If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Masks are a virtue signal and virtually useless in stopping the spread. One health professional likened it to putting up a chain link fence and hoping that it would keep mosquitoes out.
What did that "health professional" suggest then?
And I mean for the here and now - not the tired old 'we should have closed the borders earlier - or we should have added hydroxychloroquine to Canadian beer' etc.
Masks are a virtue signal and virtually useless in stopping the spread. One health professional likened it to putting up a chain link fence and hoping that it would keep mosquitoes out.
Oops! I think you've got that one backwards, Vlad. Refusal to wear a mask signals a selfish asshole who is unwilling to do something that causes him/her no harm but which public health authorities say is preventatively beneficial for the health of others. And don't bother replying with links to conspiracy sites. If you object to what I'm saying then provide a link to a Canadian public health official who backs up your position. Canadian!! Don't bother linking to some gun-toting, bourbon-swilling American dumbass.
Hey that reminds me, a few weeks ago you were crtical of some of the media sites where I get news. I asked you to name some of the sites where you get your news. You haven't provided that information yet. Why not? Embarrassed?
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Obviously, my point is that you do. For example, would you support Air Canada refusing to allow a passenger who did not have proof of vaccination (assuming that it was properly warned at ticket purchase time that you would not be allowed to board without such proof)?
Yes, I would support AC (assuming we're talking about a vaccine that is safe and effective). It wasn't that long ago in Ontario that, with very few exceptions, parents had to prove that their kids' vaccinations and boosters were up to date or have their children face suspension from school. One of the exemptions was for members of religions that prohibit vaccination. You know, the people who think their god will protect them and their children from disease but who teach their children to look both ways before crossing a street?
Last edited by Peter McKillop; Wednesday, 30th December, 2020, 07:34 PM.
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Masks are a virtue signal and virtually useless in stopping the spread. One health professional likened it to putting up a chain link fence and hoping that it would keep mosquitoes out.
So...you choose to listen to the one health professional saying that instead of the literally thousands of other health professionals saying the opposite?
What do people think about making vaccination a pre-requisite to entering a chess tournament, at least
until we have confirmation that herd immunity has been achieved?
I just can't see this as being viable or enforceable. It's too draconian. While I disagree with those on this board about the best way to address the Covid-19 issue, we cannot force people to take the vaccine any more than we can force them to immunize their children from measles. And some people cannot take vaccines for medical reasons, such as pregnant or nursing mothers, possibly children. Some people - the least vulnerable to the disease - will be the last to get immunized.
And who are we protecting? The people who already had the vaccine? They are already protected. This idea would merely further ostracize those already being scorned by the general public.
I think the best measures we can take as organizers during the vaccination stage (assuming we will run tournaments) would be to provide as hygienic an environment as possible. This would include having hand sanitizer available, cleaning clocks, boards and pieces between games, encouraging wearing of masks, and so on. In terms of preventing persons from playing, I would be in favor of having a persons exhibiting symptoms of contagious illness - Covid or otherwise - being told not to play. I personally hate playing an opponent who obviously has a cold.
Last edited by Garland Best; Thursday, 31st December, 2020, 11:57 AM.
Reason: Clarifying some of the text.
I just can't see this as being viable or enforceable. It's too draconian. While I disagree with those on this board about the best way to address the Covid-19 issue, we cannot force people to take the vaccine any more than we can force them to immunize their children from measles. And some people cannot take vaccines for medical reasons, such as pregnant or nursing mothers, possibly children. Some people - the least vulnerable to the disease - will be the last to get immunized.
And who are we protecting? The people who already had the vaccine? They are already protected. This idea would merely further ostracize those already being scorned by the general public.
