If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Trump is proving what I have long suspected: high-level business people can be more successful than lifelong politicians at politics. They generally don't do it because they have better things to do with their time and energy.
I say this even though I would never vote for Trump.
A question for Canadians: if Canada had its own version of Donald Trump in the business world (Conrad Black? LOL! or maybe a former sports great like Gretzky) and this character were to run for PM in Canada, and were to make unbelievable statements as Trump is doing... would Canadians be duped as easily as Americans are being duped by Trump?
It's quite remarkable. Perhaps the internet age is making this kind of thing more possible: just make outrageous statements with a 'feel-good' nature to them, such as "I'm going to make America great again" repeated over and over, and the masses will BELIEVE!
There was a news piece on Sunday: apparently Trump makes a lot of his money through licensing his name to real estate developments. People who buy into these developments get to meet Trump, and are led to believe that Trump is actually the developer. When it goes south, the investors find out that Trump has no involvement and can just walk away, and somewhere in the contract in very small print it mentions that he was not the developer.
Trump is proving what I have long suspected: high-level business people can be more successful than lifelong politicians at politics. They generally don't do it because they have better things to do with their time and energy.
I say this even though I would never vote for Trump.
Crazy eh. The thought of a President Trump is truly terrifying.
I was having great difficulty understanding why anyone would vote for him, but then I decided to put myself in the shoes of a die hard Republican voter. I asked myself, who would I vote for? Then I understood. :(
Indeed it is a scarey possibility, Bob. But now that the field is narrowing hopefully one of Rubio or Cruz will push Trump into the background (we can hope - not that either of those two is a prize). :)
Crazy eh. The thought of a President Trump is truly terrifying.
I was having great difficulty understanding why anyone would vote for him, but then I decided to put myself in the shoes of a die hard Republican voter. I asked myself, who would I vote for? Then I understood. :(
Super-delegates is the way the party establishment keeps outsider anti-establishment types out.....may be an obstacle Bernie just can't overcome?
Bob A
Well Bob, another state has passed judgement on Bernie Sanders.
A crushing loss, Bernie has no chance, his candidacy is over, just a footnote when a crazy old man socialist had a dream.
Or at least, that is how the mainstream media is reporting it today.
Don't you believe it.
I get a chuckle about how they say it's all about momentum, they they fail to see the momentum of the Sanders movement. He was 20+ points behind Clinton in December, and now losses Nevada by just 5 points. Hmmm, looks like momentum to me!
It is still an uphill battle, but.....
Last edited by Bob Gillanders; Sunday, 21st February, 2016, 02:16 PM.
if you are referring to Bernie Sanders he appears to have only achieved a tie in the New Hampshire primary tied with Hilary Clinton in terms of delegates.
WHAT? Well, back to Mr. Internet for help.
Pledged Delegates - based on popular vote
Bernie Sanders 15
Hillary Clinton 9
Unpledged Delegates - based on ???
Bernie Sanders 0
Hillary Clinton 6
So total New Hampshire delegates - 15 each.
But, those unpledged delegates can change their votes!
Oh, us elections are so,.....convoluted..err,..umm....complex!
And yes Virginia, the Republicans have unpledged delegates also.
Last edited by Bob Gillanders; Sunday, 14th February, 2016, 11:56 AM.
Re: Sid's question. That looks like a typo. Running for two different CP's? I don't think so.
I see, you seem to imply that it is the same Nigel Hanrahan (your good self) but the Government seems to have one of the Communist parties listed incorrectly, So which one of the Communist parties did you run as a candidate for? The Communist Party of Canada or The Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) or perhaps The Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)(Manitoba) or The Communist Party of Canada (Manitoba) ? The second party I listed seems to have a very interesting history however if the 1986 and 1988 and Manitoba General election pages are correct you appear to have been a candidate for The Communist Party of Canada (Manitoba) in the Fort Rouge Riding in 1986 and the Sturgeon Creek Riding in 1988 in addition to running for The Communist Party of Canada in the November 1988 federal election in the Winnipeg-St James electoral district.
Look's like you have not learned anything from history judging by your posts for the last few years here on chesstalk.
I'm curious too. Don't you have anything positive to say about the first Jew in US history to win a Presidential Primary?
I am not aware of any "Jew" that won a US Primary, if you are referring to Bernie Sanders he appears to have only achieved a tie in the New Hampshire primary tied with Hilary Clinton in terms of delegates.
By the way, from where I sit, someone's ancestral origin including my own does not bear any relevance on the merit of their achievement. You might have a fascist like view on how one measures what is relevant but I do not. Make no mistake about it, the Soviet brand of communism and Putin's brand of democracy is nothing but thinly veiled fascism with a dash of kleptocracy thrown in.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 15th February, 2016, 09:57 AM.
I've always wondered why the people who whine about the 1% don't become CEOs and bankers if the jobs are so easy and pay so well then donate 99% of their income to the less fortunate.
He may have won the election but as they showed on the late night comedy network, Hillary actually tied Bernie because of the super-delegates which supposedly all went Clinton's way. So in terms of delegate counts the result of a 60% to 39% victory is that they split the delegates 15 to 15. Not very democratic despite the name of the party in charge of these shenanigans.
Super-delegates is the way the party establishment keeps outsider anti-establishment types out.....may be an obstacle Bernie just can't overcome?
Leave a comment: