If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
"The community of about 90 people, which I visited in October with my Times colleagues Catrin Einhorn and Erin Schaff, is near Yasuní National Park, one of the most biodiverse places on the planet. It’s also only a short walk away from a cluster of oil company wells."
Last week's stats are consistent with those of the prior week and the 2023 average so far.
It is a problem that the number of biodiversity articles has significantly decreased after COP15 in Montreal, Province of Quebec, Canada. But they have now started randomly popping up again.
We will ferret them out and re-post them!
BiodiversityThread “Responses”
There are articles out there on the continuing loss of co-resident species on Earth, due to the encroachment of human activity.
This thread encourages CT'ers on all sides to re-post here, as responses, Biodiversity posts of interest they see elsewhere.
Note:
1. The goal of this thread is not to woodshed an opposing view into submission. Every position is entitled to post as it sees fit, regardless of the kind of, and amount of, postings by other positions. What is wanted is serious consideration of all posts........then you decide.
2. I personally, as the thread originator, am trying to post a new response at least twice per week, but admit my busy schedule means I am sometimes falling short on this. So it is going to be necessary that a number of other CT'ers are posting responses here somewhat regularly.
The Time Line
Estimates of the total number of species on Earth range from 8.7 million to a trillion. Of all the species that have existed on Earth at some point over the past 3.5 billion years, over 95% have gone extinct.
Species are disappearing fast, and more are being place on the “endangered” list. Every species has its own unique role in the overall sustainability of the planet. It is in man's own interest to try to maintain what biodiversity remains.
Goal
- to protect existing forests and green spaces and relevant natural areas from devastation due to ongoing human development activity, and to begin replacing what has been lost.
"An independent investigation into logging in the Liberian rainforest found illegal operations “on a significant scale,” with multiple missteps or breaches of law by the government agency charged with protecting those forests, according to a copy of the report obtained by The Associated Press.
The report was completed in 2020 but has never been made public despite activists’ calls to publish its findings, which included a recommendation that President George Weah order a special inquiry into what went wrong."
Last week's stats were a bit ahead of the prior week and the 2023 average so far.
It is a problem that the number of biodiversity articles has significantly decreased after COP15 in Montreal, Province of Quebec, Canada. But they have now started randomly popping up again.
We will ferret them out and re-post them!
It also did not help that Bob was sick the past week and posted little.
BiodiversityThread “Responses”
There are articles out there on the continuing loss of co-resident species on Earth, due to the encroachment of human activity.
This thread encourages CT'ers on all sides to re-post here, as responses, Biodiversity posts of interest they see elsewhere.
Note:
1. The goal of this thread is not to woodshed an opposing view into submission. Every position is entitled to post as it sees fit, regardless of the kind of, and amount of, postings by other positions. What is wanted is serious consideration of all posts........then you decide.
2. I personally, as the thread originator, am trying to post a new response at least twice per week, but admit my busy schedule means I am sometimes falling short on this. So it is going to be necessary that a number of other CT'ers are posting responses here somewhat regularly.
The Time Line
Estimates of the total number of species on Earth range from 8.7 million to a trillion. Of all the species that have existed on Earth at some point over the past 3.5 billion years, over 95% have gone extinct.
Species are disappearing fast, and more are being place on the “endangered” list. Every species has its own unique role in the overall sustainability of the planet. It is in man's own interest to try to maintain what biodiversity remains.
Goal
- to protect existing forests and green spaces and relevant natural areas from devastation due to ongoing human development activity, and to begin replacing what has been lost.
It is a problem that the number of biodiversity articles has significantly decreased after COP15 in Montreal, Province of Quebec, Canada.
So I think that it is best that this thread just be allowed to now move down the scroll, as it is less active.
So we will just have this thread pop back up randomly from time to time as some post arises.
BiodiversityThread “Responses”
There are not a lot of articles out there currently on the continuing loss of co-resident species on Earth, due to the encroachment of human activity.
But this thread encourages CT'ers on all sides to re-post here, as responses, Biodiversity posts of interest when they see them elsewhere. This will then continue to recognize the importance of this thread, if it at least reappears from time to time.
Note:
1. The goal of this thread is not to woodshed an opposing view into submission. Every position is entitled to post as it sees fit, regardless of the kind of, and amount of, postings by other positions. What is wanted is serious consideration of all posts........then you decide.
2. I personally, as the thread originator, am trying to post a new response at least twice per week, but admit my busy schedule means I am sometimes falling short on this. Also, there are just less articles on the topic easily available. So we are all going to have to go out of our way to make sure we post here, whatever we see elsewhere.
The Time Line
Estimates of the total number of species on Earth range from 8.7 million to a trillion. Of all the species that have existed on Earth at some point over the past 3.5 billion years, over 95% have gone extinct.
Species are disappearing fast, and more are being place on the “endangered” list. Every species has its own unique role in the overall sustainability of the planet. It is in man's own interest to try to maintain what biodiversity remains.
Goal
- to protect existing forests and green spaces and relevant natural areas from devastation due to ongoing human development activity, and to begin replacing what has been lost.
"Conservationists have typically focused on protecting and restoring species in their native range only, but if that range is often misunderstood and fundamentally dynamic, creating a single definitive map for each species may remain elusive. The way out of this dilemma that I favor remains a minority view, but I like it for its logical coherence: Ditch the idea of a single native range altogether."
