
Let me clarify that I'm not talking about using the device to cheat or actually input variations. I'm talking about the situation where a player is simply using the 2-dimensional screen as a "visual aid" and inputting moves normally.
Geordie, If you think about it, the situation has existed for a hundred years.
What you describe is little different from a player studying his game on the demo board and no one has ever objected to that!
Geordie, If you think about it, the situation has existed for a hundred years.
What you describe is little different from a player studying his game on the demo board and no one has ever objected to that!
I would hope that taking the Monroi device out of the playing area would be considered the same as making notes... and it should be prohibited, but leaving an expensive device on the table while one takes a bathroom break would be rather trusting?
Everyone should understand that when the Monroi is in 'record game mode' (no idea what their terminology is...) the device is locked down so that other software cannot be run - ie: you cannot just "alt-tab" and run something else. Having said that, any device is hackable at some level, although I rather doubt anyone has hacked a Monroi (if they did, they likely would not talk about it!)
I am not at all familiar with the monroi device, that's why I was unsure of the proper protocol. It did not concern me too much in this instance, as the youngster I was playing is well known and his reputation has never been questioned. I assumed that he took the device for the reason you mentioned. (unsafe to leave it on the table?). Still, the thought did cross my mind that unscrupulous folks might find a way to gain an unfair advantage with the device. Even showing the position to someone for expert input could result in a decisive advantage, without actually using the functions of the device -locked down or not. I am curious to hear from the arbiters in the audience-what is standard policy?
Re: Could using a Monroi device be considered an unfair advantage?
Would someone be allowed to take a paper scoresheet with them away from the game?
It sounds very suspicious when you put it that way, and it should be treated no differently just because it's an electronic scoresheet. I would like to think that if someone tried swiping a Monroi off a table that other people would notice and perhaps speak up! Not to mention there really aren't all that many of them, and anytime you use it at an event the serial # of the device is noted by the software.
EDIT: I forgot to answer the actual question. The scoresheet must be visible to the arbiter at all times.
Last edited by Christopher Mallon; Sunday, 2nd September, 2012, 07:46 PM.
Fischer once agreed to let his clock run in pitch blackness - the power went out and his opponent (was it Petrosian?) claimed it wasn't fair to stop the clocks, since Fischer would be analysing the board in his head!
Would someone be allowed to take a paper scoresheet with them away from the game?
It sounds very suspicious when you put it that way, and it should be treated no differently just because it's an electronic scoresheet. I would like to think that if someone tried swiping a Monroi off a table that other people would notice and perhaps speak up! Not to mention there really aren't all that many of them, and anytime you use it at an event the serial # of the device is noted by the software.
EDIT: I forgot to answer the actual question. The scoresheet must be visible to the arbiter at all times.
That's my feeling too Chris. In fact, it's worse with the monroi because you can readily visualize the board position. A possible option: Hand the monroi to the arbiter on his way out of the room?
Geordie, If you think about it, the situation has existed for a hundred years.
What you describe is little different from a player studying his game on the demo board and no one has ever objected to that!
Hi Vlad,
The main difference I see is that the display board is visible to both players, whereas only one player has access to the monroi in most cases.
I do think the Monroi device (or live broadcast in general) is good for chess and it adds a lot to an event. I'm not suggesting that Monroi devices be banned. From an arbiter's standpoint, I'm just curious if there are grounds to tell a player not to constantly stare at their device, since its purpose is to be used as a scoresheet.
Basically, my question can be broken into two parts. Is it possible for a person's "screen calculation ability" to exceed their "OTB calculation ability" (my personal opinion is that it is). If so, then is it not an unfair advantage to have access to a 2D screen while your opponent doesn't, and what can be done about it?
I don't think this is a major issue as I can't imagine it having a huge effect, and I can also think of some drawbacks to staring at the monroi screen, for example not being as aware of the clock times... But I do think it's an interesting topic for discussion, and it came up today at the Hart House tournament.
Comment