Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Jon Stewart had a funny bit on how they were just rearranging letters for their fixing policies names.
TOP HAT
HOT TAP
80% sounds better then the current success rate on this oil spill.
Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Collapse
X
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
I think the Americans are doing all they are able to do to fix the problem. I don't like the newest try because once they cut off the riser the oil flow will be more. Then if the try doesn't work the well will be spilling more oil into the ocean. The fix is the relief well they are drilling but it will take months to complete. They are drilling through very hard rock.Originally posted by Adam Cormier View Postyeah sorry Fox is obviously conservative and on the right, I got confused with left and right for a second there.
I find it particularly disheartening that America just can't seem to fix this oil spill. All these 'solutions' they keep finding are constantly failing. Maybe they should just do what the Russians say and Nuke it.
I don't like the idea of using a Nuke. That was never a sure fix and I think it's being admitted it was only successful 80% of the time. Who knows the real figure. What would worry me about using a Nuke is it might split the rock for a quarter of a mile or more and then it would not be possible to fix such a large leak. Also, how much pollution would a Nuke add to the problem and would the workers be willing to work in the area after such a blast?
The U.S. has at least one of the best blowout repair companies in the world.
These are only my thoughts from what I have read and the science I know. I have never even seen such an oil well blowout.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
yeah sorry Fox is obviously conservative and on the right, I got confused with left and right for a second there.
I find it particularly disheartening that America just can't seem to fix this oil spill. All these 'solutions' they keep finding are constantly failing. Maybe they should just do what the Russians say and Nuke it.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
I think you are mixing up left and right. Fox is right. To rephrase, Fox is on the right. :)Originally posted by Adam Cormier View PostWhen did I say I limit myself to only one side? Surely there are other news organization besides Fox on the left. I prefer unbiased opinions most of all, but it is becoming harder and harder to find these. I also watch CNN for most of my news Gary and I believe they are a professional and accurate news station.
Next, I don't watch CNN for most of my news. Only the times when there is something of great interest in the U.S. Mostly their politics are boring.
I'm watching what I'll call an "ecological disaster" from a blown out well. I don't see the same picketers or groups complaing as there were about the duck at one of our oil sand companies. Have you noticed it? It's beyond pollution.
They show people complaining about BP and the slow progress being made. Still, you don't see many complaining about the economic benefits from the drilling and offshore oil industry. Those good paying jobs on the rigs and onshore spinoff jobs.
The U.S. government takes a royalty as far as I know. Must be at least 20%. It's like ownership. Why don't they mention this partnership? How about the oversight. When I worked with natural gas I had an inspector from the Federal government here in Canada who came out and checked the installations I maintained. I haven't heard the American government had anyone on board that rig.
It's not enough to watch. Be critical.
I think the tries they have been making are because the government is telling them to do something. While I hope they succeed I don't expect anything before the relief wells are finished.
It seems to me they might have hit a grand daddy of oil fields. Hard to think they won't drill another well close after this one is plugged.
It's not a surprise this has happened. Only that it took so long. I doubt you'll read that.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
My apologies, Vlad. I made an assumption (mistake #1).
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
When did I say I limit myself to only one side? Surely there are other news organization besides Fox on the left. I prefer unbiased opinions most of all, but it is becoming harder and harder to find these. I also watch CNN for most of my news Gary and I believe they are a professional and accurate news station.Originally posted by Gary Ruben View PostI googled Glenn Beck to see who he is. I watch Canadian news or CNN when something like the oil spill is being covered. My North American ends at the Canadian Border. The U.S. is someplace from which we either get or send bad weather.
