Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Emil Smilovici
    • 2008-05-30
    • 276

    #1

    Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

    It seems that FM Hambleton had a miniature win against GM Friedel in 21 moves
    But at monroi site - starting with move 15 ... Nb3+, the moves must be wrong
    19 ...axb4 is even illegal
  • Vlad Dobrich
    • 2008-05-30
    • 2532

    #2
    Re: Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

    Everything looks ok and legal. Great win for Aman! Could this be a GM norm before an IM norm?:)

    Comment

    • Emil Smilovici
      • 2008-05-30
      • 276

      #3
      Re: Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

      Originally posted by Vlad Dobrich View Post
      Everything looks ok and legal. Great win for Aman! Could this be a GM norm before an IM norm?:)
      Yes, now it is all legal - it was changed to 15.b4 but still some remaining moves are "dubious" ?!
      The last move (21.Qh7+) is spectacular! Is it possible that the GM did not see it?

      Comment

      • Tyler Longo
        • 2008-05-31
        • 198

        #4
        Re: Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

        Originally posted by Emil Smilovici View Post
        Yes, now it is all legal - it was changed to 15.b4 but still some remaining moves are "dubious" ?!
        The last move (21.Qh7+) is spectacular! Is it possible that the GM did not see it?
        I sure hope he didn't see it or someone might get accused of sandbagging. =]

        Comment

        • Matthew Scott
          • 2010-06-13
          • 129

          #5
          Re: Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

          Originally posted by Emil Smilovici View Post
          Yes, now it is all legal - it was changed to 15.b4 but still some remaining moves are "dubious" ?!
          The last move (21.Qh7+) is spectacular! Is it possible that the GM did not see it?
          I hate to say it, but it might win the brilliancy prize :(... but mostly on account of who his opponent was.

          Comment

          • Hugh Siddeley
            • 2008-07-28
            • 314

            #6
            Is 21.Qh7!! or !!!

            The game looked very unclear. Anyway 21.Qh7 has to be a double or triple exclam, for sheer shock value. A take-me queen move leading to a forced mate! GM Friedel must have realized this after a few seconds, wow.. his heart must have hit the floor. With 3 rounds to go I don't think any Canadian can top Aman's performance now. He is on FIRE! Keep it up!


            [Event "Canadian Open Chess Championship"]
            [Site "Toronto"]
            [Date "2010.07.14"]
            [Round "6"]
            [White "Hambleton, Aman"]
            [Black "Friedel, Joshua"]
            [Result "1-0"]
            [WhiteELO "2315"]
            [WhiteTitle "FM"]
            [BlackELO "2586"]
            [BlackTitle "GM"]
            [Source "MonRoi"]

            1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 O-O 5.a3 Bxc3 6.Qxc3 d5 7.Bg5 h6 8.Bh4 c5 9.dxc5 g5 10.Bg3 Ne4 11.Qc2 Na6 12.O-O-O Naxc5 13.f3 Bd7 14.b3 dxc4 15.b4 Nb3 16.Kb1 Ned2 17.Ka2 Ba4 18.Be5 a5 19.h4 axb4 20.hxg5 Qd5 21.Qh7 1-0

            Comment

            • Matthew Scott
              • 2010-06-13
              • 129

              #7
              Re: Hambleton - Friedel 1-0 (Rd.6) - moves ?

              It scares me that Friedel is at 4.0... some good player is going to have a hell of a match up next round. I'll probably get stuck against some FM or IM; but at least I'm unlikely to have to worry about him :)

              Comment

              • Ed Seedhouse
                • 2008-05-31
                • 794

                #8
                Re: Is 21.Qh7!! or !!!

                Originally posted by Hugh Siddeley View Post
                The game looked very unclear.
                Rybka on my crappy old laptop thinks black was totally winning with NC1+, with a -11 evaluation. Also Qxg5 is also winning, Rybka thinks. Well, calculates...

                Comment

                Working...