If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
From the CFC website (of all places to find news!)
The following new rates were approved at todays AGM in Montreal,
New annual membership dues:
Adult members – reduced from $ 36 down to $ 30
Junior members – reduced from $ 24 down to $ 20
Junior participating – eliminated
Family membership – eliminated
Tournament fee – adult $ 10, junior $ 5, cost to player unchanged, but provincial portion eliminated.
New rating fee schedule:
Rating fees - $ 5 per player per tournament
Junior rating fee – eliminated.
Let me get this right, from TD viewpoint, I still have to collect membership fees, and the cost of being a CFC event now takes 70% more than before out of the prize fund?!?!?! :(
Honestly, does anyone else see the risk of pushing events to no longer be CFC rated?
... I don't understand why rules get broken at every single AGM?
It's EXTREMELY clear that no new motions can be voted on without proper advance notice. Nobody could possibly have had proxy instructions for this since we didn't know there would be a vote.
And overall memberships don't change much because the reduction for adults is covered by the INCREASE of Juniors and Family memberships!
And what's this ******** about eliminating provincial portions of fees, without speaking to the provinces about it first?!
Finally, am I reading this correct that even junior events are now $5 per player!? If so, the CFC has just taken a gun and shot themselves. All that remains to be seen is where the bullet hit and how bad the damage is.
Interesting questions. I thought that "junior rating fee eliminated" meant that the 50¢ fee changed to zero, but I see it COULD mean it has been raised to $5. If so, goodbye, junior events.
My prediction is that CFC-rated Active events will shortly become an endangered species. Active tournaments will continue but will stop being submitted to CFC. Instead, I can see more regional club & league Active rating lists start up (a la NW Ontario).
$5 per head for adults in regular time control tourneys is probably doable though not without grumbling.
You can pay the tournament membership fee... $10 adult $5 junior apparently.
Although I don't think the CFC has the right to unilaterally change or remove a provincial fee.
From this post I take it that the tournament membership still exists. Atleast they decided to keep it! (yeah for common sense!)
Personally, with a reduced membership fee for most players, this will be a good thing, but Im still not sure how it will play out in jr events.
I don't see the additional $2 rating fee as being that bad, certainly offsets the reduction of the adult membership fee but getting rid of the family membership wasn't all that bright.
Where does this leave the 'grassroots' initiative?
Well, it's a $4.50 extra rating fee for juniors, AND an increase of $10 to their membership fee per year. THAT is bad.
Judging from the amount they pay for entry to the CYCC it shouldn't be a problem. What with high entry fees, high coaching fees and the esteem of a high rating, the extra money shouldn't even slow things down.
I suspect that if one were to calculate total revenue using the old rates (using the last 360 days of transactions) compared to these just-published rates that the projected revenue would be about the same.
This is probably how the executive can justify the legitimacy or legality of the change -- that there might not be one from an accounting point of view.
However, this is making the huge assumption that the next 360 days will be about the same -- which IMO it will not be if Active and Junior events dry up.
Using old data on new criteria misses the point that the buying decisions of those TD's and players would have been different (and they will certainly be different going forward).
Comment