$120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

    Just to pass on some of the sentences said in the latest article on the website Spraggett on chess - to our discussion:

    "The most remarkable aspect of the unaccounted for 120,000 dollars (over a two year period) is that AGM minutes and OCA records indicate that not a single serious question was ever raised about the Trillium money and what it was spent on...was the OCA Executive sleeping? (and with whom?)

    This past week a perversely OCA-biased CFC Executive report into Mr. Thorvardsson's actions was released to the public. This report all but awards Mr. Thorvardsson a medal. (www.chesscanada.info/forum)"
    :)

  • #2
    Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

    Please see: http://kevinspraggett.blogspot.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

      In many aspects the OCA is simply highly ineffective in it's role, and ultimate responsibility for that has to sit with the president Chris Mallon. Of course, Chris was highly ineffective in his role as CFC president so I don't know why people expect him to suddenly develop some management competance now.
      It's comedic actually hearing Chris ponder what on earth people expect him to do with respect to Trillium ( this is leadership ? ).

      People might not like Barry's project but he did the legwork and the OCA has been incapable of getting that far as long as I have been aware of them. If Trillium is fed up well what has the OCA done to clear that up since ? What effort has the OCA made in any capacity to develop new revenue streams rather then just take in the member tax they are handed every year ?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

        Given that we sat through a combined minimum of six hours of discussion about this issue at the last two AGMs I don't see how anyone could ever say it wasn't seriously discussed.
        Christopher Mallon
        FIDE Arbiter

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

          I think the whole exercise brings into question the existance of the OCA. Chris in case you don't understand your role I would say specifically you have responsibilities in two areas :

          1. Addressing the suggestions of unethical behaviour in your organization.
          2. Managing the Trillium process which you seem far too content with to end badly.

          With respect to number one, there are other situations that have come up that make a Trillium-like situation seem inevitable. For example,
          when the kids went to Greece for WYCC the OCA decided to subsidize 2nd and 3rd place finishers at CYCC in the amount of $400 or $500.
          However, even though it was a very small group the players were not informed officially, and only a portion of the players got money, including
          a board member's son.

          With respect to number two, the Trillium project was a pilot that was a welcome change from the OCA's usual lack of success addressing marketing and promotion of the game. This area is very important to the report card on the usefulness and success of the OCA as an organization. Now what we see is a complete void in this area again under your leadership. It seems maybe the Trillium project was less
          about the OCA's efforts and more about Barry himself getting things done.
          Last edited by Duncan Smith; Wednesday, 23rd December, 2009, 06:19 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

            Originally posted by Duncan Smith View Post
            1. Addressing the suggestions of unethical behaviour in your organization.
            2. Managing the Trillium process which you seem far too content with to end badly.
            1. I've stated flat-out that illegal behaviour occured - if not under the laws of Ontario and Canada, then at least under OCA by-laws. This seems obvious.
            2. Trillium told Hal Bond they considered the matter closed. I chose to believe them.
            Christopher Mallon
            FIDE Arbiter

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

              Originally posted by Duncan Smith View Post
              I think the whole exercise brings into question the existance of the OCA.
              Duncan, will you run for the next year Presidency? :D You have so much good ideas, that the OCA must prosper under your leadership.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

                Originally posted by Caesar Posylek View Post
                Just to pass on some of the sentences said in the latest article on the website Spraggett on chess - to our discussion:

                "The most remarkable aspect of the unaccounted for 120,000 dollars (over a two year period) is that AGM minutes and OCA records indicate that not a single serious question was ever raised about the Trillium money and what it was spent on...was the OCA Executive sleeping? (and with whom?)

                This past week a perversely OCA-biased CFC Executive report into Mr. Thorvardsson's actions was released to the public. This report all but awards Mr. Thorvardsson a medal. (www.chesscanada.info/forum)"
                :)
                Kevin Spraggett has very good web site and I always enjoy reading it. As far as disappearance of $120K, we have a case of a single greedy person who hired himself and paid wages also to himself without informing anyone else. Now, what you recommend we should do about this?
                A computer beat me in chess, but it was no match when it came to kickboxing

                Comment


                • #9
                  Does OCA Simply Have to Let It Go?