I think the best measures we can take as organizers during the vaccination stage (assuming we will run tournaments) would be to provide as hygienic an environment as possible. This would include having hand sanitizer available, cleaning clocks, boards and pieces between games, encouraging wearing of masks, and so on. In terms of preventing persons from playing, I would be in favor of having a persons exhibiting symptoms of contagious illness - Covid or otherwise - being told not to play. I personally hate playing an opponent who obviously has a cold.
more to the point, from what I read, epidemiologists are not in favour of vaccine passports because it leads to people improperly estimating the risks of their behaviour. Chess tournaments for vaccinated people being an example. With a 95% effectiveness rate, that is still 5-10 people at the tournament who are not immune. If COVID is still prevalent in the community, those people will be exposed and eventually get COVID. If you are say 70 odd years old and happen to be in the 5% that don't take up immunity from the vaccine, you face a 20% or so death rate. That's a bad deal.
The epidemiologist view of when "normal" activities can resume is when COVID is no longer prevalent in the community because herd immunity has been achieved. A vaccine passport is not required then because well, herd immunity. Taking up social activities with other vaccinated people before herd immunity is achieved is not safe, vaccine passport or not.
I just can't see this as being viable or enforceable. It's too draconian. While I disagree with those on this board about the best way to address the Covid-19 issue, we cannot force people to take the vaccine any more than we can force them to immunize their children from measles. And some people cannot take vaccines for medical reasons, such as pregnant or nursing mothers, possibly children. Some people - the least vulnerable to the disease - will be the last to get immunized.
And who are we protecting? The people who already had the vaccine? They are already protected. This idea would merely further ostracize those already being scorned by the general public.
I think the best measures we can take as organizers during the vaccination stage (assuming we will run tournaments) would be to provide as hygienic an environment as possible. This would include having hand sanitizer available, cleaning clocks, boards and pieces between games, encouraging wearing of masks, and so on. In terms of preventing persons from playing, I would be in favor of having a persons exhibiting symptoms of contagious illness - Covid or otherwise - being told not to play. I personally hate playing an opponent who obviously has a cold.
You cannot force people to get a vaccination but neither can they force you to let them in your tournament without a vaccination. Anyway it is silly for us to argue this point. The government is going to decide the rules for any gatherings including chess tournaments.
So...you choose to listen to the one health professional saying that instead of the literally thousands of other health professionals saying the opposite?
Those were the same health professionals who said masks were not useful before they said they were.
If masks worked, we would have beat the virus. I wear mine whenever I am out in public but I am not stupid enough to think that it offers any protection. No one else should be under that illusion. The virus is spreading not because people are not wearing masks. It is spreading because that's what a virus does. I do get irritated when people violate social distancing which they do all the time.
They do work. Masks are meant to keep droplets inside the mask. They act as a barrier for spraying out droplets. Not as a shield from preventing droplets from coming in.
But I do think those clear acrylic panels are almost a complete waste. Air circulation goes in all directions...
“These barriers are designed to prevent large spray-born droplets, which are released when someone talks loudly or coughs at close range,” she told me. “But you also have to account for the smaller particles that can go around the plexiglass barrier and stay airborne for longer periods of time, which someone can still inhale.”
...that's why people should wear a mask! Keep as much of those 'large spray-born droplets' inside the mask as possible.
Last edited by Neil Frarey; Thursday, 31st December, 2020, 04:48 PM.
Those were the same health professionals who said masks were not useful before they said they were.
If masks worked, we would have beat the virus. I wear mine whenever I am out in public but I am not stupid enough to think that it offers any protection. No one else should be under that illusion. The virus is spreading not because people are not wearing masks. It is spreading because that's what a virus does. I do get irritated when people violate social distancing which they do all the time.
That's like saying that seatbelts don't work because people still die in car accidents. Masks don't eliminate the spread of the virus; they mitigate it, and if everyone consistently wears them when appropriate, it significantly reduces the spread. Even if they did have 100% effectiveness then we still wouldn't have beaten the virus because of the enormous number of people who refuse to wear them. You can easily find multiple meta-analyses that show the effectiveness of masks, e.g. https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...77893920302301
Can you give us your benchmark numbers for achieving herd immunity?
Fauci says 70% immune could be considered herd immunity for COVID19.
So given the rapidly rising percentage of those already infected once, multiplied by a factor to account for untested infected cases, and the fast pace of vaccination expected, all bode well for a big OTB chess tournament in the USA in mid 2021...
Tweet
Comment