Tweet
A remedy to our world crisis (which can be hit on by chess, science, history, science & religion), based on a relatively recent Post that I made on LinkedIn (besides on my Comments there, regarding that Post):
USA MAGA Moderates in GOP Democrats Congress Trump Canada 51st State Chess Science Law Religion Oh God Films I became a chess master in the 1980s while living near Toronto. I don't want to be 'He Who Restrains' & 'Removed' (= EndTimes), so I'll 'Reveal' some Streetwise things that I learned while I become a chess master, to put some perspective on the (5th) recommendation below:
1. Any who have childlike faith about a given book, e.g. concerning a chess opening (which typically includes many series of moves that a reader may hope to recall & play, if an opponent allows such a series to happen), now & then may regret that they read such a book, i.e. when they find themselves in a poor situation that apparently wasn't anticipated by an author (or the reader);
2. So unsurprisingly at times settled science has been overturned down through the Ages;
3. Anecdotal evidence (except e.g. claims re: religion -bit unfairly in my estimation) is allowed in court, though it's not weighted as much as eye witness testimony would be;
4. I'm open-minded, e.g. re: reincarnation (wikis re: author/age of various religious texts don't convince me);
5. Likely safe & quick to try at least once in your life: pray (ideally asap) 'LORD please put into effect the most exact version of scripture. Amen.' (whatever that might turn out to be -looking at e.g. wiki re: Wycliffe Bible I have doubts about it or anything newer).
Geopolitics, Risk Management, Protestantism, Vatican, Orthodox, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Middle East, Asia, EU, End Times, Scripture, Beware The Serpent.
Post | Feed | LinkedIn
[Addendums:]
I. Regarding point 3 above, here's 2 links relevant to courtroom rules concerning anecdotal evidence (note that Google's AI can produce a result that may at least slightly differ each time that a search with it is made):
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2450...5302866711624/
rules about anecdotal evidence in courtrooms - Google Search
II. The capture of (what I'd perhaps somewhat too loosely call) 'Venezuela's First Couple' happened in a successful raid against Venezuela's capital city, that was conducted by the USA (as ordered by POTUS Trump 2.0) only a few short days ago. That rather unsettling raid's 'result' was 'compounded', in terms of its 'sobering effect' (circa yesterday) worldwide, by what I'd call the (hard to fully conceal) resulting 'panic' that suddenly came upon various world leaders, due to Trump freshly (but now very unsubtly) alluding to his desire to have the USA annex Denmark's territory of Greenland, using brute force if necessary. For example, a significant number of those leaders began to meet (again, circa yesterday) in Paris, France (including our own PM Mark Carney), in a get together that was initially designed largely to address the matter of possibly ending a major war that's been going on in Europe (between Putin's Russia and Ukraine) that has not stopped for a considerable number of years now.
III. Other things to consider:
A. There are currently nine (9) nations on Earth thought to have (possibly besides other kinds of WMDs) nuclear weapons (and at least some of those nine [9] nations presently have leaders who may well not have recently had a proper 'mental health' evaluation, at least as far as I can tell);
B. The Middle East, alone, is currently a hotbed of conflict (potentially being of scriptural proportions, presently, as far as I can tell);
C. That's not to mention that the situation in the Far East (never mind the one that involves India, Pakistan & Afghanistan) is at least still 'simmering', as far as I can tell;
D. Add to all of the above that (at least as I'd assess things) there's a madman that's currently in charge of by far the most powerful nation on Earth (namely Trump, the USA's present POTUS), making all of the rest of the national leaders who are responsible for various lands/property located within The Americas quite possibly shake in their boots (at the least while they are awake);
E. Thus, anything at all related to (the GOP or) Trump himself (e.g. regarding his USA [2025] NSS document, which includes discussion of what I'd call the plan for exclusive domination of the entire Western Hemisphere by the USA, besides other things that are alluded to in that document that's been in the news for some time now).
1A) To try to anticipate any question about my reference to 'He Who Restrains' (and is later 'Removed'), in the short second paragraph of this Post, I seem to recall it's very known to many Christians (perhaps especially to those in the USA, where most Christians who believe in a 'Rapture' reside) as a reference to a mysterious 'Restrainer' (many who believe in the concept known as 'the Rapture', or possibly otherwise, think it refers to 'The Church', but it's been theorized that it could also refer to a single individual) who is somehow delaying the clear arrival upon the world stage of the 'Anti-C'. I believe this idea of a 'Restrainer' is specific to Christianity (and it may not necessarily be interpreted as why such a thing as a Rapture would ever happen, e.g. Catholics do not believe in a Rapture concept, as far as I know).
2B) Nevertheless, I still feel my recommendation for a remedy to what I see as our present world crisis may well be worth trying, at least once per person in their lifetime (ideally asap). In the 1970s era Oh God movie series, George Burns plays the part of the LORD. In the first movie, I think, George as the LORD addresses the question of a final judgement, and hopes that that it won't happen, due to there being so many casualties as a result (mind you, this is what the movie's script writers had George say). I can tell you, I myself don't like the idea of a 'Rapture', for starters - can you imagine e.g. any plane, as flown by a Christian who was unexpectedly 'Raptured', possibly dropping in altitude etc.? Makes zero sense to me, in terms of compassion for any number of half-decent people suffering, compared to at least one madman (Anti-C) causing war etc. as any 'End Times' might come to pass. Never mind if something terribly unexpected were to happen in a judgement of a vast multitude of people, should some nasty person[s] with an evil/insane agenda ever have gotten involved with changing any exact version of any sacred text at any tiime in history.
