The Suttles Trilogy Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Suttles Trilogy Review

    Finally, I have had the time and pleasure to get into the Suttles trilogy! Having been away most of this year since it was published, I only took them off the shelf recently.

    Wow! What fun books. When I buy Biographies/Collections of GM games, I like to see deep annotations with many of the comments dealing with the psychology of the play and the explanations behind the moves (same thing?), not simply variations. These are here in abundance. I had forgotten (or never understood) how weird most of Suttles' games were. The positions one sees in the diagrams are often "off the wall" at first glance. In fact, one can use the books simply by looking through the pages and diagrams and following the position from there. There will be no shortage of pleasure from that approach. His "anti-positional" play is a joy to follow (thanks to the help of BH's explanations). Yes, I know they may not really be "anti-positional" but they sure look like it when one first plays the moves.

    For a couple of weird positions that grab the eye, see the diagrams on page 145 of volume 1 OR the diagram in the Suttles-O'Donnell game on page 33 of volume 1 where the White B's are "developed" to c1 and f1 while the White Rooks are placed on a2 and h2.

    I particularly enjoyed the pictures in the centre of volume 1 with much younger shots of some of our best players of the time. The picture of Leslie (Laszlo) Witt reminded me of a free lesson he gave me in a team game from the early 60s in Montreal. I was crushed from the beginning and he won a Pawn, held it into the EG and cashed the win. After the game, I asked him why he had not crushed me with an attack (which he could have done) and his response was, "You had played weakly in the opening, so, I assumed you would do the same in the EG. There was no need to take chances!" He was not being mean, just matter-of-fact.

    I can't imagine why any Canadian chess player would not want to own a copy of these books. I am sure Larry has copies remaining. My copies will be at my chair-side for some time to come.

    There are more than 1,000 pages of pleasure here!

  • #2
    Re: The Suttles Trilogy

    Thanks!

    I tried to select "photogenic" positions for the diagrams.

    But "anti-positional"? Well, to me Duncan's play seems very positional (too much so at times). But that's one of the major themes to the book (although not the only one).

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The Suttles Trilogy

      Originally posted by J. Ken MacDonald View Post
      For a couple of weird positions that grab the eye, see the diagrams on page 145 of volume 1 OR the diagram in the Suttles-O'Donnell game on page 33 of volume 1 where the White B's are "developed" to c1 and f1 while the White Rooks are placed on a2 and h2.
      The game is here to see :

      http://www.suttlesbook.com/suttles_g...heedgevol1.htm

      Or here :

      (6) D. Suttles - T. O'Donnell [A00/07]
      Vancouver Int. Vancouver (3.6), 06.08.1981

      1.g3 e5 2.Bg2 d5 3.d3 c5 4.Nc3 Be6 5.e4 d4 6.Nce2 Bd6 7.f4 f6 8.Nf3 Nc6 9.0-0 Nge7 10.c4 0-0 11.f5 Bf7 12.g4 g5 13.h4 h6 14.Ng3 Nc8 15.Rf2 Be7 16.Bf1 Nd6 17.a3 a6 18.b3 b6 19.Raa2 Kg7 20.Rh2 Qd7 21.Raf2 Rh8 22.Bd2 a5 23.Qc1 Rag8 24.Be2 Kf8 25.Rh1 Qe8 26.Rfh2 Kg7 27.hxg5 hxg5 28.Nxg5 Rxh2 29.Ne6+ Bxe6 30.Rxh2 Rh8 31.Bh6+ Kg8 32.fxe6 Nd8 33.g5 fxg5 34.Bh5 Qc6 35.Bxg5 Qc7 36.Nf5 Nxf5 37.exf5 1-0

      Here is the funny position after White's 20 second move (20.Rh2) :

      <img src = "http://www.chessvideos.tv/bimg/ccg89k3hvrc4.png">

      Oops ! The diagram does not show :(

      But we can see the position by clicking here :

      http://www.chessvideos.tv/bimg/ccg89k3hvrc4.png

      The comment in the book, below the diagram :

      "This is worth a diagram. White has "developped" both his bishops on their original squares, and at the same time has positionned his rooks on a2 and h2."

      An amazing position indeed.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The Suttles Trilogy

        Would 10. ... dxc3ep have been any better? Try to open it up a bit and get some counter play. With the text moves black seems to get smothered.
        Gary Ruben
        CC - IA and SIM

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The Suttles Trilogy

          It's good to see Jean-Pierre post on these books. Over at the book's website, www.suttlesbook.com JPR said this of the book:

          The trilogy "Chess on the Edge" is really a set of books to TEACH chess (strategy, tactics, planning, psychology, etc.), not "only" a book to analysed the games of an elite and most original player, Duncan Suttles.

          Of all the books I know, "Chess on the Edge" might very well be THE MOST INSTRUCTIVE AND ENTERTAINING of them all. Nothing less!

          For me, the Suttles' trilogy has it's place among the top 10 or even 5 most important chess books of all time. Together with "Lasker's Manual of Chess", "My System", "Chess Paxis", all the books of Alekhine, and, yes, "Why Lasker Matters", and very few more.

          Jean-Pierre Rhéaume

          posted by John-Erik Malmsten

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The Suttles Trilogy

            Originally posted by Erik Malmsten View Post
            It's good to see Jean-Pierre post on these books. Over at the book's website, www.suttlesbook.com JPR said this of the book:

            The trilogy "Chess on the Edge" is really a set of books to TEACH chess (strategy, tactics, planning, psychology, etc.), not "only" a book to analysed the games of an elite and most original player, Duncan Suttles.

            Of all the books I know, "Chess on the Edge" might very well be THE MOST INSTRUCTIVE AND ENTERTAINING of them all. Nothing less!

            For me, the Suttles' trilogy has it's place among the top 10 or even 5 most important chess books of all time. Together with "Lasker's Manual of Chess", "My System", "Chess Paxis", all the books of Alekhine, and, yes, "Why Lasker Matters", and very few more.

            Jean-Pierre Rhéaume

            posted by John-Erik Malmsten
            Yes, Mister Malmsten, I said (wrote) that, and I stand by it. For me, every game of the trilogy I see and study confirms my view. My son, which is also my sun, love to look with me at short attacking games. But he appreciates very much the originality of Suttles : no automatic moves with that GMI. My guess is that his opponents most likely were more often in zeitnot against him than they used to be with most other GMI... where they could play by hart the first 25 moves or so just by memory of an established line.

            Also, in my list, I should have included all the books of capablanca (edited : Capablanca) and "Masters of the Chessboard", a super gem by Réti. Shame on me :(

            I do realize that my list of the best 5 or 10 best chess books of all time gets a little stretched ;)

            But I wonder why I wrote "book to analysed"... :(
            Last edited by Jean-Pierre Rhéaume; Monday, 16th June, 2008, 01:44 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: The Suttles Trilogy (with a diagram)

              Originally posted by Jean-Pierre Rhéaume View Post
              The game is here to see :

              http://www.suttlesbook.com/suttles_g...heedgevol1.htm

              Or here :

              (6) D. Suttles - T. O'Donnell [A00/07]
              Vancouver Int. Vancouver (3.6), 06.08.1981

              1.g3 e5 2.Bg2 d5 3.d3 c5 4.Nc3 Be6 5.e4 d4 6.Nce2 Bd6 7.f4 f6 8.Nf3 Nc6 9.0-0 Nge7 10.c4 0-0 11.f5 Bf7 12.g4 g5 13.h4 h6 14.Ng3 Nc8 15.Rf2 Be7 16.Bf1 Nd6 17.a3 a6 18.b3 b6 19.Raa2 Kg7 20.Rh2 Qd7 21.Raf2 Rh8 22.Bd2 a5 23.Qc1 Rag8 24.Be2 Kf8 25.Rh1 Qe8 26.Rfh2 Kg7 27.hxg5 hxg5 28.Nxg5 Rxh2 29.Ne6+ Bxe6 30.Rxh2 Rh8 31.Bh6+ Kg8 32.fxe6 Nd8 33.g5 fxg5 34.Bh5 Qc6 35.Bxg5 Qc7 36.Nf5 Nxf5 37.exf5 1-0

              Here is the funny position after White's 20 second move (20.Rh2) :

              <img src = "http://www.chessvideos.tv/bimg/ccg89k3hvrc4.png">

              Oops ! The diagram does not show :(

              But we can see the position by clicking here :

              http://www.chessvideos.tv/bimg/ccg89k3hvrc4.png

              The comment in the book, below the diagram :

              "This is worth a diagram. White has "developped" both his bishops on their original squares, and at the same time has positionned his rooks on a2 and h2."

              An amazing position indeed.
              I found a way to provide the diagram directly on Chesstalk without having to click for a link : :)

              Comment


              • #8
                The Suttles Trilogy Review

                Again by John Elburg at the website below.

                http://chessbooks.nl/elburg122.html

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: The Suttles Trilogy Review

                  Originally posted by J. Ken MacDonald View Post
                  Again by John Elburg at the website below.

                  http://chessbooks.nl/elburg122.html
                  The reading is illuminating, from the first letter to the final dot.

                  How about the conclusion ?

                  "Conclusion: A unique and timeless work!"

                  Well said :)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: The Suttles Trilogy Review - ideas for the website?

                    Any suggestions on how to make the Suttles book website more interesting?

                    I thought the review was good - one of the most interestings so far. The book appears to be spreading in Europe. Of course lots of players in Canada haven't bought it yet. I'm not sure what people want in a chess book.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What do Canadians Want In A Chess Book?

                      If they don't want the Suttles set or Nick's Best, they either can't afford the books or wouldn't buy any Canadian chess books, I guess.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: The Suttles Trilogy Review - ideas for the website?

                        Originally posted by Bruce Harper View Post
                        Any suggestions on how to make the Suttles book website more interesting? (...)
                        I don't know.
                        I don't go there often for only one reason : I try not to go on Internet more than 30 minutes a day, or one hour.

                        But I'm afraid that I could not stay on Sutlles book website only 30 minutes, or an hour. Just like when on go on Youtube for songs, I sometimes spent way too much time. At times, the whole night. Yes, from, say, 11 PM, to 3 or 4 or 5 in the night.

                        On Sutlles book website, it would be easy to spend hours and hours just at clicking to see wonderful games.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X