If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Alvah, it's great to see you here! I have been trying to contact you for months. Have you looked at Silman's rewrite of How to Reassess Your Chess? One of your games (I know of no other A.Mayo!) is in there, complete with quotes from you! Awesome! :)
Of course, with time to actually study and/or living in a more favourable part of the country chess-wise things could be different.
I never felt bad about not seeing where my chess would take me with intensive study. No regrets about choosing the work world. At the top of the chess pyramid there can only be one and it was never going to be me.
What % of the active CFC userbase would you estimate has achieved the 24 games at 2200?
I have no idea. Above they have listed about 120 players to start. I also have no idea if it's only active members because I can think of some who might not be and probably qualify.
OK. Gary & Bindi. I don't want to start a flame war with you guys, but you've obviously both lost touch with the reality of the situation.
Not everybody can become a Senior International Master (Correspondence Chess) or an IM.
Everyone's goals are important, and not everyone has the desire or capability to reach such lofty heights.
I'm not sure what kind of a message you're trying to send here, as I don't see too many others jumping on this elitist bandwagon.
Most of us won't ever become International level players, but a level of achievement title or certificate is still a nice recognition.
But that's just my opinion.
The elitist club is fun and all but as you've noticed, I kinda stopped bashing the NM title. The funnier part of the cfc title distribution is
The CFC officially recognizes the following titles, rating classes and CFC rating floors:
National Master (2200), National Candidate Master (2000), Class A (1800), Class B (1600), Class C (1400), Class D (1200), and Class E (1000).
I mean... give people "NM Titles" sure, but look at these other ones...
The elitist club is fun and all but as you've noticed, I kinda stopped bashing the NM title.....
I mean... give people "NM Titles" sure, but look at these other ones...
Didn't you ever graduate from grade 1? Grade 2?..... I could tell you I think having a PhD is no big deal but it wouldn't (and shouldn't) stop people from getting any of the intermediate steps that they care to and are capable of getting.
The classes are a statement of fact, not anything else.
For that matter, I can think of lots of people , some of them chess players, who don't think a gm title is worthwhile.
Then how can you comment on it's meaningfulness or lack thereof?
OK, David. I take it you think 2200 is a mark of excellence around the world and the majority of nations would use the same criteria as the CFC for a National Master title. Fair enough. Enjoy.
It seems from the list they will start with around 120 National Masters. About 6.5% of the membership will be national masters to start. That doesn't count the FIDE IM or GM titled players who should get one or inactive players who only need join to receive recognition.
"The title CCCA Master is a permanent title which can only be achieved by fulfilling one of the 9 requirements below:
1. Win the Canadian Closed CC Championship. (K-series)
2. Finish 2nd or 3rd twice in the Canadian Closed CC Championship ("K")
1. A Canadian Closed (zonal) champion gets IM automatically in case he has no such title yet.
2. Players with 50% get FM.
The CFC does not compete with FIDE titles. If you think that your potential is bigger than NM with 2200 CFC, then go for IM or GM, and the CFC will adore as a Honorary Member.
You might be a big fish in a Canadian chess pool but be aware of sharks waiting in open waters :D
1. A Canadian Closed (zonal) champion gets IM automatically in case he has no such title yet.
2. Players with 50% get FM.
The CFC does not compete with FIDE titles. If you think that your potential is bigger than NM with 2200 CFC, then go for IM or GM, and the CFC will adore as a Honorary Member.
You might be a big fish in a Canadian chess pool but be aware of sharks waiting in open waters :D
It was only to show the kind of accomplishments which are necessary in CC. Canada is not a zone in CC.
I haven't swam in the Canadian pool in around 15 years and prefer the open waters.
Here is my last completed event. Team play on an international team of friends. It might be my last event. I haven't decided for sure. My game is not what it used to be.
