If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Let's face it, the past 15-20 years of CFC presidency has resulted in a downward slide. (both from a monetary, a membership , and a general chess events perspective ) Toronto for example, once a haven for chess events in the 1970's and 80's , nowadays rarely sees an event at all. We hope that PWC will continue next year.
As members of the CFC , honourary or not, we ALL should be irked.
Sidenote: The Phillipines has recently introduced chess in the school system. Why can't Canada do the same? Or at least make an attempt? We need presidents that do things!
Final note: Kevin Spraggett cares about Canadian Chess because he is Canadian.
The new business manager is like the captain of a ship. Yes we can wait...............
'His legendary skills of leadership seem to have left him, he was curiously indecisive and unusually cautious.'
Captain Smith --- sinking of the Titanic
I think that's magnanimous of you to give the new guy such a vote of confidence before even seeing if he can increase the membership and balance the books. Charitible to a fault.
Regarding the Titanic, it's not like it ran into the iceberg because of bad luck. By all accounts I have seen, the problem had to do with "full steam ahead" and inattention to details.
In any case, I'm at a loss here. Could you explain to me why a person would write first class articles in a blog and spice it up with third rate cheap shots at the CFC? It's not like people haven't noticed the plight of the CFC.
Undue reverence? We are talking about knowledge and truth as it applies to Canadian chess. Sometimes the truth hurts. And obviously the truth seems to be hurting some people.
Kevin Spraggett's blog is filled with knowledge and truth in its many forms: puzzles, reports, comics, humour, and concerns. And each viewer is entitled to their own opinion re: the contents. Sometimes, if we want improvement to happen, we must get ANGRY.
As to why great reports are linked with sarcasms --- its a blog. That's what people do in blogs. Read more blogs.
Regarding the Titanic, it's not like it ran into the iceberg because of bad luck. By all accounts I have seen, the problem had to do with "full steam ahead" and inattention to details.
Gary,
There were many reasons why the Titanic sunk, but mostly poor management decisions were to blame. The use of poorer grade rivets to save money has been the latest of proven facts contributing to the sinking.
Also of note: a ship worker died in the building of the ship. Because of money reasons, the management did not rescue the worker. He was sealed and died by suffocation.
it was during the plating of Titanic that she claimed her first victim. A worker was accidentally sealed inside the lining of the hull when he crawled between the layers of the double bottom to check the internal riveting. As horrifying as it sounds, this was not uncommon for the period, given the pace at which new ships were constructed. Unfortunately, once the plates had been riveted, there was no way to rescue the man. The cost of removing the rivets and the damage to the hull and frame work in doing so made for a hopeless situation.
Things happen. I doubt we can blame someone dying during the building of the ship for the sinking. The Titanic sank because it hit an iceberg and the side was ripped open. Too many compartments were flooded.
An icebreaker and Ferry boat, the William Carson, which held over 200 passengers and more than 50 autos, also sank when it hit an iceberg. It ferried people between the mainland and Newfoundland. I think the year was 1977 or thereabouts. I was a passenger on that ship at least once but it didn't sink while I was aboard. However, all survived the sinking.
The rivets are always a handy reason when blame is assigned. A rivet can not protest.
Having workmates die on the job is no stranger to those who do dangerous work.
The CFC is not really significant. If they fail I suspect someone will start a new organization and ask for FIDE recognition. I support the CFC indirectly. I donate money to religious organizations and feel that if necessary Gawd will help the CFC.
God save the CFC. It has been hit by a phallic shaped iceberg on the Ottawa River and sends out its distress signal ... ---... ...---... ...---... ...---...
An indepth article, sometimes humourous, sometimes satyrical, and carefully scrutinized by my personal legal counsel. A brief history of the myths, the lies and the corruption behind chess politics in Canada during the past 20 years. A sincere attempt to explain why the CFC has been turned into an empty shell. Carefully researched , based on little known facts and insider information.
The true story of the 'success' behind CMA. Of the corruption in the general Canadian Chess Community. Of the dirty war that CMA Executive Director Larry Bevands waged against the CFC and Canadian Chess Legend Kevin Spraggett.
An indepth report on Canadian Chess during the past 20 years that will have you questioning your loyalties in chess. Blending humour, satire and truth of the politics of Canadian Chess, this article will change the way you look at organized chess in Canada. Controvertial, provocative and stimulating, this report will have been screened before publication by Canadian lawyers.
should be an interesting read... The problem with blogs is they end up being a place to rant about personal slights. I guess we all get to find out when he posts his article!
Comment