USA MAGA Moderates in GOP Democrats Congress Trump Canada 51st State Chess Science Law Religion Oh God Films I became a chess master in the 1980s while living near Toronto. I don't want to be 'He Who Restrains' & 'Removed' (= EndTimes), so I'll 'Reveal' some Streetwise things that I learned while I become a chess master, to put some perspective on the (5th) recommendation below:
1. Any who have childlike faith about a given book, e.g. concerning a chess opening (which typically includes many series of moves that a reader may hope to recall & play, if an opponent allows such a series to happen), now & then may regret that they read such a book, i.e. when they find themselves in a poor situation that apparently wasn't anticipated by an author (or the reader);
2. So unsurprisingly at times settled science has been overturned down through the Ages;
3. Anecdotal evidence (except e.g. claims re: religion -bit unfairly in my estimation) is allowed in court, though it's not weighted as much as eye witness testimony would be;
4. I'm open-minded, e.g. re: reincarnation (wikis re: author/age of various religious texts don't convince me);
5. Likely safe & quick to try at least once in your life: pray (ideally asap) 'LORD please put into effect the most exact version of scripture. Amen.' (whatever that might turn out to be -looking at e.g. wiki re: Wycliffe Bible I have doubts about it or anything newer).
Geopolitics, Risk Management, Protestantism, Vatican, Orthodox, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Middle East, Asia, EU, End Times, Scripture, Beware The Serpent.
Post | Feed | LinkedIn
[Addendums:]
I. Regarding point 3 above, here's 2 links relevant to courtroom rules concerning anecdotal evidence (note that Google's AI can produce a result that may at least slightly differ each time that a search with it is made):
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2450...5302866711624/
rules about anecdotal evidence in courtrooms - Google Search
II. The capture of (what I'd perhaps somewhat too loosely call) 'Venezuela's First Couple' happened in a successful raid against Venezuela's capital city, that was conducted by the USA (as ordered by POTUS Trump 2.0) only a few short days ago. That rather unsettling raid's 'result' was 'compounded', in terms of its 'sobering effect' (circa yesterday) worldwide, by what I'd call the (hard to fully conceal) resulting 'panic' that suddenly came upon various world leaders, due to Trump freshly (but now very unsubtly) alluding to his desire to have the USA annex Denmark's territory of Greenland, using brute force if necessary. For example, a significant number of those leaders began to meet (again, circa yesterday) in Paris, France (including our own PM Mark Carney), in a get together that was initially designed largely to address the matter of possibly ending a major war that's been going on in Europe (between Putin's Russia and Ukraine) that has not stopped for a considerable number of years now.
III. Other things to consider:
A. There are currently nine (9) nations on Earth thought to have (possibly besides other kinds of WMDs) nuclear weapons (and at least some of those nine [9] nations presently have leaders who may well not have recently had a proper 'mental health' evaluation, at least as far as I can tell);
B. The Middle East, alone, is currently a hotbed of conflict (potentially being of scriptural proportions, presently, as far as I can tell);
C. That's not to mention that the situation in the Far East (never mind the one that involves India, Pakistan & Afghanistan) is at least still 'simmering', as far as I can tell;
D. Add to all of the above that (at least as I'd assess things) there's a madman that's currently in charge of by far the most powerful nation on Earth (namely Trump, the USA's present POTUS), making all of the rest of the national leaders who are responsible for various lands/property located within The Americas quite possibly shake in their boots (at the least while they are awake);
E. Thus, anything at all related to (the GOP or) Trump himself (e.g. regarding his USA [2025] NSS document, which includes discussion of what I'd call the plan for exclusive domination of the entire Western Hemisphere by the USA, besides other things that are alluded to in that document that's been in the news for some time now).
1A) To try to anticipate any question about my reference to 'He Who Restrains' (and is later 'Removed'), in the short second paragraph of this Post, I seem to recall it's very known to many Christians (perhaps especially to those in the USA, where most Christians who believe in a 'Rapture' reside) as a reference to a mysterious 'Restrainer' (many who believe in the concept known as 'the Rapture', or possibly otherwise, think it refers to 'The Church', but it's been theorized that it could also refer to a single individual) who is somehow delaying the clear arrival upon the world stage of the 'Anti-C'. I believe this idea of a 'Restrainer' is specific to Christianity (and it may not necessarily be interpreted as why such a thing as a Rapture would ever happen, e.g. Catholics do not believe in a Rapture concept, as far as I know).
2B) Nevertheless, I still feel my recommendation for a remedy to what I see as our present world crisis may well be worth trying, at least once per person in their lifetime (ideally asap). In the 1970s era Oh God movie series, George Burns plays the part of the LORD. In the first movie, I think, George as the LORD addresses the question of a final judgement, and hopes that that it won't happen, due to there being so many casualties as a result (mind you, this is what the movie's script writers had George say). I can tell you, I myself don't like the idea of a 'Rapture', for starters - can you imagine e.g. any plane, as flown by a Christian who was unexpectedly 'Raptured', possibly dropping in altitude etc.? Makes zero sense to me, in terms of compassion for any number of half-decent people suffering, compared to at least one madman (Anti-C) causing war etc. as any 'End Times' might come to pass. Never mind if something terribly unexpected were to happen in a judgement of a vast multitude of people, should some nasty person[s] with an evil/insane agenda ever have gotten involved with changing any exact version of any sacred text at any tiime in history.
Comment