                  Hi Ernest:

                  During the course of the grant, the OCA executive ( less President Barry Thorvardson ) passed a motion of censure against Barry for his handling of the grant, and breach of the OCA Bylaw. But they did not apparently ask for his resignation at that time, because they had no one who was willing to take over as President.

                  Then after the grant had run, the OCA Governors passed a motion banning Barry from ever again holding an OCA office - a fairly strong censure.

                  The OCA Action Committee that investigated the Trillium Grant issue ( and the problems with the 2006 Can. Closed in which Barry was involved ) came up with little, and there has been general condemnation of the report as inadequate. Also, current OCA President, Chris Mallon, was always lukewarm at best re pursuing this matter at all, and has recently stated that he now considers it more or less closed.

                  I believe the members of the committee do not wish to reopen the matter - they feel they did what could be done. Trillium wants nothing more to do with this grant, and has refused to give the OCA any grant documentation, including the Thorvardson Final Grant Report, even though it was the OCA's grant. Thorvardson has said he gave all documents he had to OCA, and OCA denies receiving any, or at least any relevant documentation. If Barry has a copy of the final report, he is refusing now to provide it to the OCA.

                  Given this situation, the OCA has been stonewalled trying to obtain any documentation to evaluate Thorvardson's performance under the grant. Trillium is not even saying whether they are or are not happy with how the grant was handled - they had a meeting with VP Hal Bond at the time they had some questions, and we do not know whether they were satisfied with the explanations provided. Anyway, it appears they want this grant to just go away.

                  My opinion - though distasteful, and it was a very, very large grant for the OCA, it must be let go into the bins of history, as a bad OCA experience.

                  Bob - OCA Life Member

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

                    Dear Chess Talk readers;

                    Spraggett's story is untruthful. My VP report below was filed for the 2008 OCA AGM. At the 2009 AGM Barry received a lifetime ban. Most recently he was replaced as a Chess Foundation Trustee.

                    How could this happen you may ask? The biggest deception tool in Barry's arsenal the story that "the best is yet to come". The York region grant was a pilot project which if successful had reasonable chances of rolling out province wide. There was also a second grant, based on Nevada tickets if I recall, which would be an indefinite annuity. Couple these promises of gold with a lack of forthrightness and an opportunity is created. Sad but true.

                    It's not clear to me what a second report was supposed to achieve. The Trillium folks told be point blank that they would not consider recovering the money.

                    OCA Vice President’s Report, 2007-2008

                    Before proceeding to the heart of my report, I would like to congratulate a number of Ontario players who have distinguished themselves over the board during the past year. Nikolay Noritsyn earned the IM title at the 2007 Canadian Championship, where Raja Panjwani and Michael Barron both earned their FM titles. Great job, lads! Yuanling Yuan continues to impress everyone and most recently scored an awesome 6.5/9 to take silver at the recent Pan Am Women’s Championship. I hope Yuanling can join the women’s Olympic team where she will gain some vital experience and help move Canada up the rankings.

                    Unfortunately, there have been very few positive developments within the OCA this past year. Most of my energies has been consumed with the issue of the now infamous Trillium grant to the OCA.

                    In August of 2007, while pursuing the matter of OCA rebates to the various leagues, I learned that more than 90% of the Trillium grant’s salary budget was paid directly to OCA President Barry Thorvardson. This is contrary to our constitution and contrary to Trillium regulations.

                    The appointment was made without notice to the OCA Executive. After consulting with the Board, I asked Barry to tender his resignation and he refused. OCA Secretary Mark Dutton was moving to BC, and my availability was reduced due to new CFC duties. Given the weakened state of the Executive, and the absence of an apparent successor for Barry, it was decided to censure the President for his actions and defer the matter to the AGM.

                    On May 9, 2008 I attended a two hour meeting in Toronto with President Thorvdarson at the request of Trillium Regional Co-ordinator John Pugsley and Inga Lubbock, who worked with Barry on the original application. Their concerns included alleged use of Trillium funds by the CFC, deliverables under the grant, and payment to an OCA board member for staffing costs.

                    Barry and I convinced the Trillium officials that none of the grant money was used by the CFC. Barry provided explanations for why the deliverables in York Region were less than expected. They questioned these explanations at some length before moving on.

                    We then discussed the staffing question. Both Pugsley and Lubbock were adamant that board members are ineligible for such funds. They would not have approved the grant had they known that such a move was contemplated. Ms. Lubbock further expressed disappointment that the grant did not result in employment for someone who resides in York Region. They also questioned the governance of the OCA and requested copies of the minutes of the meetings at which Barry was hired. Such minutes do not exist.

                    At this point I made it very clear that the OCA Executive had not approved Barry’s appointment, that it was discovered in August 2007, he had refused to resign when asked, that he had been censured by the Executive and that further actions were left to our AGM. The Trillium personnel accepted this answer and look forward to learning the outcome of our Annual Meeting. They advised that the file was “red flagged” for the staffing irregularity, and no further actions were contemplated by Trillium.

                    Among other things, our future success with Trillium will depend on a demonstrated improvement in OCA governance. While new chess projects are not necessarily doomed with respect to Trillium, it is inconceivable that Barry Thorvardson’s name will adorn a successful Trillium grant ever again.

                    Had Barry resigned as President AND been approved by the Executive to staff the Trillium grant, he would only be accountable to us for its deliverables. Sadly, neither of these critical steps was taken, and we must still hear from Barry exactly what work was performed in exchange for the $90,000 paid to him.

                    I file this report with great regret. Notwithstanding the Trillium grant, I believe that Barry has been an energetic, positive force in Ontario Chess and I thank him for his service. It is time for new leadership in the OCA and I wish the incoming Executive every success.


                    Respectfully submitted

                    Hal Bond
                    Vice President, Ontario Chess Association

                    Thursday, June 05, 2008

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

                      So there is action undertaken by the OCA after all. The actions were just not made public.

                      And as these matters remained "hidden", some entities created issues out of it. The public was not sufficiently informed of what was going on.

                      Whether Mr. Spragett's allegations were true or not, what is important is that Mr Spraggett brought out this matter to the public. And this is his main contribution to this issue.

                      As for Mr. Posylek, we appreciate the effort for bringing out this matter to chess talk. Even if the $ 120,000 is not accurate, Mr. Posulek gave us idea of the magnitude of this missing money.

                      Mr. Armstrong, thank you for your input on this matter.

                      Mr. Bond's further explanation of OCA actions and status of this issue is well appreciated. Mr. Bond's presentation of the VP Report provided evidence that OCAdid take actions after all, citing attempts to contain the damage.

                      For all chess governing bodies in Ontario, or Canada, there should be transparency and verifiability of their activities through its published reports.

                      Lastly, thanks to Mr. Spraggett, Mr. Posylek, Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Bond for addressing public concerns on this matter.

                      We continue to hope that "the best is yet to come".

                      Merry Christmas to all!!!!
                      Happy holidays to all!!!!
                      Last edited by Erwin Casareno; Thursday, 24th December, 2009, 03:50 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

                        How is this not public or new information? It was his VP report from a year and a half ago, public knowledge.
                        Christopher Mallon
                        FIDE Arbiter

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Does OCA Simply Have to Let It Go?

                          Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                          Also, current OCA President, Chris Mallon, was always lukewarm at best re pursuing this matter at all, and has recently stated that he now considers it more or less closed.
                          Actually, I recently stated that I considered the matter effectively closed over a year ago .
                          Christopher Mallon
                          FIDE Arbiter

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

                            I just browsed through the OCA website

                            www.chessontario.com

                            and found 2 reports on the 2009 AGM and 2009 financial report.

                            These reports are very good for transparency measures.

                            Well done, Mr. Mallon!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: $120,000 disappears into thin air and no questions asked!

                              Originally posted by Erwin Casareno View Post
                              I just browsed through the OCA website

                              www.chessontario.com

                              and found 2 reports on the 2009 AGM and 2009 financial report.

                              These reports are very good for transparency measures.

                              Well done, Mr. Mallon!
                              So maybe you might have browsed the site before making a post alleging a cover up?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X