The Chess World Cup 2017
September 19, 2017
Round Six
Semi-finals
Game One
The commentators are Evgeniy Miroshnichenko and Keti Tsatsalashvili on the official channel and Eric Hansen and Yasser Seirawan on the chessbrah. Robin van Kampen will co-host the latter for the finals.
Aronian-MVL is a quick draw and So-Ding Liren looks like it is going to be a long battle.
With air time to fill, and a pesky fly in his room buzzing about, Yasser tells a joke about three samurai, who are sitting around the campfire.
To show his prowess with his sword, the first samurai draws his as a fly goes by, snip snip snip and he puts the sword back in the scabbard and the fly, cut in half, falls to the ground.
The second samurai stands as another fly goes by, and snip snip snip, sword back in the scabbard, and the fly, cut in quarters, falls to the ground.
The third stands, another fly goes by and snip snip snip and the insect flies away.
The third says, “He lives, but he will not breed!”
Yasser says that his friend, Norman Weinstein, is following their commentary.
That is a name from the past. He was on the cover of Chess Life and Review, October 1973. A kibitzer on chessgames.com gives his history over the period of a year:
1) Weinstein gave up competitive chess (OTB chess anyway) in order to become an investment banker, where he was quite successful. In fact, there is a story (on http://www.hhgross.net/chessintro.h...) about how, in 1990, Weinstein convinced his firm (Banker's Trust) to put an ad in Chess Life inviting strong chess players to apply for commercial banking positions. Supposedly they wound up hiring two GMs and three IMs as a result. If true, it would be very interesting to know if any of the people who were hired in fact had successful careers.
2) It appears that the two GMs that Bankers Trust hired from the ad were Maxim Dlugy (who seems to have done well as a financier before running afoul of the Russian authorities) and the Briton David Norwood (who has been very successful and is now CEO of the "IP2IPO Group plc"). Since neither one of them appears to have had any significant financial background before they were hired, it would seem that Norman was onto something. Still no information on any of the IMs, however.
3) IM Weinstein posted the following reply when I asked about this topic at http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt/
(See September 02, 2006)
In terms of chess players who worked at Bankers Trust, the list includes Girome Bono, Max Dlugy, Anna Gulko, Sal Matera, David Norwood, in addition to myself.
There are some interesting posts about strong players who have given up the game at:
http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt/...r-the-game.htm
_______
Eric said that when he was a younger player and wanted to achieve some understanding of strategy – he downloaded 500 games of Karpov between 1965 and 1980 (say), and then printed them out and went through them one by one, playing the moves on an actual board.
Yasser said that when he was training the American prodigy Akshat Chandra in St. Louis, they went through the games in his book Five Crowns on an actual board and Akshat had to predict the moves. In fact, Akshat said that he had played them on a computer screen before but with board and men now, it was like seeing them for the first time.
Five Crowns has all the Karpov-Kasparov games played from 1984-1990 and analyzes the NYC/Lyon WC Match 1990 in detail.
_______
Round 6, Game 1, Sept. 19
Aronian, Levon – MVL
D85 Grunfeld, Modern Exchange variation
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.Nf3 c5 8.Rb1 O-O 9.Be2 cxd4 10.cxd4 Qa5+ 11.Bd2 Qxa2 12.O-O Bg4 13.Be3 Nc6 14.d5 Na5 15.Bg5 b6 16.Bxe7 Rfe8 17.d6 Nc6 18.Bb5 Nxe7 19.h3 Bxf3 20.Qxf3 Qe6 21.Bxe8 Rxe8 22.dxe7 Qxe7 23.Rfd1 Bf8 24.Rbc1 Qxe4 25.Qc3 Qb4 26.Qa1 Bc5 27.Qxa7 Qb2 28.Kh1 Bxf2 29.Qb7 Qe2 30.Rf1 Rf8 31.Qc6 Bc5 32.Rce1 1/2-1/2
Yasser thinks that Wesley had a winning position at move 40 but let Ding off the hook by playing 41.Kc3 instead of 41.Rxb3.
Perpetual for a draw.
Round 6, Game 1, Sept. 19
So, Wesley – Ding Liren
C54 Giuoco Piano, d3 variation
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.c3 d6 6.O-O O-O 7.Re1 a5 8.Nbd2 Be6 9.Bb5 Qb8 10.Nf1 Qa7 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Nxe3 Ne7 13.a4 Ng6 14.Bc4 Bxc4 15.Nxc4 Qa6 16.g3 Rfe8 17.Qb3 Nf8 18.Qb5 Qxb5 19.axb5 b6 20.Ra3 Ne6 21.Ne3 Nc5 22.c4 a4 23.Rea1 Nb3 24.Rd1 Rec8 25.Nd2 Nxd2 26.Rxd2 Nd7 27.Rd1 Nc5 28.Nd5 Kf8 29.f4 Ra5 30.Nb4 Raa8 31.Kf2 Ke8 32.Ke3 f6 33.f5 Kd7 34.g4 Rh8 35.h4 h6 36.Nd5 Ra5 37.Rg1 Kc8 38.g5 hxg5 39.hxg5 Rh3+ 40.Kd2 Nb3+ 41.Kc3 Nd4 42.gxf6 Rh2 43.Nxb6+ cxb6 44.fxg7 Rc2+ 45.Kb4 Rxb2+ 46.Kc3 Rc2+ 47.Kb4 Rb2+ 1/2-1/2
Chat Room Comments
- Rxb3 was interesting, but not a clear win
- yes, it was a 100% clear win for white after RXb3
- was never winning except to commentators

The position after 40….Nb3+. Does 41.Rxb3 win or not?
Sagar Shah in chessbase.com says this:
The best move in this position was 41.Rxb3! axb3 42. gxf6 gxf6 43.Kc3! It is important to start with this move to not let Black rooks coordinate on the seventh rank.
Leave a comment: