If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
My opinion IS relevant. Who am I? A. A potential customer (buyer as you call them). B. A CFC Governor, responsible in part for making the rules about how CFC Memberships are processed.
If you don't consider my opinion to be relevant, don't read my posts...
well if as a CFC governer who has the power to propose new bad regulations and who has just stated that he thinks such a bad regulation should be in place, it behooves me to read your post and dispute it.
You have not provided any substantive reason for your proposed regulation other than a personnal opinion that he shouldn't do it. Your're OK apparently with a "modest" fee apparently - so what is philosophically different about a large fee?
Possibly that kind of "nominal" fee for CFC and OCA fees would bring in more members.
I (CCCA) used to give a free years membership to anyone who could get three (or maybe it was 5) people who were not members to sign up. A couple of players got multiple free years stacked up that way. Others only one year. You see, I didn't much care about the membership costs. lt was all about the tournament entries and chess goods to break even.
If an organizers can sign up a bunch of players for the CFC, what possible difference can it make if he puts on a surcharge? When the CFC asks for the player to renew the next year the lower price will seem like a bargain.
My opinion IS relevant. Who am I? A. A potential customer (buyer as you call them). B. A CFC Governor, responsible in part for making the rules about how CFC Memberships are processed.
If you don't consider my opinion to be relevant, don't read my posts...
The FQE has no problems of this kind. Adult players will always pay the same amount ($40) for a FQE membership. When an organizer has to process this membership, he sends $35 to the FQE, keeping $5 for his trouble. This is a good incentive for organizers, and players are never penalized for renewing at a tournament site.
A similar tournament with a similar prize fund, but blitz, in New York, and with a sponsor. OK, it is completely a different tournament. Anyway check the flyer.
I agree with Roger. I think it is nuts that people pay twice as much for items at their local corner store as they would going to the chain supermarket, but clearly there are people for whom the convenience is worth the price. Perhaps there are people for whom paying $15 is reasonable for renewing their CFC memberships. If they think it isn't reasonable, but still want to play in this event, they will do something else.
I suppose as an alternative the organizer could say they simply won't process memberships and that all players must already have a valid CFC membership to play, but that would potentially cut down on their number of customers, no?
My opinion IS relevant. Who am I? A. A potential customer (buyer as you call them). B. A CFC Governor, responsible in part for making the rules about how CFC Memberships are processed.
If you don't consider my opinion to be relevant, don't read my posts...
By contrast, I haven't yet reached my peak in terms of intellectual understanding in my field. I'm accomplishing things I couldn't have dreamt of 18 years ago, using the same coding language I was using then. I haven't stopped learning or improving. Yet according to your post, chess players peak around 35 and stop improving after that. Perhaps it says something about chess professionals, that very early on they reach a certain plateau, their life becomes a somewhat easy one of appearance fees and grandmaster draws, and their chess understanding undergoes no further improvement?
I believe that truly devoted chess professionals should continue to improve into their 50's, and only then would I grant them some leeway due to aging.
Paul
I am 54-year old. I began to play chess in 1976 (34 years ago). Around 1982 I got an expert rating (more than 2000), and it went up and down several times. My last 2000+ rating was in 1994. Since then my rating steadily dropped, today it is between 1850 and 1900 most of the time.
Does this mean than my chess understanding is lower than before? Not at all. Actually I understand chess a lot better now than 30 years ago. Now I understand better positional play, opening and endgame theory, and I know better chess history and the games of the great champions. So why did my rating go down? The answer is: because chess is NOT a purely intellectual endeavour. Chess is mainly a SPORT. It takes stamina to play two 5-hour games a day at a constant high level.
So today my chess understanding is better than before, but my rating is lower, because I get older... in particular, I cannot calculate long combinations as well as before... also I get tired sooner... since I take more time to find good moves, I get more often in time trouble... and I blunder more often... but fortunately my overall chess understanding is better than ever, which partly compensates for my numerous tactical slips...
It does not take so many more blunders to lower significantly a chess rating. I hope you understand better now the difference between chess understanding and chess rating.
your or my opinion on what is excessive is irrelevent. Only the buyer's and seller's opinion is relevent.
Personnally, I agree it is a large fee. I presume that the reality is that the organizer really, really doesn't want to process new memberships. And who are you to say that his dislike is excessive?
If they feel it will take up lots of their valuable time, they should factor that into how much they are paying themselves, not tax people who for any number of reasons do not have a valid membership when they show up.
.
Sure they could do that - assuming the atypical case of an organizer who pays himself. They can also charge the people responsible directly. They do for example commonly charge late fees for people who register late, adding to the aggrivation of doing a lot of things at the last minute. Your solution does not provide any incentive for players to modify their behaviour.
I don't understand your objection - strong enough apparrently that you would make it against the rules. Players who need to renew have a zero additional cost option by buying it directly from the CFC.
If they feel it will take up lots of their valuable time, they should factor that into how much they are paying themselves, not tax people who for any number of reasons do not have a valid membership when they show up.
The concept for the Grand Pacific Open sounds like a workable compromise.
Leave a comment: