If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
Re: Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
Actually I meant the VP question to be for Bob G. but heck, anything is possible. Not able to commit to anything tonight since I would need to work on my boss for a while.
Actually I meant the VP question to be for Bob G. but heck, anything is possible. Not able to commit to anything tonight since I would need to work on my boss for a while.
Does one have to be a governor to run for prez?
Oops. Well, I guess I'll show up at the meeting anyway, if only to help try to make a quorum.
I've heard that the CFC has in the past had a President(s) who wasn't an incoming Governor (but maybe it was because no Governor ran?). I believe our own NJF ran for Prez without being a Governor (not sure if he was allowed to be considered for vote without his at least being a CFC member).
In any case it might be better to be a Governor if you can vote for yourself to be Prez (though I'm not sure if that's the case).
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Actually I meant the VP question to be for Bob G. but heck, anything is possible. Not able to commit to anything tonight since I would need to work on my boss for a while.
Not all Canadian chess teachers are necessarily (currently) CMA ones. Here in Ottawa, for example, I know of one inactive master who teaches chess to adults as well as juniors, and who is not with the CMA (or the CFC). I believe there are a number of other teachers who were formerly teaching with the CMA.
Hi Kevin,
Now that I have seen the April issue of the online Canadian Chess News an at least partial apology is certainly called for! Excellent articles by yourself, Lawrence Day and Stephen Wright and a good rundown of international events and local colour. Very well done!
Kevin; in my opinion the best way to get chess to grow in Canada is to get more adult females playing.
I was at a pub in Ottawa a few nights back playing blitz with our CFC president Eric and Johnny Upper; the waitress was extremely interested in the games; I explained the moves to her while El presidente and John were battling it out. Later a women (Carleton student in psychology; I told her a study of the chess subculture would make a good doctoral thesis) who was sitting at a nearby table came over at least twice and was also interested in watching. She was captivated by the game; her boyfriend had to come over and drag her away from the chess action!
In my opinion, if we got females interested in the game the membership would skyrocket. Look at the popularity of Kevin Spraggetts site; do you think it is the chess puzzles and games on it.
Perhaps I should run for CFC president with this as my main platform chess promotional idea?
In all seriousness, you are likely to have this idea met with scathing criticism from Monsieur Hebert. Not because he's anti-women, but because he's already on record against any initiative that would widen the base of the chess pyramid with less-skilled (i.e. non-elite) players.
Therefore I am in favour of this idea, despite what follows:
I notice, Paul, that you specified ADULT women. Perhaps this is because you see that Corinna Wan and perhaps others are segregating younger girls from boys, presumably because the girls don't want to play chess with boys (this isn't a knock against Corinna or anyone else, who are trying only to provide something for the girls where otherwise there would be nothing).
Or is there some other reason you don't want to include younger girls at this time? After all, younger girls would improve faster and have greater likelihood of becoming competitive and highly rated. Most adults of either sex will never be competitve in chess if they have no childhood exposure to it.
Most of your adult women will quickly lose interest once they realize how outclassed they are. Sure, they're fascinated at first with a few drinks in them at the pub. Maybe even some of them will be initially fascinated sober. This initial fascination doesn't necessarily translate to long term membership.
In fact, this could have a negative impact if the adult women are there only to find a nice guy to get close to, and once having done that, convince their new beau to stay away from chess and spend time alone with her.
So FWIW, my advice to you on this idea is get them while they're young. I'd also advise against segregating them, which only reinforces the inferiority feelings that spawn the segregation in the first place. Girls not wanting to play chess with boys is at least slightly pathological -- not proven perhaps, but my opinion and at least worthy of consideration. You could work to encourage girls to want to play chess with boys; this could help both the boys and the girls realize that at their age it's not all about winning and losing. This requires spending time with them, teaching them to analyze and to learn. It also requires things like brilliancy prizes and sportsmanship prizes, preferably INSTEAD OF or at least EQUAL TO placement prizes.
Of course, you could do this with adult women newbies also. But, you know, somehow, once one moves beyond childhood, the fascination of seeing one's lone King chased around a chessboard by an army of opposing pieces seems to disappear fast, and worse is one's adult awareness that little to nothing was learned from the experience.
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
Re: Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
"But, you know, somehow, once one moves beyond childhood, the fascination of seeing one's lone King chased around a chessboard by an army of opposing pieces seems to disappear fast, and worse is one's adult awareness that little to nothing was learned from the experience."
I don't know about that... check out the list of early-bird entries for the Canadian Open. Lots of names with an 's' to the right- that's seniors (over 50).
"But, you know, somehow, once one moves beyond childhood, the fascination of seeing one's lone King chased around a chessboard by an army of opposing pieces seems to disappear fast, and worse is one's adult awareness that little to nothing was learned from the experience."
I don't know about that... check out the list of early-bird entries for the Canadian Open. Lots of names with an 's' to the right- that's seniors (over 50).
Those are the exceptions to the rule.
But shhhh, don't tell them that. :)
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
Re: Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
So, in response to an idea of getting adult women to play in tournaments to attract more men, you instead suggest.......... getting more young girls to play. Hmm.
So, in response to an idea of getting adult women to play in tournaments to attract more men, you instead suggest.......... getting more young girls to play. Hmm.
Re: Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
1) On the matter of getting more women/girls to play:
As Egidijus pointed out in an old thread, it's less of an issue for girls to participate in male participated/(-dominated) activities if they know there are more girls than just themselves who are going to show up, e.g. if they go to such activities with at least one other girl.
Chess organizers might therefore attract more women/girls to an open event, which involves males as well, if they could manage to get at least one woman/girl to sign up well in advance, whom might then be prominently listed as an entrant(s) in further advertising of the event. Prominence could be acheived simply by preceding the traditional tentative listings of all entries so far (in order of rating) with a listing of all ladies playing in the event (including their chess titles, if any, and noting which, if any, are juniors). Such tentative listings could be advertised to the general public, besides just within CFC circles as usual. This lines up with the point about advertising in my initial post of this thread.
2) Regarding adult players getting tired of getting crushed (e.g. having their kings driven around):
Besides low-ranked players receiving chess lessons (something that ties in with my suggestion of putting prominent links to chess teachers on websites), a possible solution to ease the problem is to have more open events done by class sections, so there are less mismatches for the whole event than in a one section open swiss.
A problem with that is that many players like playing much higher rated players at least once in a while. Another issue is to avoid the yo-yo effect for average middle-ranked players in large one section swisses, where in one round they are paired way up, lose, then are paired way down, win, then they are paired way up... Perhaps accelerated pairings should be used as much as possible in one section open swisses, in an attempt to minimize mismatches, if we are not to revert to class section swisses, which had been poorly attended at times when they were tried in the past, as I seem to recall.
Last edited by Kevin Pacey; Saturday, 8th May, 2010, 01:26 PM.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Re: Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
Hi Gary
Having a woman CFC Prez would be novel, but it would of course first take a woman being willing to run for the job. The CFC has (and has had) the odd female organizer and/or Governor, as perhaps you know. It seems it would take some sort of persuasion for one to run, and part of that persuasion could be to say to them that taking the office could advance the interest of Canadian women's chess, and thus Canadian chess as a whole.
Another question is, are most women interested in participating in the rough and tumble of holding a high political office, in chess or otherwise? In Canadian politics there are relatively few women. Some would say government would be better if there were more women in office, and others would say that some of the worst politicians have included women. Such is gender equality :).
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Re: Four cheap ideas that might improve Canadian chess a bit
The veteran women in Canadian chess have not really shown a deep political interest or extra effort toward's advancing interest in Canadian women's chess. This is their right of course ( we all have our own life priorities ) but to achieve the latter goal they would have been better off spending time with the junior girls showing up 10 years ago and finishing very high internationally for Canada. This never happened. The result would have been a notably stronger Olympiad team ( several teams ) and better awareness of these juniors during the decade. The promotion aspect for the CFC would have been significant.
The momentum bringing in new female entrants is gone now. The youngsters from the last wave are now 16-23 years old that group has far more leadership promise if they retain interest in chess. Unfortunately, the CFC itself has probably not endeared itself to these players; several of them experienced disasters like Belfort and witnessed some pretty bad politics concerning the women's Olympiad team.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Saturday, 8th May, 2010, 11:53 PM.
The veteran women in Canadian chess have not really shown a deep political interest or extra effort toward's advancing interest in Canadian women's chess.
It's not a players responsibility to advance interest in chess. That's what the organizers are for.
If you like the organization and the way things are done that's fine. If you don't then put up with it or do what has to be done to change it.
In any case, chess is such a weird game I never told my wife I knew more than the moves until after we were married.
Comment