The Trump 2nd Term

[Sid Belzberg]

Part 2

15. The reported Vaccine efficiency from the RCTs was estimated using lots of vaccine

that were manufactured using Process 1 which used PCR to amplify the temple for

mRNA synthesis. This significantly reduced the SV40 contamination. To scale up for

broad distribution, they changed to Process 2 which skipped this amplification step

and thus has more SV40 contamination. This is described by Levi et al in the BMJ.

This means the vaccines in use are materially different than the vaccines that were

used in the clinical trial.




16. SV40 promoters are intensely studied and used as a gene therapy tool as described

by David Dean PhD. With vaccines contaminated with gene therapy sequences there

is no longer any debate if these vaccines are gene therapy tools. Moderna’s own

patents declare this as does their 2020 Annual report (page 106,107,116). While

genome modification has yet to be proven, no one has looked for it using SV40

promoter contaminated mRNA. This is not disclosed in the informed consent of

these products.




17. While many of the health authorities have admitted this SV40 sequence is in the

vaccines, they have continued to claim they are safe and effective without studies

that address the long term safety of these products. The reason the health

authorities were not aware of this sequence at the time of the regulatory submission

is that Pfizer intentionally deceived them by deleting this specific annotation from

the plasmid maps. According to FDA and the WHO guidelines all regulatory elements

and open reading frames need to be annotated and disclosed. Commercial software

which performs this function automatically annotates these features. This is

evidence that Pfizer had to perform extra work to hide this sequence from

regulators. This deception should lead regulators to question every other data point

Pfizer has provided them.




18.Health Canada went on record claiming these vaccines are still safe and effective,

but their comment was delivered based on false information. They claimed these

sequences do not reach the nucleus despite David Deans work clearly showing they

reach the nucleus in all cells within hours.




19 Health Canada also suggests that the DNA levels are tested by the manufacturers

and therefor they should trust the manufacturers measurements. These are the

same manufacturers that were caught deceiving the regulators over the presence of

SV40 promoters. Independent labs have found DNA levels that exceed their limits.

These limits were also devised for DNA that is not packaged in LNPs which protect

the DNA from decay. DNA protected in LNPs should follow the DNA contamination

guidelines that predate the 1986 NCVIA (PDF attached as Appendix A) which

provided liability protection for the manufacturers. These limits are 1000 times

lower than the current 10ng .




20 Dr. Buckhaults testified (same as Line 45 of the report) in the South Carolina Senate

that he ‘guarantees there has been genome modification’. His statements are based

on Lim et a! that find very high rates of genome integration with linear plasmid DNA

like this. Since NIH has over $400M in royalty for these vaccines, very little NIH

funding is available to investigate a topic that will end or reduce this royalty stream.

This presents an enormous conflict of interest. The NIH has never endorsed or

investigated obvious early treatment protocols using Hydroxychloroquine or

Ivermectin as these cheap, safe genetic drugs are a threat to their vaccine royalty

stream.







21.In my professional opinion, oversights like this cannot stand. In December of 2019,

Dr. He was sentenced to 3 years in jail for genome_modifying 2 babies. Dr. He used

genome modification tools to modify HIV resistance into 2 embryos using CRISPR

technology. This was deemed such an offensive abuse of medical ethics and

informed consent failure that he was sentenced to 3 years in jail.




22.In 2020, society seems to have lost its moral outrage when gene therapies are now

used on billions of people as long as there is a hope for some private gain in the

alleged protection these therapies may offer to society from a virus. No genotoxicity

studies were conducted for these mRNA ‘vaccines’ as the manufacturers assured the

public that they do not enter the nucleus and do not consist of DNA. Both

statements are now demonstrably false, and billions of shots have been given to

patients who were given false informed consent.




23. These are adulterated products with clear evidence of intent to deceive by Pfizer.

Liability protection for such products has been challenged in the state of Michigan

with adulterated Remdesivir. Physicians still using these products are on notice as

the malpractice will eventually be put on them.




24.Physicians claiming these products have benefits that outweigh the risks are not

versed on the risks of Covid19 to children (0.0003% at 0-19 years, Pezzullo et al). The

adverse events alone for this age demographic is estimated at 1:800 people

(Fraiman et al). This dwarfs any protection you can get for vaccines addressing a

virus that does not affect children. These studies only considered short term harms.

To date, no randomized clinical trial exists that looked at adverse events past 2

months. The SV40 promoter DNA is oncogenic according to Moderna’s own patents

and the safety of this cannot be known with such short term studies. Claiming safety

with no RCT and zero genotoxicity studies is fraud.







25.Likewise Attorney General for Texas, U.S.A., Ken Paxton has filed a law suit against

Pfizer for false advertising of 95% relative risk reduction for vaccine effectiveness.

