If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
I've set up dozens of websites, I'm not exactly inexperienced.
Given that 95% of visitors have not had the problem, most who did are no longer having the problem, and that I did nothing to try to fix it, it seems clear it is not a problem caused by anything that I did.
Well, it will be easy to fix then. So far it doesn't work, Sympatico is a mainstream vendor that you have to work with.
Well, it will be easy to fix then. So far it doesn't work, Sympatico is a mainstream vendor that you have to work with.
It is not the case that the forum doesn't work with Sympatico, but it might be true that some Sympatico users are having problems accessing the site. Sympatico, like any large ISP, has peering arrangements with other large pipe owners and they pay for bandwidth. Sometimes, the interconnections get fubar'd and they stay that way until someone fixes the issue (a fried switch; a router with brain damage etc. the list is endless)
As Chris stated elsewhere, the problem is likely a temporary one and is NOT related to the site per se. He could temporarily change the site to a 3 line text file and it would likely make no difference!
Actually, it's up to the end-user to contact their ISP for this type of problem. If I call Sympatico as a site operator and say "Hey some of my visitors are getting really slow access" they'll just tell me to have to users call them. Because they need the users to do stuff for them like traceroutes etc. so they can see exactly where the problem is.
Sure, I know how to do that, and I could get you guys to do it for me.. but the end result will be just making the tech support call to Sympatico 10 seconds shorter, if that. (I don't know about Bell, but Rogers techs don't like to believe that you know anything)
The CFC has to become customer friendly now and drop the attitude.
Are you a CFC member? If not ...
Chris was merely pointing out the most expeditious way to get this issue resolved since it almost certainly is a problem with Sympatico's connectivity to the hosting site. What part of that do you object to?
He just wanted an excuse to bring up past gripes, apparently.
Although I don't recall him offering his "expertise" on the errors we were getting on the ratings, we already knew what the problems (yes, plural) were that were causing that. Most were fixed.
I will complain to Bell/Sympatico if the problems persist after a few more days. I am with Sympatico and *I* am their client so they will actually listen to me. I would hate to see what my bill would be if Sympatico or Pathcom or whoever wasted their time responding to every porn site operator who complains that their "clients" have difficulty accessing the best of Sexie Susie every time they change their domain and/or host. Sheesh.
Chris, are you saying you knew how to fix the ratings software in the year 2000 but chose to fix it in the year 2008 ? Seems like a strange policy. I could have fixed the worst errors within days. Could also have added excellent archiving features, better error handling, and many SQL based features you still don't have. Maybe some filtering of players by category as well, so we don't still see V. Gansvind as best female player in Canada.
Anyways, Chris, websites are not my thing you could say anything and I ( like the other governors ) would just have to believe you. Provided it works of course. And of course Kerry is right I'm not a member, have very little use for the new CFC website except read only curiosity, and many of my own reasons to care about this stuff are getting dated.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Wednesday, 27th August, 2008, 02:25 AM.
You obviously don't remember just how bad it was if you think I waited until 2008 to get some things fixed. And I was not a member nor did I visit the web page from about 1999 to 2002. It didn't get really bad until early 2004. You'll also recall that in 2006 I had a proposal for a whole new website that would have fixed all the problems and added the kind of advanced (relatively speaking) features you mention. I did as much as I could do.
Chris, are you saying you knew how to fix the ratings software in the year 2000 but chose to fix it in the year 2008 ? Seems like a strange policy. I could have fixed the worst errors within days. Could also have added excellent archiving features, better error handling, and many SQL based features you still don't have. Maybe some filtering of players by category as well, so we don't still see V. Gansvind as best female player in Canada.
I think the thing to remember is that you didn't fix the problems. Someone else did.
Kind of reminds me of when I did TV repair in the days of tubes. I'd present the bill and the customer would tell me he could have done that. The point was he didn't fix it. I did. Or the guys who waited until I had fixed the set and then said they didn't have the money. Off came the back of the set and out came the parts. Even the parts I had to cut out.
What exactly did you do for the CFC so we'll know?
The technology details aren't that important my starting point was more in the area of organizational structure and communications. I would like to see the CFC as more of a cooperative model instead of what appears to be a bureaucratic government model. I'm not dreaming it's going to happen but D. Lavin's a wildcard I believe he's successful in a fairly nontraditional business.
Creativity has always been lacking in my opinion. The chess talent has been there and at some points growing grassroots interest in chess.
ps It's nothing personal I know you tried. As did Hal Bond who I believe was a lot closer to
a correct path then the governor's realized. The bureaucracy took over again.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Wednesday, 27th August, 2008, 03:05 PM.
Comment