Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vlad Dobrich
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Jean Hébert View Post
    What were you trying to say with your "Do a poll :)" ? Did you believe for a minute that your post's shortness would prevent me from sensing the venom behind it ?
    I'm sure you see venom where others do not. My suggestion "do a poll" was in answer to Mr Cormier wondering what the general opinion was of your posts.
    Meanwhile, your response to my post of "What's with 1963?" etc. you ignored completely - so why post a quote if you are not going to respond to it?

    And to respond to Mr Cormier, when I say that insanity is when you see something others do not, I did not mean it in the creative sense such as you're the only one to see a great move in chess and no one else does. Rather by see, I meant in the literal sense such as you see someone sitting in a chair who died some years ago, but everyone else only sees an empty chair.

    Leave a comment:


  • Adam Cormier
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    There was most likely critics before you since the CFC was created in 1872 (unless it was only recently that the CFC began its downward spiral into disaster). It is true that you have been lenient (occasionally) about the CFC's current state of affairs, you are just the most notable critic out of as you said a long list of critics(Being Canadian Champion).
    Last edited by Adam Cormier; Sunday, 30th May, 2010, 01:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean Hébert
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Vlad Dobrich View Post
    What's with the 1963? What's with the "Hasn't done much good." ? What are you trying to say?
    What were you trying to say with your "Do a poll :)" ? Did you believe for a minute that your post's shortness would prevent me from sensing the venom behind it ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean Hébert
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Adam Cormier View Post
    I don't plan to follow in anyone's footsteps, but you obviously have a problem with the CFC, so do I. I'm just saying that you are the one following in the footsteps of others who also have come to the same conclusion about the CFC as you and I, but you are expecting a different result then your predecessors but still utilizing the same actions.
    Young man, I have been into chess since the late 60' and I have had to deal with the CFC for almost that long. Do you really think that I follow in anybody's footsteps in this matter ? That said, if you look closely at recent and not so recent posts, you will find that among a long list of CFC critics, I rank relatively low. I even defend the CFC occasionnally. ;)

    Youth is a wonderful thing. What a crime to waste it on children.
    -George Bernard Shaw

    Leave a comment:


  • Adam Cormier
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    I don't plan to follow in anyone's footsteps, but you obviously have a problem with the CFC, so do I. I'm just saying that you are the one following in the footsteps of others who also have come to the same conclusion about the CFC as you and I, but you are expecting a different result then your predecessors but still utilizing the same actions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean Hébert
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Adam Cormier View Post
    Jean doesn't that quote apply to you? people have complained about the CFC for years because it does have many shortcomings and now you are doing the same thing and expecting a different result (I hope). Isn't that a bit hypocritical?
    If your aim is to follow into PB's footsteps, you are doing good.

    It is very good for a man to talk about what he does not understand; as long as he understands that he does not understand it.
    – Gilbert Keith Chesterton

    Leave a comment:


  • Adam Cormier
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Vlad your definition of insanity is based on interpretation? what about art, or critical thinking/analysis in literature? Is someone insane just because his opinion of the message of a poem is different from a large group of people? is free-thinking a sign of insanity?

    "There is a fine line between insanity and genius". Not sure who said this...

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Dobrich
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    For how long have you been into polls ? 1963 ? Hasn't done much good.

    "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."
    -Benjamin Franklin

    ....Jean Hebert

    My definition of insanity is if you see something while mostly everyone else see something completely different. I have actually never done a poll. What's with the 1963? What's with the "Hasn't done much good." ? What are you trying to say?

    Leave a comment:


  • Adam Cormier
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Jean doesn't that quote apply to you? people have complained about the CFC for years because it does have many shortcomings and now you are doing the same thing and expecting a different result (I hope). Isn't that a bit hypocritical?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean Hébert
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Vlad Dobrich View Post
    Do a poll :)
    For how long have you been into polls ? 1963 ? Hasn't done much good. :)

    "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."
    -Benjamin Franklin

    Leave a comment:


  • Adam Cormier
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    I just might do that. but I wonder how I should word it so that it doesn't offend either side.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vlad Dobrich
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Do a poll :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Adam Cormier
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post
    Hi Adam. What does it matter? And why do you suggest just the two categories? Perhaps there are people who see some merit in many of the arguments.
    I guess their would be many sections of people depending on which subjects people either agree or disagree with Mr.Hebert.

    Jean Hebert seems to be a major figure head on the site, receiving both endless praise and unending criticisms and insults.

    I just wish to know which people view the current Canadian Champion in a positive light and those who view him in a negative one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ed Seedhouse
    replied
    Re: Making a mountain out of a molehill

    Originally posted by Paul Bonham View Post
    Thank you for telling me my own emotions, Dr. Seedhouse. Between you and Dr. Beckwith, I'm starting to feel better now. :D
    If you keep pretending you aren't angry when you actually are, you'll eventually end up in the hospital, or jail. Anger is a normal healthy human emotion when you learn how to deal with it properly. Pretending you aren't angry when you actually are isn't how you deal with it. And it doesn't fool anyone, either.

    If you are never angry you are not a human being or any other sentient being that evolved on this planet.

    They call them "Anger Management" sessions, not "Anger Elimination" sessions, for good reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean Hébert
    replied
    Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...

    Originally posted by Roger Patterson View Post
    The issue is not wether one agrees with one or the other, it is wether the conduct of one in particular is .... well I like the wedding vignette. But both parties have a bad case of LastWorditis.
    Quite funny. :)
    However, why is it that in this case you give the impression that not only YOU too would like to have the last word (which in my opinion is almost natural), but that to do it you are even willing to be totally unfair to one of the parties, then showing a really unwanted trait of character ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X