"Nations Agree on Language for Historic Treaty to Protect Ocean Life
The United Nations agreement is a significant step toward protecting biodiversity under growing threat from climate change, over-fishing and seabed mining.
An example from the UN Environment Program. The plan is laid out for embedding the idea that health and biodiversity are inextricably linked--to push the One Health agenda as outlined below.
It’s important to get a good grasp of how globalist organizations like the UN, WHO and World Economic Forum have taken concepts that everyone agrees on, such as the need to protect the environment, prevent species extinction, eat healthy food, and improve our agricultural practices and twisted them to usher in their own agenda.
Here is one example. Just a few years ago, the globalists decided that ‘biodiversity’ needed to be forcibly intertwined with health. By decree, biodiversity considerations were to be integrated into One Health. And the Conference of the Parties, in #1 below: “recognized the importance of ecosystem-based approaches for the delivery of multiple benefits to human health and well-being.” Hello?
Next, they needed to find some scientific way to link the two, so science-based indicators were to be established. 2. (a)
Next, “targeted messaging approaches on mainstreaming biodiversity for the health sector” were to be developed. 2. (b)
Next, a “global action plan to mainstream biodiversity and health linkages into national policies, strategies, programs and accounts” was to be drafted and developed. 2. (c)
This 35 page document tells us what has been done to further their objective. Here is a snapshot of page 1:
A bit further along in the introduction of this document you can read the following:
Section III contextualizes the relevance of One Health approaches, among other holistic approaches, and the recognition of interlinkages between biodiversity and health, in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to reduce the risk of future zoonotic pandemics. Section IV provides a draft recommendation for consideration by the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological
Advice. The draft global action plan to mainstream biodiversity and health linkages into national policies, strategies, programmes and accounts appears in the annex below.
The very end of the document tells us the messages they wanted to jam into everyone’s brain. Are any of them true? As I explain in my dialogue with James Corbett on Good Morning CHD (TV) on April 8, it is absolutely necessary for the globalists to justify their incursions into our land, agriculture, hunting and fishing that people remain convinced that pandemics emerge from contacts with wildlife, not from labs. Furthermore, the globalists appear to want to control our access to food. And that is why so many people continue to make this claim, even though there is no evidence to support it. See the take-home messages on biodiversity from the end of the document, below.
COVID-19 and recovery measures
(a) The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance of the relationship between people and nature. While the relationship between biodiversity and infectious disease is complex, it is clear that the loss and degradation of biodiversity undermines the web of life and increases the risk of disease spillover from wildlife to people;
(b) Overall plans for post-COVID-19 recovery, and specifically plans to reduce the risk of future epidemics, need to go further upstream than early detection and control of disease outbreaks, by prioritizing prevention actions rather than reactions to emerging issues;
(c) Biodiversity and conservation efforts at all levels (genes, species, and ecosystems) increase resilience by mitigating the risks to severe disruptions caused by climate change and pathogen spillover that can lead to global pandemics;66
(d) Reducing systemic drivers and anthropogenic [the term means human-caused, but the authors do not want readers to understand their gist] impacts in emerging disease hotspots could reduce pandemic risk, protect biodiversity and ecosystem services.67 [What are ecosystem services?]. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the health risks arising from the cost of inaction and continued ecosystem degradation and loss;
(e) The risk of future pandemics could also be reduced through a more integrated, cross-sectoral and biodiversity-inclusive One Health approach that builds the health and resilience of people and ecosystems, in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;
(f) There are many opportunities for responses to COVID-19, including both short-term stimulus measures and longer-term approaches to ‘build back better’, contribute to sustainable development, and reduce the risk of future pandemics.
Key messages from the Workshop on Biodiversity and Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services68
(a) Pandemics emerge from the microbial diversity found in nature;
(b) Human ecological disruption, and unsustainable consumption drive pandemic risk;
(c) Reducing anthropogenic global environmental change MAY reduce pandemic risk;
(d) Land-use change, agricultural expansion, and urbanization cause more than 30 per cent of emerging disease events;
(e) The trade and consumption of wildlife is a globally important risk for future pandemics;
(f) Current pandemic preparedness strategies aim to control diseases after they emerge. These strategies often rely on, and can affect, biodiversity;
(g) Escape from the Pandemic Era requires policy options that foster transformative change towards preventing pandemics:
(i) Enabling mechanisms;
(ii) Policies to reduce the role of land-use change in pandemic emergence;
(iii) Policies to reduce pandemic emergence related to the wildlife trade;
(iv) Closing critical knowledge gaps;
(v) Foster a role for all sectors of society to engage in reducing risk of pandemics.
The World Economic Forum also fosters these false theories and action plans.
The UN Environment Program chief parrots the same talking points.
And so does the avuncular Tony Fauci. If you had any doubt about the veracity of these concepts, I hope Uncle Tony, the World Health Godfather, will put them to rest.
Tony knows the labs he funded developed COVID or pieces of COVID, but has latched on to raccoon dog story to CYA and push the globalist agenda. April 6, 2023. You can watch the video here: https://www.newsnationnow.com/vargas...-wuhan-market/
Comment