some time ago, I posted number of games played by people in the period (approx) 2006-2010.    I have had occasion to revisit this and now have some numbers for the period mid 2001-mid(late) 2011 or roughly a decade.
As before there are some cavaets: people at the start of the period with established ratings were considered to be at 26 games played - so these numbers are not quite exact.
Some other information:
- of people with at least 100 regular games played, 39% of them had established active ratings. (i.e. 61% had <=25 active games)
- of the players counted, 72% of them played less than 25 games in this period.
- of the players counted, 86% of them played less than 50 games in this period.
A graph and list of the top 20 or so is given below. (I came in at #39 :-) ) If you want the whole Excel file it is at: http://www.victoriachess.com/cfc/dat...2001-2011.xlsx

							
						
					As before there are some cavaets: people at the start of the period with established ratings were considered to be at 26 games played - so these numbers are not quite exact.
Some other information:
- of people with at least 100 regular games played, 39% of them had established active ratings. (i.e. 61% had <=25 active games)
- of the players counted, 72% of them played less than 25 games in this period.
- of the players counted, 86% of them played less than 50 games in this period.
A graph and list of the top 20 or so is given below. (I came in at #39 :-) ) If you want the whole Excel file it is at: http://www.victoriachess.com/cfc/dat...2001-2011.xlsx
| Rank | NUMBER | FIRST | LAST | RATING | GAMES_PLAYED_TOTAL | 
| 2 | 100034 | Robert J. | Armstrong | 1712 | 1047 | 
| 3 | 108202 | Robert | Gillanders | 1793 | 926 | 
| 4 | 102743 | Roy | Yearwood | 2208 | 924 | 
| 5 | 106376 | Tim | Knechtel | 1683 | 838 | 
| 6 | 108323 | Robert J. | Gardner | 2304 | 832 | 
| 7 | 138609 | Roman | Sapozhnikov | 2434 | 804 | 
| 8 | 132534 | Nikolay | Noritsyn | 2634 | 761 | 
| 9 | 127516 | Alex T. | Ferreira | 2048 | 732 | 
| 10 | 101793 | Maurice | Smith | 1535 | 722 | 
| 11 | 101874 | Arthur | Milne | 1779 | 714 | 
| 12 | 127769 | Liam | Henry | 2282 | 711 | 
| 13 | 109793 | Joe | Bellomo | 1607 | 698 | 
| 14 | 121202 | Raja | Panjwani | 2481 | 694 | 
| 15 | 134729 | Nathan | Farrant-Diaz | 1593 | 681 | 
| 16 | 121087 | Brian | Oliver | 1492 | 668 | 
| 17 | 127483 | Jason | Wihnon | 1846 | 658 | 
| 18 | 130889 | Arthur | Calugar | 2376 | 656 | 
| 19 | 127431 | Shiyam | Thavandiran | 2479 | 651 | 
| 20 | 101895 | Alex | Danilov | 1907 | 642 | 


 What is a bin size for played games? IMHO, the bar plot might be better with a larger bin size (number of games 10 or 25). An additional curve N_players who played more than X games (smth like an integral of the posted plot.) Thnx.
 What is a bin size for played games? IMHO, the bar plot might be better with a larger bin size (number of games 10 or 25). An additional curve N_players who played more than X games (smth like an integral of the posted plot.) Thnx.
							
						
Comment