Didn't you ever graduate from grade 1? Grade 2?..... I could tell you I think having a PhD is no big deal but it wouldn't (and shouldn't) stop people from getting any of the intermediate steps that they care to and are capable of getting.
The classes are a statement of fact, not anything else.
For that matter, I can think of lots of people , some of them chess players, who don't think a gm title is worthwhile.
I don't get what your problem is with me Roger but I've never badmouthed you in any way so i really don't understand why you want to launch personal attacks against me. If you actually read what I said instead of ignoring them completely, you can see that the problem with the new title system is that it awards even 1000 rated players a *title.* I have plenty of university friends who play chess and I can tell you for a fact that I've known some people who just play casually and even they can attain the Class E title. What's the point of motivating players to improve if they're satisfied with a so-called 10 dollar title that they can hang anywhere around their home? Do you seriously want to buy the National Candidate Master title?
Furthermore, who are these chess players that you're talking about that think getting a GM title is not worthwhile? Canada has only a few grandmasters and the last time I checked, apart from Mark and Kevin, everyone has always been under 2600 so I'm sure it's not anyone from Canada. If you're comparing Canada to the world in a global sense, I'm sure these "chess players" would think the new title table is a satirical piece of work.
I don't get what your problem is with me Roger but I've never badmouthed you in any way so i really don't understand why you want to launch personal attacks against me. If you actually read what I said instead of ignoring them completely, you can see that the problem with the new title system is that it awards even 1000 rated players a *title.* I have plenty of university friends who play chess and I can tell you for a fact that I've known some people who just play casually and even they can attain the Class E title. What's the point of motivating players to improve if they're satisfied with a so-called 10 dollar title that they can hang anywhere around their home? Do you seriously want to buy the National Candidate Master title?
Furthermore, who are these chess players that you're talking about that think getting a GM title is not worthwhile? Canada has only a few grandmasters and the last time I checked, apart from Mark and Kevin, everyone has always been under 2600 so I'm sure it's not anyone from Canada. If you're comparing Canada to the world in a global sense, I'm sure these "chess players" would think the new title table is a satirical piece of work.
?? exactly how or when did I bad mouth you? What personal attack?
I didn't ever buy a $10 certificate for NM so no, I wouldn't buy a CM title certificate either. In fact, I wouldn't buy any certificate for any title up to and including world champion. Either you are what ever it is or you are not in my view. But that's just my feeling. I have no objection if someone else wants the piece of paper.
Nigel Short comes to mind as someone who thinks a GM title is not worth anything as has been published elsewhere. Feels pretty much the same way about GM titles as you do about NM titles as far as I can tell. I'm sure he's entitled to think of a mere 2500 GM as weak but the rest of us can still aspire to that level.
But the whole arguement about these levels being not a big deal on the world scene so therefore they should not be recognized is spurious. Pretty much every club championship, city championship, provincial championship or even national championship in Canada is meaningless on the world scale. Doesn't stop anybody from having those championships and giving out trophys etc. Likewise for rating class levels.
I think an NM title is worthwhile. My comments are only regarding the difficulty level.
I got the Correspondence NM title for scoring 50% or more in the Olympiad but don't recall getting a certificate for the title. The IM and SIM and IA titles came with a certificate which my wife framed (all of them). They didn't cost me anything. The IM and SIM titles came with a very nice medal. Bronze for the IM and silver for the SIM. I think the GM comes with the gold medal but I don't expect to ever get one of those. The IA title came with a pin which is quite nice. I wasn't charged anything for the certificates.
A $10. charge doesn't seem like a lot for the NM title. Mailing and handling has to cost almost that much.
OK, David. I take it you think 2200 is a mark of excellence around the world and the majority of nations would use the same criteria as the CFC for a National Master title. Fair enough. Enjoy.
Do you ever get tired of randomly interpreting my comments and extrapolating from them completely unreasonable conclusions? I'm just asking if you have any idea what you're talking about, and as usual, you don't.
Tweet
Comment