If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
So, Gary, will you now have more free time to post on ChessTalk? :p
I always have time for Chess Talk. It's unique. Sometimes I get the feeling every screwball who ever pushed a pawn enjoys refreshing discussions with me. :)
My original response required no replies at all. It was simply for anyone I know who might wonder what I thought of your retirement. I find it preferable to simply not commenting or becoming a "I wonder what he thought" trivia question.
I always have time for Chess Talk. It's unique. Sometimes I get the feeling every screwball who ever pushed a pawn enjoys refreshing discussions with me. :)
As long as you refrain from lecturing me on economic and financial issues while making claims that a graduate of a grade eight math program clearly shouldn't make, I don't have a problem with that.
Well actually economics and finances are social sciences. So I get to say plenty about those things :P
Funny how easily many people can confuse the way they see and understand things with what they call "reality" instead of "my reality". Referring to "reality" is probably the weakest argument someone can come up with...
Jean are you saying reality is relative :) What if none of us exist and we are all just parts of Duncan's imagination?
Anyway, technology transformed analyses and a moves' transmission (mails>emails>servers). Meaningless - - there more useless activities in the world, like playing poker :p
When I said meaningless, I said meaningless as a competition. Things like competing for your country, all those parallal titles, ratings. Honestly, none of it matters when the best chess engines and published theory can beat the hell out of almost every player on the planet.
If all the universities resorted to open book exams, how much respect would the degrees and marks have to anyone ? Bring your laptop in, any books you like, and your notes. Then write your exam with a 12 hour time limit. That would be a pretty good approximation of the nature of correspondance chess.
Yes, you might respect the researching skills and persistance of a student scoring 90% + in those circumstances. But not me. I'd only respect the students who have only themselves and 3 hours to do the test.
Ask yourself one question. Why do universities not allow resources during final exams ? Can you answer that question. It might help give some context to your opinion on correspondance chess as a competition.
Jean are you saying reality is relative :) What if none of us exist and we are all just parts of Duncan's imagination?
Outside opinion on chess is rarely received well by traditional players. I'm ok with that, because I've seen that real change in chess only occurs when there is an emergency. For example, if the fields of a Canadian Junior get weak, a bunch of people start posting it must be changed. This method of management though results in a perpetual state of mediocrity in chess in Canada.
I think in the case of correspondance that all these opinions don't matter, it will die a natural death when there is nobody left that wants to organize events and very few interested players. The real question to me is will this also occur for otb chess in Canada. Numerous aspects of this world that are assumed to be important by some veterans on the scene are not a given at all anymore. Change comes very slowly, and not without incessant argueing and shooting the messenger.
Then again, maybe I'm imagining things, there are always people saying otb chess is growing. I've been seeing these claims for 12 years.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Thursday, 12th January, 2012, 05:10 PM.
Outside opinion on chess is rarely received well by traditional players. I'm ok with that, because I've seen that real change in chess only occurs when there is an emergency. For example, if the fields of a Canadian Junior get weak, a bunch of people start posting it must be changed. This method of management though results in a perpetual state of mediocrity in chess in Canada.
I think in the case of correspondance that all these opinions don't matter, it will die a natural death when there is nobody left that wants to organize events and very few interested players. The real question to me is will this also occur for otb chess in Canada. Numerous aspects of this world that are assumed to be important by some veterans on the scene are not a given at all anymore. Change comes very slowly, and not without incessant argueing and shooting the messenger.
Then again, maybe I'm imagining things, there are always people saying otb chess is growing. I've been seeing these claims for 12 years.
I quoted this so it can't be changed. It's priceless and timeless. Chess according to Duncan. The world. Reality. Don't hold anything back, Smith.
Last edited by Gary Ruben; Thursday, 12th January, 2012, 07:39 PM.
I think in the case of correspondance that all these opinions don't matter, it will die a natural death when there is nobody left that wants to organize events and very few interested players...
I've been playing correspondence chess on http://schemingmind.com/ for quite some time as do many others. Don't think it will be dying any time soon :P
Comment