If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Rachel strikes me as far more rational than her coach, Steve (Istvan) Kiraly. The goal of finishing in the top half (there are evidently 87 girls in Rachel's U16 Section) when you're the 62nd seed is realistic. Steve must have been seriously into the Pangloss Kool-Aid when he said Rachel "has the potential and power to return as World Champion".
If she does (zero chance for all intents and purposes), Rachel may well replace the name Alan Trefler for the greatest upset in chess history. Alan, of course, was co-winner (with GM Pal Benko) of the 1975 World Open Chess Championship when he was only rated 2045 and the 115th seed (of 372). After losing his R1 match, Trefler did Caruana one better by reeling off 8 consecutive wins to finish with 8/9 (:
Rachel strikes me as far more rational than her coach, Steve (Istvan) Kiraly. The goal of finishing in the top half (there are evidently 87 girls in Rachel's U16 Section) when you're the 62nd seed is realistic. Steve must have been seriously into the Pangloss Kool-Aid when he said Rachel "has the potential and power to return as World Champion".
If she does (zero chance for all intents and purposes), Rachel may well replace the name Alan Trefler for the greatest upset in chess history. Alan, of course, was co-winner (with GM Pal Benko) of the 1975 World Open Chess Championship when he was only rated 2045 and the 115th seed (of 372). After losing his R1 match, Trefler did Caruana one better by reeling off 8 consecutive wins to finish with 8/9 (:
To be fair to Istvan that was a very short snippet from a longer interview. Rachel has qualified for WYCC four times in the last four years. She has been part of the Windsor chess scene for a long time and she is one of the girls who is intent on continuing to play into her teens and beyond. She was in John Coleman's Friday night advanced class when I started teaching and playing chess again in 2007. She was small and hyper aggressive on the chessboard as an eight year old. Many of her games were very raw attacks where if she didn't checkmate she ran out of pieces to attack with. I expect that she will perform well, better than her rating going into the event, though as Istvan mentioned her final placement will depend on how she handles all of the variables which are part of a good performance.
Interviewers in these situations deal in cliches because that is what their readers want to hear and see on their local newscast. The only person who has zero chance is the person that doesn't play. It is not necessarily a bad thing for a coach to show a strong belief in the capabilities of their student.
It is not necessarily a bad thing for a coach to show a strong belief in the capabilities of their student.
Many times I have read that coaches wanted to please parents with unrealistic promises and evaluations.
imho, if journalists removed all clutter like "prodigy", adults, and let her just talk & play, it would have been a great interview :) Good luck in the WYCC.
Rachel's parents have realistic expectations for her. They are well experienced with regard to the highs and lows of tournament chess at the international level. Ultimately she is playing against herself of yesterday and trying to become a stronger player which she will succeed at. We all wish her luck and I know I along with the rest of the Windsor chess community will be following her games closely at WYCC.
Comment