Any medical opinion based on these vaccine efficacy numbers violates the FDA

guidelines which demands absolute risk reduction as being the proper Vaccine

efficiency to be advertised. The absolute risk reduction for these vaccines was

measure at below 1% in a trial that did not use the manufacturing process for the

vaccine that is actually being given to the public.




26.In May of 2024 a Canadian citizen received an ATIP of Health Canada’s emails on the

SV40 contamination. These emails revealed that Health Canada’s public statements

about the DNA contamination risk contradicts their internal communication on

these risks. https://scoopsmcgoo.substack.com/p/e...lth-canada-re-

sv40




27. They are actively requesting the manufacturers to remove this DNA from the

vaccines while telling the public it is of no consequence?




28. They claim the SV40 Promoter is not material to plasmid manufacturing. This is an

overt lie. You cannot manufacture plasmids without the promoter for the antibiotic




selection gene.




29. They also claim this DNA has no functional consequence despite Drayman et al

demonstrating it binds to the tumor suppressor gene P53.




https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27462916,




30. They openly admit that Pfizer has no assay to measure the fragment lengths of the

DNA and will need to validate a new method. How can Health Canada claim the DNA

is of insignificant quantity if Pfizer doesn’t even have a method validated to measure

it?




https://anandamide.substack.com/p/sc...ls-a-bombshell




31. In addition to this revelation, Dr. Brigitte Konig’s paper is now peer reviewed

demonstrating the DNA contamination in these vaccines is more than 100X over the

guideline.




https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/7/3/41




32. | have carefully reviewed Konig’s work and while | believe their methods slightly over

estimate the scale of quantitation, her data aligns with our data and demonstrate at

minimum 10X more DNA than allowable.




https://anandamide.substack.com/p/re...mination-paper




33. Even Cytosolic DNA can be carcinogenic with persistent activation of the cGAS-STING

pathway. This is also in the peer reviewed literature described by Kwok et al.




https://aacrjournals.org/cancerdisco...Cytosolic-DNA-

Sensing-cGAS-STING-Pathway-in




34. Preliminary evidence using vaccine treated OvCar3 cell lines demonstrates this DNA

is replicating in mammalian cells due to presence of the SV40 Origin of replication.




anandamide.substack.com lasmid-dna-replication-in-bnt162b2

35. Wafik El-Deiry’s lab has recently published that the Spike protein down regulates

P53.




https://www.oncotarget.com/article/28582/text,




36. These sequences were not disclosed to the public nor the regulators and evidence

continues to mount demonstrating they are functional and potentially oncogenic.




Sincerely,




Kevin McKernan

[Sid Belzberg]

Part 1
July 12, 2024

Kevin McKernan, CSO

Medicinal Genomics

100 Cummings Center, Suite 406L

Beverly MA, 01915




Background

| have a BS in Biology from Emory University, 1995




From 1996-2000, | was the Team Leader for R&D for the Human Genome Project at the

Whitehead Institute/MIT Center Genome Research.




| have over 59K citations to my publications in the genomics field. | have dozens of issued

patents related to DNA and RNA purification and DNA sequencing technologies.




| have Founded 3 genomics companies and have been awarded over $30M in NIH grants for

genomics.




Agencourt Biosciences was acquired by Beckman Coulter in 2005 for their DNA and RNA

purification technologies and their advanced genome center.




Agencourt Personal Genomics was acquired by Applied Biosystems in 2006 for the

revolutionary DNA sequencing platform we invented that dropped the cost of DNA sequencing

100,000 fold in 5 years (the SOLID sequencer).




| also was the Chief Scientific Officer for Courtagen Life Sciences which performed clinical

genome sequencing for children with Epilepsy and Mitochondrial disease. Most recently, |

founded Medicinal Genomics which sequences medicinal organisms to design safer

therapeutics.




My Google Scholar page is here :

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=WKED1 sAAAAJ&hl=en




My ORCID ID is here: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-1122




| am aware of my duty to assist the panel and | am not an advocate for any party. | have

prepared this report with this in mind and am happy to testify in any setting to address

questions regarding the matter.




1. In February 2023, our team sequenced the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) and m1273 (Moderna)

mRNA ‘vaccines’ and found contaminating DNA in the vials. This resulted in the

below PrePrint publication (https://osf.io/preprints/osf/b9t7m). Preprints require




replication. Half of the peer reviewed papers can’t be reproduced. This Preprint has

been reproduced at least 5 Labs around the world.




a. Dr. Phillip Buckhaults (https://www.youtube.com/watch ?v=lEWHhrHiiTY)




b. Dr. David Speicher (https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97)




c. Dr. Brigitte Konig (https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/foreign-dna-




contamination-in-covid-19-vaccines-exceeds-who-limits-professor )

d. Dr. Sin Hang Lee (https://anandamide.substack.com/p/independent-sanger-




sequencing-verification)




2. Of particular concern are the SV40 promoter sequences found in the Pfizer vaccines

which were hidden from regulators. Health Canada, the FDA and the EMA have all

confirmed that this DNA sequence is in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine but that Pfizer

omitted any annotation of this feature.




My presentation to the Croatian Parliament documents these events.




3. This SV40 sequence has a nuclear targeting sequence which localizes to the nucleus

in hours and is used in gene therapies (Dean et al). Despite many official promises

that the mRNA remains in the cytosol, the contents of the lipid nanoparticles contain

SV40 promoters used to drag DNA into the nucleus. Once DNA is inside the nucleus

the odds of genome integration increase substantially.




4. This SV40 promoter sequence is also known to bind the tumor suppressor gene p53

(Drayman et al). Tumor suppressor genes keep cancer in check. Interaction with this

gene should raise alarm bells in light of the papers documenting rapid acceleration

of lymphoma after BNT162b2 vaccination.




There are billions to 100s of billions of this sequence in each dose and many patients

have taken over 4 doses with the current schedule in the US demanding over 7 of

these doses to ‘protect’ against a low IFR respiratory virus.




Moderna has an issued and in force patent stating the importance of removing this

DNA as it can be oncogenic and cause insertional mutagenesis (US patent

10,898,574). Insertional mutagenesis occurs when foreign DNA is present in the

nucleus and is adopted by the host genome as described by Lim et al who describe

‘High spontaneous integration rates of end-modified linear DNA upon mammalian

transfection’.




5. Dr. Jospeph Ladapo MD, PhD as the surgeon general of the state of Florida has sent a

letter of concern to the FDA and the CDC over these contamination matters.




6. These ‘vaccines’ do not stop transmission and evidence is mounting that the

vaccinated have a higher rate of C19 (Shrestha et al).







10.The ‘vaccine’ does not localize to the muscle and the nucleic acids have now been

detected in Breast milk a week later(Hanna et al), Plasma 15 days later (Fertig et al),

Heart tissue (Krauson et al) 30 days later. Spike protein is found circulating on

exosomes 4 months later (Bansal et al) and for 187 days in the blood (Brogna et al).

This is another false promise used in the informed consent process. The nucleic acid

(DNA and RNA) was promised to stay at the injection site in the arm. We now know

that it travels to all tissues in the body. If insertional mutagenesis was limited to

non-dividing muscle cells it would be less of a concern. Now that we know stem

cells, and reproductive cells are exposed to LNPs and mammalian transfection we

must now be concerned of modifying cells that can amplify in number. Stem cell

transfection with DNA could lead to expansion of the modified cell lines and

persistent expression of off target sequences. Transfection of germ cells could lead

to generational transmission of modified genomes.




11. In October of 2021 we also published a preprint that predicted frameshifted

peptides would result with the use of these modified nucleotides in the mRNA

vaccines (McKernan et al).




12. This concern was recently proven by Mulroney et al who described frameshifted

peptides being expressed in 5/21 patients treated with mRNA vaccines. These

frameshifted peptides are off target peptides being synthesized by vaccinated

patients’ cells. These were not part of the informed consent process and may lead to

a myriad of autoimmune issues reported from BNT162b2 vaccination.




13. In summary, the mRNA vaccines are adulterated with SV40 DNA that binds to tumor

suppressor genes (p53) is known to travel to the nucleus for gene therapies. The

modified mRNAs are now known to produce off target proteins due to frameshifting

in translation of these mRNAs in humans. This is not disclosed to the patient in the

informed consent process and it’s a violation of the Hippocratic oath to continue to

administer contaminated and faulty products.




14. The death records in Massachusetts were acquired by John Beaudoin via a Freedom

of Information Act request. These data show an alarming rise in Cancer post

vaccination (https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/unredacted/ ).(Enclose USB_ of




video)

[Sid Belzberg]

I wish the Democrats had more speakers as eloquent as French Senator Claude Malhuret.

He is genocidal globalist scum bag that as a physician during the pandemic pushed hard for the COVID vaccines that as it turns our were deliberately contaminated with carcinogenic SV40 promoter sequences as revealed in FOIA emails both of the TGA (Therapeurtic Goods Administration of Australia and Health Canada) knew this to be the case. Here is a speech by Dr. Claude Muharet during the pandemic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS0t5vg6yek&t=5s
The next post below is a report submitted to the British Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons about this ,that forced the withdrawal of all charges against Dr. Charles Hoffee for the terrible crime of reporting serious injuries his patients suffered from the "vaccines" aka bioweapons as well as the rise in cancers post "vaccination".

[Dilip Panjwani]

Problems of Size and Monoliths

1. In society, there are benefits to smallness: Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered is a collection of essays published in 1973 by German-born British economist E. F. Schumacher. Originally published: 1973 Wikipedia

2. Who has the power to control? - A 1-World Government will pass laws to enslave us all.

3. Societal Structure Evolution - The world needs to evolve from a collection of "Nations" to a collection of "Villages" (This is a similar concept, as far as I can discern, as Dilip's "Circles within circles" societal organization; at least the commonality is that a local unit is better at controlling its own societal structures, especially its politicians. And what village could afford to have thousands of nuclear warheads, and millions of military, to use to blackmail the rest of the planet??)

Bob A (Anti-Globalist)

1. Of course, small is beautiful, and hence the innermost of the circles would have only 10 to 20 voters. But it is also essential to co-operate with a much larger number of people, and hence bigger is better is also true, with the largest of the circles encompassing the whole world... One World, One Nation!!

2. Not in a Libertarian set-up.

3. Not even the bigger circles will need to have military in a Libertarian set-up... Only the 'One Nation' will have a force to enforce the Natural Law...

[Bob Gillanders]

I wish the Democrats had more speakers as eloquent as French Senator Claude Malhuret.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unSS...el=I%27veHadIt

[Sid Belzberg]

[Bob Armstrong]

Problems of Size and Monoliths

1. In society, there are benefits to smallness: Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered is a collection of essays published in 1973 by German-born British economist E. F. Schumacher. Originally published: 1973 Wikipedia

2. Who has the power to control? - A 1-World Government will pass laws to enslave us all.

3. Societal Structure Evolution - The world needs to evolve from a collection of "Nations" to a collection of "Villages" (This is a similar concept, as far as I can discern, as Dilip's "Circles within circles" societal organization; at least the commonality is that a local unit is better at controlling its own societal structures, especially its politicians. And what village could afford to have thousands of nuclear warheads, and millions of military, to use to blackmail the rest of the planet??)

Bob A (Anti-Globalist)

[Vlad Drkulec]

What could be wrong about being a globalist. Bob?

There are those pesky people that want to kill you for one thing.

[Dilip Panjwani]

Bob A (Anti-globalist)

What could be wrong about being a globalist. Bob?

[Bob Armstrong]

Do we have a new set of Axis Powers arising?

USA? Russia? China? & Who Else?

Bob A (Anti-globalist)

[Dilip Panjwani]

Canadians must now consider the possibility that a Trump-led USA could invade Canada with armed troops n the near future.

He won't need to do that. If he stops doing trade with Canada, Canadians will make USA their 11th province, and both Trump and Canada will get what they want... and one step towards a worldwide "One World, One Nation'!

[Frank Dixon]

Canadians must now consider the possibility that a Trump-led USA could invade Canada with armed troops n the near future.

[Dilip Panjwani]

I agree 100%, Dilip. Russia took Crimea concurrently with Yanukovych resigning and fleeing the country, so there may not have been much negotiation possible in that case. Apparently the Obama administration didn't deal effectively the problem. But then Trump had four years and, to the best of my recollection, did nothing to work towards a resolution of the tension.

The tension persisted because Ukraine insisted it wanted to bring NATO right to Russia's doorstep...

[Peter McKillop]

As I stated when the war started, Ukraine was facing a situation similar to what Cuba was facing a few decades ago: JFK had told Cuba he will destroy it, if it imports missiles from Russia. Both Cuba and Russia backed off to prevent a war. And now Russia told Ukraine it will be destroyed if it joins NATO with access to their missiles. Ukraine and NATO could also have backed off to prevent this war...

I agree 100%, Dilip. Russia took Crimea concurrently with Yanukovych resigning and fleeing the country, so there may not have been much negotiation possible in that case. Apparently the Obama administration didn't deal effectively the problem. But then Trump had four years and, to the best of my recollection, did nothing to work towards a resolution of the tension.

[Tom O'Donnell]

Russia has about 140M people. The rest of Europe has, what, 600M? Those countries will have to move some of the money they presently do on social programs to defense if they don't want to get invaded, assuming this is even in Putin's mind, which I doubt. I think the US is correct to stop being the policeman of the world. It is costly and unproductive.

Why should the US taxpayer pay for any of this? What good has come of any of this interference? Is Syria better? Iraq? Libya?

We in Canada are very fortunate that we share a border because there is no chance the US would let some country set up military bases right next to them. If we had to actually pay for our own defense (small population, huge borders) we would all be broke.

The armchair QBs who are fine with the continued fighting have no skin in the game. It is easy to be generous with other peoples' lives and money.