If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
It depends on your definition of "chess players". Do you mean CFC-rated players (members or not); players rated under any system; Canada only; worldwide; or anyone who knows how to move the pieces?
It depends on your definition of "chess players". Do you mean CFC-rated players (members or not); players rated under any system; Canada only; worldwide; or anyone who knows how to move the pieces?
I remember reading somewhere a couple of years ago that only 1% of chess players have a rating over 2000.
As Hugh says, you really need to define what you mean by "chess players".
If the question you want to answer is: If you stop someone randomly on the street, and if they know how to play chess - what is the probability that they are of strength 2000 or higher, that number is probably very, very small. Maybe 0.1% (number of people who know how to play in Canada is of order 20,000,000; at a guess maybe 20,000 or so are expert strength).
If the question you want to answer is: at a 'serious' chess tournament, what fraction of the players are 2000 strength or higher, that number is much higher (it was 37% at this year's Canadian Open) (this begs the question of what is a 'serious' chess tournament)
If the question you want to answer is what fraction people who have played in the last year in a CFC rated event are that strength or higher, then the graph I gave you answers that question. (more or less, it's problematic because of the uneven rating of low level juniors across the country)
Is there a way I can look on the CFC website and look at all the players, and filter the players between 0-2200 then 2200+ and then simply count and divide?
Is there a way I can look on the CFC website and look at all the players, and filter the players between 0-2200 then 2200+ and then simply count and divide?
You could use the TD list: (which gives every player who has ever been rated, so you would want to filter probably by membership expiry date as well.) The conversion of the TD list to an Excel file is somewhat annoying, not all the rows have the same number of deliminters so you will have to go through the data a couple of times to fix things.
Is there a way I can look on the CFC website and look at all the players, and filter the players between 0-2200 then 2200+ and then simply count and divide?
another way of getting similar information would be to go to the USCF rating site and look up the rating of someone you know is ~2200. Their rating report will list their rank and percentile. Not sure how the USCF is calculating this though (current members, all players, active players only?) so if you want a precise definition, maybe it's not what you want.
Is there a way I can look on the CFC website and look at all the players, and filter the players between 0-2200 then 2200+ and then simply count and divide?
1007 players are currently FQE members. 30 players have a 2200+ rating, and another 17 players had a 2200+ rating in the past but are now below 2200.
... If the question you want to answer is: If you stop someone randomly on the street, and if they know how to play chess - what is the probability that they are of strength 2000 or higher, that number is probably very, very small. Maybe 0.1% (number of people who know how to play in Canada is of order 20,000,000; at a guess maybe 20,000 or so are expert strength). ...
I would be shocked if there were even 2000 players in Canada who would be 2000+ strength (i.e. could maintain a rating in OTB standard tournament chess of 2000 or greater). What would make you think the number is so large?
"Tom is a well known racist, and like most of them he won't admit it, possibly even to himself." - Ed Seedhouse, October 4, 2020.
I would be shocked if there were even 2000 players in Canada who would be 2000+ strength (i.e. could maintain a rating in OTB standard tournament chess of 2000 or greater). What would make you think the number is so large?
well, I wanted to give an upper limit. But as to 2000 such players, there are ~2200 names in the TD list with that rating or higher. Of course, some of them are dead or foreign but then again, it doesn't include any number of people who haven't played in the CFC for one reason or another (e.g. people who used to play and emigrated to Canada but did not play here.)
For what it's worth, chess.com has roughly 6500 such players listed as Canadian (I know, the rating scale is probably suspect and not the same...) Throw in some more from other servers (ok, there are some duplicates) and it's pretty clear that the number of players in Canada of OTB tournament chess standard of 2000 rating is well above 2000 players.
another way of getting similar information would be to go to the USCF rating site and look up the rating of someone you know is ~2200. Their rating report will list their rank and percentile. Not sure how the USCF is calculating this though (current members, all players, active players only?) so if you want a precise definition, maybe it's not what you want.
:)En Passant Aug 1990 lists 154 players
with a rating starting at 2100.Kevin
Spraggett at 2592 and Tom O'Donnell
at 2481.Those were the top two players
back then.I think todays list has only
the top 20 players;)
Comment