If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
This morning, Chesstalk has turned into de Firmian's MCO 14th Edition.
Every election needs posters. Maybe the best way to inform voters/members is as follows:
1 Page Promotional Poster
- At the top show a picture of self involved in a positive chess activity
- List accomplishments
- List platform: moderate claims need not be supported; ambitious claims to be backed by more details
- Facts not well known to the public need to be support through links in the footnotes
1 Page Attack Poster
- At the top show a picture of the other candidate photo-shopped to resemble a historical villain
- List their past transgressions
- List how they will harm Canadian chess if they are elected
- Facts not well known to the public need to be support through links in the footnotes
Yeah, except when your candidate is losing, more is better and flailing around in a mud puddle will dirty both candidates.
What is surprising me is the amount of energy wasted on a issue that nobody involved can do anything about it. Our Canadian Chess family is so small and make me sad to see it so divided around this subject. I am referring to the ones that did something so Canadian Chess can get better: coaching, sponsoring, achieving great international results, TD-ing, organizing, spending time in different CFC boards and so on.
Anyone can correct me if I am wrong, but our vote in next FIDE election will NOT decide the next president. As far as I know one of the candidates has secured more than sufficient votes to be elected.
I understand the principles behind the voting for the less evil/moral choice but by the end of the election, all will be left with is the adversity between some of the members of our small Canadian chess family. Why are to few to afford sparing any of us, let's make our "fights" just about finding more sponsors, creating more chess clubs, spreading the popularity of this game that brought us together.
What is surprising me is the amount of energy wasted on a issue that nobody involved can do anything about it. Our Canadian Chess family is so small and make me sad to see it so divided around this subject. I am referring to the ones that did something so Canadian Chess can get better: coaching, sponsoring, achieving great international results, TD-ing, organizing, spending time in different CFC boards and so on.
Anyone can correct me if I am wrong, but our vote in next FIDE election will NOT decide the next president. As far as I know one of the candidates has secured more than sufficient votes to be elected.
I understand the principles behind the voting for the less evil/moral choice but by the end of the election, all will be left with is the adversity between some of the members of our small Canadian chess family. Why are to few to afford sparing any of us, let's make our "fights" just about finding more sponsors, creating more chess clubs, spreading the popularity of this game that brought us together.
Andrei Botez
Too bad we don't have a like button on this board.
What is surprising me is the amount of energy wasted on a issue that nobody involved can do anything about it. Our Canadian Chess family is so small and make me sad to see it so divided around this subject. I am referring to the ones that did something so Canadian Chess can get better: coaching, sponsoring, achieving great international results, TD-ing, organizing, spending time in different CFC boards and so on.
Nostalgia for Cold War zealotry is a factor. Let's just say that we have over-representation of such views in the chess fraternity in Canada. There may be a good historical reason for it, but it's way past its shelf life now.* We should be widening the base of interest in chess in Canada instead of making the success of chess conditional on a certain political point of view. This approach has led to failure for Kasparov in Russia domestically and, by the looks of it, it will lead to failure internationally. Maybe Garry Kimovich can run for election (next) among the space aliens that Kirsan talks about. They might share the Cold War shibboleths of the zealots.
If the current regime in Ottawa has wisely decided to stay the hell away from the tempest in a teapot over this issue in Canadian chess, then I have to admit that I agree with them (probably for the first time) for doing so. There's nothing in it for them.
*Supplemental: Canada's chess history is very much intertwined with Soviet bloc ex-pats whose political views were (perhaps) understandably on the extreme end of the Cold Warrior perspective. Those views are easily resurrected among Westerners even today - just look at the successful Russophobia and Putinphobia long after that country has become a capitalist country. The Cold War templates are trotted out with the predictable Pavlovian response by the mass media, etc. But Russia today gets much of its economic activity from (excessive?) resource extraction and could be classified as the same kind of petro-state as Canada is.
Dogs will bark, but the caravan of chess moves on.
But Russia today gets much of its economic activity from (excessive?) resource extraction and could be classified as the same kind of petro-state as Canada is.
Don't forget that AFTER the sanctions began Russia signed a natural gas deal with China. It's a 30 year, $400 Billion dollar agreement. Lots of pipe to lay in the next few years and gas fields to be developed. Jobs, jobs, jobs
If we ever get to the point where we're shipping liquid natural gas (LNG) into that market it will likely be at a price lower than China agreed with Russia.
The deal makes Russia less reliant on the EU to sell that natural resource. Although, I'm sure there are EU nations which will continue to purchase from Russia.
Comment