If a person claims to be interested in science and limits himself to either the left wing view or the right wing view I think there is a problem. I would think people who spend hours trying to find the truth in a chess position would spend as much, if not more time, trying to find the truth in scientific topics they discuss.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Well, in that case Gary I hope you soon get the help you need with your problem.Originally posted by Gary Ruben View PostIf a person claims to be interested in science and limits himself to either the left wing view or the right wing view I think there is a problem.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
I googled Glenn Beck to see who he is. I watch Canadian news or CNN when something like the oil spill is being covered. My North American ends at the Canadian Border. The U.S. is someplace from which we either get or send bad weather.Originally posted by Adam Cormier View Post^I generally watch Glenn Beck when I want a good laugh, it is like the daily show but he is actually serious.
If a person claims to be interested in science and limits himself to either the left wing view or the right wing view I think there is a problem. I would think people who spend hours trying to find the truth in a chess position would spend as much, if not more time, trying to find the truth in scientific topics they discuss.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
^I generally watch Glenn Beck when I want a good laugh, it is like the daily show but he is actually serious.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
I'm also cheering on Adam. He seems to be reading enough Fox News to decide he doesn't like it. Him I have never met or seen, that I know of.Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View PostI do not get some of the references in the Vlad/Jean "debate", and don't care. As to the Adam/Jean/Gary "debate", I am quietly cheering on Adam! There is no requirement to comment, and no comment does not imply agreement, enough said! :)
As an organizer, do you have a thin skin? Smile. Be nice. Pair your critic with every under rated shark in the event. If he beats them then maybe he has a point.:)
In one big correspondence event I paired all the problem players in one section. I called it my survivor section. :)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Hey Paul, we are having some great weather here is southern Ontario this weekend. It was much better to enjoy the sunshine, rather than worrying about what Jean is saying. :DOriginally posted by Paul Bonham View PostSo where are Steve Douglas, Paul Beckwith, Bob Gillanders when Jean insults people? He does it more directly than anyone else. Looks like Jean has diplomatic immunity, which he uses freely.
I do not get some of the references in the Vlad/Jean "debate", and don't care. As to the Adam/Jean/Gary "debate", I am quietly cheering on Adam! There is no requirement to comment, and no comment does not imply agreement, enough said! :)
I thought you were gonna take a sabbatical from chesstalk? :)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Whaaaat? I never met the man, and I don't look forward to such. The man is a venomous viper who jumps at any perceived sleight. His chess success has clearly gone to his head - or was he always like this?Originally posted by Peter McKillop View PostThere seems to be some pre-existing bad blood between Vlad and Jean. What's the point in jumping into the middle of that?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
There seems to be some pre-existing bad blood between Vlad and Jean. What's the point in jumping into the middle of that?Originally posted by Paul Bonham View PostSo where are Steve Douglas, Paul Beckwith, Bob Gillanders when Jean insults people? He does it more directly than anyone else. Looks like Jean has diplomatic immunity, which he uses freely.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Originally posted by Jean Hébert View PostDon't play hypocrit with me. You know the point is not about what others see or not. I can smell a snake right out of its shell. But keep your bad tooth if you like. I am no dentist.
A quotation is not a question; it's food for thought. You probably need extra vitamins. About "polls" and 1963, if you haven't got what I meant by now, you are unlikely to agree anyways if you ever get it.
If you cannot convince them, confuse them.
-Harry S Truman :)
So where are Steve Douglas, Paul Beckwith, Bob Gillanders when Jean insults people? He does it more directly than anyone else. Looks like Jean has diplomatic immunity, which he uses freely.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Chess Insight from the Great Paul Bonham...
Don't play hypocrit with me. You know the point is not about what others see or not. I can smell a snake right out of its shell. But keep your bad tooth if you like. I am no dentist.Originally posted by Vlad Dobrich View PostI'm sure you see venom where others do not.
A quotation is not a question; it's food for thought. You probably need extra vitamins. About "polls" and 1963, if you haven't got what I meant by now, you are unlikely to agree anyways if you ever get it.Originally posted by Vlad Dobrich View PostMeanwhile, your response to my post of "What's with 1963?" etc. you ignored completely - so why post a quote if you are not going to respond to it?
If you cannot convince them, confuse them.
-Harry S Truman :)
Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: