Originally posted by Sid Belzberg
View Post
2018 FIDE Elections
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
There was not one rich guy involved. So? Your point?
I bet we could even get some press out of it. So......wanna play?Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Tuesday, 31st July, 2018, 12:47 AM.
- 1 like
Comment
-
If I were to agree to that, I would have to vote for impeachment of the CFC president when it came up for a vote. What is next, trial by combat? Chess boxing? Wooden swords? Pistols at dawn? Scratch that last one, I am a much bigger target. I would also be hard pressed to find a clause in the Not For Profit Act which would allow such a solution.
If it was Daswani or Bonham, I might go for chess boxing and channel Hannibal Lecter but I don't dislike you, Sid. Your positions are perfectly reasonable from your point of view. You are not a bad person even if I don't always like your actions. You are motivated by your friendship with Garry Kasparov.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
There was not one rich guy involved. So? Your point?
My experience more recently has been that it is probably better for me to go into meetings myself. I tend to get better results that way as I am focused on the outcome and we don't get any disruptions to the flow of the story from our side of the table.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
I have no problem working with successful capitalists. I have little problem getting people to invest in chess. All I have to do is talk to them and tell them what we are doing. My issue is that we don't have enough organizers to make use of all the opportunities that have been uncovered. In March we met with 26 communities and multiple hotel chains interested in working with us to hold chess events. Most of them are still deeply interested. I don't have enough organizers who can assist them in their efforts. I even had one organizer that was irritated that we were stirring up sponsorship opportunities on "their turf".
Where we do have organizers it seems to me that these efforts in March by Fred McKim and myself have probably led to on the order of $40,000 to $50,000 of sponsorship assuming that the communities get the events they are bidding on or the tournaments being organized go ahead. They could easily lead to ten times that if we had a better infrastructure of organizers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alain Lafleche View PostMy choice would be Mr. Arkady Dvorkovich. I I think he has the tools to promote chess and tournaments around the world. Mr.Short has often criticized chess women.... not my 1st choice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
At the moment, Mr. Dvorkovich is an impressive candidate based on his handling of the FIFA world cup but he is on the U.S. Treasury department pre-sanctions list so there is a strong likelihood that we would be right back where we started. He is closer to Mr. Putin than Mr. Ilyumzhinov was.
This is a very bad way to influence the vote from other presidents of other countries... I do not approve this way of doing things
Regards
Alain Lafleche
Comment
-
Originally posted by Erik Malmsten View Post
Thank you for working with these communities and hotels obtaining a little bit of potential sponsorship. I assume that you're looking for volunteer organizers in low population areas (like the successful Canadian Open in Sault Ste Marie). Shouldn't the CFC have a program of training players to become organizers? We have a few taking FA classes now and many masters teaching.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
At the moment, Mr. Dvorkovich is an impressive candidate based on his handling of the FIFA world cup but he is on the U.S. Treasury department pre-sanctions list so there is a strong likelihood that we would be right back where we started. He is closer to Mr. Putin than Mr. Ilyumzhinov was.
What is also astonishing about the US hubris on this issue is that they - like Canada, the UK and certain other countries that cannot be named I might add - are, now that the Daesh terrorists have been virtually completely militarily defeated in Syria, welcoming, e.g., the White Helmets as "refugees" when the latter have proven connections with the terrorists, were active only on territory controlled by the terrorists, tried, in vain, to justify US and other attacks on Syria by manufactured claims of chemical attacks, and so on.
The hubris of the US aside, and the current POTUS who is, to put it generously, an unpredictable entity, trying to negotiate such a mine-field of nasty politics must be very, very difficult.
I salute you and the Executive for doing your best in an impossible situation. Whatever candidate you decide to support will probably be undermined even before he takes office. To have others come on here, in addition, with bullying tactics and threats, is more of the same nonsense.
Well done, and, in the words of Margaret Atwood, "Nolite te Bastardes Carborundorum".
Dogs will bark, but the caravan of chess moves on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nigel Hanrahan View Post
Well done, and, in the words of Margaret Atwood, "Nolite te Bastardes Carborundorum".
Comment
Comment