2018 FIDE Elections

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Erik Malmsten View Post

    Thank you for working with these communities and hotels obtaining a little bit of potential sponsorship. I assume that you're looking for volunteer organizers in low population areas (like the successful Canadian Open in Sault Ste Marie). Shouldn't the CFC have a program of training players to become organizers? We have a few taking FA classes now and many masters teaching.
    The best way to train is to volunteer to help at a tournament like the one you are thinking of organizing. The Pereduns Roman and Andrew both helped at CYCC 2015, CYCC 2016, CO 2016 and NAYCC 2016 all of which took place in Windsor.and they were well prepared to organize an excellent 2017 CYCC and CO in Sault Ste Marie. Lessons I learned from CYCC 2015 really helped me to avoid the same mistakes in 2016 when I organized the three tournaments.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    What part of FIDE will not be able to have a bank account don't you understand?

    If you do not get involved in chess politics then you can't legitimately complain with the decisions made by those that do. This was the trap that I fell into. You are welcome to do the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alain Lafleche
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post

    At the moment, Mr. Dvorkovich is an impressive candidate based on his handling of the FIFA world cup but he is on the U.S. Treasury department pre-sanctions list so there is a strong likelihood that we would be right back where we started. He is closer to Mr. Putin than Mr. Ilyumzhinov was.
    You are right Mr.Druklec, but i sincerely I believe that Mr. Dvorkovich is the man of the situation to promote chess and tournaments around the world. The success of FIFA world CUP is an example. I must confess that I am very disappointed with the AIDEF who answered in your place on their Website saying that you already made your choice with Mr Makropoulos.
    This is a very bad way to influence the vote from other presidents of other countries... I do not approve this way of doing things

    Regards

    Alain Lafleche

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Alain Lafleche View Post
    My choice would be Mr. Arkady Dvorkovich. I I think he has the tools to promote chess and tournaments around the world. Mr.Short has often criticized chess women.... not my 1st choice.
    At the moment, Mr. Dvorkovich is an impressive candidate based on his handling of the FIFA world cup but he is on the U.S. Treasury department pre-sanctions list so there is a strong likelihood that we would be right back where we started. He is closer to Mr. Putin than Mr. Ilyumzhinov was.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alain Lafleche
    replied
    My choice would be Mr. Arkady Dvorkovich. I I think he has the tools to promote chess and tournaments around the world. Mr.Short has often criticized chess women.... not my 1st choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Erik Malmsten
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post

    I have no problem working with successful capitalists. I have little problem getting people to invest in chess. All I have to do is talk to them and tell them what we are doing. My issue is that we don't have enough organizers to make use of all the opportunities that have been uncovered. In March we met with 26 communities and multiple hotel chains interested in working with us to hold chess events. Most of them are still deeply interested. I don't have enough organizers who can assist them in their efforts. I even had one organizer that was irritated that we were stirring up sponsorship opportunities on "their turf".

    Where we do have organizers it seems to me that these efforts in March by Fred McKim and myself have probably led to on the order of $40,000 to $50,000 of sponsorship assuming that the communities get the events they are bidding on or the tournaments being organized go ahead. They could easily lead to ten times that if we had a better infrastructure of organizers
    Thank you for working with these communities and hotels obtaining a little bit of potential sponsorship. I assume that you're looking for volunteer organizers in low population areas (like the successful Canadian Open in Sault Ste Marie). Shouldn't the CFC have a program of training players to become organizers? We have a few taking FA classes now and many masters teaching.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Ken Craft View Post
    I had my finger on the impeachment button. ;^)
    Dodged a bullet there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ken Craft
    replied
    I had my finger on the impeachment button. ;^)

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Imaginary evil is romantic and varied; real evil is gloomy, monotonous, barren, boring. Imaginary good is boring; real good is always new, marvelous, intoxicating.
    - Simone Weil

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post

    There was not one rich guy involved. So? Your point?
    I was working as part of a team where the situation was defined already and we had to work out a solution.

    My experience more recently has been that it is probably better for me to go into meetings myself. I tend to get better results that way as I am focused on the outcome and we don't get any disruptions to the flow of the story from our side of the table.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    If I were to agree to that, I would have to vote for impeachment of the CFC president when it came up for a vote. What is next, trial by combat? Chess boxing? Wooden swords? Pistols at dawn? Scratch that last one, I am a much bigger target. I would also be hard pressed to find a clause in the Not For Profit Act which would allow such a solution.

    If it was Daswani or Bonham, I might go for chess boxing and channel Hannibal Lecter but I don't dislike you, Sid. Your positions are perfectly reasonable from your point of view. You are not a bad person even if I don't always like your actions. You are motivated by your friendship with Garry Kasparov.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post

    There was not one rich guy involved. So? Your point?
    Hey Vlad I have another idea to settle this whole issue .I challenge you to a 5-0 blitz match of 7 games. If you win I move on and leave you and the CFC alone. If I win you and the CFC endorses and vote for Nigel Short. I am rusty but the quality of your replies emboldens me to make such a challenge. This would be a fitting way after all to settle a long standing conflict between us and could serve as an example.
    I bet we could even get some press out of it. So......wanna play?
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Tuesday, 31st July, 2018, 12:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Drkulec
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    No, I expect responses relevant to the post, ie "not one rich guy involved". You said you have "no problem working with successful capitalists" that contradicts the "not one rich guy involved" post you already did. Of course from you I expect no rational or credible dialogue whatsoever.
    There was not one rich guy involved. So? Your point?

    Leave a comment:


  • Egidijus Zeromskis
    replied
    Sid and Vlad, you shall call each other and figure out all details. Just writing here will not solve anything. After that please write me a sponsorship cheque for Aurora Fall Open LOL It will be the 15th tournament, thus a good cause to support :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec
    Okay. You are expecting me to remember what we did in the 1990s
    No, I expect responses relevant to the post, ie "not one rich guy involved". You said you have "no problem working with successful capitalists" that contradicts the "not one rich guy involved" post you already did. Of course from you I expect no rational or credible dialogue whatsoever.
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 30th July, 2018, 09:31 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X